Ipcrf 2019

Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VI - Western Visayas SCHOOLS DIVISION OF ILOILO KIRAYAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Miagao, Iloilo

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) Name of Employee: _______________________________________________________ Position: _________________________________________________________________ Division: _________________________________________________________________ Rating Period: _____________________________________________________________

Name of Rater: ___________________________________________ Position: _________________________________________________ Date of Review: ___________________________________________

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING MFO's

KRA's

Basic 1. Content Education Knowledge and Services Pedagogy

Objectives 1. Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas.

Timeline

Weight per KRA

2. Used a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills.

RATING

Performance Indicators QET Quality

Efficiency

Basic Education Services

TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Timeliness Quality

Outstanding

(5) Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (4)

(3) Unsatisfactory (2)

Poor

Actual Results (1)

Showed knowledge of content and its integration within and across subject areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Submitted at least 4 lessons using MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV

Showed knowledge of content and its integration within and across subject areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 3 lessons using MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV

Showed knowledge of content and its integration within and across subject areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 Submitted 2 lessons using MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV

Showed knowledge of content and its integration within and across subject areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4 Submitted any 1 of the given MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Facilitated using different teaching strategies that promote reading, writing and/or numeracy skills as shown in

Facilitated using different teaching strategies that promote reading, writing and/or numeracy skills as shown in

Facilitated using different teaching strategies that promote reading, writing and/or numeracy skills as shown in

Facilitated using different teaching strategies that promote reading, writing and/or numeracy skills as shown in

No acceptable evidence was shown

No acceptable evidence was shown

Q

E

T

Ave

SCORE

MOV 1 with a

MOV 1 with a rating of 6

rating of 7

MFO's

KRA's

Objectives

Timeline

Weight per KRA

3. Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well as other higherorder thinking skills.

QET

Timeliness Quality

Efficiency

Basic 2. Learning Education Environment and Services Diversity of Learners

4. Managed classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical learning environments

MOV 1 with a rating of 4

RATING

Performance Indicators

Efficiency

Basic Education Services

MOV 1 with a rating of 5

Timeliness Quality

Efficiency

Outstanding

Very Satisfactory (5) Satisfactory (4)

Unsatisfactory (3) (2)

Poor

Actual Results (1)

Submitted at least 4 learner-centered lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Submitted 3 learner-centered lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Submitted 2 learner-centered lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Submitted 1 learner-centered lesson as evidently shown in any of the given MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Used different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Submitted at least 4 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV

Used different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 3 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV

Used different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 Submitted 2 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV

Used different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4 Submitted 1 lesson as evidenced by any 1 of the given MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Submitted at least 4 lessons supported by

Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 3 lessons supported by

Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 Submitted 2 lessons supported by

Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4 Submitted 1 lesson supported by

No acceptable evidence was shown

No acceptable evidence was shown

No acceptable evidence

Q

E

T

Ave

SCORE

MOV 1 and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

MOV 1 and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

MOV 1 and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

any of the acceptable MOV

was shown

Timeliness

MFO's Basic Education Services

KRA's

Objectives 5. Managed learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learningfocused environments.

Timeline

Weight per KRA

QET Quality

Efficiency

Basic Education Services

6. Used differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experience

RATING

Performance Indicators

Timeliness Quality

Efficiency

Outstanding

(5) Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (4)

(3) Unsatisfactory (2)

Poor

Actual Results (1)

Applied teacher management strategies of learner behavior that promote positive and non-violent discipline as shown in MOV submitted with a rating of 7 Submitted at least 4 of the given strategies as observed in at least 4 lessons

Applied teacher management strategies of learner behavior that promote positive and non-violent discipline as shown in MOV submitted with a rating of 6 Submitted at least 4 of the given strategies as observed in 3 lessons

Applied teacher management strategies of learner behavior that promote positive and non-violent discipline as shown in MOV submitted with a rating of 5 Submitted at least 4 of the given strategies as observed in 2 lessons

Applied teacher management strategies of learner behavior that promote positive and non-violent discipline as shown in MOV submitted with a rating of 4 Submitted any 1 of the given strategies as observed in only 1 lesson

No acceptable evidence was shown

Applied differentiated teaching strategies to address learner diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Submitted at least 4 differentiated teaching strategies in at least 2 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the

Applied differentiated teaching strategies to address learner diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 3 differentiated teaching strategies in at least 2 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other

Applied differentiated teaching strategies to address learner diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 Submitted 2 differentiated teaching strategies in 2 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other

Applied differentiated teaching strategies to address learner diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4 Submitted any 1 differentiated teaching strategy in only 1 lesson as evidently shown in any 1 of the acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence shown

No acceptable evidence was shown

No acceptable evidence shown

Q

E

T

Ave

SCORE

other acceptable MOV

acceptable MOV

acceptable MOV

Timeliness

MFO's

KRA's

Basic 3. Curriculum Education and Planning Services

Objectives 7. Planned, managed and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts.

Timeline

Weight per KRA

QET Quality

Efficiency

Basic Education Services

8. Participated in collegial discussions that use teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching practice

RATING

Performance Indicators

Timeliness Quality

Outstanding

(5)

Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (4)

(3)

Unsatisfactory (2)

Poor

(1)

Planned and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Submitted at least 4 developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV

Planned and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 3 developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV

Planned and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 Submitted 2 developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV

Planned and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4 Submitted 1 developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Consistently participated in LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in the MOV submitted

Frequently participated in LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in the MOV submitted

Occasionally participated in LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in the MOV submitted

Rarely participated in LAC/FGD/ meeting to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in the MOV submitted

No acceptable evidence was shown

No acceptable evidence shown

Actual Results

Q

E

T

Ave

SCORE

Efficiency

Participated in at least 4 LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV

Participated in 3 LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV

Participated in 2 LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV

Participated in 1 LAC/FGD/ meeting as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Timeliness

MFO's

KRA's

Basic Education Services

Objectives 9. Selected, developed, organized and used appropriate teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address learning goals

Timeline

Weight per KRA

QET Quality

Efficiency

Basic 4. Assessment Education and Reporting Services

10. Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements

Timeliness Quality

Outstanding

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory (5) Satisfactory (4)

RATING (3) Unsatisfactory (2)

Poor

(1)

Developed and used varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address learning goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Submitted at least 4 varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the acceptable MOV

Developed and used varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address learning goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 3 varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the acceptable MOV

Developed and used varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address learning goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 Submitted 2 varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the acceptable MOV

Developed and used varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address learning goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4 Submitted any teaching and learning resource, including ICT, as evidently shown in any of the acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements as

Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements as

Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements as

Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements as

No acceptable evidence was shown

No acceptable evidence was shown

Actual Results

Q

E

T

Ave

SCORE

Efficiency

shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Submitted at least 4 varied assessment tools as evidently shown in any 1 of the acceptable MOV

shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 3 varied assessment tools as evidently shown in any 1 of the acceptable MOV

shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 Submitted 2 varied assessment tools as evidently shown in any 1 of the acceptable MOV

shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4 Submitted 1 assessment tool as evidently shown in any of the acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Timeliness

MFO's Basic Education Services

KRA's

Objectives 11. Monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data

Timeline

Weight per KRA

QET Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Basic Education Services

12. Communicated promptly and clearly the learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/guardians

Quality

Outstanding Consistently monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted a combination of at least 4 of the acceptable MOV Submitted MOV were distributed across 4 quarters Consistently showed prompt and clear communication of the learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders, including

