Lamuth Middle School - Riverside School District - State Facilities Report

Building Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School

Program Type

Expedited Local Partnership Program (ELPP)

Setting

Small City

Assessment Name

Copy of LaMuth Middle School - Final

Assessment Date

2008-03-17

Cost Set:

2007

Building Name

LaMuth Middle School

Building IRN

61895

Building Address

6700 Auburn Rd

Building City

Painesville

Building Zipcode

44077

Building Phone

(440) 354-4394

Acreage

48

Current Grades

6-7

Teaching Stations

38

Number of Floors

2

Student Capacity

633

Current Enrollment

732

Enrollment Date

2007-08-23

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken. Number of Classrooms

33

Historical Register

NO

Building’s Principal

Mr. Eric Kujala

Building Type

Middle Next Page

Building Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School

Page 1

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Building Pictures - Riverside Local Local SD(47894) - LaMuth Middle School(61895)

North elevation photo:

East elevation photo:

South elevation photo:

West elevation photo:

GENERAL DESCRIPTION 89,837 Total Existing Square Footage 1969,1994 Building Dates 6-7 Grades 732 Current Enrollment 38 Teaching Stations 48 Site Acreage LaMuth Middle School is a two (2) story structure totaling 89,837 s.f. The original facility of 35,174 s.f. was constructed in 1969. A large building addition totaling 54,663 s.f. was constructed in 1994. The complex contains one (1) gymnasium of 9,322 s.f., one (1) student dining of 4,859 s.f., one (1) kitchen of 1,842 s.f. and one (1) media center of 2,945 s.f. LaMuth Middle School currently provides space for grades 6-7. The complex provides partial accessibility but does not fully conform to the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act Guidelines. Typical classrooms throughout the complex are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio. The school facility is located on a 48 acre site in a residential area. School buses load/unload along the main entry drive which shares access with vehicular traffic. The existing structure is outfitted with a motion sensor security system and a fire alarm system. A limited portion of the complex is equipped with an air conditioning system.

Previous Page Next Page

Building Pictures - Riverside Local Local SD(47894) - LaMuth Middle School(61895)

Page 2

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Building Construction Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

Name

Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet

Original Building 1969 no

2

35,174

Building Addition 1994 yes

2

54,663

Previous Page Next Page

Building Construction Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

Page 3

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Building Component Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

Addition

Auditorium Agricultural Primary Media Vocational Student Indoor Adult Board Outside Auxiliary Fixed Corridors Education Kitchen Natatorium Gymnasium Center Space Dining Tracks Education Offices Agencies Gymnasium Seating Lab

Original Building (1969)

5395

Building Addition (1994)

8275

4859 9322

1842

2945

Master Planning Considerations Previous Page Next Page

Building Component Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

Page 4

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Existing CT Programs for Assessment Next Page Previous Page Program Type Program Name Related Space Square Feet No Records Found Legend: Not in current design manual In current design manual but missing from assessment



Page 5

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

Building Summary - LaMuth Middle School (61895) District:

Riverside Local Local SD

County:

Lake

Name:

LaMuth Middle School

Contact:

Mr. Eric Kujala

Phone:

(440) 354-4394

Address: 6700 Auburn Rd Painesville,OH 44077 Bldg. IRN: 61895

Date Prepared: 2008-03-17

By:

Tony Schorr

Date Revised: 2008-08-26

By:

Jeff Tuckerman

Current Grades

6-7

Acreage:

48

Proposed Grades

N/A

Teaching Stations:

38

Current Enrollment

732

Classrooms:

33

Projected Enrollment

N/A

Date HA

Number of Floors

Original Building

1969 no

2

Building Addition

Section

1994 yes

2

Current Square Feet 1.0 The School Site 35,174 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 54,663 3.0 Plant Maintainability 89,837 4.0 Building Safety and Security

Total

Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category ‹

‹

‹

200

186

93%

‹ Excellent

400

286

72%

Satisfactory

200

150

75%

Satisfactory

400

292

73%

Satisfactory

*HA

= Handicapped Access

5.0 Educational Adequacy

400

290

73%

Satisfactory

*Rating

=1 Satisfactory

6.0 Environment for Education

400

304

76%

Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair

Commentary

‹

‹

‹

=3 Needs Replacement

Total

2000

1508

75%

Rating

‹ Satisfactory

C=Under Contract

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2007

Dollar Assessment C Renovation Cost Factor

104.16% $2,605,273.00 - Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $10,794,010.51 $399,777.00 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is $0.00 - requested from a Master Plan.

A. Heating System

3

B. Roofing

3

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

1

D. Electrical Systems

3

$553,990.50 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

3

$100,400.00 -

F. Windows

3

$83,520.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation

1

$0.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

2

$78,610.00 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

1

$0.00 -

J. General Finishes

3

$1,214,111.80 -

K. Interior Lighting

3

$449,185.00 -

L. Security Systems

3

$224,592.50 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

3

$89,837.00 -

N. Fire Alarm

3

$134,755.50 -

O. Handicapped Access

3

$258,723.70 -

P. Site Condition

3

$563,535.50 -

Q. Sewage System

3

$164,700.00 -

R. Water Supply

1

$0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors

3

$32,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material

3

$189,000.00 -

U. Life Safety

3

$341,970.25 -

V. Loose Furnishings

3

$179,674.00 -

W. Technology

3

$671,082.39 -

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

-

$2,028,175.18 -

Total

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Cover Sheet

Addition

-

Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)

$10,362,913.32 Previous Page

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

Page 6

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

Original Building (1969) Summary District:

Riverside Local Local SD

County:

Lake

Name:

LaMuth Middle School

Contact:

Mr. Eric Kujala

Phone:

(440) 354-4394

Address: 6700 Auburn Rd Painesville,OH 44077 Bldg. IRN: 61895

Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)

