Hale Road Elementary - Riverside School District - State Facilities Report

Building Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary

Program Type

Expedited Local Partnership Program (ELPP)

Setting

Small City

Assessment Name

Copy of Hale Road Elementary School - Final

Assessment Date

2008-03-18

Cost Set:

2007

Building Name

Hale Road Elementary

Building IRN

14845

Building Address

56 Hale Rd

Building City

Painesville

Building Zipcode

44077

Building Phone

(440) 352-2300

Acreage

32

Current Grades

K-5

Teaching Stations

28

Number of Floors

3

Student Capacity

419

Current Enrollment

1

Enrollment Date

2007-08-23

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken. Number of Classrooms

26

Historical Register

NO

Building’s Principal

Mr. Jack Miley

Building Type

Elementary Next Page

Building Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary

Page 1

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Building Pictures - Riverside Local Local SD(47894) - Hale Road Elementary(14845)

North elevation photo:

East elevation photo:

South elevation photo:

West elevation photo:

GENERAL DESCRIPTION 52,375 Total Existing Square Footage 1925,1949,1965 Building Dates K-5 Grades 1 Current Enrollment 28 Teaching Stations 32 Site Acreage Hale Road Elementary School is a three (3) story structure totaling 52,375 s.f. The complex is constructed on a sloping site providing a multi-height split level floor arrangement. The original facility of 22,156 s.f. was constructed in 1925. The first classroom wing addition of 19,180 s.f. was constructed in 1949. The second classroom wing addition of 10,409 s.f. was constructed in 1965. The facility contains one (1) gymnasium of 3,902 s.f., which also serves as student dining, one (1) kitchen of 662 s.f. and one (1) media center of 1014 s.f. Hale Road Elementary currently provides space for grades K-5. The majority of the complex is not accessible and does not conform to the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act Guidelines. Typical classrooms throughout the complex are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio. The school facility is located on a 32 acre site in a residential area. School buses load/unload along a separated drive at the main entry to the school. The existing structure is constructed with load bearing masonry walls with supported deck and slab on grade construction. The structure is outfitted with a motion sensor security system and a fire alarm system with manual pull stations. The complex does not contain a suppression system and the majority of the complex is not air conditioned.

Previous Page Next Page

Building Pictures - Riverside Local Local SD(47894) - Hale Road Elementary(14845)

Page 2

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Building Construction Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Name Original Building

Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet 1925 no

3

22,156

Classroom Wing Addition 1949 no

3

19,810

Classroom Wing Addition 1965 no

2

10,409

Previous Page Next Page

Building Construction Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Page 3

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Building Component Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Addition

Auditorium Agricultural Primary Media Vocational Student Indoor Adult Board Outside Auxiliary Fixed Corridors Education Kitchen Natatorium Gymnasium Center Space Dining Tracks Education Offices Agencies Gymnasium Seating Lab

Original Building (1925)

2724

Classroom Wing Addition (1949)

2926

Classroom Wing Addition (1965)

1817

3902

1014

662

Master Planning Considerations Previous Page Next Page

Building Component Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Page 4

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Existing CT Programs for Assessment Next Page Previous Page Program Type Program Name Related Space Square Feet No Records Found Legend: Not in current design manual In current design manual but missing from assessment



Page 5

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Building Summary - Hale Road Elementary (14845) District:

Riverside Local Local SD

County:

Lake

Name:

Hale Road Elementary

Contact:

Mr. Jack Miley

Phone:

(440) 352-2300

Address: 56 Hale Rd Painesville,OH 44077 Bldg. IRN: 14845

Date Prepared: 2008-03-18

By:

Tony Schorr

Date Revised: 2008-08-26

By:

Jeff Tuckerman

Current Grades

K-5

Acreage:

32

Proposed Grades

N/A

Teaching Stations:

28

Current Enrollment

1

Classrooms:

26

Projected Enrollment

N/A Date HA

Number of Floors

Original Building

1925 no

3

Classroom Wing Addition

1949 no

3

Classroom Wing Addition

1965 no

Section

‹

‹

‹

176

88%

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 22,156 3.0 Plant Maintainability

400

248

62%

Borderline

200

140

70%

Satisfactory

19,810 4.0 Building Safety and Security

400

294

74%

Satisfactory

400

246

62%

Borderline

400

236

59%

Borderline

‹

‹

‹

2000

1340

67%

1.0 The School Site

5.0 Educational Adequacy 2

10,409 6.0 Environment for Education 52,375

*HA

= Handicapped Access

*Rating

=1 Satisfactory

Commentary Total

‹ Satisfactory

‹ Borderline

C=Under Contract

=2 Needs Repair

Renovation Cost Factor

=3 Needs Replacement

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2007

Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category 200

Current Square Feet

Total

Rating

104.16% $8,088,060.81

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is Dollar requested from a Master Plan. Assessment C