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory (5) Satisfactory (4)

RATING (3) Unsatisfactory (2)

Frequently monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data as shown in the MOV submitted

Occasionally monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data as shown in the MOV submitted

Rarely monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data as shown in the MOV submitted

Submitted a combination of 3 of the acceptable MOV Submitted MOV were distributed across 3 quarters Frequently showed prompt and clear communication of the learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders, including

Submitted a combination of 2 of the acceptable MOV Submitted MOV were distributed across 2 quarters Occasionally showed prompt and clear communication of the learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders, including

Submitted 1 acceptable MOV

Submitted MOV was completed in only 1 quarter Rarely showed prompt and clear communication of the learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders, including

Poor

(1)

No acceptable evidence was shown

No acceptable evidence was shown No acceptable evidence was shown

Actual Results

Q

E

T

Ave

SCORE

Efficiency

Timeliness

MFO's

KRA's

Basic 5. Plus Factor Education Services

Objectives 13. Performed various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching-learning process.

Timeline

Weight per KRA

QET Quality

Efficiency

parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted a combination of at least 4 of the acceptable MOV Submitted MOV were distributed across 4 quarters

Outstanding Consistently performed various related work/activities that contribute to the teaching learning process as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted at least 4 different kinds of acceptable MOV

parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted a combination of 3 of the acceptable MOV Submitted MOV were distributed across 3 quarters

parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted

parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted

Submitted a combination of 2 of the acceptable MOV Submitted MOV were distributed across 2 quarters

Submitted any 1 of the given MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Submitted MOV was completed in only 1 quarter

No acceptable evidence was shown

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory (5) Satisfactory (4) Frequently performed various related work/activities that contribute to the teaching learning process as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted 3 different kinds of acceptable MOV

Occasionally performed various related work/activities that contribute to the teaching learning process as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted 2 different kinds of acceptable MOV

RATING (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Rarely performed various related work/activities that contribute to the teaching learning process as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted any 1 of the acceptable MOV

Poor

(1)

Actual Results

No acceptable evidence was shown

No acceptable evidence was shown

Timeliness RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Q

E

T

Ave

SCORE

____________________________ Rater

________________________________ Ratee

___________________________ Approving Authority

Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VI - Western Visayas SCHOOLS DIVISION OF ILOILO LEGANES NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Leganes, Iloilo

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) Name of Employee: _______________________________________________________ Position: _________________________________________________________________ Division: _________________________________________________________________ Rating Period: _____________________________________________________________

Name of Rater: ___________________________________________ Position: _________________________________________________ Date of Review: ___________________________________________

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING MFO's

KRA's

Basic 1. Content Education Knowledge and Services Pedagogy

Objectives 1. Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum teaching areas

Timeline

Weight per KRA

2. Collaborated with colleagues in the conduct and application of research to enrich

RATING

Performance Indicators QET Quality

Efficiency

Basic Education Services

TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Timeliness Quality

Outstanding

(5) Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (4)

Modeled effective applications of effective content knowledge applications of applications of within and across content knowledge content knowledge content curriculum teaching within and across areas as shown in knowledge curriculum teaching MOV 1as shown in areas within and across curriculum teaching areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 8 Submitted at least 4 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Conducted, completed and disseminated action research with colleagues

(3) Unsatisfactory (2)

Poor

Actual Results (1)

Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum teaching areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Submitted 3 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 from colleagues and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum teaching areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 2 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 from colleagues and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum teaching areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 Submitted 1 lesson as evidenced by MOV 1 from colleagues and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

No acceptable evidence was shown

Conducted and completed action research with colleagues

Conducted action research with colleagues

Proposed action research with colleagues

No acceptable evidence was shown

No acceptable evidence was shown

Q

E

T

Ave

SCORE

knowledge of content and pedagogy.

MFO's

KRA's

Basic Education Services

Objectives

3. Developed and applied effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher order thinking skills

Timeline

Weight per KRA

QET Efficiency

Submitted at least 4 of the given MOV

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Basic 2. Learning Education Environment and Services Diversity of Learners

4. Worked with colleagues to model and share effective techniques in the management of classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a

Outstanding

Timeliness Quality

Efficiency

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory (5) Satisfactory (4)

RATING (3) Unsatisfactory (2)

Submitted any 2 MOV

Submitted any 1 MOV

Presented the research report within the rating period Demonstrated effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher order thinking skills as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 8 Submitted 4 or more lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Submitted any 3 of the acceptable MOV Completed the research report within the rating period Demonstrated effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher order thinking skills as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Submitted 3 lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Conducted the research report within the rating period Demonstrated effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher order thinking skills as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 2 lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Proposed the research report within the rating period Demonstrated effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher order thinking skills as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 Submitted 1 lesson as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any of the other MOV given

Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Submitted at least 4 lessons supported by

Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 3 lessons supported by

Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 Submitted 2 lessons supported by

Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4 Submitted 1 lesson supported by

Poor

(1)

No acceptable evidence was shown No acceptable evidence was shown No acceptable evidence was shown

No acceptable evidence was shown

No acceptable evidence

Actual Results

Q

E

T

Ave

SCORE

range of physical learning environment

MOV 1 and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

MOV 1 and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

MOV 1 and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

any of the acceptable MOV

was shown

Timeliness

MFO's

KRA's

Basic Education Services

Objectives 5. Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learningfocused environments.

Timeline

Weight per KRA

QET Quality

Efficiency

Basic Education Services

Basic

6. Worked with colleagues to share differentiated, developmentally appropriate opportunities to address learners’ differences in gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences

3. Curriculum

7. Developed and

RATING

Performance Indicators

Timeliness Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness Quality

Outstanding

(5) Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (4)

(3) Unsatisfactory (2)

Poor

Actual Results (1)

Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning focused environments shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 8 Applied at least 7 of the given strategies as observed in at least 4 lessons

Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning focused environments shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Applied at least 7 of the given strategies as observed in 3 lessons

Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning focused environments shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Applied at least 7 of the given strategies as observed in 2 lessons

Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning focused environments shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 Applied any of the given strategies as observed in only 1 lesson

No acceptable evidence was shown

Worked with colleagues at least in the district/cluster level to share lesson Submitted at least 1 lesson as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any acceptable MOV

Worked with colleagues in the school level to share lesson

Worked with colleagues in the department or grade level to share lesson

Worked with colleagues but no evidence of sharing with others

No acceptable evidence shown

Submitted at least 1 lesson as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any acceptable MOV

Submitted at least 1 lesson as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any acceptable MOV

Submitted at least 1 lesson, as evidenced by either MOV 2 or 3 but no evidence of sharing with others

No acceptable evidence shown

Developed and

Developed and

Developed and

Developed and

No

No acceptable evidence was shown

Q

E

T

Ave

SCORE

Education and Planning Services

MFO's

KRA's

applied effective strategies in the planning and management of developmentally sequenced teaching and learning

Objectives processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts.