Date Prepared: 2008-03-17

By:

Tony Schorr

Date Revised: 2008-08-26

By:

Jeff Tuckerman

Current Grades

6-7

Acreage:

48

Proposed Grades

N/A

Teaching Stations:

38

Current Enrollment

732

Classrooms:

33

Projected Enrollment

N/A

CEFPI Appraisal Summary Section Cover Sheet

Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet 1.0 The School Site Original Building 1969 no 2 35,174 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features Building Addition 1994 yes 2 54,663 3.0 Plant Maintainability Addition

89,837 4.0 Building Safety and Security 5.0 Educational Adequacy

Total *HA

= Handicapped Access

*Rating

=1 Satisfactory

6.0 Environment for Education

=2 Needs Repair

Commentary

=3 Needs Replacement

Total

-

Rating

‹

‹

‹

200

186

93%

‹ Excellent

400

286

72%

Satisfactory

200

150

75%

Satisfactory

400

292

73%

Satisfactory

400

290

73%

Satisfactory

400

304

76%

Satisfactory

‹

‹

‹

2000

1508

75%

‹ Satisfactory

C=Under Contract

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2007

Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category

Dollar Assessment C Renovation Cost Factor $1,020,046.00 - Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)

104.16%

A. Heating System

3

B. Roofing

3

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

1

$123,151.00 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is $0.00 - requested from a Master Plan.

D. Electrical Systems

3

$553,990.50 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

3

$84,600.00 -

F. Windows

3

$73,920.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation

1

$0.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

2

$20,460.00 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

1

$0.00 -

J. General Finishes

3

$779,745.00 -

K. Interior Lighting

3

$175,870.00 -

L. Security Systems

3

$87,935.00 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

3

$35,174.00 -

N. Fire Alarm

3

$52,761.00 -

O. Handicapped Access

3

$194,337.40 -

P. Site Condition

3

$304,171.00 -

Q. Sewage System

3

$164,700.00 -

R. Water Supply

1

$0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors

3

$16,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material

3

$189,000.00 -

U. Life Safety

3

$154,315.50 -

V. Loose Furnishings

3

$70,348.00 -

W. Technology

3

$262,749.78 -

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

-

$1,061,759.14 -

Total

$5,650,714.71

$5,425,033.32

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

Page 7

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

Building Addition (1994) Summary District:

Riverside Local Local SD

County:

Lake

Name:

LaMuth Middle School

Contact:

Mr. Eric Kujala

Phone:

(440) 354-4394

Address: 6700 Auburn Rd Painesville,OH 44077 Bldg. IRN: 61895

Date Prepared: 2008-03-17

By:

Tony Schorr

Date Revised: 2008-08-26

By:

Jeff Tuckerman

Current Grades

6-7

Acreage:

48

Proposed Grades

N/A

Teaching Stations:

38

Current Enrollment

732

Classrooms:

33

Projected Enrollment

N/A

Addition Original Building

Section Cover Sheet

54,663 3.0 Plant Maintainability 89,837 4.0 Building Safety and Security

2

Total

Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category ‹

‹

‹

200

186

93%

‹ Excellent

400

286

72%

Satisfactory

200

150

75%

Satisfactory

400

292

73%

Satisfactory

*HA

= Handicapped Access

5.0 Educational Adequacy

400

290

73%

Satisfactory

*Rating

=1 Satisfactory

6.0 Environment for Education

400

304

76%

Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair

Commentary

‹

‹

‹

=3 Needs Replacement

Total

2000

1508

75%

Rating

‹ Satisfactory

C=Under Contract

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2007

Dollar Assessment C Renovation Cost Factor $1,585,227.00 - Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)

A. Heating System

3

B. Roofing

3

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

1

D. Electrical Systems

3

$0.00 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

3

$15,800.00 -

F. Windows

3

$9,600.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation

1

$0.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

2

$58,150.00 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

1

$0.00 -

J. General Finishes

3

$434,366.80 -

K. Interior Lighting

3

$273,315.00 -

L. Security Systems

3

$136,657.50 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

3

$54,663.00 -

N. Fire Alarm

3

$81,994.50 -

O. Handicapped Access

3

$64,386.30 -

P. Site Condition

3

$259,364.50 -

Q. Sewage System

3

$0.00 -

R. Water Supply

1

$0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors

3

$16,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material

3

$0.00 -

U. Life Safety

3

$187,654.75 -

V. Loose Furnishings

3

$109,326.00 -

W. Technology

3

$408,332.61 -

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

-

$966,416.04 -

Total

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet 1.0 The School Site 1969 no 2 35,174 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features

Building Addition 1994 yes

-

Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)

104.16% $5,143,295.81

$276,626.00 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is $0.00 - requested from a Master Plan.

$4,937,880.00

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

Page 8

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

A. Heating System Description:

The existing system for the entire complex is a gas fired hot water system. The boilers were installed in 1983 and 2004. A limited portion of the complex is equipped with air conditioning. Typical classrooms are equipped with a 2 pipe ventilator system that will not permit simultaneous operation of the boiler and chiller units. District officials noted the facility’s conditioning requirements have been difficult to manage during moderate temperature cycles.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for complete replacement of the entire heating, ventilation, and cooling system throughout the entire complex due to condition and lack of proper ventilation and air conditioning. Convert to a fully ducted system to conform to OSDM standards and current ventilation requirements.

Item

Cost

HVAC System Replacement: Convert To Ducted System Replacement

$22.00sq.ft.

Sum:

Unit Whole Building

$7.00sq.ft.

