Merc Mock Bar.docx

  • Uploaded by: csncsncsn
  • 0
  • 0
  • December 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Merc Mock Bar.docx as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,217
  • Pages: 4
I. (10%) R issued a check for P1M which he used to pay S for killing his political enemy. a. Can the check be considered a negotiable instrument? b. Does S. have a cause of action against R in case of dishonor by the drawee bank? c. If S negotiated the check to T, who accepted it in good faith and for value, may R be held secondarily liable by T? Reason briefly in (a), (b) and (c). II. (10%) Alex deposited goods for which Billy, warehouseman, issued a negotiable warehouse receipt wherein the goods were deliverable to Alex or order. Alex negotiated the receipt to Caloy. Thereafter, Dario, a creditor secured judgment against Alex and served notice of levy over the goods on the warehouseman. a. To whom should the warehouseman deliver the goods upon demand? b. Would you answer be the same if the warehouseman issued a non-negotiable warehouse receipt III. (5%) Diana and Piolo are famous personalities in showbusiness who kept their love affair secret. They use a special instant messaging service which allows them to see one another's typing on their own screen as each letter key is pressed. When Greg, the controller of the service facility, found out their identities, he kept a copy of all the messages Diana and Piolo sent each other and published them. Is Greg liable for copyright infringement? Reason briefly. IV. (10%) Alfredo took out a policy to insure his commercial building against fire. The broker for the insurance company agreed to give a 15-day credit within which to pay the insurance premium. Upon delivery of the policy on May 15, 2006, Alfredo issued a postdated check payable on May 30, 2006. On May 28, 2006, a fire broke out and destroyed the building owned by Alfredo. a. May Alfredo recover on the insurance policy? b. Would your answer in (a) be the same if it was found that the proximate cause of the fire was an explosion and that fire was but the immediate cause of loss and there is no excepted peril under the policy? c. If the fire was found to have been caused by Alfredo's own negligence, can he still recover on the policy? Reason briefly in (a), (b) and (c).

V. (5%) C contracted D to renovate his commercial building. D ordered construction materials from E and received delivery thereof. The following day, C went to F Bank to apply for a loan to pay the construction materials. As security for the loan, C was made to execute a trust receipt. One year later, after C failed to pay the balance on the loan, F Bank charged him with violation of the Trust Receipts Law. a. What is a Trust Receipt? b. Will the case against C prosper? Reason briefly. VI. (5%) Discuss the trust fund doctrine VII. (10%) In a stockholder's meeting, S dissented from the corporate act converting preferred voting shares to non-voting shares. Thereafter, S submitted his certificates of stock for notation that his shares are dissenting. The next day, S transferred his shares to T to whom new certificates were issued. Now, T demands from the corporation the payment of the value of his shares. a. What is the meaning of a stockholder's appraisal right? b. Can T exercise the right of appraisal? Reason briefly. VIII. (10%) Due to growing financial difficulties, Z Bank was unable to finish construction of its 21-storey building on a prime lot located in Makati City. Inevitably, the Bangko Sentral ordered the closure of Z Bank and consequently placed it under receivership. In a bid to save the bank's property investment, the President of Z Bank entered into a financing agreement with a group of investors for the completion of the construction of the 21-storey building in exchange for a ten year lease and the exclusive option to purchase the building. a. Is the act of the President valid? Why or why not? b. Will a suit to enforce the exclusive right of the investors to purchase the property prosper? Reason briefly. IX. (5%) On December 4, 2003, RED Corporation executed a real estate mortgage in favor of BLUE Bank. RED Corporation defaulted in the payment of its loan. Consequently, on June 4, 2004, BLUE Bank extrajudicially foreclosed the property. Being the highest bidder in the auction sale conducted, the Bank was issued a Certificate of Sale which was registered on August 4, 2004.

Does RED Corporation still have the right to redeem the property as of September 14, 2007? Reason briefly. X. Triple A Corporation (Triple A) was incorporated in 1960, with 500 founders’ shares and 78 common shares as its initial capital stock subscription. However, Triple A registered its stock and transfer book only in 1978, and recorded merely 33 common shares as the corporation’s issued and outstanding shares. a. In 1982, Juancho, the sole heir of one of the original incorporators filed a petition with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the registration of his property rights over 120 founders’ shares and 12 common shares. The petition was supported by a copy of the Articles of Incorporation indicating the incorporators’ initial capital stock subscription. Will the petition be granted? Why or why not? (3%) b. On May 6, 1992, a special stockholders’ meeting was held. At this meeting, what would have constituted a quorum? Explain. (3%) c. What is a stock and transfer book? (1% XI. (10%) Two vessels figured in a collision along the Straits of Guimaras resulting in considerable loss of cargo. The damaged vessels were safely conducted to the Port of Iloilo. Passenger A failed to file a maritime protest. B. a non-passenger but a shipper who suffered damage to his cargo, likewise did not file a maritime protest at all. a. What is a maritime protest? b. Can A and B successfully maintain an action to recover losses and damages arising from the collision? Reason briefly. XII After disposing of his last opponent in only two rounds in Las Vegas, the renowned Filipino boxer Sonny Bachao arrived at the Ninoy Aquino International Airport met by thousands of heroworshipping fans and hundreds of media photographers. The following day, a colored photograph of Sonny wearing a black polo shirt embroidered with the 2-inch Lacoste crocodile logo appeared on the front page of every Philippine newspaper. Lacoste International, the French firm that manufactures Lacoste apparel and owns the Lacoste trademark, decided to cash in on the universal popularity of the boxing icon. It reprinted the photographs, with the permission of the newspaper publishers, and went on a world-wide blitz of print commercials in which Sonny is shown wearing a Lacoste shirt alongside the phrase "Sonny Bachao just loves Lacoste." When Sonny sees the Lacoste advertisements, he hires you as lawyer and asks you to sue Lacoste International before a Philippine court: a. For trademark infringement in the Philippines because Lacoste International used his image without his permission; (2%) b. For copyright infringement because of the unauthorized use of the published photographs; (2%) and

c. For injunction in order to stop Lacoste International from featuring him in their commercials. (2%) Will these actions prosper? Explain. d. Can Lacoste International validly invoke the defense that it is not a Philippine company and, therefore, Philippine courts have no jurisdiction? Explain. (2%)

Related Documents

Merc Mock Bar.docx
December 2019 5
Merc
May 2020 7
Merc Bono
June 2020 8
Merc Slk
May 2020 6
Cap3 Merc
May 2020 10
Juicio Ordinario Merc
August 2019 13

More Documents from ""

Tax Reviewer.docx
November 2019 7
Merc Mock Bar.docx
December 2019 5
08-0612-395 Ihra Paper.docx
December 2019 8
Trust Agreement.doc
December 2019 11
Profile.docx
December 2019 7
Meal Period.docx
December 2019 11