Basic Education Services

8. Reviewed with colleagues, teacher and learner feedback to plan, facilitate and enrich teaching practice.

applied effective strategies showing developmentally sequenced teaching and learning

Timeline

Weight per KRA

9. Advised and guided colleagues in the

applied effective strategies showing developmentally sequenced teaching and learning

applied effective strategies showing developmentally sequenced teaching and learning

acceptable evidence was shown

RATING

Performance Indicators QET Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness Quality

Efficiency

Basic Education

applied effective strategies showing developmentally sequenced teaching and learning

Timeliness Quality

Outstanding

(5) Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (4)

(3) Unsatisfactory (2)

Poor

(1)

process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 8 Submitted at least 4 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and 2 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Submitted 2-3 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and 2 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 1 lesson as evidenced by shown in MOV 1 and/or 2 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 Submitted 1 lesson as evidenced by any 1 of the acceptable MOV

Consistently participated in LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in the MOV submitted Participated in at least 4 LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV

Frequently participated in LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in the MOV submitted Participated in 3 LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV

Occasionally participated in LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in the MOV submitted Participated in 2 LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV

Rarely participated in LAC/FGD/ meeting to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in the MOV submitted Participated in 1 LAC/FGD/ meeting as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Consistently advised

Frequently advised

Occasionally advised

Rarely advised colleagues in

No acceptable

No acceptable evidence was shown

No acceptable evidence was shown

Actual Results

Q

E

T

Ave

SCORE

Services

MFO's

colleagues in the selection, organization, development and appropriate use of teaching and learning resources as shown in the MOV submitted

selection, organization, development and use of appropriate teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address specific learning goals.

KRA's

Objectives

Timeline

Weight per KRA

QET Efficiency

4. Assessment Basic Education and Reporting Services

Basic Education Services

10. Worked collaboratively with colleagues to review the design, selection, organization and use of a range of effective diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements

11. Interpreted collaboratively monitoring and evaluation strategies of attainment data to support learner progress and achievement.

Timeliness Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness Quality

Efficiency

Outstanding

colleagues in the selection, organization, development and appropriate use of teaching and learning resources as shown in the MOV submitted

colleagues in the selection, organization, development and appropriate use of teaching and learning resources as shown in the MOV submitted

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory (5) Satisfactory (4)

the selection, organization, development and appropriate use of teaching and learning resources as shown in the MOV submitted

evidence was shown

RATING (3) Unsatisfactory (2)

Poor

(1)

Submitted at least 4 teaching and learning resources as evidenced by at least 1 of the acceptable MOV

Submitted 3 teaching and learning resources as evidenced by at least 1 of the acceptable MOV

Submitted 2 teaching and learning resources, evidenced by at least 1 of the acceptable MOV

Submitted 1 teaching and learning resource, evidenced by any of the acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Consistently reviewed collaboratively assessment tools with colleagues as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted at least 4 assessment tools as evidently shown in any of the acceptable MO

Frequently reviewed collaboratively assessment tools with colleagues as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted 3 assessment tools as evidently shown in any of the acceptable MOV

Occasionally reviewed collaboratively assessment tools with colleagues as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted 2 assessment tools as evidently shown in any of the acceptable MOV

Rarely reviewed collaboratively assessment tools with colleagues as shown in the MOV submitted

No acceptable evidence was shown

Submitted 1 assessment tool as evidently shown in any of the acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Consistently collaborated with colleagues in the interpretation of assessment data as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted at

Frequently collaborated with colleagues in the interpretation of assessment data as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted at

Occasionally collaborated with colleagues in the interpretation of assessment data as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted at

Rarely collaborated with colleagues in the interpretation of assessment data as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted any 1

No acceptable evidence was shown

No

Actual Results

Q

E

T

Ave

SCORE

Basic Education Services

MFO's

Timeliness Quality

12. Applied skills in the effective communication of learner needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/guardians.

KRA's

Objectives

Timeline

Weight per KRA

QET Efficiency

Basic 5. Plus Factor Education Services

13. Performed various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching-learning process

Timeliness Quality

Efficiency

least 2 different types of MOV

least 3 of the same kind of MOV

least 2 of the same kind of MOV

of the MOV

acceptable evidence was shown

Consistently applied skills in the effective communication of learner needs and progress to parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted

Frequently applied skills in the effective communication of learner needs and progress to parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted

Occasionally applied skills in the effective communication of learner needs and progress to parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted

Rarely applied skills in the effective communication of learner needs and progress to parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted

No acceptable evidence was shown

Outstanding

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory (5) Satisfactory (4)

RATING (3) Unsatisfactory (2)

Poor

(1)

Submitted at least 3 of the acceptable MOV

Submitted any 3 MOV

Submitted any 2 MOV

Submitted any 1 MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Consistently performed special tasks and/or assignments as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted at least 4 different kinds of acceptable MOV

Frequently performed special tasks and/or assignments as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted only 3 different kinds of acceptable MOV

Occasionally performed special tasks and/or assignments as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted only 2 different kinds of acceptable MOV

Rarely performed special tasks and/or assignments as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted any 1 of the acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Actual Results

No acceptable evidence was shown

Timeliness RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Q

E

T

Ave

SCORE

____________________________ Rater

________________________________ Ratee

___________________________ Approving Authority

Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VI - Western Visayas SCHOOLS DIVISION OF ILOILO LEGANES NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Leganes, Iloilo

RPMS Tool for Teacher I - III (Proficient Teachers) POSITION AND COMPETENCY PROFILE Position Title Parenthetical Title Office Unit Reports to

Salary Grade Effectivity Date Page/s

Position Supervised

JOB SUMMARY QUALIFICATION STANDARDS A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications Education Experience Eligibility Trainings B. Preferred Qualifications Education Experience Eligibility Trainings

PCP No. ______

Revision Code: 00

DUTIES AND RESPONSOBILITIES 1. Applies mastery of content knowledge and its application across learning areas 2. Facilitates learning using appropriate and innovative teaching strategies and classroom management practices 3. Manages an environment conducive to learning 4. Addresses learner diversity 5. Implements and supervises curricular and co-curricular programs to support learning 6. Monitors and evaluates learner progress and undertakes activities to improve learner performance 7. Maintains updated records of learners’ progress 8. Counsels and guides learners 9. Works with relevant stakeholders, both internal and external, to promote learning and improve school performance 10. Undertakes activities towards personal and professional growth 11. Does related work

Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VI - Western Visayas SCHOOLS DIVISION OF ILOILO LEGANES NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Leganes, Iloilo

RPMS Tool for Master Teacher I - IV (Highly Proficient Teachers) POSITION AND COMPETENCY PROFILE Position Title Parenthetical Title Office Unit Reports to Position Supervised

Salary Grade Effectivity Date Page/s

JOB SUMMARY QUALIFICATION STANDARDS A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications Education Experience Eligibility Trainings B. Preferred Qualifications Education Experience Eligibility Trainings

PCP No. ______

Revision Code: 00

DUTIES AND RESPONSOBILITIES 1. Models exemplary practice in the application of content knowledge and pedagogy showing its integration within qnd across learning areas 2. Conducts in-depth studies or action researchs on teaching-learning innovations 3. Works with colleagues to create learning-focused environments that promote learner responsibility and achievement 4. Assists colleagues to implement differentiated teaching strategies that are responsive to learner diversity 5. Leads in the preparation and enrichment of curriculum 6. Initiates programs and projects that can enhance the curriculum and its implementation 7. Leads colleagues in the design, evaluation, interpretation and utilizationof different types of assessment tools for the improvement of the teaching and learning process 8. Updates parents/guardians on learners needs, progress and achievement 9. Strengthens school-community partnerships to enrich engagement of internal and external stakeholders in the educative process 10. Establishes links with colleagues through attendance and membership in professional organizations for self-growth and advancement 11. Provides technical assistance through demonstration teaching, mentoring, coaching, class monitoring and observation, organizing/leading/serving as trainers/facilitators in teacher quality circles/learning action cells 12. Does related works

Means Of Verification (MOV) for TEACHER I - III Major Final Outputs (MFOs) Key Result Areas (KRAs)

Objectives

Means of Verification (MOV)

1. Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas.

