Jms 480 -- Focus Group Findings

  • Uploaded by: Diana
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Jms 480 -- Focus Group Findings as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 731
  • Pages: 2
Expanded Discussion of Primary Research A group of seven San Diego Sate University faculty, lecturers, and staff supporters participated in a focus group discussion about the Seven Essential Capacities of General Education by Diana Petras. The meeting took place in the Faculty Staff club from 12:00pm to 12:50pm on Friday, June 12, 2009. The participants were drawn from an OverLunch meeting in Course Design that took place from 11:00am to 12:00pm, so food and refreshments were not offered during the focus group discussion. The focus group discussion was audio recorded and Sarah Cole took notes on her computer while Sheridan Sands recorded nonverbal communication. Sarah Coe reviewed the audio recording and the notes that were taken during the focus group discussion in order to transcribe an accurate focus group session. The transcription is near word for word and Diana Petras summarized the main findings.

Summarized Findings The faculty members, lecturers, and staff supporters are passionate are enthusiastic about the subjects that they teach. They believe that higher education prepares students to learn how to think critically, to communicate well, and to problem solve – and that is equivalent to the underlining of the Seven Essential Capacities. At the end of the semester or a course students should be able to apply the skills that they in class to the real world. However, about half of the focus participants were unaware of the Seven Essential Capacities changes that were made to modify the General Education Program. Most of participants agreed that in theory the revision for the standards in the General Education program was positive, but a bit too idealistic and that it would difficult to implement them to students. Almost the majority of the participants believed that students only use the calendar and the grading portions of the syllabus and do not read anything else within the syllabus. Focus group members that were aware of the Seven Essential Capacities did not find it significant enough to execute because they are skeptical on whether or not it would make a real difference in student learning. That is because a nearly all of the participants believe that students do not really read the syllabi for the main purpose of the class, which is to empower students with the objectives or the 21st Century Capacities that are listed in the syllabus, and it seems useless to try. According to the participants, the Seven Essential Capacities appeared to be an ideal sense of progress in higher education for university officials. In testing campaign ideas, we discovered that senior university officials, like President Weber, would not influence most of the participants’ performance. They are more likely to be influenced by the Deans and Department Chairs of

their specific separate college on campus, who are their opinion leaders and they are those who the participants have established connections and relationships with.

Disclosure From the research, the findings lack external validity and cannot be generalized to all of the faculty, lecturers, and staff members because the focus group was not a contained random sample of participants. Those who played a part in the focus group were ones that were attending the OverLunch meeting and were invited to participate. The faculty, lecturers, and staff members who attended the meeting also had an above average interest in improving higher education as proven by unpaid-in-the-middle-ofsummer-break-course-design-luncheon.

Implications for Program Proposal A great majority of the faculty and lecturers on campus are unaware of the Seven Essential Capacities and its purpose. If our campaign objective is aimed at changing knowledge, the mission is to send out the information. However, if our objective were to encourage faculty and lecturers in empowering students with the capacities, our campaign would need to show them the value of the changes done with the Seven Essential Capacities. We would need to address their gaps in value motivation in teaching these capacities because copying and pasting it into the syllabi are not going to influence the outcome of a student. Based on our research, the most effective way to reach faculty members and lecturers would be through the primary target for our campaign, the Deans and Department Chairs. In order to implement this, it would be done through a two-way symmetrical system between the Center for Learning and Teaching and professors and we are going to have to get their approval of incorporating and executing the Seven Essential Capacities.

Related Documents


More Documents from ""