A. Heating System

3

$1,518,875.00 -

B. Roofing

3

$146,937.00 -

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

1

$0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems

2

$80,000.00 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

3

$486,625.00 -

F. Windows

3

$214,500.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation

2

$46,100.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

3

$209,872.50 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

1

$0.00 -

J. General Finishes

3

$871,779.50 -

K. Interior Lighting

3

$261,875.00 -

L. Security Systems

3

$130,937.50 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

3

$52,375.00 -

N. Fire Alarm

3

$78,562.50 -

O. Handicapped Access

3

$631,837.50 -

P. Site Condition

3

$319,943.00 -

Q. Sewage System

1

$0.00 -

R. Water Supply

2

$5,000.00 -

S. Exterior Doors

3

$16,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material

3

$75,000.00 -

U. Life Safety

3

$330,218.75 -

V. Loose Furnishings

3

$209,500.00 -

W. Technology

3

$559,365.00 -

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

-

$1,519,732.09 -

Total

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Cover Sheet

Addition

-

Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)

$7,765,035.34 Previous Page

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Page 6

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Original Building (1925) Summary District:

Riverside Local Local SD

County:

Lake

Name:

Hale Road Elementary

Contact:

Mr. Jack Miley

Phone:

(440) 352-2300

Address: 56 Hale Rd Painesville,OH 44077 Bldg. IRN: 14845

Date Prepared: 2008-03-18

By:

Tony Schorr

Date Revised: 2008-08-26

By:

Jeff Tuckerman

Current Grades

K-5

Acreage:

32

Proposed Grades

N/A

Teaching Stations:

28

Current Enrollment

1

Classrooms:

26

Projected Enrollment

N/A Date HA

Number of Floors

Original Building

1925 no

3

Classroom Wing Addition

1949 no

3

Classroom Wing Addition

1965 no

Section

‹

‹

‹

176

88%

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 22,156 3.0 Plant Maintainability

400

248

62%

Borderline

200

140

70%

Satisfactory

19,810 4.0 Building Safety and Security

400

294

74%

Satisfactory

400

246

62%

Borderline

400

236

59%

Borderline

‹

‹

‹

2000

1340

67%

1.0 The School Site

5.0 Educational Adequacy 2

10,409 6.0 Environment for Education 52,375

*HA

= Handicapped Access

*Rating

=1 Satisfactory

Commentary Total

‹ Satisfactory

‹ Borderline

C=Under Contract

=2 Needs Repair

Renovation Cost Factor

=3 Needs Replacement

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2007

Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category 200

Current Square Feet

Total

Rating

104.16% $3,703,868.60

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is Dollar requested from a Master Plan. Assessment C

A. Heating System

3

$642,524.00 -

B. Roofing

3

$67,592.00 -

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

1

$0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems

2

$80,000.00 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

3

$191,692.00 -

F. Windows

3

$82,500.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation

2

$22,100.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

3

$99,522.50 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

1

$0.00 -

J. General Finishes

3

$419,604.00 -

K. Interior Lighting

3

$110,780.00 -

L. Security Systems

3

$55,390.00 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

3

$22,156.00 -

N. Fire Alarm

3

$33,234.00 -

O. Handicapped Access

3

$288,815.60 -

P. Site Condition

3

$168,824.00 -

Q. Sewage System

1

$0.00 -

R. Water Supply

2

$5,000.00 -

S. Exterior Doors

3

$8,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material

3

$75,000.00 -

U. Life Safety

3

$162,007.00 -

V. Loose Furnishings

3

$88,624.00 -

W. Technology

3

$236,626.08 -

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

-

$695,950.25 -

Total

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Cover Sheet

Addition

-

Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)

$3,555,941.43

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Page 7

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Classroom Wing Addition (1949) Summary District:

Riverside Local Local SD

County:

Lake

Name:

Hale Road Elementary

Contact:

Mr. Jack Miley

Phone:

(440) 352-2300

Address: 56 Hale Rd Painesville,OH 44077 Bldg. IRN: 14845

Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)

Date Prepared: 2008-03-18

By:

Tony Schorr

Date Revised: 2008-08-26

By:

