Ipcrf 2018edited.docx

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE AND COMMITMENT FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I, II and III NAME OF EMPLOYEE: GERALD N. ROJAS POSITION: TEACHER III REVIEW PERIOD: SY. 2017-2018 DIVISION: COTABATO CITY

NAME OF RATER: MARIVEL B. PARIS POSITION: ASST PRINCIPAL DATE OF PHASE: APRIL 20, 2018

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

TO BE FILLED-IN DURING PLANNING MFO

KRA

OBJECTIVES

TIME LINE

WEIGH T/KRA QUALITY

K to 12 Basic EducationIm plemen tation

Page | 1

1. TeachingLearning Process (40)

A. From June 2017 to March 2018 developed daily lesson plans / learning logs and appropriate learning materials through some use of localization and contextualization (if applicable) to meet the needs of the learners

June 2017 to March 2018

10%

ACTUAL RESULT

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Prepared 260 or more lesson 5 plans with complete components, appropriate and adequate instructional materials as checked by MT’s/Tl/SH/Department Head Prepared 172 to 259 lesson plans with complete 4 components, appropriate and adequate instructional materials as checked by MT’s/Tl/SH/Department Head Prepared 150 to 171 lesson plans with complete 3 components, but without appropriate or adequate instructional materials as checked by the MT’s/HT/SH/Department Head

EFFICIENCY

TIMELINE Submitted DLL/DLP daily

Submitted DLL/DLP one day after

Submitted DLL/DLP two days after

Q

E

T

5

4

4

RA TIN G

SCOR E

4.33 0.43

B. Facilitated/Achieved learning through functional lesson plans/daily logs and innovative teaching strategies

June 2017 to March 2018

10%

Prepared 101 to 149 lesson 2 plans without complete components and appropriate instructional materials as checked by MT’s/HT/SH/Department Head Prepared 100 or less lesson 1 plans without instructional materials 5 85-90% of the students achieved above 75% final rating

4 80-84% of the students achieved above 75% final rating

3 75-79% of the students taught achieved above 75% final rating

2 70-74% of the students t achieved above 75% final rating

1 65-69% of the students taught achieved above 75% final rating C. Maintained diversity appreciation, safe, positive and motivating environment overall physical atmosphere, cleanliness and orderliness of classroom including proper waste disposal Page | 2

Every Quart er

10%

5 Maintained safe, orderly and clean classrooms and practiced proper waste segregation regularly(daily) for a conducive learning environment 4 Maintained safe, orderly but not regularly clean classrooms

Submitted DLL/DLP 3 days after

Submitted DLL/.DLP 4 days after Reported to class and facilitated learning within 95-100%of the number of school days Reported to class and facilitated learning within 90-94% of the number of school days Reported to class and facilitated learning within 85-89% of the number of school days Reported to class and facilitated learning within 80-84% of the number of school days Reported to class and facilitated learning within 75-79% of the number of school days

5

5

4

4.67 0.47

5

5

3

4.33 0.43

3

2

1

D. Monitored students’ daily attendance (accomplished SF 2) and submitted at the Office of the Principal at the end of the month

Daily Year round

10%

5

and seldom practiced proper waste segregation Maintained safe, orderly and clean classrooms and sometimes practiced proper waste segregation Maintained safe, orderly and clean classrooms butdid not practice proper waste segregation Did not maintain safe, orderly and clean classrooms and did not practice proper waste segregation Monitored attendance daily (SF 2 duly accomplished)

Submitted School form 2 on due date Submitted School form 2 a day after Submitted School form 2,2 days after Submitted School form 2, 3 days after Submitted School form 2, 4 days after

4 Monitored attendance regularly except for 1 instance in a week 3 Monitored attendance regularly except for 2 instances in a week 2 Monitored attendance except for 3 instances in a week

1 Failed to check attendance weekly 2. Students Outcomes (30%)

Page | 3

A. Monitored, evaluated and maintained students’ progress

Every Quart er

10%

5 Prepared and administered 4 summative tests (written or performance) with Table of Specifications (TOS)/Rubrics within the quarter