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed highlighting integration of content knowledge within and across subject areas 3. Instructional materials highlighting mastery of content and its integration in other subject areas 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) highlighting integration of content knowledge within and across subject areas 5. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

2. Used a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills.

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in teaching highlighting learner-centered strategies that promote literacy and/or numeracy skills 3. Instructional materials highlighting learner centered strategies that promote literacy and/or numeracy skills 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in teaching 5. Results of assessment used in teaching 6. Others (Please specify and provide

Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

annotations) Major Final Outputs (MFOs) Key Result Areas (KRAs)

Objectives 3. Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills.

4. Managed classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration, Learning Environment discovery and hands-on activities and Diversity of within a range of physical learning Learners environments.

5. Managed learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher order thinking skills 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in teaching highlighting different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS 3. Instructional materials highlighting different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in demonstration teaching 5. Results of assessment used in teaching 6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about managing classroom structure that engages learners in various activities 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting various classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks in different physical learning environments 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about teacher management of learner behavior using

learning-focused environments

Major Final Outputs (MFOs) Key Result Areas (KRAs)

Objectives

6. Used differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences.

7. Planned, managed and implemented developmentally

the following strategies: 1. Providing motivation

Means of Verification (MOV) 2. Praising the learners/Giving positive feedback 3. Setting house rules/guidelines 4. Ensuring learners’ active participation 5. Allowing learners to express their ideas/opinions 6. Giving equal opportunities to learners 7. Encouraging learners to ask questions 8. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning experiences 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed highlighting differentiation in content, product, process, learning environment or others according to learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences 3. Instructional materials developed highlighting differentiation in content, product, process, learning environment or others according to learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences 4. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form

Curriculum and Planning

Major Final Key Result Areas (KRAs) Outputs (MFOs)

sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts.

Objectives

8. Participated in collegial discussions that use teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching practice.

9. Selected, developed, organized and used appropriate teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address learning goals.

about using developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting developmentally sequenced instruction that

Means of Verification (MOV) meet curriculum goals and varied teaching contexts 3. Instructional materials used to implement developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts 4. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) 1. Personal notes of teachers on LACs/FGDs/meetings with proof of attendance 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching practice with proof of attendance 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using appropriate teaching and learning resources, including ICT Examples: • Activity sheets/task sheets/work sheets • PowerPoint presentations • Video clips • Module • SIMs-Strategic Intervention Materials

• Others 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with appropriate instructional materials appended 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

Major Final Outputs (MFOs) Key Result Areas (KRAs)

Assessment and Reporting

Objectives 10. Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements.

11. Monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data.

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies 2. Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting appropriate use of formative assessment strategies 3. Developed diagnostic tests: (a) with TOS reviewed by superior; (b) with sample accomplished questionnaire/answer sheets 4. Developed summative tests: (a) with TOS reviewed by superior; (b) with sample accomplished questionnaire/answer sheets 5. Developed performance tasks: (a) with rubrics reviewed by superior; (b) with sample accomplished rubrics 5. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) 1. Compilation of a learner’s written work with summary of results and with signature of parents 2. Formative/summative assessment tools with TOS and frequency of errors with identified

least mastered skills 3. Class records/grading sheets 4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs showing index of mastery 5. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

Major Final Outputs (MFOs) Key Result Areas (KRAs)

Objectives 12. Communicated promptly and clearly the learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/guardians.

13. Performed various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching-learning process. Plus Factor

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. At least 3 samples of corrected test papers of the same 3 learners in the same learning area with parents’ or guardians’ signature and date of receipt 2. Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent-Teacher conferences in all quarters with proof of parent’s/guardian’s attendance 3. Report cards with parent’s or guardian’s signature in all quarters supported by minutes of meeting 4. Communication with parents/guardians using various modalities 5. Anecdotal record showing entries per quarter 6. Other documents showing learner needs, progress and achievement submitted to other stakeholders 1. Certificate of Recognition or Participation 2. Certificate of Training 3. Certificate of Speakership 4. Committee involvement 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities

6. Book or Journal Authorship/Coauthorship/ Contributorship 7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship 8. Coaching and mentoring learners in competitions 9. Mentoring pre-service/in-service teachers 10. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

Means Of Verification (MOV) for MASTER TEACHER I - IV

Major Final Key Result Areas (KRAs) Outputs (MFOs)

Objectives 1. Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum teaching areas

Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed highlighting integration of content knowledge within and across subject areas 3. Instructional materials highlighting mastery of content and its integration in other subject areas 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) highlighting integration of content knowledge within and 5. Results of assessment used in demonstration across subject areas teaching highlighting mastery of lessons

learned 6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

2. Collaborated with colleagues in the conduct and application of research to enrich knowledge of content and pedagogy.

Major Final Outputs (MFOs) Key Result Areas (KRAs)

Objectives 3. Developed and applied effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative thinking, as well a

4. Worked with colleagues to model

1. Copy of the research proposal focused on enriching knowledge of content and pedagogy 2. Proof of participation and/or contribution to a collaborative research (e.g. e-mail, actual output submitted, terms of reference, etc.) 3. Certified completed collaborative research focused on enriching knowledge of content and pedagogy 4. Proof of dissemination of research findings with colleagues 5. Proof of utilization of research findings 6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative teaching, as well as other higher-order thinking skills 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in demonstration teaching highlighting different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS 3. Instructional materials highlighting different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking, and/or other HOTS 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in demonstration teaching 5. Results of assessment used in the demonstration teaching 6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet

and share effective techniques in the management of classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical learning environments.

Learning Environment and Diversity of Learners

Major Final Outputs (MFOs) Key Result Areas (KRAs)

Objectives 5. Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by applying positive and nonviolent discipline to ensure learningfocused environments.

6. Worked with colleagues to share differentiated, developmentally appropriate opportunities to address

and/or inter-observer agreement form about sharing effective techniques in the management of classroom structure 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in demonstration teaching highlighting effective classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks in different physical learning environments 3. Minutes of LAC highlighting the sharing on effective classroom management techniques 4. Instructional materials used in demonstration teaching 5. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

Means of Verification (MOV) Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about effective teacher management of learner behavior using the following strategies: 1. Providing motivation 2. Praising the learners/Giving positive feedback 3. Setting house rules/guidelines 4. Ensuring learners’ active participation 5. Allowing learners to express their ideas/opinions 6. Giving equal opportunities to learners 7. Encouraging learners to ask questions 8. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) 1. Minutes of LAC session/s, highlighting one’s sharing of strategies on differentiated and developmentally appropriate opportunities to

learners’ differences in gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences.

