Ipcrf 2018-2019.docx

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) Name of Employee: LHESLY B. BINONGO Position: Teacher I Review Period: June 2018-October 2019 Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Habay Elementary School

Name of Rater: Alfon M. Tiengo Position: Principal II Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES Prepared Daily lesson Plans and Daily Logs of activities including appropriate, adequate and updated instructional materials (15%)

A. TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS

• Facilitated learning in the school through functional lesson plans, daily logs and innovative teaching strategies (10%)

•Monitored attendance, diversity appreciation, safe, positive and motivating environment, overall physical atmosphere, cleanliness and orderliness of

TIMELINE

Weight per KRA

June 2018 to April 2019

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) 5-OUTSTAN DING -Has met the five(5) characteristics of LP/DLL 4-Very Satisfactory -Has met the four(4)characteristics of LP/DLL 3- Satisfactory -Has met the three(3)characteristics of LP/DLL 2- Unsatisfactory -Has met the two(2) characteristics of a LP/DLL 1-Poor.Has met the one(1) characteristics of a LP/DLL

June 2018 to April 2019

June 2018 to April 2019

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

35%

5-OUTSTANDING -Has met the five(5)characteristics of Facilitated Learning 4-Very Satisfactory - Has met the four(4) characteristics of a Facilitated Learning 3- Satisfactory - Has met the three(3) characteristics of Facilitated Learning 2- Unsatisfactory -Has met the two(2) characteristics of Facilitated Learning 1-Poor -Has met one(1) characteristics of Facilitated Learning 5-OUTSTANDING -Presence of all five(5) evidences 4-Very Satisfactory Presence of four(4) evidences 3- Satisfactory Presence of three (3) evidences 2- Unsatisfactory - Presence of two (2) evidences 1-Poor

ACTUAL RESULTS Daily Lesson Plan and Instructional Materials characteristics: a. It has five parts b. Objective is SMART, based on the desired learning competencies c. It has adequate and appropriate instructional materials d. Develop Higher Order Thinking Skills(HOTS) e. Developing 21st Century Skills a. Teaching methods and interactive methods and strategies elicit interaction from a class b. Participative learning-project-based c. Cooperative Learning strategies d. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) integration (i.e. Multimedia etc.) e. Provision of individualized interaction • Class Rules and well-behaved students • Positive/ productive/ safe learning environment . SF 2 Required Evidences: a. Inclusive/multi-cultural/accepting environment: stress free classroom setting

RATING Q

E

T

AVE

SCORE

classrooms including proper waste disposal daily (10%)

B. PUPILS/ STUDENTS OUTCOMES

C. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

-Presence of one( 1)evidence

•Monitored, evaluated and maintained pupils progress within the rating period. (10%)

June 2018 to April 2019

•Conducted remediation/ enrichment programs to improve performance indicators (10%)

June 2018 to April 2019

•Maintained updated pupils school records (10%)

June 2018 to April 2019

•Conducted Periodic PTA Meetings/ Conferences (10%)

June 2018 to April 2019

30%

20%

5-OUTSTANDING -Presence of all five(5) evidences 4-Very Satisfactory -Presence of four(4) evidences 3- Satisfactory -Presence of three (3) evidences 2- Unsatisfactory - Presence of two (2)evidences 1-Poor. Presence of one( 1)evidence 5- Outstanding - Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 100% of students who need it. 4- Very Satisfactory - Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 88-99% who need it. 3- Satisfactory -Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 77-87% who need it 2- Unsatisfactory - Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 39-76% who need it. 1-Poor - Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 38% and below who need it 5- Outstanding -100% updated pupils school records 4- Very Satisfactory -88-99% updated the pupils school reports 3- Satisfactory -77-87% updated the pupils school reports 2- Unsatisfactory -39-76% updated the pupils school reports minimal 1-Poor -38% pupils reports are not updated 5-Outstanding-Presence of all five(5) evidences 4-Very Satisfactory -Presence of all four(4) evidences 3- Satisfactory -Presence of three (3) evidences 2-Unsatisfactory -Presence of two (2) evidences 1-Poor -Presence of one( 1)evidence

b. Well-structured well kept, orderly, and well ventilated classroom c. Presence of bins for waste segregation d. Updated attendance chart Required Evidences: a. Class Record/E-Class Record b. Learners Portfolio c. Table of Specifications (TOS) of Test Questions(TQ) d. Assessment Tools and Analysis Reports e. Test Item Bank f. Updated School Forms ( SF-1,SF-2)



