T2 B7 Team 2 Workplan Fdr- Draft Outline Workplan- Intelligence Collection Analysis And Management Team 638
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View T2 B7 Team 2 Workplan Fdr- Draft Outline Workplan- Intelligence Collection Analysis And Management Team 638 as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 824
- Pages: 5
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
DRAFT
WORKPLAN INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION, ANALYSIS, AND MANAGEMENT TEAM Objectives:
(1)
(2) (3)
I.
Assess the performance of the Intelligence Community (1C)1 in collecting and analyzing information related to counterterrorism, both prior and subsequent to the 9/11 attacks; Identify the reasons for such performance; and Recommend ways to improve the IC's future performance regarding counterterrorism.
Key Questions. A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Collection strategy. 1.
What was the collection strategy, if any, of the USG vis-a-vis terrorists in general and al Qaeda in particular?
2.
What were the strengths and weaknesses of the strategy?
3.
How was the strategy implemented?
Analytical integration. 1.
How was analytical integration performed?
2.
What was the relationship of analytical integration to tasking?
Warning. 1.
How are strategic and tactical warning conducted?
2.
Was there a warning network for counterterrorism purposes?
Management. 1.
How is the 1C organized? How should it be organized? To what extent is the 1C an interagency matter?
2.
What is the White House's role in managing the 1C?
Resource Allocation. 1.
How is resource allocation accomplished within the 1C?
1 I assume that the 1C includes: CIA, DIA, NSA, NRO, NIMA, Army Intel, Navy Intel, Marine Intel, Air Force Intel, Coast Guard Intel, State, Treasury, Energy, and FBI, plus DHS and TTIC.
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
F.
2.
How has Congress authorized and appropriated funding?
3.
What has counterterrorism's share of the budget been?
Oversight. 1.
II.
DRAFT
How is oversight conducted?
Materials With Which Commissioners Should Be Familiar. To be completed.
III.
IV.
Materials We Need To Request From The Government A.
Internal government documents that describe how the 1C is supposed to function.
B.
Access to documents and report of the Joint Inquiry.
C.
Budgetary information.
D.
Transcripts of Congressional oversight hearings.
E.
Reports and other documentation submitted to Congress.
F.
Organizational charts.
G.
Documents from the NSC office overseeing intelligence.
H.
Documents related to tasking of SIGINT, HUMINT, and MINT for count erterrorism purposes.
I.
Documents concerning the allocation of resources concerning analysis.
J.
Documents from DoD concerning intelligence oversight.
K.
Cable traffic concerning counterterrorism.
L.
Transcripts of interviews with al Qaeda detainees.
Individuals/Groups We Should Interview.
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL V.
DRAFT
General areas. A.
B.
C.
D.
The IC's mission(s). 1.
What was the IC's intended mission(s), and how did the mission(s) evolve over time? Where has counterterrorism fit into the mission(s)?
2.
What organizing principle(s) governs how the 1C should function in general and conduct counterterrorism in particular?
Intelligence policy. 1.
What major policy decisions have guided the 1C? Who made such decisions, and under what conditions?
2.
How did such policy decisions impact the IC's counterterrorism capabilities and efforts, either intentionally or unintentionally?
Organizational structure of the 1C. 1.
How was the 1C intended to function, and what were its organizing principle(s)? How has it functioned in reality?
2.
What are the implications of such functioning for counterterrorism?
Resources allocated to the 1C. 1.
2.
E.
Sources of resources. a.
Requested by the 1C.
b.
Requested by the President and OMB.
c.
Appropriated.
d.
Spent by the 1C.
What resources were requested for, appropriated for, and ultimately spent on counterterrorism? Were such resources adequate?
Information collection. 1.
Aspects of information collection, a.
Priorities.
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL b. 2.
F.
2.
Where did counterterrorism fit in the priorities for collection? What decisions were made regarding the type of counterterrorism information to be collected, and how successful were such collection efforts? What impediments were there to successful collection of counterterrorism information?
Aspects of information analysis. a.
Priorities regarding what topics are being analyzed and thus what collected information is most important to analysts.
b.
Challenges to analysis, such as translation, data mining, and "connecting the dots."
Did the 1C give sufficient attention to analyzing intelligence information for counterterrorism purposes? What challenges did the 1C face regarding analysis of such information and "connecting the dots"?
Information-sharing. 1.
2.
H.
Types: HUMINT, SIGINT, open source, etc.
Information analysis. 1.
G.
DRAFT
Venn diagrams depicting information-sharing. a.
Within the 1C.
b.
Between the 1C and other federal agencies (e.g., INS).
c.
Between the U.S. Government and other entities (State and local governments, foreign countries, and the private sector).
What policies and procedures govern information- sharing? How has such information-sharing worked in practice, and, more specifically, how has information- sharing impacted U.S. counterterrorism efforts?
Oversight. 1.
Types of oversight. a.
Executive Branch. (i)
President.
(ii)
Senior Presidential advisers.
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
b.
c.
(iii)
NSC.
(iv)
OMB.
(v)
SecDef- of agencies within DoD budget.
Congress. (i)
HPSCI and SSCI.
(ii)
Armed Services,
(iii)
Judiciary,
(iv)
Appropriations.
Other. (i)
(ii)
2.
DRAFT
Judicial. (a)
FISA court.
(b)
Other federal courts,
Other. (a)
Media.
(b)
Other interest groups.
What is the objective of oversight? How has oversight affected the IC's mission(s), structure, self-perception, exploitation of its authorities, and - ultimately - performance? More specifically, what role did oversight play in the IC's performance regarding counterterrorism?
