Ppap Iii Checklist

PPAP 3rd Edition Check List Supplier:

Date:

Part #:

Eng. Chg. Level: Yes No

1. Design Records / Drawings Correct Eng. Chg. Level 2. Eng. Chg. Documents On file / with Package 3.Engineering Approval Customer Eng. Approval 4. DFMEA, Design Responsible DFMEA present Format to 3rd or latest edition 5. Process Flow Diagram Production Process Flow Diagram 6. PFMEA High RPN's Addressed Corrective Actions in Place Format to 3rd or latest edition Includes entire process(receiving to shipping) Complete 7. Dimensional Results Correct Eng. Chg. Level Dimensions Verified Complete and Acceptable 8. Material / Performance See Drawing notes Material Certificates Included Complete and Acceptable 9. Initial Process Study Initial Study Ppk / Cpk > 1.67 Complete 10. MSA Studies GR&R Studies completed Acceptable 11. Qualified Lab Documents Scope and Accreditation Certificate to ISO/IEC 17025 12. Control Plan Correct Eng. Chg. Level Matches process flow Acceptable 13. Part Submission Warrant Correct Part Name & Number Correct Eng. Chg. Level Purchase Order Number Signed and Dated 14. AAR Appearance Items 15.Bulk Material Checklist Specific Requirements / List 16. Sample Product Sample provided if applicable 17. Master Sample Retained w/ Approval Date Correctly Identified by Part # 18. Checking Aids Checking aids Required GR&R App'd 19. Customer Specific See Drawing notes section and supplier manual for specific requirements Are there any customer specific requirements? Are Parts identified properly? (correct label)

PPAPKIT_F01 Rev. A (May_03)

Submission Level: N/A

Reviewed By: Comments

Dana Corp., Part Submission Warrant Part Name

______________________________________

Government and/or Safety Regulation

Yes

No

Part Number

_______________________________________

Engineering Drawing Change Level__________ Dated___________

Additional Engineering Changes _____________________________________________________________Dated___________ Shown on Drawing Number_____________________ Purchase Order Number______________________ Weight_________kg Checking Aid No.___________________________ Engineering Change Level_______________________ Dated___________ SUPPLIER MANUFACTURING INFORMATION

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

__________________________________________________ Supplier Name Supplier Code __________________________________________________ Street Address

Dimensional

Materials/Functional

Appearance

Customer Name/Division___________________________ Buyer/Buyer Code________________________________

__________________________________________________ City State/Province Postal Code

Application______________________________________

REASON FOR SUBMISSION Initial Submission Engineering Change Tooling: Transfer, Replacement, Refurbishment, or additional Correction of Discrepancy Other – please specify____________________________________

Change to Optional Construction or Material Sub-Supplier of Material Source Change Change in Part Processing Parts Produced at Additional Location

REQUESTED SUBMISSION LEVEL (Check one) Level 1 - Dana Warrant, Appearance Approval Report (for designated appearance items only) Level 2 - Dana Warrant, Parts, Drawings, Inspection Results, Laboratory and Functional Results, Appearance Approval Report. Level 3 - Dana Warrant, Parts, Drawings, Inspection Results, Laboratory Results, and Appearance Approval Report, Process Capability Results, Capability Study, Process Control Plan, Gage Study, FMEA. Level 4 - Per Level 3, but without parts. Level 5 - At Supplier Location – Warrant, Parts, Drawings, Inspection Results, Laboratory and Functional Results, Appearance Approval Report, Process Capability Results, Capability Study, Process Control Plan, Gage Study, FMEA. SUBMISSION RESULTS Submitting: dimensional measurements material & functional tests appearance criteria ? statistical process package These results meet all drawing and specification requirements: YES NO (if “NO” – Explanation required) DECLARATION I hereby affirm that the samples represented by this warrant are representative of our parts, have been made to the applicable Production Part Approval Process Manual 3 rd Edition Requirements. I further warrant these samples were produced at the production rate of ______ / 8 hours. IMDS DECLARATION We affirm that details of the materials used in these parts have been entered onto the IMDS and that the samples conform to all applicable government and safety requirements on restricted materials. YES NO (if “NO” – Explanation required) IMDS Number: I have noted any deviations from this declaration below: EXPLANATION / COMMENTS _______________________________________________________________________________________ Print Name ___________________________________________ Title_______________________________ Phone No.___________________ Supplier Authorized Signature__________________________________________________________ Date: ____________________________

FOR DANA USE ONLY – Part Disposition:

Approved

Rejected

Other __________________________________________

Representative_____________________________________Signature_______________________________________Date_________________ PPAP KIT Rev. B (March 04)

Production Part Approval Process— Feasibility Commitment Dana Locaton:

Date:

Part #

Part description:

Feasibility Considerations The following questions are not intended to be all-includsive in performing a feasibility evaluation. Drawings and/or specifications provided are for analysing your ability to meet specified requirements. All NO answers need to be supported with attached explanations, including proposed changes to meet specifications. Please respond to all questions. Yes

No

Consideration Is product adequately designed (application requirements, etc.) to evaluate feasiblity? Can Engineering Performance Specifications be met as written? Can product be manufactured to tolerances specified on the drawing? Can product be manufactured with Cpk's that meet requirements? Is there adequate capacity to product product? Does the design allow for the use of efficent material handling techniques? Can the product be manufactured without incurring any unusual: Cost fo capital equipment? Cost for tooling? Alternative manufacturing methods? Is statistical process control required on this product? Are you using statistical process control on similar products? Where statistical process control is used on similar products: Are the processes in control and stable? Are Cpk's greater than 1.33?

Conclusion (check one) Feasible: Product can be produced as specified with no revisions. Feasible: Changes recommened (see attached.) Not Feasible: Design revision required to produce produce within the specified requirements

Supplier Sign-Off List all team members Name

PPAP KIT Rev. B (March 04)

Title

Date

Production Part Approval Process— Page_____of____

Dimensional Test Results SUPPLIER

PART NUMBER

NAME/LOCATION OF INSPECTION FACILITY

PART NAME

ITEM

DIMENSION/ SPECIFICATION

SUPPLIER MEASUREMENTS

OK

NOT OK

COMMENTS (Dana use only)

Submitted by: NAME

PPAPKIT_F03 Rev. A (May_03)

TITLE

SIGNATURE

DATE

Production Part Approval Process— Page_____of____

Material Test Results SUPPLIER

PART NUMBER

NAME/LOCATION OF LABORATORY

PART NAME

TYPE OF TEST

MATERIAL SPEC. NO./ DATE/ SPECIFICATION

SUPPLIER TEST RESULTS

OK

NOT OK

COMMENTS (Dana use only)

Submitted by: NAME

PPAPKIT_F04 Rev. A (May_03)

TITLE

SIGNATURE

DATE

Production Part Approval Process— Page_____of____

Performance Test Results SUPPLIER

PART NUMBER

NAME/LOCATION OF LABORATORY

PART NAME

REF. NO.

REQUIREMENTS

TEST FREQ

TEST QTY.

SUPPLIER TEST RESULTS AND TEST CONDITIONS

OK

NOT OK

COMMENTS (Dana use only)

Submitted by: NAME

PPAPKIT_F05 Rev. A (May_03)

TITLE

SIGNATURE

DATE