The Stimulus Law & Health Care

The Stimulus Law and President Barack Obama's health care bill One defining legacy of the Barack Obama Presidency pertains to the end result of how his stimulus law would impact the outcome of the U.S. economy. His new economic stimulus law is still controversial, hated, and loved by those in the world over. The need to build up our financial system is apparently a necessity when record unemployment plagues America. Some state have unemployment rates as high as 10%. In America, some believe that the unemployment nationwide is 9.8 percent, yet government reporting agencies believe it’s underreported

and the real number is like 17 percent as of September 2009 (according to Paul Craig Roberts). Now, Obama's stimulus law gave money to big banks in order for them to loan them to the American people. It also gave money to numerous infrastructure projects. The goal of it was to create short term and long term economic growth including job creation. Its results now have been mixed. Some economic growth have occurred in some areas and in other areas, that growth is non-existent. The problem now is that common sense measures aren't done additionally to recover the economy rapidly. There is still a huge amount of government debt in the world. Economic systems are too centralized into a few hands. A recent analysis of the 2007 financial markets of 48 countries has revealed that the world’s finances (in the majority) are in the hands of just a few mutual funds, banks, and corporations. This is the first clear picture of the global concentration of financial power, and point out the worldwide financial system’s vulnerability as it stood on the brink of the current economic crisis. A pair of physicists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich found this out in their research. There is a billion dollar program to build a mega-embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan that could rival the one in Baghdad, Iraq. Unemployment benefits are extended for many more months. If they are exhausted more than a million people will be in unemployment rolls by the end of 2009 and the beginning of 2010. There are homeless tent cities nationwide. There are hundreds of billions of dollars (in about $636 billion appropriated for wars of aggression) spent on defense spending bill. It's hard to pay for this when the Federal Reserve can't print any more money to keep the government moving without raising inflation and interest rates. Obama’s two top economic advisors, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and director of the National Economic Council Larry Summers, are floating the prospect of a middle class tax increase. Ironically, Geithner and Summers take their cues from the international bankers. One example is how

an Associated Press report exposed about how CFR member & Trilateralist Timothy Geithner spoke to a group of powerful Wall Street bankers during the Barack Obama

administration (and via a FOIA request, Geithner and the Treasury Department are linked with Citigroup Inc., JP Morgan Chase and Co., and Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.). Goldman Sachs supports the bailout and the cap and trade scam (in . Daniel Tencer accuses Goldman Sachs of playing a role in market bubbles from the Great Depression in 1929 onward. Geithner also sits on the board of the Bank for International Settlements, the mega-globalist outfit that enjoys immunity from virtually all regulation, scrutiny and accountability. Summers was once apart of the Clinton administration.

*It’s been found by disclosure forms according to Bloomberg showing the Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s closest aided received millions of dollars from Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Citigroup Inc., and other Wall Street firms. One aide is named Gene Sperling. Sperling (during last year) took $887,727 from Goldman Sachs and $158,000 for speeches mostly to financial companies, including the firm run by accused Ponzi scheme mastermind R. Allen Stanford. Bloomberg reported that another aide named Lee Sachs reported on more than 3 million dollars in salary plus partnership income from Mariner Investment Group. The Mariner Investment Group is a New York hedge fund. Sperling is apart of the Council on Foreign Relations. He’s an economic advisor to Hillary Clinton. He was tutored by Larry Summers and Robert Rubin (Sperling once worked in the Clinton administration as the President’s National Economic Adviser and Director of the National Economic Council). Lee Sachs was on the board of Bear Stearns. He is the right hand man of Geithner of handling the financial crisis. Sperling and Sachs have influenced in the economic plans of the nation, but they haven’t faced public scrutiny by Congress or testified to Congress to discuss or defend the Treasury’s policies. Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Chase, Brown Brothers, etc. are international banks purchasing bills, bonds, and noted from the Treasury directly. Goldman Sachs is getting billions of dollars from the AIG bailout. Goldman Sachs is a key ally of the Federal Reserve as well (Goldman Sachs’ agents or ex-members support the cap and trade policy via the CFTC. CFTC stands for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. ExGoldman Sachs member Gary Gensler is the current chairman of the CFTC). Cap and trade is about using taxes to prevent greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, while it can be exploited for people to pollute in exchange to pay corporate consortiums money (which handles the carbon credits in the first place). One inventor of cap and trade now disagrees with this policy. Now, billions of dollars in the TARP system are sent into large banks as well trillions of dollars that have been added to the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet have been funneled into the stock market. This has lead to more financial concentration. Also, foreign corporate elites and their banks are stealing our wealth in America as well.

