Failure To Overturn Proposition 8

California Supreme Court has breached our United States Constitution for Failure to Overturn Proposition 8 California Supreme Court has breached our United States Constitution for failure to overturn Proposition 8. The State of California has committed an egregious infraction of our civil liberties to schedule a referendum to vote on the Civil Rights of a minority class (i.e. gays). The Civil Rights Acts of 1866, 1871 and/or 1964 have forbidden intimidation of any minority class of American citizen exercising his or her civil liberties. The political phrase ‘Will of the people” is a subterfuge to circumvent our rule of law. The Supreme Court has been imputed the incumbent duty to decree our civil liberties as being peremptory shield away from debate. The State of California et al. may schedule referendums for the people to vote on any public business within certain legal boundaries. When those legal boundaries have transgressed across civil liberties lines, then the California Supreme Court is obligated by our rule of law to apply 18 U.S.C.A. § 241, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985(3), and 1988]). The legal term ‘color’ or color of office denotes the meaning that a police officer etc. may act with pretext under of authority to cite Proposition 8 as legal grounds to arrest homosexual couples for getting married illegally. Visit the website of our United States Department of Justice (USDOJ) Civil Rights Division (CRD). The CRD has

listed the Civil Rights Acts of 1957, 1960 and 1964. Does this suggest that the CRD isn’t responsible for enforcing the Civil Rights Act of 1866 or 1871? The irony is that Federal or State Courts require Plaintiffs to file their Civil Rights complaints under Title 42 Chapter 21 which is a codification of the Civil Rights Act of 1871. The CRD has acted under color of office to steer minority Plaintiffs of Title 42 Chapter 21 to the bar association. Private Civil Rights law firms have capitalized to scalp legal fees to prosecute Civil Rights complaints. Congress has already earmarked legal fees for the CRD to hire attorneys to prosecute Civil Rights complaints free of charge as criminal offenses. Civil Rights lawyers have jacked up or gouged the prices of their legal fees and charged plaintiff to prosecute their Civil Rights complaints that the CRD has steered traffic in their direction. It’s a get rich scheme for lawyers. California State lawmakers have committed a crime by scheduling a referendum to vote on same-sex marriages. Discrimination is against the law. Our 14th Amendment has warranted equal protection under the law. The California Supreme Court has upheld Proposition 8. The law will steer literally thousands of gay couples to hire private Civil Rights lawyers. The CRD under color of office will withhold its lawful authority to estop the injustice. Gay couples will be forced to live in a constant state of fear. Stanley Green 1978 Goodhaven Dr. Memphis, TN 38116

(901) 653-6243