Curriculum and Planning

Major Final Outputs (MFOs) Key Result Areas (KRAs)

7. Developed and applied effective strategies in the planning and management of developmentally sequenced teaching and learning

Objectives processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts.

Curriculum and Planning

8. Reviewed with colleagues, teacher

address learners’ differences 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting strategies on differentiated and developmentally-appropriate opportunities to address learners’ differences 3. Corresponding instructional materials showing differentiated and developmentally-appropriate opportunities to address learners’ differences 4. Others (e.g. testimonial, write-up from colleagues of the lessons/insights gained from the Master Teacher's sharing 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using effective strategies in implementing developmentally sequenced teaching and

Means of Verification (MOV) learning process 2. Results of learners’ assessment during the actual teaching 3. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in demonstration teaching highlighting developmentally sequenced teaching-learning process 4. Instructional materials showing effective strategies in developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process 5. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in demonstration teaching 6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations 1. Implemented LAC/FGD Plan

and learner feedback to plan, facilitate and enrich teaching practice.

9. Advised and guided colleagues in the selection, organization, development and use of appropriate teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address specific learning goals.

Major Final Key Result Areas (KRAs) Outputs (MFOs)

Objectives 10. Worked collaboratively with colleagues to review the design, selection, organization and use of a range of effective diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements.

Assessment and Reporting 12. Applied skills in the effective communication of learner needs, progress and achievement to key

2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching practice with proof of attendance 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) 1. Teaching and learning resources developed by colleagues and critiqued on their alignment to learning goals 2. Lesson plans by colleagues critiqued in terms of the alignment of the teaching and learning resources to the indicated learning goals and appropriateness to the target learners 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. Any proof of collaborative review if the test is designed based on its purpose (e.g. diagnostic, formative and summative) 2. Any proof of collaborative review of the alignment of the test with the curriculum 2.1. formative test attached to a lesson plan 2.2. summative assessment with TOS 2.3. diagnostic test with its TOS 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) 1. Sample agreement for learners at risk signed by parents and corresponding evidence of improvement

stakeholders, including parents/guardians.

Major Final Outputs (MFOs) Key Result Areas (KRAs)

Plus Factor

Objectives

13. Performed various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching-learning process.

2. Record of dialogue and/or parent-teacher conferences and corresponding evidence of improvement 3. Anecdotal record communicated to and signed by the learners and/or parents with corresponding evidence of improvement 4. Sample of learners' test results signed by parents and corresponding evidence of improvement 5. Sample of accomplished rubrics given for performance task and corresponding evidence of improvement 6. Attendance sheet/minutes of parent-teacher conference 7. Signed report cards of students at risk with corresponding evidence of improvement

Means of Verification (MOV) 8. Correspondence notebook/letters/proof of communication using other modalities (e.g. email, SMS, etc.) and corresponding evidence of improvement 9. Learners’ performance record 10. Others (Please specify and provide annotations 1. Served as reliever of classes in the absence of teachers 2. Served as OIC in the absence of the principal

3. Represented the principal in meetings and conferences 4. Observed classes of Teachers I-III 5. Assisted the school selection committee in the evaluation of credentials when hiring or promoting teachers 6. Certificate of Recognition or Participation 7. Certificate of Training 8. Certificate of Speakership 9. Committee involvement 10. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities 11. Book or Journal Authorship/Coauthorship/ Contributorship 12. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship 13. Coaching and mentoring learners in competitions 14. Mentoring pre-service/in-service teachers 15. Others (Please specify and provide annotations

INDICATORS for TEACHER I - III Objectives 1. Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas.

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed highlighting integration of content knowledge within and across subject areas 3. Instructional materials highlighting mastery of content and its integration in other subject areas 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) high lighting integration of content knowledge within and across subject areas 5. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

2. Used a range 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating of teaching sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form strategies that about teaching strategies that enhance learner enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills achievement 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in teaching in literacy and highlighting learner-centered strategies that numeracy skills. promote literacy and/or numeracy skills 3. Instructional materials highlighting learner centered strategies that promote literacy and/or numeracy skills

QET Quality

Efficiency

Outstanding (5) Showed knowledge of content and its integration within and across subject areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Submitted at least 4 lessons using MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

Showed knowledge of content and its integration within and across subject areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 3 lessons using MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV

Showed knowledge of content and its integration within and across subject areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 Submitted 2 lessons using MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given MOV

Showed knowledge of content and its integration within and across subject areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4 Submitted any 1 of the given MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Facilitated using different teaching strategies that promote reading, writing and/or numeracy skills numeracy skills as shown in as shown in MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a rating of 6 rating of 7

Facilitated using different teaching strategies that promote reading, writing and/or numeracy skills as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5

Facilitated using different teaching strategies that promote reading, writing and/or numeracy skills as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4

No acceptable evidence was shown

Timeliness Quality Facilitated using different teaching strategies that promote reading, writing and/or

No acceptable evidence was shown

Objectives

Means of Verification (MOV) 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in teaching 5. Results of assessment used in teaching 6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

3. Applied a

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating range of teaching sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form strategies to about teaching strategies to develop critical develop critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher and creative order thinking skills thinking, as 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in teaching well as other highlighting different teaching strategies that higher-order develop critical and creative thinking and/or thinking skills. other HOTS 3. Instructional materials highlighting different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in demonstration teaching 5. Results of assessment used in teaching 6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

QET Efficiency

Outstanding (5) Submitted at least 4 learner centered lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Timeliness Quality Used different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Efficiency Submitted at least 4 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

Submitted 3 learner centered lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Submitted 2 learner centered lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Submitted 1 learner centered lesson as evidently

No acceptable evidence was shown

Used different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 3 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given

Used different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5

Used different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4

No acceptable evidence was shown

Submitted 2 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given

Submitted 1 lesson as evidenced by any 1 of the given MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

shown in any of the given MOV

Timeliness

Objectives

Means of Verification (MOV)

QET

Quality 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about managing classroom structure that engage learners, engages learners in various activities 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting individually various classroom management strategies or in groups, in meaningful that engage learners in activities/tasks in different physical learning environments exploration, 3. Others (Please specify and provide discovery and Efficiency annotations) hands-on 4. Managed classroom structure to

activities within a range of physical learning environments.

5. Managed learner behavior

constructively by applying positive and non-violent

discipline to ensure learning-focused

environments

Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about teacher management of learner behavior using the following strategies: 1. Providing motivation 2. Praising the learners/Giving positive feedback 3. Setting house rules/guidelines 4. Ensuring learners’ active participation 5. Allowing learners to express their ideas/opinions

MOV

MOV

Outstanding (5)

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Submitted at least 4 lessons supported by MOV 1 and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

Timeliness Quality Applied teacher management strategies of learner behavior that promote positive and non-violent discipline as shown in MOV submitted with a

Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 3 lessons supported by MOV 1 and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

MOV

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5

Used classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4

No acceptable evidence was shown

Submitted 2 lessons supported by MOV 1 and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

Submitted 1 lesson supported by any of the acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher management management management strategies of strategies of strategies of learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior that promote that promote that promote positive and positive and positive and non-violent non-violent non-violent discipline as discipline as discipline as shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a

No acceptable evidence was shown

6. Giving equal opportunities to learners

Objectives

Means of Verification (MOV) 7. Encouraging learners to ask questions 8. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

6. Used differentiated, developmentally

appropriate learning experiences to address learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences.