As many realize, the economic crisis developed by many events spanning decades before Barack Obama was elected President. The Glass Steagall Act was passed by Franklin Roosevelt in 1933. This Act provided standards for Chartered Banks in the form of prohibiting them from Speculating with Depositor Money. Much of the bubble that was imploded in 1929 was a result of the then equivalent to

Derivatives, "Options". Prior to this law, Banks that took Deposits were allowed to speculate with other peoples money. The result of this Act passing and being signed into law was the forced splitting of Mega-Banks (or Commercial Banks that were merged with Investment Houses) to isolate the "Option" crisis to Investment Houses and free the Commercial Banks of these debt burdens so they could continue to function. One notable result was the splitting of JP Morgan Bank into JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley. In 1999, the Glass Steagal Act was repealed. This and the risk taking of many businesses (along with unnecessary spending, risky loans, etc.) caused the economic depression in late 2007. There was the 1.5 quadrillion dollar bubble of derivatives and the meltdown. Some want to end the Federal Reserve because of its bad policies of overprinting of the dollars and draconian power over the U.S. economy. The FED issues private credit and bypassing

Congressional appropriations. Many bankers from the military industrial complex are responsible for the financial mess we're in (including these people looting money from America). Economic solutions ought to exist. We need to have fiscal discipline, cut unnecessary spending (like in the war on terror), save our money, create a tax value system where companies who maintain our jobs here in America are to be rewarded, have fair trade (i.e. Free trade in the form of mercantilism doesn't work), promote alternative energy, assist people suffering real foreclosures plus extreme economic complications, and invest our money in America. We should not create policies that make multinational corporations control our government. The people should control the government not corporations. A key means of economic improvement is building our infrastructure since that will create jobs that stay here in America (even Lincoln did that back in the 1860's and Lincoln's Greenbacks have caused an economic boom. Lincoln started the International railway during the late 1800’s). Even President George Washington issued infrastructure projects. Real national infrastructure development (including having technological advancement) that is done in an efficient way improves the economy. One example proving this is that without power plants, factories or farms won’t be developed greatly, without bridges and transportation, you can’t transport goods. These infrastructure components are what consumers want in America plus globally. I don't agree with Tarpley on every issue, but he is 100% right on that point. Article 1, Section 8 blatantly supports the federal government to fund our infrastructure in these following words: “…The Congress shall have power To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; To borrow money on the credit of the United States; To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes; To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States; To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures; To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States; To establish post offices and post roads; To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries; To constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court; To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;

To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water; To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years; To provide and maintain a navy; To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces; To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions; To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress; To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;—And To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof…”

So, there is no doubt that the government ought to promote the

General Welfare in our nation. That some in the Austrian school of Economics refuse to talk about or omit. See, I am starting to see that extreme policies of Communism/Socialism and Fascism or laissez faire, monopolistic capitalism don’t work. These 2 extremes historically have been funded by the same globalists [in the Vatican/Jesuit network, the Pilgrims, high level Masons, the Black Nobility

bloodlines, Bilderbergers, etc.] in order to contain wealth into a group of a few centralized hands in order to establish a feudal like-system. Carroll Quigley admits that the international banking elite desired this goal in his “Tragedy and Hope” book. Disinformation agents love to say it’s only about Communism or it’s about the Capitalists when it’s bigger than that. These agents on the “left” side of the coin support the United Nations when the U.N. was created by the CFR plus other globalists (The United Nations has been caught being involved in population control, sex scandals, and other crimes). The neo con side of the coin agrees with war on terror when the CIA