Written tests / performance test and TOS/Rubrics are aligned with the competencies and budget of work within the quarter

5

4

4

4.33 0.43

5

4

4

4.33 0.43

4 Prepared and administered 4 summative tests (written or performance) with Table of Specifications (TOS) but did not cover the rubrics within the quarter 3 Prepared and administered 4 summative tests (written or performance) but no Table of Specifications (TOS)

2 Did not prepare and administer 4 summative tests (written or performance)

1 Did not prepare and B. Issued Class Progress Report Card (F-138) to parent/guardian

Every Quart er

10%

administer 4 summative tests (written or performance) 5 Completed the entries with no error

4 Completed the entries with 1 error Distribution of Form 138 1stQtr 2ndQtr 3rdQtr 4thQtr -

Page | 4

3 Completed the entries with 2 errors

Written tests/ performance tests and TOS/Rubrics are aligned with the competencies and budget of work , but did not finish the quarter Written test / performance tests and TOS/Rubrics are not aligned with the competencies and only half in the budget of work completed for the given quarter Written tests/ performance tests and TOS/Rubrics are not all aligned and covered only a few of the competencies for the given quarter No written tests/performance tests were given Issued F-138 to parent/guardian on card day Issued F-138 to parent/guardian 1 day after card day Issued F-138 to parent/guardian 2 days after card day

5

4

4

4.67 0.47

(DO No. 23 s, 2016)

2 Completed the entries with 3

Issued F-138 to students/parents 3 days after card day Did not issue F-138 during the quarter

errors

1 Incomplete entries C. Conducted remediation/enrichment programs to improve performance

Every Quart er

10%

5 Conducted

4

3

2

1 Page | 5

remediation/enrichment programs to learners regularly with individual development program during off session for at least 30 minutes per session Conducted remediation/enrichment programs to learners at least thrice a week with individual development program during off session for at least 30 minutes per session Conducted remediation/enrichment programs to learners at least twice a week with individual development program during off session in at least 30 minutes per session Conducted remediation/enrichment programs to learnersat least once a week with individual development program during off session for at least 30 minutes per session Conducted remediation/enrichment

100% of the students under remedial classes have achieved 100-85% mastery level

85% of the students under remedial classes have achieved 85-100% mastery level

75% of the students under remedial classes have achieved 85-100% mastery level

60% of the students under remedial classes have achieved 85-100% mastery level

50% of the students under remedial classes

5

5

4

4.67 0.47

3. Community Involve ment (10)

A. Conducted Homeroom ParentsTeachers (PTA) Conference Quarterly

Every Quart er

5%

programs to learners at least once a week with no individual development program during off session for at least 30 minutes per session 5 Conducted 4 Homeroom PTA meetings

4 Conducted 3 Homeroom PTA meetings

3 Conducted 2 Homeroom PTA meetings

2 Conducted 1 Homeroom PTA meetings

1 Did not conduct Homeroom PTA meetings

B. Conduct/involved in schoolapproved activities to solicit stakeholders’ support Or Initiated communications advocacy plan (CAP) for stakeholders to gain support

5%

5 Conducted 5 school-wide advocacy program to promote school PPAs Prepared CAP approved and used by school to gain support

4 Conducted 4 school-wide advocacy program to promote school PPAs Prepared CAP approved and Page | 6

achieved 85-100% Mastery level

Conducted 4 5 HRPTA meetings on the prescribed date Conducted 3 HRPTA meetings on the prescribed date Conducted 2 HRPTA meetings on the prescribed date Conducted 1 HRPTA meetings on the prescribed date Did not conduct HRPTA meetings on the prescribed date 5

4

4

4.33 0.22

5

4

4.67 0.23

used by school to gain support

3 Conducted 3school-wide advocacy program to promote school PPAs. Prepared CAP approved and used by school to gain support 2 Conducted 2 school-wide advocacy program to promote school PPAs Prepared CAP approved and used by school to gain support 1 Conducted 1 school-wide advocacy program to promote school PPAs Prepared CAP approved and used by school to gain support 4. Professional Growth and Development (10)