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning experiences 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed highlighting differentiation in content, product, process, learning environment or others according to learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences 3. Instructional materials developed highlighting differentiation in content, product, process, learning environment or others according to learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences 4. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

QET Efficiency

rating of 7

rating of 6

Outstanding (5)

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Submitted at least 4 of the given strategies as observed in at least 4 lessons

Timeliness Quality Applied differentiated teaching strategies to address learner diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Efficiency Submitted at least 4 differentiated teaching strategies in at least 2 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the

rating of 5

rating of 4

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

Submitted at least 4 of the given strategies as observed in 3 lessons

Submitted at least 4 of the given strategies as observed in 2 lessons

Submitted any 1 of the given strategies as observed in only 1 lesson

No acceptable evidence was shown

Applied differentiated teaching strategies to address learner diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 3 differentiated teaching strategies in at least 2 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other

Applied differentiated teaching strategies to address learner diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 Submitted 2 differentiated teaching strategies in 2 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other

Applied differentiated teaching strategies to address learner diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4 Submitted any 1 differentiated teaching strategy in only 1 lesson as evidently shown in any 1 of the acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence shown

No acceptable evidence shown

Timeliness

Objectives 7. Planned, managed and implemented

Means of Verification (MOV)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process developmentally sequenced 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting teaching developmentally sequenced instruction that and learning meet curriculum goals and varied teaching processes to contexts meet curriculum 3. Instructional materials used to implement requirements developmentally sequenced teaching and and varied learning process to meet curriculum teaching contexts. requirements and varied teaching contexts 4. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

QET

other acceptable MOV

Outstanding (5)

acceptable MOV

acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

Quality

Planned and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7

Planned and Planned and Planned and implemented implemented implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and learning learning learning process as process as process as shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating of 6 of 5 of 4

No acceptable evidence was shown

Efficiency

Submitted at least 4 developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other given

Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 developmentally developmentally developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and learning learning learning process as process as process as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any 1 of the supported by supported by given MOV any 1 of the any 1 of the other given other given MOV MOV

No acceptable evidence shown

Timeliness

Objectives

Means of Verification (MOV)

8. Participated in collegial

1. Personal notes of teachers on LACs/FGDs/meetings with proof of attendance discussions that 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of use teacher and teacher and learner feedback to enrich learner feedback teaching practice with proof of attendance to enrich teaching 3. Others (Please specify and provide practice. annotations)

QET Quality

Efficiency

9. Selected, developed, organized and used appropriate teaching and

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using appropriate teaching and learning resources, including ICT Examples: • Activity sheets/task sheets/work sheets

MOV

Outstanding (5) Consistently participated in LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in the MOV submitted Participated in at least 4 LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV

Timeliness Quality Developed and used varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

Frequently participated in LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in the MOV submitted Participated in 3 LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV

Occasionally participated in LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in the MOV submitted Participated in 2 LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV

Rarely participated in LAC/FGD/ meeting to discuss teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction as shown in the MOV submitted Participated in 1 LAC/FGD/ meeting as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Developed and used varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to

Developed and used varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to

Developed and used varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to

No acceptable evidence was shown

No acceptable evidence was shown

learning resources, including ICT, to address learning goals.

Objectives

• PowerPoint presentations • Video clips • Module • SIMs-Strategic Intervention Materials • Others

Means of Verification (MOV) 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with appropriate instructional materials appended 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations

10. Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements.

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies 2. Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting appropriate use of formative assessment strategies 3. Developed diagnostic tests: (a) with TOS reviewed by superior; (b) with sample accomplished questionnaire/answer sheets 4. Developed summative tests: (a) with TOS reviewed by superior; (b) with sample accomplished questionnaire/answer sheets

QET Efficiency

address learning goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7

address learning goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6

Outstanding (5)

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Submitted at least 4 varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the acceptable MOV

Timeliness Quality Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements as shown in MOV 1 with a rating

address learning goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5

address learning goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

Submitted 3 varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the acceptable MOV

Submitted 2 varied teaching and learning resources, including ICT, as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the acceptable MOV

Submitted any teaching and learning resource, including ICT, as evidently shown in any of the acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements as shown in MOV 1 with a rating

Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements as shown in MOV 1 with a rating

Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements as shown in MOV 1 with a rating

No acceptable evidence was shown

5. Developed performance tasks: (a) with rubrics reviewed by superior; (b) with sample accomplished rubrics 5. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

Efficiency

Timeliness

Objectives

Means of Verification (MOV)

11. Monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner

1. Compilation of a learner’s written work with summary of results and with signature of parents 2. Formative/summative assessment tools with TOS and frequency of errors with identified least mastered skills attainment data. 3. Class records/grading sheets 4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs showing index of mastery 5. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

12. Communicated

promptly and clearly the learners’ needs, progress and achievement to

1. At least 3 samples of corrected test papers of the same 3 learners in the same learning area with parents’ or guardians’ signature and date of receipt 2. Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent-Teacher conferences in all quarters with proof of

QET Quality

of 7 Submitted at least 4 varied assessment tools as evidently shown in any 1 of the acceptable MOV

of 6 Submitted 3 varied assessment tools as evidently shown in any 1 of the acceptable MOV

Outstanding (5)

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Consistently monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data as shown in the MOV submitted Efficiency Submitted a combination of at least 4 of the acceptable MOV Timeliness Submitted MOV were distributed across 4 quarters Quality Consistently showed prompt and clear communication of the learners’ needs, progress

Frequently monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted a combination of 3 of the acceptable MOV Submitted MOV were distributed across 3 quarters Frequently showed prompt and clear communication of the learners’ needs, progress

of 5 Submitted 2 varied assessment tools as evidently shown in any 1 of the acceptable MOV

Occasionally monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted a combination of 2 of the acceptable MOV Submitted MOV were distributed across 2 quarters Occasionally showed prompt and clear communication of the learners’ needs, progress

of 4 Submitted 1 assessment tool as evidently shown in any of the acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1) Rarely monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data as shown in the MOV submitted Submitted 1 acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Submitted MOV No was completed acceptable in only 1 quarter evidence was shown Rarely showed No prompt and acceptable clear evidence communication was shown of the learners’ needs, progress

key stakeholders, parent’s/guardian’s attendance 3. Report cards with parent’s or guardian’s including signature in all quarters supported by minutes parents/

guardians.