facilitated the Muslim radicals (like al-Qeada) for decades as a means to limit freedoms in America while creating immoral wars overseas. Therefore, I don’t trust Communists or cartel-capitalists (whose policies can cause more poverty, less building of infrastructure from hospitals to schools, and the constriction of wealth into a limited group of people). The rabbit hole gets deeper since one of the Austrian school of Economics’ greatest proponents Ron Paul supported an international currency back in March of 2001:

nothing to fear from globalism, free trade and a single worldwide currency.... The effort in recent decades to unify government surveillance over all world trade and international financial transactions through the UN, IMF, World Bank, WTO, ICC, the OECD, and the Bank of International Settlements can never substitute for a peaceful world based on true free trade, freedom of movement, a single but sound market currency, and voluntary contracts with private property rights.... The ultimate solution will only come with the rejection of fiat money worldwide, and a restoration of commodity money. Commodity money if voluntarily and universally accepted could give us a single world currency requiring no money managers, no manipulators orchestrating a man-made business cycle with rampant price inflation.” (Congressional Record, 13 March 2001) “…“There’s

I didn’t knew that about Paul until recently. Ron Paul probably does oppose a global currency today in 2009 to be fair. Ron Paul is correct to point out that we should promote individual liberty, ban torture, never have a draft, believe in gun rights, and we should acquire a more tolerant foreign policy. Barbara Aho (even though I don’t agree with her Jewish baiting hateful rhetoric. She supports the 33rd Degree Freemason Henry Ford, who received an award from Nazis. Also, the Ford Foundation funds Communists, monopolist capitalists, and others for decades. Barbara doesn’t expose that information. Aho is right that many Jewish bankers [like Warburg, Lehman, Rothschild, etc.] have done evil, but evil is among many people not just one ethnic group. Also, Aho omits the Pilgrim Society, the Vatican, the Constantinian Order, etc. which have more power than the Zionism. Zionism isn‘t monolithic since some Zionists are peaceful and others are not. Aho is right to expose the CNP/Vatican-infiltrated Dominionists though) accurately pointed out that the Austrian School of Ludwig von Mises, is allied with

co-conspirator with Count Coudenhove-Kalergi who, with Archduke Otto von Hapsburg, established the Pan European Union with funding from the Rothschild and Warburg banking elite. So, the elite fund this movement of cartel capitalism. “Commodity money” refers to gold and silver coinage which was used before fiat currency. The intentionally depletion of the value of the dollar has caused some to propose a global currency system. The corporate elite is using their resources to try to control national sovereignties of every nation on Earth. Huw

Jones from Reuters on October 16, 2009 wrote about how the FSA desired a global body with legal powers to enforce the world’s new financial rules. The FSA stands for the Financial Services Authority. Verena Ross is the FSA’s new director of international affairs. Verena said that the Financial Stability Board or the FSB was key to ensuring all gaps in

regulation between securities, insurance and banking sectors were plugged. The FSB was expanded in April to include central bankers and finance ministry plus regulatory officials from all G20 (or Group of 20 countries). A new economic body that’s global has been called more and more rapidly in the past 2 years.

*Ironically, many Third World nations trying to use independent industrialization projects are called "terrorists" by the establishment. In my opinion, a multifaceted approach in terms of economic solutions (not giving billions or trillions of dollars to AIG, Goldman Sachs, etc. that President Barack Obama is doing) is the only way to make our economic situation better than it is now. We should build our economy from the ground up (and from the top bottom) since top down economic growth alone can only do so far. Efficient, legitimate government existing along with real private enterprise existing in a nation have made economic improvement a reality for thousands of years in human history. Health care is a vital part of our society at large. Certainly, most people understand that our present American health care system is in dire need of reform. Some of our system is great in surgeries, etc. Yet, there are also high premium costs, services are being cut nationwide, and millions of Americans lack health care insurance or coverage. They lack it for a myriad of reasons from choosing not to have it, some can't afford it, young people are not having it, and other reasons. Barack Obama's health bill is made up of many parts. There is a federally funded insurance program that would compete with a privately run insurance plan. There is a co-op insurance program that can get seed money from the government (not necessarily controlled by all of the government). His plan isn't a government run health care plan per se. It is a combination of private and possible public options. These were once the 2 public options. Barack Obama says that if you have your own insurance, nothing will happen to it. There is the cost issue. Health care costs are increasing. There is a need to pay for the plan which can cost almost 1 trillion dollars. Obama wants a surtax to pay for it in