Original Building (1969) 35,174 ft² Required Required

$2,605,273.00 $1,020,046.00

Building Addition Sum Comments (1994) 54,663 ft² Required $1,976,414.00(includes demo of existing system and reconfiguration of piping layout and new controls, air conditioning) Required $628,859.00(includes cost for vert. & horz. chases, cut openings, soffits, etc. Must be used in addition to HVAC System Replacement if the existing HVAC system is non-ducted) $1,585,227.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 9

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

B. Roofing Description:

The existing roof asseembly for the complex is a modified bituminous roof system installed at various dates from 1978-2007. The majority of the existing system installations exceed 15 years of age.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for complete replacement of the existing roof systems due to condition and extent of dated system installations. Provide an OSDM compliant membrane system at all areas.

Item

Cost Unit

Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)Sum Comments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Membrane (all types):$7.00sq.ft. (Qty) 17,593 Required 39,518 Required $399,777.00(unless under 10,000 sq.ft.) Sum: $399,777.00 $123,151.00 $276,626.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 10

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning Description:

A limited portion of the complex is equipped with an air conditioning system typically provided by roof top chiller units. The conditioned areas of the complex include the media center, technology labs, band and choral classroom areas, and administrative spaces. Window cooling units are provided in a few areas.

Rating:

1 Satisfactory

Recommendations:

Provide an air conditioning system throughout the entire complex to confrom to OSDM standards. Provisions identified in Plate ’’A’’.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)SumComments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 11

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

D. Electrical Systems Description:

The existing electrical service for the complex is a 3 phase, 208/120 volt, 1600 amp service. The electrical distribution systems are original to the date of each portion of the facility.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for complete replacement of the main electrical service and distribution system at the 1969 addition. The electrical system installations at the 1994 addition are satisfactory.

Item

Cost

System Replacement:

$15.75sq.ft.

Sum:

Unit Whole Building

Original Building Building (1969) Addition 35,174 ft² (1994) 54,663 ft² Required

$553,990.50 $553,990.50

Sum

Comments

$553,990.50(Includes demo of existing system. Includes generator for life safety systems. Does not include telephone or data cable or equipment) (Use items below ONLY when the entire system is NOT being replaced)

$0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 12

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

E. Plumbing and Fixtures Description:

The school facility contains 8 group restrooms (4 girls, 4 boys), 2 locker room toilets and 13 single occupancy restrooms. Fixtures are a combination of newer and older equipment. A portion of water closets/toilets are floor mounted. The majority of the restrooms at the 1969 buiding are not accessible and do not conform to the provisions of the ADA guidelines. The majority of the toilet rooms at the 1994 addition provide accessible accommodations except for original portions of the facility that were incorporated into the new addition area. A portion of the urinals are equipped with a continual flush system. District officials noted domestic supply piping was copper.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for replacement of select wall and floor mounted fixtures due to age, condition, and OSDM requirements.

Item

Cost

Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)Sum Comments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Toilet: $3,800.00unit 10 Required 1 Required $41,800.00(new) Urinal: $3,800.00unit 7 Required $26,600.00(new) Sink: $2,500.00unit 8 Required 1 Required $22,500.00(new) Other: Shower Valve/Faucet $500.00each 19 Required $9,500.00Shower Valve/Faucet Sum: $100,400.00 $84,600.00 $15,800.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 13

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

F. Windows Description:

The majority of the existing window and storefront installations at the 1969 building are not equipped with thermally efficient units. Typical window installations contain single pane glazing and are deteriorated. The 1994 media center addition is equipped with thermally efficient window assemblies with insulated glazing. The window installations are operable and cannot be equipped with integral blinds.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for complete replacement of all window assemblies at the 1969 addition to conform to OSDM standards and include integral blinds. The window installations at the media center addition are satisfactory.

Item

Cost

Unit

Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)Sum Comments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Insulated Glass/Panels: $55.00sq.ft. (Qty) 1,344 Required $73,920.00(includes blinds) Curtain Wall/Storefront System:$60.00sq.ft. (Qty) 160 Required $9,600.00(remove and replace) Sum: $83,520.00 $73,920.00 $9,600.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 14

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

G. Structure: Foundation Description:

The existing complex contains a masonry/concrete foundation system. There were no significant areas of deterioration, cracking, or settlement.

Rating:

1 Satisfactory

Recommendations:

No work is required at this time.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)SumComments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 15

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys Description:

The existing structure is constructed with masonry bearing wall asemblies with brick and concrete masonry exteriors. There are a few minor areas of deterioration. The complex is equipped with control joints. District officials noted the facility underwent masonry renovations in 2004.

Rating:

2 Needs Repair

Recommendations:

Provide masonry cleaning, sealing, and exteiror caulking as a preventative measure for routine maintenance.

Item

Cost Unit

Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)Sum Comments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Exterior Masonry Cleaning:$1.50sq.ft. (Qty) 7,968 Required 22,636 Required $45,906.00(wall surface) Exterior Masonry Sealing: $1.00sq.ft. (Qty) 7,968 Required 22,636 Required $30,604.00(wall surface) Exterior Caulking: $2.50ln.ft. 216 Required 624 Required $2,100.00(removing and replacing) Sum: $78,610.00 $20,460.00 $58,150.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 16

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs Description:

The floor construction for the entire complex is slab on grade construction and a steel joist system. The roof system for the structure is a steel joist system. There was no significante evidence of deterioration.

Rating:

1 Satisfactory

Recommendations:

No work is required at this time.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)SumComments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 17

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

J. General Finishes Description:

The current finishes at the 1969 building are dated. The quantity of casework is limited. Portions of the existing locker installations are dated. District officials did not provide the specific date of construction but noted the majority of the equipment is original to the date of construction. The majority of the finishes at the 1994 addition are satisfactory. A portion of the toilet partitions are deteriorated. Asbestos tile is suspected at the gymnasium, the flooring is deteriorated.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for replacement of all finishes, casework, and lockers due to age, condition, and extent of renovation work at the 1969 structure. Replace dated kitchen equipment. Replace/repair finishes disturbed by proposed renovation work at the 1994 building addition. Include replacement of the gymnasium flooring.