Remediation/enrichment programs conducted



Updated pupils school records

a. Notice/Letter to parents/guardians b. Agenda/Schedule c. Minutes of the meeting d. Record of Attendance duly signed by attendees e. Documentation/Pictorials

•Visited parents of students needing academic monitoring/ follow-up within the rating period (5%)

June 2018 to April 2019

•Undertaken/ initiated projects/events/ activities with external funding/ sponsorship within the target date (5%)

June 2018 to April 2019

Conducted action research related to school or classroom concerns/ problems during the year (5%)

June 2018 to April 2019

D.

5-Outstanding -Presence of all five(5) evidences 4-Very Satisfactory -Presence of four(4) evidences 3- Satisfactory -Presence of three (3) evidences 2- Unsatisfactory -Presence of two (2) evidences 1-Poor - Presence of one( 1)evidence

15%

PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

Initiated / Participated in co-curricular/ school activities within the rating period (3%)

June 2018 to April 2019

5- Outstanding -100% and above project accomplishment with full documentation report on completion 4- Very Satisfactory -88-99% project accomplishment with partial completion 3- Satisfactory -77-87% project initiative only with no completion report 2- Unsatisfactory -39-76% project initiative only with no completion report 1-Poor No project/event/activity initiated 5- Outstanding -3 Action research conducted with full documentation on completion and interventions 4- Very satisfactory -2 Action research conducted with full documentation on completion and interventions 3- Satisfactory -1 Action research conducted with full documentation on completion and interventions 2- Unsatisfactory -Identified classroom/learning problems with research proposals 1 - Poor -Only classroom / learning problems/issues identified 5- Outstanding -Initiated at least 2 co-curricular/ school activities with documented results 4- Very Satisfactory - Initiated and participated in co-curricular/school activities with documented results 3- Satisfactory -participated in most of co-curricular/school activities with documented results 2- Unsatisfactory -Participation only without documented results 1-Poor - No participation in school activities

Required Evidences a. Letter to Parents/ Guardians & Principal /Permission for home visitation b. Anecdotal Records c. Home Visitation Form d. Record of Attendance e. Feedback/ Progress Report with documentation



Projects/ events/ activities initiated/ undertaken



Action research



Professional Membership and or community linkages

Earned relevant professional trainings, earned units or graduated from a higher relevant degree (3%)

3. Attended trainings, seminars, workshops, or conferences (2%)

Received special awards/citation/ recognition for exemplary performance (2%)

5-Outstanding -Earned at least 30 units in MA degree 4-Very Satisfactory -Earned at least 27 units in MA degree 3-Satisfacotry -Earned at least 18 units in MA degree 2-Unsatisfactory -Earned at least 9 units in MA degree 1-Poor -Earned at least 6 units in MA degree

June 2018 to April 2019

5-Outstanding -At least one(1) training / seminar abroad 4-Very Satisfactory -At least one(1) national and Regional seminar /training 3-Satisfactory - At least one(1)Division/ District seminar /training/ conference 2-Unsatisfactory -At least one (1) school seminar/ training/ conference 1-Poor -No Seminar/training/conference attended 5- Outstanding -National Award/Citation/Recognition 4- Very Satisfactory -Regional Award/Citation/Recognition 3- Satisfactory -Division Award/Citation/Recognition 2- Unsatisfactory -District Award/Citation/Recognition 1-Poor -School Award/Citation/Recognition

June 2018 to April 2019

June 2018 to April 2019

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned.

Outstanding

4.500

-

Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor

3.500 2.500 1.500 1.000

-

Required Evidences: a. Certificate of Appearance/ Participation b. Official Receipt c. Memorandum d. Travel Order/Authority to Travel e. Pictures/Official Documentation f. Narrative Report g. Echo Seminar



Trophies / Certificates

100%

_Ma. Louisa A. Payac__ Rater

Certified true and correct: 5.000

4.499 3.499 2.499 1.499

Transcript of Records Certification

OVER-ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTIVE RATING

_LHESLY B. BINONGO_ Ratee

Adjectival Rating Scale

 

__Alfon M. Tiengo_ Principal II