the top 1.25% earners, possibly tax insurers, use incentives for employers, or penalties for those aren't in a plan. There are some good parts of the bill and some bad parts. Typically, the bad parts of this bill are hidden or not overtly mentioned by the White House for obvious reasons. The cost of it as high as almost $1 trillion in 10 years. Now, Barack Obama wants a cop op not a huge private option at all (if he doesn‘t get his way). Democrats threaten to vote against the bill if the private option is nonexistent in the health care bill. This bill is called H.R. 3200 or "America's Affordable Health Choices Act." It will have at least 53 new federal bureaucracies. These boards are headed by bureaucrats which will control a great deal of our health care system. Some of this bureaucracies include Health Benefits Advisory Committee (Section 123, pg. 30), Health Choices Administration (Section 141 pg. 41), Public Health Workforce Corps (Section 2231, p. 898), etc. Are all of these 53 boards and commissions necessary in real health reform when you can simplify solutions dealing with the health care crisis? The answer is no. There is the abortion issue. Some believe that the health care will fund abortions and others disagree with this view. Senator Arlen Specter believes that there are 2 options in this bill. One is that people don't have to pay for abortions and another option is where people can pay for abortion in the health care bill. So, Specter says that people aren't forced to pay for abortions, but abortion funding is in the health care reform bill. Jill Stanek wrote an article that Planned Parenthood his sending a flyer (on Craigslist) saying that they want "reproductive choice" (which is a known code word for abortion) funding in health care reform bill. Baucus claims that his new bill bans abortion funding, but some Pro-lifers disagree with him. Even Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus (DMontana) received millions of dollars in his career from the insurance industry. He proposed a $3,800 fine on Americans who fail to purchase health insurance. Some Democrats accuse Baucus' health care proposal a taxing middle class Americans in extremely high levels. So, the insurance industry will benefit if the health bill as it is will pass. The controversy of abortion and the health care bill continues. The Supreme Court consistently ruled that the Congress have no authority to legislate medical practice or have direct medical practice within the states of the Union.

In Linder v. United States, 268 U.S. 5, 18, 45 S. Ct. 446 (1925), The court ruled: "Obviously, direct control of medical practice in the of states is beyond the power the federal government." In U.S. v. Anthony, 15 Supp. 553, 555, (S.D. Ca., 1936) and U.S. v. Evers, 453 F. Supp. 1141, 1150 (M.D. Ala., 1978), the court ruled: "...The direct control of medical practice has been left to the states." And, in Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton Railroad Co., above, the United States Supreme Court said, "These matters obviously lie outside the orbit of congressional power.” Parts of health care reform are even found in the stimulus bill that was passed by President Barack Obama (which is called the American Investment and Recovery Act of 2009). This has been admitted by Dr. Dave Janda. Section 9201 of the Stimulus describes the creation of the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research or a Federal Council dealing with medical costs plus research. This council is already exiting with 15 members. Critics believe that this panel is similar to the rationing British National Health Care Board. It is true that this federal council will handle a large portion of our health care by bureaucrats today. According to former New York Lieutenant Governor and Health Policy Analyst Dr. Betsy McCaughey, the Federal Council will set a cost effectiveness standard for treatment. So, the health care panel was created by the Stimulus law or H.R. 1. The Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (or an unelected bureaucracy trying to make decisions on health care issues) was a brainchild of Tom Daschle. Daschle said that Americans must act more like Europeans in accepting a "hopeless diagnoses." His 2008 book was called "Critical: What We Can Do about the Health Care Crisis." One member of this council is Dr. Ezekiel J. Emanuel, MD, PhD. Ezekiel has said controversial statements about medicine and health care.