Item

Paint: Acoustic Ceiling: Complete Replacement of Finishes and Casework: Toilet Partitions: Toilet Accessory Replacement Resilient Wood/Synthetic Flooring Total Kitchen Equipment Replacement: Sum:

Cost

Unit

$2.00sq.ft. $3.50sq.ft. (Qty) $14.30sq.ft. $1,000.00per stall $0.20sq.ft. $12.85sq.ft. (Qty) $141.00sq.ft. (Qty)

Whole Building

Original Building Building Sum Comments (1969) Addition (1994) 54,663 ft² 35,174 ft² Required $109,326.00(partial finish - floor area/prep and installation) 54,663 Required$191,320.50(partial finish - tear out and replace per area) Required

$502,988.20(elementary, per building area, with removal of existing)

10 Required

3 Required

$13,000.00(removing and replacing)

Required

Required

$17,967.40(per building area)

9,322 Required $119,787.70(tear-out and replace per area) 1,842 Required

$1,214,111.80 $779,745.00

$259,722.00(square footage based upon only existing area of food preparation, serving, kitchen storage areas and walk-ins. Includes demolition and removal of existing kitchen equipment) $434,366.80

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 18

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

K. Interior Lighting Description:

The entire complex contains fluorescent and incandescent lighting. The lighting levels are: gymnasium11.8 FC, student dining 78 FC, kitchen 85.5 FC, media center 42 FC, science lab-43.9 FC, and typical classrooms-38.4 FC-66.3 FC. A portion of the classrooms are equipped with dual level lighting.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide complete replacement of lighting due to addition of a suppression system and HVAC systems.

Item

Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)Sum Comments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Complete Building Lighting Replacement$5.00sq.ft. Required Required $449,185.00Includes demo of existing fixtures Sum: $449,185.00 $175,870.00 $273,315.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 19

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

L. Security Systems Description:

The current security system is a motion sensor security system with magnetic lock controlled entry. Site lighting is provided by a combination of building mounted and a few pole mounted fixtures. The provisions provide limited illumination of the exterior site.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide upgrade of the current security system and exterior lighting due to OSDM standards.

Item

Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)Sum Comments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Security System: $1.50sq.ft. Required Required $134,755.50(complete, area of building) Exterior Site Lighting:$1.00sq.ft. Required Required $89,837.00building Sum: $224,592.50 $87,935.00 $136,657.50

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 20

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting Description:

The complex is equipped with exit signs and emergency egress lighting. The system was updated in the recent past. A portion of the existing fixture installations are ceiling mounted and will be disturbed by recommended renovation work.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide complete replacement of the emergency/egress lighting due to addition of sprinkler and HVAC systems.

Item

Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)Sum Comments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Emergency/Egress Lighting:$1.00sq.ft. Required Required $89,837.00(complete, area of building) Sum: $89,837.00 $35,174.00 $54,663.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 21

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

N. Fire Alarm Description:

The complex is equipped with a fire alarm system with manual pull stations with zoned detection and horn/strobe signals. The existing system is lacking horn/strobe signals in a portion of the occupiable rooms/spaces. The 1994 building addition is equipped with smoke detectors. A portion of equipment is ceiling mounted and will be disturbed by recommended renovation work.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide complete replacement of the fire alarm system. Provide an addressable system with horn/strobe signals in all occupiable rooms/spaces throughout the entire complex.

Item

Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)Sum Comments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Fire Alarm System:$1.50sq.ft. Required Required $134,755.50(complete new system, including removal of existing) Sum: $134,755.50 $52,761.00 $81,994.50

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 22

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

O. Handicapped Access Description:

The existing complex provides partial accessibility but does not fully conform to the provisions of the ADA guidelines in all areas. A portion of the toilet rooms/restrooms at the 1969 addition were renovated to provide accessible accommodations. However, the modifications are incomplete and/or are an inappropriate application of the ADA guidelines. The majority of the drinking fountains at the 1969 addition are not accessible. A portion of the existing door assemblies do not provide the required maneuvering clearances or are not equipped with accessible hardware. The 1994 addition was designed to provide accessible accommmodations but a portion of the existing lavatories are lacking pipe insulation protection or accessible hardware. The original toilet/shower facilities that were incorporated into the new addition area were not renovated to provide accessible accommodations. A portion of the toilet partitions at the 1994 building are deteriorated. The complex is equipped with an elevator.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for full accessibility throughout the entire complex in conformance with the provisions of the ADA and OSFC requirements.

Item

Cost

Unit

Signage: Ramps:

$0.10sq.ft. $40.00sq.ft. (Qty) Electric Water Coolers: $3,000.00unit Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $3,800.00unit Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00stall ADA Assist Door & $7,500.00unit Frame: Replace Doors: $1,100.00leaf

Whole Building

Original Building Building Sum Comments (1969) Addition (1994) 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Required Required $8,983.70(per building area) 28 Required 28 Required $2,240.00(per ramp/interior-exterior complete) 3 Required 21 Required

9 Required 5 Required

1 Required 44 Required

2 Required 2 Required

Replace Doors:

$5,000.00leaf

5 Required

Replace Doors:

$5,000.00leaf

4 Required

Other: ADA Shower Other: Shower Controls/Faucets Other: Pipe Insulation Sum:

$5,000.00each $500.00each

1 Required 1 Required

$100.00each $258,723.70 $194,337.40

9 Required $64,386.30

$9,000.00(new double ADA) $114,000.00(new ADA) $5,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included) $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc) $50,600.00(standard 3070 wood door, HM frame-classroom door/light, includes hardware) $35,000.00(rework narrow opening to provide 3070 wood door, HM frame, door/light, includes hardware) $20,000.00(rework opening and corridor wall to accommodate ADA standards when door opening is set back from edge of corridor and cannot accommodate a wheelchair.) $5,000.00ADA Shower $500.00Shower Controls/Faucets $900.00Pipe Insulation

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 23

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

P. Site Condition Description:

Buses load/unload at the main entry to the school complex and share a common path of travel with vehicular traffic. Asphalt pavements display signs of deterioration. Sidewalks are cracked and raised in some areas. A portion of the existing egress doors are lacking an accessible path of travel. Portions of the site were covered with snow at the time of the site visit, thus hindering full assessment of site conditions.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Replace deteriorated walks and pavements. Provide a dedicated bus loading/unloading zone. Provide a walkway system and an accessible path of travel from all egress doors.