DRAFT
WORKPLAN INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION, ANALYSIS, AND MANAGEMENT TEAM Objectives:
(1)
(2) (3)
I.
Assess the performance of the Intelligence Community (1C)1 in collecting and analyzing information related to counterterrorism, both prior and subsequent to the 9/11 attacks; Identify the reasons for such performance; and Recommend ways to improve the IC's future performance regarding counterterrorism.
Key Questions. A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Collection strategy. 1.
What was the collection strategy, if any, of the USG vis-a-vis terrorists in general and al Qaeda in particular?
2.
What were the strengths and weaknesses of the strategy?
3.
How was the strategy implemented?
Analytical integration. 1.
How was analytical integration performed?
2.
What was the relationship of analytical integration to tasking?
Warning. 1.
How are strategic and tactical warning conducted?
2.
Was there a warning network for counterterrorism purposes?
Management. 1.
How is the 1C organized? How should it be organized? To what extent is the 1C an interagency matter?
2.
What is the White House's role in managing the 1C?
Resource Allocation. 1.
How is resource allocation accomplished within the 1C?
1 I assume that the 1C includes: CIA, DIA, NSA, NRO, NIMA, Army Intel, Navy Intel, Marine Intel, Air Force Intel, Coast Guard Intel, State, Treasury, Energy, and FBI, plus DHS and TTIC.
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
F.
2.
How has Congress authorized and appropriated funding?
3.
What has counterterrorism's share of the budget been?
Oversight. 1.
II.
DRAFT
How is oversight conducted?
Materials With Which Commissioners Should Be Familiar. To be completed.
III.
IV.
Materials We Need To Request From The Government A.
Internal government documents that describe how the 1C is supposed to function.
B.
Access to documents and report of the Joint Inquiry.
C.
Budgetary information.
D.
Transcripts of Congressional oversight hearings.
E.
Reports and other documentation submitted to Congress.
F.
Organizational charts.
G.
Documents from the NSC office overseeing intelligence.
H.
Documents related to tasking of SIGINT, HUMINT, and MINT for count erterrorism purposes.
I.
Documents concerning the allocation of resources concerning analysis.
J.
Documents from DoD concerning intelligence oversight.
K.
Cable traffic concerning counterterrorism.
L.
Transcripts of interviews with al Qaeda detainees.
Individuals/Groups We Should Interview.
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL V.
DRAFT
General areas. A.
B.
C.
D.
The IC's mission(s). 1.
What was the IC's intended mission(s), and how did the mission(s) evolve over time? Where has counterterrorism fit into the mission(s)?
2.
What organizing principle(s) governs how the 1C should function in general and conduct counterterrorism in particular?
Intelligence policy. 1.
What major policy decisions have guided the 1C? Who made such decisions, and under what conditions?
2.
How did such policy decisions impact the IC's counterterrorism capabilities and efforts, either intentionally or unintentionally?
Organizational structure of the 1C. 1.
How was the 1C intended to function, and what were its organizing principle(s)? How has it functioned in reality?
2.
What are the implications of such functioning for counterterrorism?
Resources allocated to the 1C. 1.
2.
E.
Sources of resources. a.
Requested by the 1C.
b.
Requested by the President and OMB.
c.
Appropriated.
d.
Spent by the 1C.
What resources were requested for, appropriated for, and ultimately spent on counterterrorism? Were such resources adequate?
Information collection. 1.
Aspects of information collection, a.
Priorities.
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL b. 2.
F.
2.
Where did counterterrorism fit in the priorities for collection? What decisions were made regarding the type of counterterrorism information to be collected, and how successful were such collection efforts? What impediments were there to successful collection of counterterrorism information?
Aspects of information analysis. a.
Priorities regarding what topics are being analyzed and thus what collected information is most important to analysts.
b.
Challenges to analysis, such as translation, data mining, and "connecting the dots."
Did the 1C give sufficient attention to analyzing intelligence information for counterterrorism purposes? What challenges did the 1C face regarding analysis of such information and "connecting the dots"?
Information-sharing. 1.
2.
H.
Types: HUMINT, SIGINT, open source, etc.
Information analysis. 1.
G.
DRAFT
Venn diagrams depicting information-sharing. a.
Within the 1C.
b.
Between the 1C and other federal agencies (e.g., INS).
c.
Between the U.S. Government and other entities (State and local governments, foreign countries, and the private sector).
What policies and procedures govern information- sharing? How has such information-sharing worked in practice, and, more specifically, how has information- sharing impacted U.S. counterterrorism efforts?
Oversight. 1.
Types of oversight. a.
Executive Branch. (i)
President.
(ii)
Senior Presidential advisers.
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
b.
c.
(iii)
NSC.
(iv)
OMB.
(v)
SecDef- of agencies within DoD budget.
Congress. (i)
HPSCI and SSCI.
(ii)
Armed Services,
(iii)
Judiciary,
(iv)
Appropriations.
Other. (i)
(ii)
2.
DRAFT
Judicial. (a)
FISA court.
(b)
Other federal courts,
Other. (a)
Media.
(b)
Other interest groups.
What is the objective of oversight? How has oversight affected the IC's mission(s), structure, self-perception, exploitation of its authorities, and - ultimately - performance? More specifically, what role did oversight play in the IC's performance regarding counterterrorism?
Related Documents
More Documents from "9/11 Document Archive"
Letter To 9/11 Commission About John Kerry
April 2020 0
