T2 B24 Aircraft As Weapons 1 Of 2 Fdr- 7-28-03 Emails Re Aviation Security As Reactive 669

  • Uploaded by: 9/11 Document Archive
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View T2 B24 Aircraft As Weapons 1 Of 2 Fdr- 7-28-03 Emails Re Aviation Security As Reactive 669 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 431
  • Pages: 2
Mail:: INBOX: RE: Aviation Security as Reactive

Page 1 of 2

INBOX Compose Folders Options Search Problem? Help Addressbook Tasks Memos Calendar Logout

Open Folder »

57.73MB/476.84MB (12.11%)

INBOX: RE: Aviation Security as Reactive (1 of 28) 0®

wove i copy |Thjs message to

Delete I Reply I Reply to All I Forward I Redirect I Blacklist I Message Source I Resume I Save as I Print

gj

Back to INBOX

Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:08:53-0400 From: William Johnstone <[email protected]>^ To: "" ^ Subject: RE: Aviation Security as Reactive

Most of the major recommendations of the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security (the Gore Commission), issued in 1996 and 1997, all concerned dealing with the explosives threat: immediate deployment of explosives detection technology; partial bag-passenger match on domestic flights; additional deployment of bomb-sniffing canine teams; and automated passenger profiling (for passengers with checked baggage only) . This focus was reflected in the two implementing laws, the Federal Aviation Reauthorization Act of 1996, and the Airport Security Improvement Act of 2000. ----- Original Message ----From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:24 AM To: William Johnstone Subject: Re: Aviation Security as Reactive Thanks. This is excellent. My large apologies for the last minute request. If you could draft a sentence about implementation of Gore Commission recommendations, I would be most grateful. Thanks again. Quoting William Johnstone <wjohnstone@9-llcommission. gov> : > The Air Transportation Security Act of 1974 was enacted specifically to > address the hijackings of the late 1960s and early 1970s. It created the > basic security framework for dealing with hijackings still in place on 9/11: > FAA-issued and enforced security rules for airlines and airports; > prohibitions on carrying of weapons onto aircraft; and pre-boarding > screening of passengers and baggage for weapons.

> The Aviation Security Improvement Act of 1990 sought to implement the > recommendations of the Presidential Commission on Aviation Security and > Terrorism, which was created in response to the terrorist destruction of Pan > Am 103. Among its many provisions, it sought to accelerate the FAA's > research program to develop more effective explosives detection equipment.

> Let me know if you need anything more. (I have lots of stuff on Gore

http://kinesis.swishmail.com/webmaiVimp/message.php ?Horde=89aeeld2616aad8d4alb779... 7/28/03

51:: INBOX: RE: Aviation Security as Reactive

Page 2 of 2

> Commission and the two implementing laws.)

Delete I Reply I Reply to All I Forward I Redirect I Blacklist I Message Source I Resume I Save as I Print

Back to INBOX

Move I copy [This message to

http://kinesis.swishmail.com/webmail/imp/message.php?Horde=89aee 1 d2616aad8d4a Ib779...

7/28/03

Related Documents


More Documents from "9/11 Document Archive"