Item

Replace Existing Asphalt Paving: Bus Drop-Off for Middle

Concrete Curb: Concrete Sidewalk:

Cost

Unit

$30.00sq. yard $110.00per student

Whole Building

Original Building (1969) 35,174 ft² 3,454 Required

Building Sum Comments Addition (1994) 54,663 ft² 5,403 Required $265,710.00(including drainage / tear out for light or heavy duty asphalt) 800 Required $88,000.00(Number of students should be rounded up to the nearest 100. $5500 per bus; 40 students per bus; 80% of middle school students riding) 78 Required 120 Required $2,970.00(new) 2,155 Required 3,370 Required $22,100.00(5 in exterior slab)

$15.00ln.ft. $4.00sq.ft. (Qty) Base Sitework Allowance for Unforeseen $50,000.00allowance Required Circumstances Sitework Allowance for Unforeseen $1.50sq.ft. Required Circumstances for buildings between 0 SF and 100,000 SF Sum: $563,535.50 $304,171.00

Required

$50,000.00Include this and one of the next two. (Applies for whole building, so only one addition should have this item) $134,755.50Include this one or the next. (Each addition should have this item)

$259,364.50

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 24

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

Q. Sewage System Description:

The facility is served by an on-site sewage treatment plant. District officials noted the system was not appropriately sized for the scope of the school complex and identified the maintenance of the system has been an ongoing issue of concern.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Replace/redesign on-site sewage treatment system.

Item

Cost

Unit

Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)Sum Comments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² On-Site Sewage Treatment System:$225.00per student 732 Required $164,700.00(per student at middle/high) Sum: $164,700.00 $164,700.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 25

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

R. Water Supply Description:

The complex water supply is copper. The structure is served by the local municipal system. District officials noted the system was satisfactory.

Rating:

1 Satisfactory

Recommendations:

No work is required at this time.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)SumComments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 26

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

S. Exterior Doors Description:

The existing door assemblies are a combination of newer and dated installations. A portion of the assemblies are deteriorated and/or contain single pane glazing. The storefront door assemblies at the 1994 building addition contain single pane glazing.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for replacement of dated/deteriorated door assemblies. Replace door assemblies equipped with single pane glazing with thermally efficient installations.

Item

Cost

Unit

Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)Sum Comments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Door Leaf/Frame and Hardware:$2,000.00per leaf 8 Required 8 Required $32,000.00(includes removal of existing) Sum: $32,000.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 27

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

T. Hazardous Material Description:

District officials have provided information identifying hazardous materials in this facility.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Remove all hazardous materials as identified by the Hazardous Materials Consultant. A full EEHA assessment will be required to verify the accuracy of the provided information.

Item

Cost Unit

Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)Sum Comments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² Environmental Hazards Form EHA Form ‹ Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic$3.00sq.ft. (Qty) 63,000 Required $189,000.00See J Sum: $189,000.00 $189,000.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 28

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

U. Life Safety Description:

The entire complex is not equipped with an automatic fire suppression system. A portion of the interior stair assemblies are not enclosed and the handrail/guardrail systems do not conform to current code provisions or ADA accessibility requirements.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide an automated fire suppression system throughout the entire complex. Enclose open stair assemblies and provide compliant handrail systems.

Item

Cost

Unit

Sprinkler / Fire Suppression System: Interior Stairwell Closure:

$3.25sq.ft. (Qty) $5,000.00per level

Handrails: Sum:

$5,000.00level

Whole Building

Original Building (1969) 35,174 ft² 35,174 Required

Building Addition (1994) 54,663 ft² 54,663 Required

4 Required

$341,970.25

4 Required $154,315.50

2 Required $187,654.75

Sum

Comments

$291,970.25(includes increase of service piping, if required) $20,000.00(includes associated doors, door frames and hardware) $30,000.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 29

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

V. Loose Furnishings Description:

Typical classrooms are furnished with a combination of newer and older equipment. The majority of the 1994 building addition is equipped with newer aged furnishings.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for furnishing replacement based upon the rating of 7 given for item 6.17 of the attached CEFPI rating.

Item

Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)Sum Comments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² CEFPI Rating 7$2.00sq.ft. Required Required $179,674.00 Sum: $179,674.00 $70,348.00 $109,326.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 30

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

W. Technology Description:

Typical classrooms are equipped with 1-5 data ports for teacher and student use, televisions, ceiling mounted projectors and smart boards. Classrooms are not equipped with telephones.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Replace all wiring due to extensive renovation to be undertaked and to fully conform to OSDM standards.

Item

Cost Unit

Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)Building Addition (1994)Sum Comments 35,174 ft² 54,663 ft² MS portion of building with total SF 67,951 to 91,650$7.47sq.ft. (Qty) 35,174 Required 54,663 Required $671,082.39 Sum: $671,082.39 $262,749.78 $408,332.61

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 31

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Facility Assessment

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost Renovation Costs (A-W) 7.00%

Construction Contingency

Subtotal 16.20%

$8,334,738.14 $583,431.67 $8,918,169.81

Non-Construction Costs

Total Project

$1,444,743.51 $10,362,913.32

Construction Contingency

$583,431.67

Non-Construction Costs

$1,444,743.51

Total for X.