Jeff Tuckerman

Current Grades

K-5

Acreage:

32

Proposed Grades

N/A

Teaching Stations:

28

Current Enrollment

1

Classrooms:

26

Projected Enrollment

N/A

CEFPI Appraisal Summary Section Cover Sheet

Addition

Date HA

Number of Floors

Original Building

1925 no

3

Classroom Wing Addition

1949 no

3

‹

‹

‹

200

176

88%

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 22,156 3.0 Plant Maintainability

400

248

62%

Borderline

200

140

70%

Satisfactory

19,810 4.0 Building Safety and Security

400

294

74%

Satisfactory

400

246

62%

Borderline

400

236

59%

Borderline

52,375 Commentary

‹

‹

‹

2000

1340

67%

Current Square Feet

1.0 The School Site

5.0 Educational Adequacy

Classroom Wing Addition 1965 no

2

10,409 6.0 Environment for Education

Total

Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category

*HA

= Handicapped Access

Total

*Rating

=1 Satisfactory

C=Under Contract

‹ Satisfactory

‹ Borderline

=2 Needs Repair =3 Needs Replacement

Renovation Cost Factor

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2007

-

Rating

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)

Dollar The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is Assessment C requested from a Master Plan. $574,490.00 -

A. Heating System

3

B. Roofing

3

$42,910.00 -

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

1

$0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems

2

$0.00 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

3

$185,470.00 -

F. Windows

3

$73,480.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation

2

$24,000.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

3

$75,390.00 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

1

$0.00 -

J. General Finishes

3

$295,245.00 -

K. Interior Lighting

3

$99,050.00 -

L. Security Systems

3

$49,525.00 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

3

$19,810.00 -

N. Fire Alarm

3

$29,715.00 -

O. Handicapped Access

3

$126,981.00 -

P. Site Condition

3

$99,020.00 -

Q. Sewage System

1

$0.00 -

R. Water Supply

2

$0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors

3

$0.00 -

T. Hazardous Material

3

$0.00 -

U. Life Safety

3

$114,382.50 -

V. Loose Furnishings

3

$79,240.00 -

W. Technology

3

$211,570.80 -

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

-

$511,081.96 -

Total

104.16% $2,719,993.89

$2,611,361.26

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Page 8

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) Summary District:

Riverside Local Local SD

County:

Lake

Name:

Hale Road Elementary

Contact:

Mr. Jack Miley

Phone:

(440) 352-2300

Address: 56 Hale Rd Painesville,OH 44077 Bldg. IRN: 14845

Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)

Date Prepared: 2008-03-18

By:

Tony Schorr

Date Revised: 2008-08-26

By:

Jeff Tuckerman

Current Grades

K-5

Acreage:

32

Proposed Grades

N/A

Teaching Stations:

28

Current Enrollment

1

Classrooms:

26

Projected Enrollment

N/A

CEFPI Appraisal Summary Section Cover Sheet

‹

‹

‹

200

176

88%

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 22,156 3.0 Plant Maintainability

400

248

62%

Borderline

200

140

70%

Satisfactory

3

19,810 4.0 Building Safety and Security

400

294

74%

Satisfactory

2

10,409 5.0 Educational Adequacy

400

246

62%

Borderline

400

236

59%

Borderline

52,375 Commentary

‹

‹

‹

2000

1340

67%

Addition

Date HA

Number of Floors

Original Building

1925 no

3

Classroom Wing Addition 1949 no Classroom Wing Addition

1965 no

Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category

Current Square Feet

1.0 The School Site

6.0 Environment for Education

Total *HA

= Handicapped Access

Total

*Rating

=1 Satisfactory

C=Under Contract

‹ Satisfactory

‹ Borderline

=2 Needs Repair =3 Needs Replacement

Renovation Cost Factor

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2007

-

Rating

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)

Dollar The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is Assessment C requested from a Master Plan. $301,861.00 -