Ezekiel Emmanuel is a communitarian (which is a combination of communism and fascism). He is a fellow at the Rockefeller-influenced nonprofit bioethics research Institute of the Hastings Center. Emanuel appeared to support rationing health care for disabled Americans. Bradley Mattes is the director of Life Issues Institute. Theodore Dobzhansky, the founding director of the Hastings Center, was chairman of the American Eugenics Society. Daniel Callahan, founder of the organization, was a director of the Eugenics Society. So, the authors of Obamacare have ties to eugenicists or pro-eugenic people. Of course, Barack Obama doesn’t support eugenics. Peter Orszag, currently the White House Budget Director, sent his deputy Philip Ellis to Hastings last May to assure the Center that “comparative effectiveness” would be the criterion for an Obama Administration’s attack on respect for human life. Comparative effectiveness is judging who gets medical care on the basis of age and other factors. Obama’s Regulatory Czar Cass Sunstein believes that human life varies in value, which is a key definition of eugenics. (In 2003, he wrote these views in a paper for the AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies ). Mattes said that Emanuel is quoted back in 1996 that saying medical benefits of a government-controlled healthcare plan would not be given to “individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens.” Emanuel clarified his stance by adding, “An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia.”

“Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious [offensive] discrimination," Emanuel wrote. This is shocking. Mattes wrote an email to Lifenews.com that this allocation refers to healthcare services. Some of these

services were critical to sustaining life or at the very least, a better quality of life. These services are about everything from life saving bypass surgery to joint replacements. Emanuel reject the Hippocratic Oath's part of trying to help the patient regardless of cost. "Yes, that's what patients want their doctors to do. But Emanuel wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their patients and consider social justice, such as whether the money could be better spent on somebody else," McCaughey says in an editorial. "Many doctors are horrified by this notion; they'll tell you that a doctor's job is to achieve social justice one patient at a time." Ezekiel Emmanuel and other pro-eugenicists authored Section 1233 in the House version of the health care bill (That has been Senate pulled the end of care counseling sessions in the book). One author was Oregon Congressman Earl Blumenauer (Oregon legalizes assisted suicide). Blumenauer supports assisted suicide before the Supreme Court in the 2005 case of Gonzalez vs. Oregon. Bluemenaeur's website is linked to the 1960's Harper's magazine article that supports voluntary and involuntary euthanasia. The group called Compassion and Choices (which was called the Hemlock Society) had a hand in forming Section 1233 (It wrote that it wants to require Medicare to cover patient consultation with doctors about end of life choices every 5 years in the House bill. Even when the Section 1322 is voluntarily, Compassion and Choices want it to be bigger than that). Barbara Lee is the President of Compassion and Choices and she explicitly says that: "...We dream of a time when all American can live and die as free people, in dignity and according to their own values..." So, shady characters are behind this health care reform bill. Section 1233 isn't equivalent to euthanasia, but its authors embrace some form of euthanasia (and that section deals with end of life discussions). That's a fact.

In the UK, doctors have accused the National Health Service of using patients with terminal illnesses being made to die prematurely. This is done under a new policy of the

NHS. The Daily Telegraph received a letter from a group of experts saying that some patients have been wrongly judged as close to death. NHS guidance in England help doctors and medical staff to kill dying patients by having fluids and drugs withdrawn. Many are put on continuous sedation until they pass away. The doctors oppose this policy since it could falsely call a patient as near death and mask about their condition improving. The scheme, called the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP), was designed to reduce patient suffering in their final hours. The warning comes just a week after a report by the Patients Association estimated that up to one million patients had received poor or cruel care on the NHS. The scheme, called the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP), was designed to reduce patient suffering in their final hours. This program is still going on. The LCP are investing £286 million over the two years to 2011 to support implementation of the End of Life Care Strategy.

Here are some other portions of this proposed bill: -Section 163 of the bill in Congress allows the government real-time access to a person's bank records, including direct access to a person's bank records, including direct access to bank accounts for electronic fund transactions. “Even-though the bill mentions privacy aspects, the fact remains that if approved, Obama’s health care plan will allow government access at any time to your personal bank records,” KFYI News reports. That part of the bill sounds Orwellian according to Arizona Congressman John Shadegg. This is nothing new since the government have created a huge global database have been done for years by the CIA, the NSA, etc. The Constitution says in the 4th Amendment says that the government can't search you without a warrant or probable cause. This Section wants the government to snoop under the cover of health care. -The health care bill will allow Congressional members to be exempt.