$2,028,175.18

Non-Construction Costs Breakdown Land Survey

0.03%

$2,675.45

Soil Borings

0.10%

$8,918.17

Agency Approval Fees

0.15%

$13,377.25

Construction Testing

0.25%

$22,295.42

Printing

0.27%

$24,079.06

Advertising

0.03%

$2,675.45

Builder’s Risk

0.11%

$9,809.99

Design Professional Compensation

7.50%

$668,862.74

CM Compensation

6.00%

$535,090.19

Commissioning

0.33%

$29,429.96

Maintenance Plan Advisor

0.11%

$9,809.99

Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services)

1.32%

$117,719.84

16.20%

$1,444,743.51

Total Non-Construction Costs Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 32

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

School Facility Appraisal

Name of Appraiser

Jeff Tuckerman

Date of Appraisal

Building Name

LaMuth Middle School

Street Address

6700 Auburn Rd

City/Town, State, Zip Code

Painesville, OH 44077

Telephone Number(s)

(440) 354-4394

School District

Riverside Local Local SD

Setting:

Small City

2008-03-17

Site-Acreage

48

Building Square Footage

89,837

Grades Housed

6-7

Student Capacity

633

Number of Teaching Stations

38

Number of Floors

2

Student Enrollment

732

Dates of Construction

1969,1994

Energy Sources:

Fuel Oil

Gas

Electric

Solar

Air Conditioning:

Roof Top

Windows Units

Central

Room Units

Heating:

Central

Roof Top

Individual Unit

Forced Air

Hot Water

Steam

Type of Construction

Exterior Surfacing

Floor Construction

Load bearing masonry

Brick

Wood Joists

Steel frame

Stucco

Steel Joists

Concrete frame

Metal

Slab on grade

Wood

Wood

Structural slab

Steel Joists

Stone

Back to Assessment Summary

School Facility Appraisal

Page 33

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

1.0 The School Site School Facility Appraisal

Points Allocated

1.1

Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements

Points

25

25

20

18

10

10

10

9

10

9

5

5

5

5

5

4

5

3

5

5

The building sits on a 48 acre site.

1.2

Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population The site is geographically located to serve the school community.

1.3

Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards The site is located in a residential area with light traffic.

1.4

Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs The site contains mature trees, low shrubbery, lawn areas and nearby woods.

1.5

ES

Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areas

MS

Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parking

HS

Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking

The site is equipped with athletic fields and large parking areas.

1.6

Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines The site is relatively flat without steep inclines.

1.7

Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion There were no significant areas of ponding or erosion.

1.8

Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning There was no designated area for this activity. Portions of the site surrounding the school complex are wooded.

1.9

Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes Sidewalks are deteriorated in some areas. Portions of the site are lacking a continuous path of travel.

1.10

ES/MS

Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided

HS

Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community

District officals noted there was adequate parking at this facility.

TOTAL - The School Site

100

93

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 34

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features School Facility Appraisal

Points Allocated

Structural

2.1

Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally

Points

15

10

15

10

A portion of the complex provides accessible accommodations but the provisions do not fully conform to the ADA guidelines.

2.2

Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight

The roofs are comprised of modified bituminous systems. Installations are a combination of newer and older assemblies. A portion of the roofs are dated.

2.3

Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks

10

8

10

9

10

8

10

7

10

7

10

7

There were no significant signs of deterioration, settlement, or cracking.

2.4

Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration A portion of the complex was equipped with control joints. There were no significant areas of deterioration.

2.5

Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow The location of exits is adequate for student circulation.

2.6

Building ’’envelope’’ generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) The majority of the existing window assemblies are dated and contain single pane glazing at the original facility.

2.7

Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials District officials provided a hazardous materials report indicating areas of known asbestos.

2.8

Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes The original 1969 facility was not designed for flexibility of use.

Points Allocated

Mechanical/Electrical

2.9

Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating

Points

15

12

15

13

15

9

Lighting levels do not conform to OSDM standards in some areas.

2.10

Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements Domestic supply piping is copper. No pressure problems were reported by District officials.

2.11

Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technology applications

Typical classrooms are equipped with 1-5 data ports and a portion of the classrooms are equipped with projectors and smart boards. Classrooms are not equipped with telephones.

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 35

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

2.12

Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible

10

8

10

6

10

7

10

7

Electrical sevice panels are located in the mechanical areas.

2.13

Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions for the disabled A portion of drinking fountains were not accessible and do not provide multi-height accommodations.

2.14

Number and size of restrooms meet requirements A portion of the toilet facilities were not accessible and do not conform to the provisions of the ADA.

2.15

Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements

The complex is served by an on site sewage system. District officials noted the system was oversized and as a result is not functioning appropriately.

2.16

Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements

10

6

10

5

5

4

The facility is not equipped with a suppression system. The fire alarm system is lacking horn/strobe signals in some occupiable areas.

2.17

Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication between the office and instructional areas Classrooms are not equipped with telephones.

2.18

Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage Hose bibb connections are provided at the exterior of the structure.

TOTAL - Structural and Mechanical Features

200

143

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 36

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

3.0 Plant Maintainability School Facility Appraisal

Points Allocated

3.1

Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance

Points

15

10

15

12

10

8

10

7

10

7

10

7

10

8

10

8

10

8

The majority of window installations at the 1969 building are dated and are equipped with single pane glazing.

3.2

Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care Floor surfaces were terrazzo, carpet, and vinyl tile.

3.3

Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain Suspended acoustic ceilings are provided in most areas.

3.4

Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance Casework installations are limited. The majority of casework is dated at older portions of the complex.

3.5

Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality The majority of the door assemblies were not equipped with lever/ADA compliant hardware at older portions of the complex.

3.6

Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish The fixtures were a combination of wall and floor mounted units. Original/dated installations remain in some areas.

