1st speaker affirmative This house would ban Youtube We are affirmative team. I’d like to state our team split. I’m Kokoh Wahyu Prasetya as first speaker delivering argument from law point of view. The second speaker is Diba delivering argument from culture point of view. The third speaker is Saski collaborating the argument of first and second speaker and rebutting the negative team. Ladies and gentlemen YouTube is a popular video sharing website where users can load, watch and share video clips for free. Generally videos on YouTube are music clips (video clips), movies, TV, and videos made by the users themselves. We limit just Now, this time for me to deliver our argument from law point of view. in 2019 Indonesia will hold a presidential election. In this era, Indonesians people often watch youtube. from toddlers to the elderly. Creator of YouTube content also increases. a lot of youtube content now involves the issue of Indonesian political issues ahead of the election. the content leads to public opinion and divides Indonesian society into two mutually hostile camps. Their content drop each other and spread hatred. in the eyes of the law, this is prohibited in UU pasal 28 ayat (2) ITE which says Every person intentionally and without the right to disseminate information intended to cause hatred or hostility of certain individuals and / or groups based on ethnicity, religion, race, and intergroup (SARA). so I agree to YouTube ban because this will stop the hostility of the Indonesian people and maintain the tranquility of the Indonesian people. So, This house would ban Youtube .I’m Kokoh back to the house. Time Keeper