The Imf And The World Bank

The IMF and the World Bank

The IMF and the World Bank are one of the reasons why the Third World is suffering in the manner that it is. These groups were created after the Bretton Woods conference of 1944. This conference was held in Bretton Woods, New Hamsphire. This meeting outlined the dollar as the international currency and restructured world markets. The IMF is short for the International Monetary Fund. This is an international organization that oversees global financial system. The IMF handle exchange rates and payments. Its headquarters are in Washington, D.C. ironically. They have a pool of money where countries can borrow form. It's made up of 185 nations. The IMF and World Bank combined represent the international economy of the world. The IMF was created by July 1944 in the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference. Harry Dexter White was one of the inventors of the International Monetary Fund including the World Bank. White was involved in the Bretton Woods Agreement. FBI sources accuse White of working for the Soviet Union (yet, the Soviet Union was an invention of the Secret Societies and globalists). This was later confirmed by the testimony of Soviet defector Elizabeth Bentley and the release of the VENONA material by US Army Signal Intelligence. Of course, White's family deny this charge to this day. There is an IMF Board of Governors belonging mostly to the 24 member Executive Board. The IMF was formally organized on December 27, 1945, when the first 29 countries signed its Articles of Agreement. Now, the IMF has huge influence in the world economy. The World Bank has a similar origin to the IMF. The World Bank is an internationally supported bank that provides financial help and technical assistance to developing nations. They do this under the guise of reducing poverty, although this group is highly controversial. The World Bank was formally established on December 27, 1945, following the ratification of the Bretton Woods agreement. In 1946, the World Bank loaned 250 million dollars to France for post-war reconstruction. Today they are doing the Millennium Development Goals (or MDGs) to try to eliminate poverty and promote sustainable development. Sustainable development is a code name for the globalists to control as much private property as possible. This plan is very similar to Agenda 21 where the United Nations gets land deemed inactive for humans to live at all (which

can force people to live in more urban locations). That is why numerous private citizens and organizations have expressed opposition to Agenda 21. The World Bank give loans and grants to the Third World. The President of the World Bank today is Robert B. Zoellick. They have a Board of Directors as well. Their group works worldwide. Critics of the World Bank believe that the World Bank is an agent of the West (in order to advance US and Western business interests). Also, the World Bank have made errors in executing their policies that are detrimental to the environment, public health, and cultural diversity. This agenda according to the World Bank's critics is apart of neo-liberalism. Neo-liberalism is an economic philosophy that subscribes to total free trade in how they conduct themselves in international trade (with a mix of health reform, pro-growth policies, and other liberal sounding tenets). From the beginning, the World Bank supported the Brazilian Castello Branco’s authoritarian-rightist government. It was supplying Branco with a $80 million loan for power projects. Johann Hari from the Global Research on May 3, 2007 wrote about the World Bank killing thousands of some of the poorest people in the world. There is a person named Hawa Amadu. She is 70 something years old. She lives in the slums of Accra, which is the capital of Ghana. She wants to raise her grandkids as best as she can. There is a problem here. She can't afford electricity and water anymore. The reason is that the World Bank threatened to refuse to lend any more to her government. The World Bank doesn't want subsidies to electricity and water. The subsidies stopped and she is suffering. There is mother named Maxima Cari from Bolivia. There, she said that the World Bank took away her right to clean water. In 1997, the World Bank demanded that the Bolivian government to privatize the country's water supply. Now, Privatization is not about true individual ownership of private property at all. It's about select corporations ruling most of the resources of a location (not the people or individuals at all). Later, Maxima had to use dirty water since she couldn't afford the water any more. Evo Morales (who is Bolivia's leader) has been threatened by the World Bank for trying to get the water back. Muracin Claircin is a Haitian rice farmer. He can't grow rice any more. Since 1995, the World Bank wanted Haiti to drop all restrictions on imports. That made the US to flood Haiti with rice. Haiti can't offer rival subsidies making their economy suffering (along with other reasons). In essence, much of the World Bank's policies are damaging the poor. According to Johann Hari: "...The World Bank's own Independent Evaluation Group just found that barely one in ten of its borrowers experienced persistent growth between 1995 and 2005 - a much smaller proportion than those who stagnated or slid deeper into poverty. The bank's own former chief economist, Nobel Prize-winner Joseph Stiglitz, says this approach "has condemned people to death...They don't care if people live or die."...Why? Why would a body that claims to help the poor actually thrash them? Because its mission to end poverty has always been mythical. As George Monbiot explains in his book The Age of Consent, the World Bank was created in the 1940s by US economist Henry Dexter White to be a further projection of US power. The bank's head is invariably American, the bank is based in Washington, and the US has a permanent veto on policies. It does not promote a sensible mix of markets and state action - the real path to development. No: the World Bank pursues the interests of US corporations over the poor, every time..." Recently, there has been more wild news pertaining to the IMF. There is a $100 billion (without oversight) bailout for the IMF that has been tagged on to a war funding bill. If this is passed, billions of tax dollars could be handed off to European banks. Most of the Democrats have agreed to this bill that will continue the destructive war on terror (in the sovereign nations of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq). According to lawmakers’ aides