3.7

Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building Custodial space is typically provided near toilet rooms.

3.8

Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area School officials noted electrical provisions were adequate to serve the facility’s current needs.

3.9

Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement Exterior lighting was provided primarily by building mounted fixtures.

TOTAL - Plant Maintainability

100

75

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 37

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

4.0 Building Safety and Security School Facility Appraisal

Site Safety

4.1

Points Allocated

Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways

Points

15

10

10

6

5

3

5

4

5

4

Bus circulation shares a common path of travel with vehicular traffic.

4.2

Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians Walkways are deteriorated in some areas. A portion of the site is lacking a continuous path of travel.

4.3

Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area The main ingress/egress drive is not equipped with a signal system.

4.4

Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow Vehicular entrances were not equipped with turning lanes.

4.5

ES

Playground equipment is free from hazard

MS

Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazard

HS

Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard

The facility is equipped with athletic fields.

Building Safety

4.6

Points Allocated

The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas

Points

20

15

15

12

10

8

10

8

10

7

10

5

The boilers were located in the mechanical areas. Classrooms were equipped with unit ventilators.

4.7

Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress The facility contains multiple stair assemblies. A portion of the installations were not enclosed in rated assemblies.

4.8

Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic devices. A portion of installations are dated.

4.9

Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical circuits The facility was equipped with an emergency/egress lighting system.

4.10

Classroom doors are recessed and open outward A portion of classroom doors are recessed and open outward.

4.11

Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program

The facility contains a motion sensor system. District officials noted the system was not adequate to serve the needs of the school.

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 38

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

4.12

Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition

5

4

5

4

5

4

5

4

5

3

Classrooms/educational areas were equipped with vinyl tile. Corridors were terrazzo. A portion of finishes were deteriorated.

4.13

Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 Stair risers do not exceed 7’’.

4.14

Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury Safety glazing was identified at some locations.

4.15

Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall Drinking fountains project into corridors.

4.16

Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress Main corridors lead to exits. A portion of the exits were unenclosed and do not egress directly to the exterior.

Emergency Safety

4.17

Points Allocated

Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located

Points

15

13

15

12

Fire extinguishers were provided throughout the facility.

4.18

There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building

Remote means of egress were provided from most areas. A portion of the exits from the second floor do not discharge directly to the exterior.

4.19

Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure

15

8

15

12

Rated assemblies could not be identified at the older portions of the structure.

4.20

Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided

The facility is equipped with a fire alarm system with manual pull stations. A portion of the occupiable spaces are lacking horn/strobe signals.

TOTAL - Building Safety and Security

200

146

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 39

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

5.0 Educational Adequacy School Facility Appraisal

Academic Learning Space

5.1

Points Allocated

Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards

Points

25

20

15

10

10

9

10

5

10

7

10

5

Typical classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.2

Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity There is no designated space for this activity. Classrooms are undersized.

5.3

Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive noise The media center was centrally located on the main floor near the classroom wing.

5.4

Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students There is no designated space for this activity. Classrooms are undersized.

5.5

Storage for student materials is adequate A portion of locker installations are dated.

5.6

Storage for teacher materials is adequate Storage space is limited. There is little casework in classrooms.

Special Learning Space

5.7

Points Allocated

Size of special learning area(s) meets standards

Points

15

9

10

7

10

10

5

3

10

7

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.8

Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.9

Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space The media center is a recent addition to the complex and provides a pleasant environment.

5.10

Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction Vinyl asbestos tile is suspected at the gymnasium floor.

5.11

ES

Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instruction

MS/HS

Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 40

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

5.12

Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space

5

4

5

3

Music education takes place in dedicated classrooms. Band and choir are provided separate classroom areas.

5.13

Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standard established by the State of Ohio.

School Facility Appraisal

5.14

Points Allocated

Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment

Points

5

5

5

1

5

3

Technology education takes place in a dedicated classroom at the 1994 complex.

5.15

Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms There is no designated space for this activity.

5.16

Storage for student and teacher material is adequate Classroom storage provisions are limited.

Support Space

5.17

Points Allocated

Teacher’s lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals

Points

10

9

10

8

5

4

5

4

5

4

5

4

5

4

Teacher lounge/work areas are provided adjacent to the classroom wings.

5.18

Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation The student dining and kitchen are located in the original 1969 structure. The majority of kitchen equipment is dated.

5.19

Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturity of the students served Administrative offices are located adjacent to the main entry at the 1994 addition.

5.20

Counselor’s office insures privacy and sufficient storage Counselor’s office is located at the administration area.

5.21

Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements The clinic is equipped with accessible toilet facilities. The lavatory is lacking accessible hardware and insulation.

5.22

Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors Administrative areas are located near the main entry of the complex at the 1994 addition. The area provides a pleasant environment.

5.23

Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy The administrative area provides a pleasant environment.

TOTAL - Educational Adequacy

200

145

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 41

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

6.0 Environment for Education School Facility Appraisal

Exterior Environment

6.1

Points Allocated

Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students

Points

15

14

10

9

10

10

10

5

5

4

Exterior masonry construction is appropriate for educational design. The 1994 addition provides a pleasant design.

6.2

Site and building are well landscaped The site contains mature trees, low shrubbery, open lawn, and nearby woods.

6.3

Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning The site is located in a residential area with overhangs.

6.4

Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather The majority of entrances were not equipped with overhangs.

6.5

Building materials provide attractive color and texture The 1994 building addition provides an attractive design with varied materials and colors.

Interior Environment

6.6

Points Allocated

Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning

Points

20

16

15

7

15

9

15

10

15

10

10

9

10

9

Interior finishes at the 1994 addition provide a pleasant environment with a unified color scheme.

6.7

Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building A limited poriton of the facility is not equipped with air conditioning.

6.8

Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement The ventilation system does not conform to current OSDM standards at older portions of the complex.

