3. 3th Speaker affirmative Thanks for the time that give to me. I’am Saskia as the third speaker from affirmative team, allow me to respond the negative team argument, collaborate first and second speaker and conclude my team argument. Ladies and gentelmen, my first and second speaker said that agree to YouTube ban because this will stop the hostility of the Indonesian people and maintain the tranquility of the Indonesian people. As we know, Youtube as social media can be used by everyone. we could use it for something positive, example, we could share many informations about our culture to international citizen who dont know about our culture
Ladies and gentelmen, not all Youtube videos come from reliable sources. This means that someone can upload any kind of video for anyone to see. And this also means that not all of sources are accurate. However, one way to get around this problem is that student can read some of the comments see if someone has corrected the video, maybe they have just made a mistake or they can read the comment to see maybe this isn’t a great video that they should be watching and maybe the comments will refer them to watch another video that they should be more helpful to them. Another con is that not all of the material on YouTube is suitable for people of all ages. There is a lot of content on YouTube that is not okay for Children to watch. This is why YouTube will banned in school for a long time. Then educators discoveed that YouTube could be used to educate students in ways were not possible in the classroom. And lastly, the biggest con of YouTube is that if you don’t have an internet connection you don’t have access to YouTube or watching the videos.