Objectives

of meeting 4. Communication with parents/guardians using various modalities 5. Anecdotal record showing entries per quarter 6. Other documents showing learner needs, progress and achievement submitted to other

Means of Verification (MOV) stakeholders

13. Performed various related

1. Certificate of Recognition or Participation 2. Certificate of Training works/activities 3. Certificate of Speakership that contribute 4. Committee involvement to the teaching 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities learning process. 6. Book or Journal Authorship/Coauthorship/ Contributorship 7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship 8. Coaching and mentoring learners in competitions

QET Efficiency

and achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted

and achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted

and achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted

Outstanding (5)

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Submitted a combination of at least 4 of the acceptable MOV Timeliness Submitted MOV were distributed across 4 quarters Quality Consistently performed various related work/activities that contribute to the teaching learning process as shown in the MOV submitted

Submitted a combination of 3 of the acceptable MOV Submitted MOV were distributed across 3 quarters Frequently performed various related work/activities that contribute to the teaching learning process as shown in the MOV submitted

Submitted a combination of 2 of the acceptable MOV Submitted MOV were distributed across 2 quarters Occasionally performed various related work/activities that contribute to the teaching learning process as shown in the MOV submitted

and achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1) Submitted any 1 No of the given acceptable MOV evidence was shown Submitted MOV No was completed acceptable in only 1 quarter evidence was shown No Rarely acceptable performed various related evidence work/activities was shown that contribute to the teaching learning process as shown in the MOV submitted

9. Mentoring pre-service/in-service teachers 10. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

Efficiency

Timeliness

Submitted at least 4 different kinds of acceptable MOV

Submitted 3 different kinds of acceptable MOV

Submitted 2 different kinds of acceptable MOV

Submitted any 1 of the acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

INDICATORS for MASTER TEACHER I - IV Objectives 1. Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum teaching areas.

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. Classroom observation tool

QET Quality

Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum teaching areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 8

Efficiency

Submitted at least 4 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and

(COT) rating sheet and/or interobserver agreement form about effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum teaching areas 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in demonstration teaching highlighting integration of content knowledge within and across subject areas 3. Instructional materials developed highlighting effective application of content knowledge within and across subject areas 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in demonstration teaching highlighting integration of content knowledge within and

supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

across subject areas 5. Results of assessment used in demonstration teaching highlighting mastery of lessons learned

6. Others (Please specify and provide annotation

Outstanding (5)

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum teaching areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Submitted 3 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 from colleagues and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum teaching areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 Submitted 2 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 from colleagues and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1) Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum teaching areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5

No acceptable evidence was shown

Submitted 1 lesson as evidenced by MOV 1 from colleagues and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

No acceptable evidence was shown

Objectives 2. Collaborated with

colleagues in the

conduct and application of research to enrich knowledge of content and pedagogy.

3. Developed and applied effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher order thinking skills.

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. Copy of the research proposal focused on enriching knowledge of content and pedagogy 2. Proof of participation and/or contribution to a collaborative research (e.g. e-mail, actual output submitted, terms of reference, etc.) 3. Certified completed collaborative research focused on enriching knowledge of content and pedagogy 4. Proof of dissemination of research findings with colleagues 5. Proof of utilization of research findings 6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter observer agreement form about using effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative teaching, as well as other higher-order thinking skills 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in demonstration teaching highlighting different teaching strategies that develop critical

QET Quality

Outstanding (5) Conducted, completed and disseminated action research with colleagues

Efficiency

Submitted at least 4 of the given MOV

Timeliness Presented the research report within the rating period Quality Demonstrated effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

Conducted and completed action research with colleagues

Conducted action research with colleagues

Proposed action research with colleagues

No acceptable evidence was shown

Submitted any 3 of the acceptable MOV

Submitted any 2 MOV

Submitted any 1 MOV

Completed the research report within the rating period Demonstrated effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills

Conducted the research report within the rating period Demonstrated effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills

Proposed the research report within the rating period

No acceptable evidence was shown

Demonstrated effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills as shown in

No acceptable evidence was shown

and creative thinking and/or other HOTS 3. Instructional materials highlighting different teaching

Objectives

4. Worked with colleagues to model and share effective techniques in the management of classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical learning environments

Means of Verification (MOV) strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in demonstration teaching 5. Results of assessment used in the demonstration teaching 6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or interobserver agreement form about sharing effective techniques in the management of classroom structure 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in demonstration teaching highlighting effective classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks in different physical learning environments 3. Minutes of LAC highlighting the sharing on effective classroom management techniques 4. Instructional materials used in

QET Efficiency

as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 8

as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7

Outstanding (5)

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Submitted 4 or more lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Timeliness Quality Modeled and shared effective classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/ tasks done in different physical learning environments as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 8

as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6

MOV 1 with a rating of 5

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

Submitted 3 lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Submitted 2 lessons as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the other MOV given

Submitted 1 lesson as evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported by any of the other MOV given

No acceptable evidence was shown

Modeled and shared effective classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/ tasks done in different physical learning environments as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7

Modeled and shared effective classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/ tasks done in different physical learning environments as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6

Modeled and shared effective classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/ tasks done in different physical learning environments as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5

No acceptable evidence was shown

demonstration teaching 5. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

Objectives

Means of Verification (MOV)

Efficiency

QET

Submitted at least 4 lessons supported by MOV 1 and

Submitted 3 lessons supported by MOV 1 and

Outstanding (5)

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

any 1 of the other acceptable MOV 5. Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by applying positive and nonviolent discipline to ensure learningfocused environments

Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about effective teacher management of learner behavior using the following strategies: 1. Providing motivation 2. Praising the learners/Giving positive feedback 3. Setting house rules/guidelines 4. Ensuring learners’ active participation 5. Allowing learners to express their ideas/opinions 6. Giving equal opportunities to learners 7. Encouraging learners to ask questions

Timeliness Quality Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learningfocused environments shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 8 Efficiency Applied at least 7 of the

Submitted 2 lessons supported by MOV 1 and

Submitted any 1 of the acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learningfocused environments shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 Applied at least 7 of the

Exhibited Exhibited effective and effective and constructive constructive behavior behavior management management skills by skills by applying applying positive and positive and non-violent non-violent discipline to discipline to ensure ensure learningfocused learningfocused environments environments shown in shown in MOV MOV 1 with a 1 with a rating rating of 6 of 5 Applied at Applied any of least 7 of the the given

No acceptable evidence shown

No acceptable

8. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

given strategies as observed in at least 4 lessons

given strategies as observed in 3 lessons

given strategies as observed in 2 lessons

strategies as observed in only 1 lesson

evidence shown

Timeliness

Objectives

Means of Verification (MOV)

6. Worked with

1. Minutes of LAC session/s,

colleagues to share

QET Quality

Outstanding (5)

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

Worked with

Worked with

Worked with

Worked with

No

highlighting one’s sharing of

colleagues at

colleagues in

colleagues in

colleagues but

acceptable

differentiated,

strategies on differentiated and

least in the

the school

the

no evidence of

evidence

developmentally

developmentally-appropriate

district/cluster

level to share

department or sharing with

appropriate

opportunities to address learners’

level to share

lesson

grade level to

opportunities to

differences

lesson

address learners’

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs

differences in gender,

highlighting strategies on

needs, strengths,

differentiated and

interests and

developmentally-appropriate

experiences.

Efficiency

shown

others

share lesson

Submitted at

Submitted at

Submitted at

Submitted at

No

opportunities to address learners’

least 1 lesson

least 1 lesson

least 1 lesson

least 1 lesson,

acceptable

differences

as evidently

as evidently

as evidently

as evidenced

evidence

3. Corresponding instructional

shown in MOV shown in

shown in

by either MOV

shown

materials showing differentiated

1 and

MOV 1 and

MOV 1 and

2 or 3 but no

and developmentally appropriate

supported by

supported by

supported by

evidence of

opportunities to address learners’

any

any

any

sharing with

differences

acceptable

acceptable

acceptable

others

4. Others (e.g. testimonial, write-up

MOV

MOV

MOV

from colleagues of the lessons/insights gained from the Master Teacher's sharing)

Objectives 7. Developed and applied effective strategies in the planning and management of developmentally sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts.

