Dreamis Introduction March 2009

Dreamis Disaster Recovery and Mitigation Information System www.dreamis.info Mar 2009

Content Overview of Dreamis Year 1 Achievements Past & Potential uses of Dreamis

Content Overview of Dreamis Year 1 Achievements Past & Potential uses of Dreamis

Dreamis is an information system that supports post-crisis recovery and disaster risk reduction financial management Dreamis uses..

..in order to increase…

…by supporting.. • improved planning

• Data from past reconstruction programmes

• Transparency • Accountability and

• Data from past DRR activities • Effectiveness • Data from on-going reconstruction programmes

…In the use of funds…

• improved policymaking • and improved management of funds

..for better financial management of • Post-crisis reconstruction and • Disaster Risk Reduction planning

Dreamis is a repository of information related to financial management of post-crisis reconstruction and disaster risk reduction Users • Gov Agencies • Dev Agencies Input Info from complementary information systems Methodologies Data & info of past disasters

• Academic institutions Objective DREAMIS Global hub for sharing knowledge on pre- disaster and post-crisis financial information

Managed by Dreamis Team, WB Jakarta Supported by GFDRR

•Improved financial planning and policy • Increased transparency and accountability

Dreamis is made up of three components What is this? •Info from past disasters

1 Data Tools

•Data sets relating to predisaster and disaster recovery financing •Presented in a public database, parameters can be set by user

2

3

Research Packages

Expenditure Tracking Support

•Lessons Learned and Methodologies •Related to recon and risk reduction financial management •Support in tracking pre-disaster and post-disaster expenditures

How does it help? •Allows analysis and comparison of situation against past scenarios •Facilitates resource mobilization •Supports policy development

•Provides information for conducting Damage & Loss and Needs Assessments •Increases transparency and accountability in the use of funds •Improves aid coordination

Content Overview of Dreamis Year 1 Achievements Past & Potential uses of Dreamis

The team and the database are established and operational • Core team hired

Operations

• Mitigation expert hired & initial research conducted

• Presentation at IDRC, Davos Aug 08 Using Data to Improve Reconstruction

Coms & Partnership

• Publication: Aceh Reconstruction Tracking Aug 08 • Advisory group convened and operational • Working relationship established with key partners • D&L data gathered and inputted

System

• Needs & Expenditure data collated • Database prototype running

Dreamis has been connected to related activities in the sector through its Advisory Group

Agency

Expert

Location

CRED / Em-Dat

Deberati Guha Sapir

Brussels

ProVention Consortium

Margaret Arnold

Geneva

UNISDR

Craig Duncan

Geneva

ECLAC

Roberto Jovel

LAC / DC

FTS / UNOCHA

Esther Kuisch

Geneva

Munich Re

Angelika Wirtz

Munich

Government

Suprayoga Hadi

Indonesia

The website is operational and the number of hits is increasing

Homepage •Database access •Research Package access •News feed •Links to partner sites

The database prototype is operational

Database user interface Analysis by; •Country •Disaster type •Sector Generates Excel files and graphs

Content Overview of Dreamis Year 1 Achievements Past & Potential uses of Dreamis

In post-tsunami Aceh the aid tracking exercise increased the transparency, accountability and effectiveness of the use of funds Analysis of expenditures was done by;

Source of funds

Sectoral allocations

Needs & Gaps

• Donors and government were able to track expenditures by donors, NGOs and government

• Donors and government were able to see in who was disbursing in each sector

• Under funded sectors where tracked throughout the reconstruction programme

The reconstruction programme in Palestine is an example of a potential use for Dreamis Expenditure Tracking Support occupied Palestinian territory 2009 Table B: Total Humanitarian Assistance per Donor (Appeal plus other*)(carry over not included) as of 15-March-2009 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts (Table ref: R24)

Overview of current pledges

Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations. Donor

United States

Funding USD

% of Grand Total

Uncommitted pledges USD

Private (individuals & organisations) United States

44,700,000

13.1 %

800,000

Private (individuals & organisations)

36,723,656

10.8 %

0

Kuwait

34,000,000

10.0 %

0

33,764,726

9.9 %

0

Kuwait Carry-over (donors not specified) Qatar

Carry-over (donors not specified)

United Kingdom

Qatar

29,600,000

8.7 %

0

Netherlands

24,756,688

7.3 %

15,282,437

Saudi Arabia

Spain

16,882,088

4.9 %

16,473,200

Spain

Japan

11,865,233

3.5 %

0

Japan

Saudi Arabia

11,022,762

3.2 %

0

9,445,084

2.8 %

0

8,590,750

2.5 %

0

8,034,331

2.4 %

0

7,405,842

2.2 %

494,998

United Kingdom

France Norway

Norway Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF)

Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF)

Switzerland

Switzerland

Finland

7,155,064

2.1 %

0

Australia

7,106,142

2.1 %

0

Australia

France

6,883,354

2.0 %

0

Denmark

Germany

5,470,784

1.6 %

0

4,892,419

1.4 %

75,984,632

4,789,067

1.4 %

0

4,055,287

1.2 %

0

Germany Finland

European Commission (ECHO) Italy Netherlands Austria Canada Russian Federation United Arab Emirates Sweden Others

Grand Total:

Denmark

European Commis sion (ECHO) Italy

3,674,541

1.1 %

0

Austria

3,281,379

1.0 %

0

Canada

2,660,000

0.8 %

0

Russian Federation

2,452,480

0.7 %

0

United Arab Emirates

2,393,735

0.7 %

0

9,680,234

2.8 %

2,524,934

Sweden 0M

341,285,646

10M

20M

30M

40M

100 %

50M

Value USD

Tracked by; •Source type •Pledge, commitment, disbursement •Sector •Needs/gaps Can be tracked on a monthly, bimonthly or quarterly basis

111,560,201

60M

70M

80M

90M

Top 15 donors represent almost 90% of currently pledged funds*

*Source: OCHA FTS March 15 2009