-On page 15, Section 101 of the bill says that "All private healthcare plans must conform to government rules to participate in a Healthcare Exchange." -Under the “Creating Healthier Communities” provision of the bill (found on page 382), grants could be awarded to only three types of "entities:" state governments, local governments and groups that are members of a “national network of community-based organizations." Dodd could not rule out that the controversial group ACORN could benefit from this provision in his bill. In other words, ACORN could be funded grants in the health care bill when people especially the uninsured should readily benefit from health care reform. -The bill allows for home visits in certain circumstances. The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee’s official summary of the bill says: “Authorizes a demonstration program to improve immunization coverage. Under this program, CDC will provide grants to states to improve immunization coverage of children, adolescents, and adults through the use of evidence-based interventions. States may use funds to implement interventions that are recommended by the Community Preventive Services Task Force, such as reminders or recalls for patients or providers, or home visits.” Chuck Norris says that: “It’s outlined in sections 440 and 1904 of the House bill (Page 838), under the heading “home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children.” The programs (provided via grants to states) would educate parents on child behavior and parenting skills. The bill says that the government agents, “well-trained and competent staff,” would “provide parents with knowledge of age-appropriate child development in cognitive, language, social, emotional, and motor domains … modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices,” and “skills to interact with their child to enhance age-appropriate development.” The government has no right to authorize even voluntarily home visits under the guise of "health care" at all. “One government rebuttal is that this program would be “voluntary.” Is that right?,” asks Norris. “Does that imply that this agency would just sit back passively until some parent needing parenting skills said, “I don’t think I’ll call my parents, priest or friends or read a plethora of books, but I’ll go down to the local government offices”? To the contrary, the bill points to specific targeted groups and problems, on Page 840: The state “shall identify and prioritize serving communities that are in high need of such services, especially communities with a high proportion of low-income families.” So, if you are on the health care system, you can have home visits. There DNC attack ad calls those who oppose latest round of legislative agenda “angry mobs” and “extremists.” The President is calling on people to forward emails to the White House that are critical of his policies. “Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to [email protected].” The big picture is that some in the White and Congress are trying to intimidate people who disagree with Obamacare. The fact is that we have the First Amendment right to protest, address our grievances, and disagree with any policy in a respectful manner. The Founding Fathers and others during the colonial days did a lot more than simply yelling at politicians about an issue. They threw tea in the water, used self defense with arms, and petition the King about their oppression by the British Empire. So, we should be respectful to people (I don't agree with some of the protesters assaulting people though. Yet, the Founding Fathers yelled at the

top of their lungs about independence much more than we are today. We rarely defend us liberty in America as compared even decades ago regardless of what some in MSNBC or other media people proclaim), but never be intimidated from succinctly speaking out on disagreements with composition of the proposed health care reform bill at all. The SEIU union thugs have assaulted people in St. Louis, Missouri. Even a black man was assaulted and called racial slurs for just disagreeing with Barack Obama on health care. The mainstream media (with agents like Keith Olbermann and HBO's Bill Maher) exploit also protesters who made mistakes in calling Obamacare equivalent to Nazism as an excuse to demonize any dissent with the health care plan. One example is how Barney Frank yelled at a woman calling her insane for using the word Nazi around. It’s too bad the woman confronting Frank didn’t quote Obama himself, who suggested a woman with heart disease “should take a painkiller” instead of getting a pacemaker. The women should of quoted the pro-eugenic architects of the health care bill. People don't buy propaganda. People who reject the Republican/Democrat paradigm have outlined legitimate criticism against Obamacare via protests, etc. Congress wants this bill passed when many of them haven't even read the whole bill. So, we will expose bad parts of Obamacare, the open borders agenda, the North American integration plans, the evils of abortion, and the anti-gun bills in Congress. So, there are many protestors of the

health care plans of President Barack Obama. Some of them are talking to Congress people in town hall meetings. Typically, the Democratic establishment are collectively demonizing them as rabid extremists. Senator Barbara Boxer called the protesters at Town Hall meetings as trying to hurt the President. House Majority leader Nancy Pelosi called them carrying swastikas and symbols like that to a town meeting on healthcare.” That's a lie of course since legitimate criticism is never equated to bigotry at all. Recently, Rainbow Girls member and Republican Olympia Snowe voted for the bill in a 14-9 vote in the Senate Finance Committee. The Rainbow Girls a Masonic female group. For adults, the Eastern Star is the Masonic group for females. She is from Maine and is apart of the Council on Foreign Relations. A lot of Congressmen and Congresswomen are apart of the CFR as well.

