Urban Planning Students Presentation On Outline Development Plan For Mahabalipuram Tamil Nadu, India

  • Uploaded by: ravi shankar
  • 0
  • 0
  • April 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Urban Planning Students Presentation On Outline Development Plan For Mahabalipuram Tamil Nadu, India as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 416
  • Pages: 17
Outline Development Plan for Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu,India.

TYPE OF TRADE

WHOLESA LE 7%

OTHERS 3%

WHOLESALE RETAIL SHOPS OTHERS

RETAIL SHOPS 90%

COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT

3% 0%

3% GOVT PRIVATE OWNERSHIP LOCAL BODY OTHERS

94%

PARKING FACILITIES

INADEQUATE 28%

ADEQUATE 3%

ADEQUATE PARTLY ADEQUATE PARTLY ADEQUATE 69%

INADEQUATE

LITERACY DISTRIBUTION 6000

5013

Population

5000 4000 3000 2000

3742

3677 2568

Male

2332

Female

1715

1000 0 1981

1991

Ye ar

2001

EXISTING OCCUPATION PATTERN_2005 GOVERNMENT 6%

25%

40%

3% 7%

6%

12%

TOURISM RELATED ACTIVITY SCULPTURE INDUSTRY INDUSTRY AGRICULTURE FISHING

1%

COMMERCIAL OTHERS

PROJECTED OCCUPATION PATTERN_2021 GOVERNMENT 3% 8%

9%

TOURISM RELATED ACTIVITY SCULPTURE INDUSTRY INDUSTRY

6%

8% 2%

54%

10%

AGRICULTURE FISHING COMMERCIAL OTHERS

EXISTING INCOME PATTERN_2005

18% 43%

<25,000 25,000-50,000 >50,000

39%

CHENNAI 6%

AROUND MAHABALIPU RAM 28%

ENTERTA INM ENT 66%

RESEARCH 17%

TOURIST SATISFACTION

ACCOM ODATION

MAHABALIPU RAM 66%

F A C I L I T I E S

OCCA SIONAL 6% EDUCA TIONA L 11%

PARKING 1

4

5 5 9

10

WATER 0

5

5

18%

10

43%

2

9 6

SANITATION

10

7

10 4

HYGIENE

2

6

INFO_AVBL 1

PURPOSE OF VISIT

INCOME PATTERN

15

FOOD

15

GOOD FAIR

0 3

0

3

0

BAD WORSE

< 25,000

39%

25000 - 50000

20

> 50000

TOURISTS SURVEYED

ROUTE TAKEN

OMR 6%

OCCUPATIONAL PATTERN

OTHERS 15%

PRIMARY

PRIMARY 42%

SECONDARY

TERTIARY 25%

TERTIARY OTHERS

SECONDARY 18%

ECR 94% HOUSING STRUCTURE

35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0%

PUCCA

KUTCHA

SEMI PUCCA

PRIVATE TRANSPORT 23%

MODAL SPLIT PUBLIC TRANSPORT PRIVATE TRANSPORT PUBLIC TRANSPORT 77%

ACCESIBILITY TO SCHOOL NOT APPLICABLE

10

WITHIN 1 KM

9 USERS

WITHINN 1/2 KM

22 0

USERS

5

10

15

20

25

WITHINN 1/2 KM

WITHIN 1 KM

NOT APPLICABLE

22

9

10

A C C E S S IB IL IT Y T O H E A L T H F A C IL IT IE S

20%

13% 0%

20%

HEALTH FACILITIES

80%

VERY GOOD

A C C E S S IB L E N O T A C C E S S IB L E

GOOD AVERAGE 34%

BAD WORST

33%

7% 0% HOUSING CONDITION

13%

VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE

13%

BAD 67%

WATER SUPPLY 7%

WORST

DRAINAGE

13%

20%

7% 0%

7%

46%

20%

13%

PRIMARY EDUCATION

ROADS

20%

VERY GOOD

7%

33% GOOD BAD

WORST 7%

GOOD

27%

VERY GOOD AVERAGE WORST

BAD 13%

VERY GOOD

GOOD

AVERAGE

20% AVERAGE

BAD

WORST

BAD

60%

WORST

A VERA GE 27%

GOOD 53%

Related Documents


More Documents from "ravi shankar"