6.9

Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination Lighting levels are below OSDM standards in some areas.

6.10

Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located Toilet rooms are located at dispersed areas. A portion of the facilities provide accessible accommodations.

6.11

Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization The gymnasiums, student dining, media center, and lobby provide common areas for socialization.

6.12

Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 42

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Corridors are sized for student circulation.

6.13

Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group

10

9

10

8

10

8

10

8

The gymnasiums, student dining area, lobby, and the media center provide areas for interaction.

6.14

Large group areas are designed for effective management of students The gymnasium is equipped with a retracting screen.

6.15

Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control Acoustic ceilings are provided in most areas.

6.16

Window design contributes to a pleasant environment

The majority of the window assemblies at the 1969 addition are equipped with single pane glazing and narrow openings.

6.17

Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere

10

7

The majority of the existing furniture is a combination of newer and dated equipment.

TOTAL - Environment for Education

200

152

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 43

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Justification for Allocation of Points

Building Name and Level:

LaMuth Middle School 6-7

Building features that clearly exceed criteria: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate: 1.

The building is not suppressed.

2.

The complex is not equipped with an adequate air conditioning system.

3. 4. 5. 6. Back to Assessment Summary

Justification for Allocation of Points

Page 44

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

Building Summary - LaMuth Middle School (61895) District:

Riverside Local Local SD

County:

Lake

Name:

LaMuth Middle School

Contact:

Mr. Eric Kujala

Phone:

(440) 354-4394

Address: 6700 Auburn Rd Painesville,OH 44077 Bldg. IRN: 61895

Date Prepared: 2008-03-17

By:

Tony Schorr

Date Revised: 2008-08-26

By:

Jeff Tuckerman

Current Grades

6-7

Acreage:

48

Proposed Grades

N/A

Teaching Stations:

38

Current Enrollment

732

Classrooms:

33

Projected Enrollment

N/A

Date HA

Number of Floors

Original Building

1969 no

2

Building Addition

Section

1994 yes

2

Current Square Feet 1.0 The School Site 35,174 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 54,663 3.0 Plant Maintainability 89,837 4.0 Building Safety and Security

Total

Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category ‹

‹

‹

200

186

93%

‹ Excellent

400

286

72%

Satisfactory

200

150

75%

Satisfactory

400

292

73%

Satisfactory

*HA

= Handicapped Access

5.0 Educational Adequacy

400

290

73%

Satisfactory

*Rating

=1 Satisfactory

6.0 Environment for Education

400

304

76%

Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair

Commentary

‹

‹

‹

=3 Needs Replacement

Total

2000

1508

75%

Rating

‹ Satisfactory

C=Under Contract

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2007

Dollar Assessment C Renovation Cost Factor

104.16% $2,605,273.00 - Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $10,794,010.51 $399,777.00 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is $0.00 - requested from a Master Plan.

A. Heating System

3

B. Roofing

3

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

1

D. Electrical Systems

3

$553,990.50 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

3

$100,400.00 -

F. Windows

3

$83,520.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation

1

$0.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

2

$78,610.00 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

1

$0.00 -

J. General Finishes

3

$1,214,111.80 -

K. Interior Lighting

3

$449,185.00 -

L. Security Systems

3

$224,592.50 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

3

$89,837.00 -

N. Fire Alarm

3

$134,755.50 -

O. Handicapped Access

3

$258,723.70 -

P. Site Condition

3

$563,535.50 -

Q. Sewage System

3

$164,700.00 -

R. Water Supply

1

$0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors

3

$32,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material

3

$189,000.00 -

U. Life Safety

3

$341,970.25 -

V. Loose Furnishings

3

$179,674.00 -

W. Technology

3

$671,082.39 -

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

-

$2,028,175.18 -

Total

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Cover Sheet

Addition

-

Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)

$10,362,913.32 Previous Page

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

Page 45

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26

Environmental Hazards - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895) - Original Building Environmental Hazards - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895) - Original Building

Owner:

Riverside Local Local SD

Facility:

LaMuth Middle School

Bldg. IRN:

61895

BuildingAdd:

Date:

Original Building

Consultant Name:

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) ACM Found 1. Boiler/Furnace/Breeching Insulation Removal 2. Tank/Duct Insulation Removal 3. Pipe Insulation Removal 4. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal 5. Acoustical Plaster Removal 6. Fireproofing Removal 7. Hard Plaster Removal 8. Gypsum Board Removal 9. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal 10. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic 11. Roofing Removal 12. (Sum of Lines 1-11) 13. (Sum of Lines 1-9)

Status Quantity Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 63000 Not Present 0 Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work

AFM=Asbestos Free Material Unit Cost Estimated Cost $10.00 $0.00 $8.00 $0.00 $8.00 $0.00 $20.00 $0.00 $7.00 $0.00 $15.00 $0.00 $7.00 $0.00 $6.00 $0.00 $3.00 $0.00 $3.00 $189,000.00 $2.00 $0.00 $189,000.00 $0.00

B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks Tank No. 1. (Sum of Lines 1-0)

None Reported Location

Age

Product Stored Size Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks

C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only 1. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups 2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups 3. (Sum of Lines 1-2) D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Area Of Building Addition 1. 35174 0

$0.00

Addition Constructed after 1980 $0.00 $0.00 Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00

Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts

Unit Cost $0.05

E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks 1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) 2. (Sum of Lines 1-0)

Est.Rem.Cost

None Reported Cost Estimate $0.00 $0.00

Description Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition

F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries 1. A12, B1, C3, D1, and E1 2. A13, B1, D1, and E2

Not Applicable Total Cost $0.00

Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition

$189,000.00 $0.00

* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM): a.

Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.

b.

Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster, acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12"×12" floor tile and mastic.

c.

Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.

THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.



Page 46

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:26