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using effective strategies in implementing developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process 2. Results of learners’ assessment during the actual teaching 3. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in demonstration teaching highlighting developmentally sequenced teaching-learning process 4. Instructional materials showing effective strategies in developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process 5. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in demonstration teaching

Timeliness

QET

Outstanding (5)

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

Quality

Developed and applied effective strategies showing developmentall y- sequenced teaching and learning process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 8

Developed and applied effective strategies showing developmenta lly- sequenced teaching and learning process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7

Developed and applied effective strategies showing developmenta lly-sequenced teaching and learning process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6

Developed and applied effective strategies showing developmentall y- sequenced teaching and learning process as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5

No acceptable evidence was shown

Efficiency

Submitted at least 4 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and 2 and supported by

Submitted 2-3 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and 2 and supported by any 1 of

Submitted 1 lesson as evidenced by shown in MOV 1 and/or 2 and

Submitted 1 lesson as evidenced by any 1 of the acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

the other acceptable MOV

supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Objectives 8. Reviewed with colleagues, teacher and learner feedback to plan, facilitate and enrich teaching practice.

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. Implemented LAC/FGD Plan 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching practice with proof of attendance 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

QET

Outstanding (5)

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

Quality

Consistently led collaborative reviews of teacher and learner feedback as evidenced by the MOV submitted

Frequently led collaborative reviews of teacher and learner feedback as evidenced by the MOV submitted

Occasionally led collaborative reviews of teacher and learner feedback as evidenced by the MOV submitted

Rarely led collaborative reviews of teacher and learner feedback as evidenced by the MOV submitted

No acceptable evidence was shown

Efficiency

Submitted 4 collaborative reviews of teacher and learner feedback as evidently shown in MOV 1 and

Submitted 3 collaborative reviews of teacher and learner feedback as evidently shown in MOV 1 and

Submitted 2 collaborative reviews of teacher and learner feedback as evidently shown in MOV 1 and

Submitted 1 collaborative review of teacher and learner feedback as evidently shown in any of the acceptable

No acceptable evidence was shown

supported by any 1 of the acceptable MOV

supported by any 1 of the acceptable MOV

supported by any 1 of the acceptable MOV

Outstanding (5)

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

MOV

Timeliness

Objectives 9. Advised and guided colleagues in the selection, organization, development and use of appropriate teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address specific learning goals.

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. Teaching and learning resources developed by colleagues and critiqued on their alignment to learning goals 2. Lesson plans by colleagues critiqued in terms of the alignment of the teaching and learning resources to the indicated learning goals and appropriateness to the target learners 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

QET

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

Quality

Consistently advised colleagues in the selection, organization, development and appropriate use of teaching and learning resources as shown in the MOV submitted

Frequently advised colleagues in the selection, organization, development and appropriate use of teaching and learning resources as shown in the MOV submitted

Occasionally advised colleagues in the selection, organization, development and appropriate use of teaching and learning resources as shown in the MOV submitted

Rarely advised colleagues in the selection, organization, development and appropriate use of teaching and learning resources as shown in the MOV submitted

No acceptable evidence was shown

Efficiency

Submitted at

Submitted 3

Submitted 2

Submitted 1

No

least 4 teaching and learning resources as evidenced by at least 1 of the acceptable MOV

teaching and learning resources as evidenced by at least 1 of the acceptable MOV

teaching and learning resources as evidenced by at least 1 of the acceptable MOV

teaching and learning resource as evidenced by any of the acceptable MOV

acceptable evidence was shown

Timeliness

Objectives 10. Worked collaboratively with colleagues to review the design, selection, organization and use of a range of effective diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements.

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. Any proof of collaborative review if the test is designed based on its purpose (e.g. diagnostic, formative and summative) 2. Any proof of collaborative review of the alignment of the test with the curriculum 2.1. formative test attached to a lesson plan 2.2. summative assessment with TOS 2.3. diagnostic test with its TOS 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

QET

Outstanding (5)

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1)

Quality

Consistently reviewed collaboratively assessment tools with colleagues as shown in the MOV submitted

Frequently reviewed collaboratively assessment tools with colleagues as shown in the MOV submitted

Occasionally reviewed collaborativel y assessment tools with colleagues as shown in the MOV submitted

Rarely reviewed collaboratively assessment tools with colleagues as shown in the MOV submitted

No acceptable evidence was shown

Efficiency

Submitted at least 4 assessment

Submitted 3 assessment tools as

Submitted 2 assessment tools as

Submitted 1 assessment tool as

No acceptable evidence

tools as evidently shown in any of the acceptable MOV

evidently shown in any of the acceptable MOV

evidently shown in any of the acceptable MOV

evidently shown in any of the acceptable MOV

was shown

Timeliness

Objectives 11. Interpreted collaboratively monitoring and evaluation strategies of attainment data to support learner progress and achievement.

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. Collaborative interpretation of the index of mastery obtained from 1 class 2. Collaborative interpretation of item analysis of quarterly examinations 3. Collaborative interpretation of results of performance assessment 4. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

QET Quality

Outstanding (5) Consistently collaborated with colleagues in the interpretation of assessment data as shown in the MOV submitted

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Frequently collaborated with colleagues in the interpretation of assessment data as shown in the MOV submitted

Occasionally collaborated with colleagues in the interpretation of assessment data as shown in the MOV submitted

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1) Rarely collaborated with colleagues in the interpretation of assessment data as shown in the MOV submitted

No acceptable evidence was shown

Efficiency

Submitted at least 2 different types of MOV

Submitted at least 3 of the same kind of MOV

Submitted at least 2 of the same kind of MOV

Outstanding (5)

Performance Indicators Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) (4)

Submitted any 1 of the MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown

Timeliness

Objectives 12. Applied skills in the effective communication of learner needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/guardians.

Means of Verification (MOV) 1. Sample agreement for learners at risk signed by parents and corresponding evidence of improvement 2. Record of dialogue and/or parentteacher conferences and corresponding evidence of improvement 3. Anecdotal record communicated to and signed by the learners and/or parents with corresponding evidence of improvement 4. Sample of learners’ test results signed by parents and corresponding evidence of improvement

QET Quality

Consistently applied skills in the effective communication of learner needs and progress to parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted

Frequently applied skills in the effective communicatio n of learner needs and progress to parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted

Occasionally applied skills in the effective communicatio n of learner needs and progress to parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted

Unsatisfactory Poor (2) (1) Rarely applied skills in the effective communication of learner needs and progress to parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV submitted

No acceptable evidence was shown

5. Sample of accomplished rubrics given for performance task and corresponding evidence of improvement 6. Attendance sheet/minutes of parent-teacher conference 7. Signed report cards of students at risk with corresponding evidence of improvement 8. Correspondence notebook/letters/proof of communication using other modalities (e.g. e-mail, SMS, etc.) and corresponding evidence of improvement 9. Learners’ performance record Others (Please specify and provide annotations

Efficiency

Timeliness

Submitted at least 3 of the acceptable MOV

Submitted any 3 MOV

Submitted any 2 MOV

Submitted any 1 MOV

No acceptable evidence was shown