quoted in a Reuters report, the measure would increase U.S. member contributions to the IMF by $8 million and it would authorize America to back the IMF’s plan to sell 400 tons (or 12.97 million ounces) of gold. Barack Obama even made a pledge to the G20 back in April that he wanted to give the IMF $500 billion (he said it was needed to help the poorer nation during the economic downturn). Yet, the catch is that the Treasury Department wants an international version of the Wall Street bailout. This means a hundred billion dollar bailout for the IMF. Some amount this to a bailout for European

banks facing big losses in Central and Eastern Europe. House Republicans, including Minority Leader John Boehner, have threatened to vote no on the war funding if the IMF money is attached. He said that IMF funding out to be made separate from defense spending. The passage of the bill will be close. There are GOP votes need to make up the 51 anti-war Democrats who opposed it last month. If all Republicans vote no, then the House leadership will need 18 of the Democrats to reverse their defection and vote yes. The overt agents of the IMF via documents is to be empowered under the guise of this serious economic crisis and recession. That is why unelected central bankers are trying to establish more authority to usurp state sovereignty in order to create economic global governance (and regulate the financial institutions of the world). Some in the IMF and the United Nations have supported plans to create a global banking system already (while the dollar is replaced for a new world reserve currency system).

*There has been other bombshells from the World Bank. According to F. William Engdahl, a secret World Bank report confirms that Biofeuls are a major cause of the world food crisis. The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank are key instruments that endorse globalization

and the new world order. Oldthinkernews.com exposed about the Technocracy (or the scientific control of society at the expense of liberty). Technocracy is about social engineering by the state. The ruling class who support technocracy believe that the common person can't rule themselves and an elite class of people must control the masses. Throughout human elite, this conflict of control have existed. In other words, one part of the technocracy is allowing the state to use social scientists to manipulate and control societies (via using Foundations to control our educational systems). The General Education Board which is a pro-Rockefeller Foundation), Fred Gates admitted in 1904 that his agenda was to maintain a docile population not improve society. Fred Gates said that: "...In our dreams, we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility at our molding hands. The present educational conventions fade form our minds, and unhampered by traditions, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk! We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into Philosophers or men of learning, or men of science. We have not to raise up form among them authors, editors, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicans, statesmen, of whom we have an ample supply." These foundations admit that certain social engineers are intentionally dumbing down the education of Americans (Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt wrote a book about this issue). Unfortunately, some view public education as a means to indoctrinate children to the state's perspective with the claim they should control their lives instead of a child's parents. John Taylor Gatto is an expert and he saw the problems in the mainstream educational system. "The Underground History of American Education" is the sum of Gatto's research. The Behavioral Science Teach Education Study was created in 1969 (and it was funded by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare). It describes much of what is happening now in 2009. It says that in the future, political choices will be limited, people in America will be more hedonistic (who are conditioned to to get bread and circuses to keep social dissension and disruption to a minimum), and a small elite will pretty much dictate the lives of American society. The study predicted that in the future, few individuals will be able to maintain control over their opinion. Most will be pawns of competing opinion molders according to the 1969 study as well. Ironically, wealthy elitists (especially the Rockefeller family using foundations to fund social scientists as early as the 1920's) have used social scientists to get that study's predictions fulfilled. That is that the Reece Committee (Norman Dodd was apart of this Committee in 1953 as a researcher) exposed how tax-exempt foundations influence propaganda, international affairs, and education in the world.