There is a new book that profiles the victims of rationing in government run health care system. This book is called "Shattered Lives: 100 Victims of Government Health Care." It tells the personal stories of 100 victims. The author of this book is called Amy Ridenour and Ryan Balis. Amry Ridenour is the President of National Center for Public Policy Research and Ryan Balis is a National Center policy analyst. The victims of these events hail from Great Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, and other nations. They have all struggled to get government health services. Sometimes they have died stuck on long government waiting lists. "Some 16 years after Washington last attempted to nationalize health care, some politicians in Washington are at it again," co-author Amy Ridenour said in a statement LifeNews.com received. "But if Americans choose to adopt a public health care system, as the stories in this book attest, they will soon regret the decision." Shattered Lives is a book that have frustrated citizens fed up with having their surgeries constantly being canceled, medicines denies, and patients herded like animals onto gigantic government waiting lists. One story shows how Barbara Moss was withheld powerful anticancer drugs in the Britain's government managed NHS or the National Health Service. Dunil Almeida was 42 as he suffered from colon cancer. The British NHS refused to test him for cancer for almost 2 years. When doctors in Sri Lanka told him that he cancer, it was too late. He died. Most people want health care reform, but not a public option that can limit treatment or deny coverage toward people at all. Ridenour added, "...Washington should be promoting a transparent and competitive market for health care, freeing Americans at the individual level to choose the insurance and medical services most appropriate for themselves and their families..." This book proves that the government shouldn’t control every aspect of our lives at all. The government has a role in society, but its role should never be an overbearing figure that restricts individual liberty at all. Barack Obama says that his plan will not add one dime to our deficits, but he's adding trillions of dollars to the deficit to fund wars. Cutting war spending to fund our domestic priorities like education and health care could be one solution (out of many like banning poisons like flouride in our water & food supplies, getting toxins out of all substances we utilized in our bodies period, don't fine people who can't or don't want to have health insurance, allow people to achieve health care across state lines, have people voluntarily get whatever health care they desire, increase funds to construct hospitals plus medical facilities nationwide, make insurance companies accountable so they won't perform injustices, the promotion of exercise plus real natural foods, etc.) to solve our health care crisis.

The health care bill was passed by the House. People are taking about the Stupak/Pitts amendment. The House approved the Stupak–Pitts amendment on November 7, 2009, by a vote of 240–194. The measure appears to contain strong conscience protection regarding abortion for medical professionals; however, "Section 304(d) protects abortion practitioners from “discrimination” by pro-life insurance plans who want to participate in the exchange, but do not want to contract with abortionists," says Americans United for Life. The bill HR 3926 has end of life concerns. It has these end of life panels. There is Medicare reimbursement for optional end of life planning consultation. States like Washington and Oregon (possibly Montana soon) have legal assisted suicide. The Senate is known for rejecting pro-life amendments in the health care bill. The legal process isn't over. The bill vote must go into the Senate and then both houses of Congress will make a bill that both must vote on it again. The Senate Finance Committee voted 14-9 last month to send a proabortion health care reform bill to the Senate floor. The Baucus bill, named for the chairman of the panel who is its main sponsor, would fund abortions with massive subsidies. Lawmakers voted mostly along party lines with pro-abortion Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine joining the committee's pro-abortion Democrats to pass the bill. After rejecting pro-life amendments that would have ensured the Baucus health care bill does not fund abortions and to protect the conscience rights of medical professionals, pro-life groups urged opposition to the bill. Steve Lefemine from Columbia Christians for Life believe that the Stupak amendment doesn't stop abortion funding totally. He made an interesting view on this issue. He writes that the Hyde Amendment (in Medicaid in the federal HHS Appropriations Bill) still funds abortion in rape, incest, and to save the life of the mother. Planned Parenthood and other pro-abortion extremists oppose the Stupak/Pitts Amendment since it doesn’t go fund abortions to their level. Planned Parenthood benefit from killing unborn babies, so that’s typical of them. The bill has over 2,000 pages in it. Some accuse like Andrew Napolitano the bill of violating privacy, rationing care, rising taxes, etc. Freedom is the right for people to do actions according to their own conscience. The truth is that we do need health care reform, because our health care system has issues. Yet, we should do it in the right way in allowing coverage, while preserving health freedom at the same time.