A. Conducted/Implemented Classroom Action Research (CAR)

Once every school Year

2%

5 Conducted and completed CAR and adapted by other department/grade level 4 Conducted and completed CAR and implemented within the classroom 3 Conducted and completed CAR but not implemented 2 Submitted CAR proposal

SDO Cut -Off: March ____ 2018

1 No CAR proposal B. Received special awards/citation/recognition for exemplary performance

Page | 7

Every quart er

2%

5 Served as participant/trainer/coach and won first place in any competition OR received National Level commendation

Before the due date On the due date

One day after the due date Two days after the due No proposal submitted within the year

5

5

5

5

0.1

from DepEd or stakeholder

4 Served as participant trainer/coach and won 2nd place in any competition OR received regional Level commendation from DepEd or stakeholder 3 Served as participant/trainer/coach and won 3rd place in any competition OR received Division Level commendation from DepEd orstakeholder 2 Served as participant/trainer/coach and won 4th place in any competition or Received District Level commendation from DepEd or stakeholder 1 Served as participant/trainer/coach and won 5th place in any competition or received School Level commendation from the school head or stakeholder C. Attended relevant INSET/Seminar/Training for teachers

As neede d

2%

5

4

Page | 8

Attended at least 1International1 National level 3-days training or 2 Regional Level 3 day training or 3 Division 3 day training Attended 1 regional Level 3 day training or 2 Division Level 3 day

5

5

4

4.67 0.09

training Attended I Regional Level 3 day training or 3 Division Level 2-day training or 4 division level 1 day training Attended 2 Division Level 2-day training or 3 Division Level 1-day training Attended 1 division level 2-day training or 2 Division Level 1 -day training

3

2

1

D. Participated in / completed School-Based Learning Action Cell (LAC) sessions. (Sec. 17.5, DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016)

Every Friday of the week year round

2%

5 Participated in / completed all 4 3 2 1

E. Served as Demo Teacher/Speaker/Facilitator

Page | 9

As neede d

2%

Arrived in all LAC session on time With 1 instances of tardiness With 2 instances of tardiness With 3 instances of tardiness With 4 instances of tardiness

(monthly) LAC sessions With 1 instance of non participation With 2 instances of non participation With 3 instances of non participation With 4 instances of non participation

4

At least one (1) division level OR 5 school level 3-4 School level

3

2 school level

2

1 school level

1

No Demo teaching/speakership/ facilitatorship

5

5

5

4

4.67 0.09

5

4

4

4.33 0.09

5. PLUS FACTORAd ditional assignment related to instruction on top of job description (10)

A. Objectives are based on the add-ons/special assignments

As neede d

10%

5 Accomplished and submitted the needed reports with no revision with complete supporting documents 4 Accomplished and submitted the needed report with minor revisions 3 Accomplished and submitted the needed report with major revisions and incomplete supporting documents 2 Accomplished and submitted reports with general revision

(e.g. EBEIS work, Canteen work, SF work, Winnings, Teacher Awardee)

1 Accomplished but inadequate report and no supporting documents 100%

Accomplished 100% of the needed reports

Accomplished 90% of the needed reports

Submitted all documents I day before the due date Submitted on the due date

Accomplished 80% of the needed reports

Submitted 1 day after the due date

Accomplished 75% of the needed reports

Submitted 2 day after the due date Submitted 1 week after the due date

Accomplished 50% of the needed reports

5

4

4

4.33 0.43

4.48

100

Over-all Rating for Accomplishments *MFO – Major Final Output: increased access rate, increased retention rate/decreased -out rate and increased achievement rate ____________________________ Rater Date Signed : _________________

Approved by : _________________________

Page | 10

___________________________ Ratee Date Signed : _______________

VS

Page | 11

Page | 12

PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results

Rating

Adjectival Rating

%

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives Rater – Ratee Agreement The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee:

Name of Superior:

Signature:

Signature:

Date:

Date:

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS Strengths

Page | 13

Development Needs

Action Plan (Recommended Development Intervention)

Timeline

Resources Needed

Rater

Page | 14

Ratee

Approving Authority