Appendix A: NAFTA & the SPP President Clinton signed Executive Order 13107 or “The Implementation of Human Rights Treaties” which claimed that U.N. Human Rights standards must be enforced in the U.S. We all want human rights, but to allow a Communist organization to force its laws unto us is morally repugnant. The same description goes for NAFTA. President George H. W. Bush has pushed for NAFTA as early as the early 1990’s. It was President Bill Clinton who passed the oppressive NAFTA or the North American Free Trade Agreement at 1994. Fake conservative Rush Limbaugh supported NAFTA as well. The Bilderberg Group seeks in their long-term agenda to

expand NAFTA throughout the Western Hemisphere to create the American Union (according to researcher Jim Tucker) like the EU ending sovereignty of countries and further establishing NATO as the UN’s world army. FTAA was formed as a NAFTA expansion. FTAA is made up of 34 countries in the Western Hemisphere (except Cuba). Even David Rockefeller stated on tape that he wants the American Union by 2005. One of the main problems with NAFTA is that it gives too much corporate investment rights and protections that are unprecedented in scope and power. NAFTA allows corporations to travel and sue the national government of a NAFTA country in secret tribunals if they feel that a regulation of a government decision effects the investment in conflict with new NAFTA rights. If a corporation wins the suit, the taxpayer of the “losing” NAFTA nation must foot the bill. Article 1100, 1102, and 1105 of NAFTA deals with the issues with the World Bank and the U.N. handling many of the cases. NAFTA very well may represent the 1st of a 10 Super Nation States or 10 Regions of the N.W.O. This was all prophesized at Daniel 17:7-8. Bill Lambert told Cutting Edge Ministries in a secret meeting about NAFTA and the 10 occult leaders of the 10 superpowers to form the N.W.O.

The North American Union has a long history. As far back as the late 1500’s, Sir Francis

Bacon advocated a New Atlantis on the North American continent. Now, others have supported it in times past. As far back as November 13, 1979, then Presidential candidate, Ronald Reagan proposes a "North American Agreement" which will produce "a North American continent in which the goods and people of the three countries will cross boundaries more freely." On January 1, 1989, The Canada US Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA or FTA) goes into effect. On January 1, 1994, NAFTA goes into effect replacing CUSFTA. The Fraser Institute publishes a paper by Herbert G. Grubel titled "The Case for the Amero: The Economics and Politics of a North American Monetary Union". In the paper Grubel argues that a common currency is not inevitable but it is desirable. NAFTA was a law signed by Bill Clinton which was promoted in a claim that it was necessary to improve trade among the nations of America, Canada, and Mexico. On the other hand, NAFTA has caused problems in America. There is the open trucking part of NAFTA (allowing Mexicans trucks to roam America while competing with American unions. In 2007, the U.S. trade deficit with Mexico soared 16 percent to $73 billion, which a record. The U.S. trade deficit with China shot up 10 percent to $256 billion, which is the largest trade deficit ever between any two countries. The 2 previous sentences outline the dire consequences of the NAFTA agreement). Protectionism made America’s economic growth extremely high in the late 1800’s. Legitimate tariffs have brought a boon to American society. North American integration has been endorsed strongly for years. For example, Robert Pastor wrote a book entitled "Toward a North American Community," a book promoting the development of a North American union as a regional government. The book called for the adoption of the amero as a common monetary currency to replace the dollar and the peso. Pastor was even vice chairman of the May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force entitled "Building a North American Community. It wants a North American security perimeter by 2010, a North American biometric passport, and other forms of North American integration. One big part of that is a planned superhighway spanning Mexico, the US, and Canada. Later in September 13, 2006, there was another secret North American integration meeting at Banff, Canada. It was so secret that Judicial Watch had to use a FOIA to get documents on the events. In that meeting they had a North American Forum. Surprisingly, at least one attendee of the conference said the meeting was intended to subvert the democratic process. Mel Hurtig, a Canadian author and publisher elected as the leader of the National Party of Canada, told WND last fall the

idea of the North American Forum is to move the countries toward integration without public consent or even their knowledge. There are also Corridors like CANAMEX across America into Canadian as a proposed part of NAFTA Superhighways. According to the CANAMEX Corridor Coalition website:

Since its inception in 1995, the CANAMEX Corridor has grown to become the cornerstone for the seamless and efficient transportation of goods, services, people and information between Canada, Mexico and the United States. As the implementation of NAFTA moves toward fruition, the CANAMEX Corridor will broaden its initiatives to harvest the benefits of increased trade, tourism and economic activity within the region.

