T8 B5 Misc Loose Docs Fdr- Email From Miles Kara Re Delta 1989 As Neads-norad Target B089193
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View T8 B5 Misc Loose Docs Fdr- Email From Miles Kara Re Delta 1989 As Neads-norad Target B089193 as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 250
- Pages: 1
John Azzarello From: Sent: To: Cc:
Miles Kara Monday, January 26, 2004 3:45 PM Sam Brinkley Team 7; Team 8
Subject:
RE: Delta 1989
Sam, an old e-mail from waaay back. D1989 is very much real. and Bill. We need to engage on this after your hearing.
I've talked briefly to John
Miles ----- Original Message ----From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 7:06 AM To: Miles Kara Cc : Team 7 ; Team 8 Subject: Re: Delta 1989 For sure it was a distractor. We are not currently pursuing. My recommendation is that it would be the 5th a/c for priority of work and not necessarily worked to the same level of detail, even then. Sam
Quoting Miles Kara <[email protected]> : > Sam, John, Bill-I meant to mention this yesterday. We also have an > interest in Delta 1989 and was wondering what/how you are pursuing > that a/c, if at all.
> > > >
Why? It was treated as a hijack that day and is, it appears, the only incident that NEADS/NORAD was able to work up as a target, so identified, on 9/11. That raises questions as to why/how they were able to do that, but not any other a/c that day.
> The AGL daily record of facility operation for the duty officer shows > at 1354Z Dall989 B763 BOS-CLE hijacked.
> The target number, BO 8 9 as I recall, shows up in NORAD level logs.
> What do you think?
> Miles
Miles Kara Monday, January 26, 2004 3:45 PM Sam Brinkley Team 7; Team 8
Subject:
RE: Delta 1989
Sam, an old e-mail from waaay back. D1989 is very much real. and Bill. We need to engage on this after your hearing.
I've talked briefly to John
Miles ----- Original Message ----From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 7:06 AM To: Miles Kara Cc : Team 7 ; Team 8 Subject: Re: Delta 1989 For sure it was a distractor. We are not currently pursuing. My recommendation is that it would be the 5th a/c for priority of work and not necessarily worked to the same level of detail, even then. Sam
Quoting Miles Kara <[email protected]> : > Sam, John, Bill-I meant to mention this yesterday. We also have an > interest in Delta 1989 and was wondering what/how you are pursuing > that a/c, if at all.
> > > >
Why? It was treated as a hijack that day and is, it appears, the only incident that NEADS/NORAD was able to work up as a target, so identified, on 9/11. That raises questions as to why/how they were able to do that, but not any other a/c that day.
> The AGL daily record of facility operation for the duty officer shows > at 1354Z Dall989 B763 BOS-CLE hijacked.
> The target number, BO 8 9 as I recall, shows up in NORAD level logs.
> What do you think?
> Miles
Related Documents
More Documents from "9/11 Document Archive"
Letter To 9/11 Commission About John Kerry
April 2020 0