*One smoking gun problem with the health care bill is that one proposal threaten to fine or jail people who voluntarily reject having the care in the first place. Ranking Member of the

House Ways and Means Committee Dave Camp (R-MI) released a letter from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) confirming that the failure to comply with the individual mandate to buy health insurance contained in the Pelosi health care bill (H.R. 3962, as amended) could land people in jail. The JCT letter makes clear that Americans who do not maintain “acceptable health insurance coverage” and who choose not to pay the bill’s new individual mandate tax (generally 2.5% of income), are subject to numerous civil and criminal penalties, including criminal fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment of up to five years. In response to the JCT letter, Camp said: “This is the ultimate example of the Democrats’ command-and-control style of governing – buy what we tell you or go to jail. It is outrageous and it should be stopped immediately.” When confronted with this same issue during its consideration of a similar individual mandate tax, the Senate Finance Committee worked on a bipartisan basis to include language in its bill that shielded Americans from civil and criminal penalties. The Pelosi bill, however, contains no similar language protecting American citizens from civil and criminal tax penalties that could include a $250,000 fine and five years in jail.

Poisons like MSG, Aspartame, fluoride, etc. exist in today’s world. In recent years, my knowledge about health hazards have increased. I don’t trust Big Pharma either unconditionally since they are the ones promoting evils like GM foods, toxins, and vaccine corruption for decades in the world. There are tons of examples proving this view. What we put into our bodies is very vital to our survival. There is nothing wrong to better our quality of lives by improving our lives. One of the biggest smoking guns on the corruption of the pharmaceutical industry is how they create diseases to earn profits. An article about it was written in the London Times on April 11, 2006 by Mark Henderson. Henderson further writes on how they exaggerate real illness to for the same purpose as well. The article goes on to mention that ADHD, female sexual dysfunction, and “restless legs syndrome” are promoted, so

money can come into companies. Many people are suffering from horrendous diseases. The Honolulu Star-Bulletin on April 5, 2006 talk about the 34-year-old mortgage loan officer Oliver Johnson. He's almost near death from a flesh eating disease. The doctor called the disease as necrotizing fasciitis, a Group A streptococcal infection. The disease led an amputation of his left leg. For years, people have discussed about the dangers of soft drinks. Many of them contain aspartame and other chemicals, which can cause brain damage and increased risks of cancer. Now, we find that soft drinks have a higher level of benzene than water. LIBBY QUAID is an AP Food and Farm Writer. He wrote an article entitled "Benzene Levels in Soft Drinks Above Limit" on April 5, 2006 talking about the soft drink issue. Benzene can cause cancer and is linked to leukemia. The FDA has admitted to the high level of benzene in soft drinks. Bird Flu is promoted all over the media. We do know that in the hoopla over bird flu, the United States government signed protocols for detention and quarantine. Newstarget and others reported on how Bush April 1, 2005 issued an executive for quarantine people in case of an emergency of a bird flu outbreak. Global News Matrix on October 24, 2005 wrote that Bilderberg Group members are profiting from Tamiflu. George Shultz, Rumsfeld (former chairman of Gilead, the manufacturer of Tamiflu and major shareholder of Tamiflu), Etienne F. Davignon (a Bilderberger Kingpin and one of the most powerful men in Europe), and Lodewijk J.R. de Vink (a Gilead partner and Gilead) are profiting from the Bird Flu situation. We do need health care reform, so I want to make that perfectly clear. By Timothy