Therefore, these superhighways are complex. In the process, American sovereignty is further lowered. The Gazette on February 17, 2008 on how CANADACOM is To Assist U.S. In Emergencies via an agreement. The pact allows Canada and America to protect each other in cases of emergencies. Northcom was created in October 1, 2002 and Canada Command was created in February 1, 2006. This agreement was signed in Houston Texas at February 14, 2008 (in Fort Sam Houston). U.S. Air Force General Gene Renuart is pictured shaking hands with Candaian Air Force Force Lt. General Marc Dumais. This is treasonous since no nation has a right to interfere domestically with the affairs of another nation even in times of emergencies. Even the Constitution doesn’t mention this. This agreement wasn’t approved by Congress at all making this illegal. This goes into secret military operations around the nations and Black water acting in 14 murders (yet, they acted domestically in New Orleans during the Hurricane Katrina disaster. Many Black water leaders like Erik Prince and SMOM & Opus Dei member Schmitz are Papal agents). On another level Lee Rogers wrote about the Vision 2020 plan. The Vision 2020 document outlines plans for USNORTHCOM to seek closer ties with various military institutions, government bodies and private entities in the U.S., Canada and Mexico leading up until the year 2020. This agreement could be a prelude to the real North American Army. This agreement is definitely against the national sovereignties of Canada and the United States of America. The mainstream media isn’t reporting on Vision 2020 or especially the agreement between Canada and the USA. Jerome Corsi wrote about the North American Union agenda again. Corsi wrote of the increased tactic that members and proponents of the SPP (or the Security Prosperity and Partnership. It’s made up of unelected bureaucrats from heads of state to cabinet members) are trying to lie and deny it’s trying to create a North American Union. Corsi found this out from an internal memo from Canada’s Foreign Affairs and Internal Trade ministry. The memo is an internal government description of the third SPP summit. That was held in Montebello, Quebec in August 20-21st 2007. In that place, folks’ rights were restricted with barriers, etc. Additionally, the North American Competitiveness Council or the NACC played a big role in the North American integration agenda. In fact, NACC was the only group meeting behind closed doors with the SPP in the Canadian meeting. US, Mexico, and Canada officials are involved in this endeavor. The memo admits that: "In closing, all leaders expressed a desire for the NACC to play a role in articulating publicly the benefits of greater collaboration in North America..."and "...In terms of building public support, President Bush suggested engaging the support of those who had benefited from NAFTA and from North American integration (including small business owners) to tell their stories and humanize the impressive

results..." They deny a North American integration plan, but CFR member Robert Pastor called for a North American biometric boundary plus Pastor called for North American highways in 2005. The SPP Documents outline a harmonization of laws within America, Mexico, and Canada. Now, this proves that the North American trilateral integration agenda exists. These development are eerily similar to the European Union development (which has enormous Bilderberg Group/Vatican influence). Hence, it’s important to expose the North American Union and oppose it. Jerome wrote more on the North American subject. Corsi wrote that President George W. Bush signed an agreement that allowed the World Health Organization and the U.N. complete control over response procedures in the event of a pandemic outbreak in the U.S (This was reported by Paul Joseph Watson at Prison Planet at Sunday, on September 2, 2007).

Before that back in 2005, President Bush announced a new International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza to a High-Level Plenary Meeting of the U.N. General Assembly, in New York. Corsi wrote that the SPP meeting in Montebello, Canada an agreement was created that U.N. law along with regulations from the WHO was supreme over U.S. law during a pandemic. Corsi calls this: "...the stage for militarizing the management of continental health emergencies." Dr. David Nabarro have called for the U.N. to have full control of health emergencies. Corsi exposed Nabarro many false virus predictions. Dr. Jerome Corsi doesn’t ignore the possibility that the U.N. or the WHO could release viruses. Additionally, it’s vital for us to refute the disinformation coming out from the SPP denying North America integration plans. Jerome Corsi from World Net Daily reported on yet another pro-North American integration meeting. It happened at the State Department in Washington D.C. It primarily dealt with linking the North American community with the European Union. For months, the alternative media have strongly reported on this issue or the Transatlantic Union.

The Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy, or ACIEP supported such a meeting. It was held in "Chatham House" rules that prohibit reporters from attributing specific comments to individual participants. Now if this SPP/Transatlantic Union meeting was so peaceful and isn’t a threat, why have so much secrecy in this circumstance? It doesn’t make sense unless the people organizing this affair wanted to withhold the truth from the public. The meeting talked about the SPP (or the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. It has 20 trilateral bureaucratic working groups that seek to "integrate and harmonize" administrative rules and regulations on a continental basis) and the USEU Transatlantic Economic Council or TEC. The TEC endorses the merging or convergence of administrative rules and regulations between Europe and North America to possibly form a "Transatlantic Economic Union" between the EU and North America. The Transatlantic Economic Council, or TEC, was created by President Bush at an April 30 summit meeting at the White House with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the current president of the European Council, and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso. Corsi wrote that those in the meeting wanted to seek a Transatlantic outlook or market. Corsi also wrote that those in the affair wanted standardization, open borders, and other means for integration. Sen. Robert Bennett, RUtah wanted a Transatlantic Common Market with the US and the EU united economically by 2015.

Jerome Corsi wrote that the North American integration plan has been supported by the CFR and it didn't end with the Bush administration. Corsi feels is still going forward in the Barack Obama administration. Thomas D'Aquino is the CEO and President of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives. This is the Canadian counterpart to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. He admitted in an interview that the Council on Foreign Relations was the prime mover in establishing the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America or the SPP. This interview has been published in the Metropolitan Corporate Counsel on October 4 in Canada. The SPP wasn't some conspiracy theory. It was a real group of unelected bureaucrats wanting North American integration (organized by the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the CFR in America). d'Aqunio said that President Barack wants North American integration (in the guise of the North American Leaders Summit) as along as the North American Competitiveness Council can be recast to have more environmentalists plus union leaders. d'Aquino said that the

SPP started as a response to the 9/11 attacks (in the need to work for North American needs while claiming to promote border security). With this goal in mind, d'Aquino explained that the CCCE by 2003 had "launched an agenda that we called the North American Security and Prosperity Initiative, or NASPI." The term "Security and Prosperity" was first used by the Canadian Council of Chief Executives in a January 23, 2003 in a report entitled, "Security and Prosperity: Toward a New Canada-United States Partnership in North America." d'Aquino bought the idea to CFR President Richard Haass and agreed with it (along with a trilateral task force to make a more international North America. He recruited John Manley on Canada's side, along with William Weld, former governor of Massachusetts, and Pedro Aspe, the former Mexican economy minister, who had been so influential in promoting NAFTA). The CFR made a task force document in 2004 about creating a North American community. By 2005, Bush, Paul Martin, and Vicente Fox united in supporting the SPP by their March 23, 2005 meeting in Waco, TX as a trilateral summit. The final task force report, titled "Building a North American Community," was issued in March 2005, immediately following the Waco summit (This CFR report wanted more financial aid to Mexico, a security border around North America, and a new North American tribunal to settle disputes). It wanted a 2010 North American economic and security community as well. "At their next summit meeting, in 2006, the three leaders invited leading members of the CEO communities in the three countries to provide privatesector input on issues related to competitiveness," he continued. "From that idea, the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC) was born, to be composed of 10 frontline CEOs from each of Canada, the United States and Mexico." That plan was implemented. The NACC had another SPP summit in Montebello, Quebec in August of 2007 plus New Orleans in 2008. The SPP and now the NACC (plus the North American Leaders Summit) is similar to the prelude of a North American Union (which like the EU wants to integrate trade into a unelected bureaucratic body). The North American Competitiveness Council is composed of 30 North American business executives hand-picked, 10 each by the Chambers of Commerce of the three countries. Barack Obama wants this agenda to continue under the name of the North American Leaders Summit (as Obama, Mexican President Calderon, and Canadian Prime Minister Harper meet each other in Guadalajara, Mexico in August of 2008). So, the new world order agenda is still alive.

By Timothy