A. Heating System

3

B. Roofing

3

$36,435.00 -

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

1

$0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems

2

$0.00 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

3

$109,463.00 -

F. Windows

3

$58,520.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation

2

$0.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

3

$34,960.00 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

1

$0.00 -

J. General Finishes

3

$156,930.50 -

K. Interior Lighting

3

$52,045.00 -

L. Security Systems

3

$26,022.50 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

3

$10,409.00 -

N. Fire Alarm

3

$15,613.50 -

O. Handicapped Access

3

$216,040.90 -

P. Site Condition

3

$52,099.00 -

Q. Sewage System

1

$0.00 -

R. Water Supply

2

$0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors

3

$8,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material

3

$0.00 -

U. Life Safety

3

$53,829.25 -

V. Loose Furnishings

3

$41,636.00 -

W. Technology

3

$111,168.12 -

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

-

$312,699.87 -

Total

104.16% $1,664,198.32

$1,597,732.64

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Page 9

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

A. Heating System Description:

The existing system for the entire complex is a gas-fired steam boiler system. The boilers were updated in 1998. Typical classrooms are equipped with unit ventilators. Radiators remain in service in a few areas. The majority of the complex is not equipped with air conditioning.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for complete replacement of the entire heating, ventilation and cooling system throughout the entire complex due to condition, use of dated equipment, and lack of proper ventilation and air conditioning. Convert to fully ducted system to conform to OSDM standards and current ventilation requirements.

Item

Cost

Unit Whole Building

HVAC System $22.00sq.ft. Replacement: Convert To Ducted $7.00sq.ft. System Replacement Sum:

Original Building (1925) 22,156 ft² Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1949) 19,810 ft² Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) 10,409 ft² Required

Required

Required

Required

$574,490.00

$301,861.00

$1,518,875.00 $642,524.00

Sum

Comments

$1,152,250.00(includes demo of existing system and reconfiguration of piping layout and new controls, air conditioning) $366,625.00(includes cost for vert. & horz. chases, cut openings, soffits, etc. Must be used in addition to HVAC System Replacement if the existing HVAC system is non-ducted)

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 10

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

B. Roofing Description:

The existing roof system for the entire complex is a modified bituminous roof system installed in sections in 1977 and 1993 and now exceeds 15 years of age.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for complete replacement of the existing roof systems due to condition and dated system installations. Provide an OSDM compliant membrane system at all areas.

Item

Cost Unit

Membrane (all types): Sum:

$7.00sq.ft. (Qty)

Whole Building

$146,937.00

Original Building (1925) 22,156 ft² 9,656 Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1949) 19,810 ft² 6,130 Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) 10,409 ft² 5,205 Required

$67,592.00

$42,910.00

$36,435.00

Sum

Comments

$146,937.00(unless under 10,000 sq.ft.)

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 11

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning Description:

The majority of the complex is not equipped with an air conditioning system. Air conditioning is provided in isolated areas only. Window units are provided in a few areas.

Rating:

1 Satisfactory

Recommendations:

Provide an air conditioning system throughout the entire complex to conform to OSDM standards. Provisions identified in Plate A.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1925)Classroom Wing Addition (1949)Classroom Wing Addition (1965)SumComments 22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft² Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 12

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

D. Electrical Systems Description:

The electrical system for the entire complex is a 208/120 volt, 3-phase, 800 amp service. The main electrical service and the distribution system were replaced in 2001. District officials noted the system was satisfactory.

Rating:

2 Needs Repair

Recommendations:

Provide for expansion of the existing electrical system to provide a minimum 3-phase 208v Amperage service capacity of 2,400 amps to conform to OSDM requirements.

Item

Cost

Other: Electrical Service increase

$80,000.00allowance

Sum:

Unit

Whole Building

Original Classroom Wing Building (1925) Addition (1949) 22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² Required

$80,000.00 $80,000.00

$0.00

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) 10,409 ft²

Sum

Comments

$80,000.00Provide for expansion of the existing electrical system to provide a minimum 3-phase 208v Amperage service capacity of 2,400 amps. $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 13

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

E. Plumbing and Fixtures Description:

The school facility contains 8 group restrooms (4 girls, 4 boys) and 2 single occupancy toilet rooms. Fixtures are a combination of newer and older equipment. Water closets/toilets are typically floor mounted. The majority of the toilet facilities are not accessible and do not conform to the provisions of the ADA. A portion of urinals are equipped with a continual flush system. Domestic supply piping is copper. District officials noted that system leaks for both supply and drainage systems have been an ongoing issue of concern.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for replacement of all wall and floor mounted fixtures due to age, condition and/or OSDM requirements. Replace domestic supply and drainage systems throughout the complex.

Item

Cost

Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1925)Classroom Wing Addition (1949)Classroom Wing Addition (1965)Sum Comments 22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft² Back Flow Preventer: $5,000.00unit 1 Required $5,000.00 Domestic Supply Piping: $3.50sq.ft. Required Required Required $183,312.50(remove / replace) Sanitary Waste Piping: $3.50sq.ft. Required Required Required $183,312.50(remove / replace) Toilet: $3,800.00unit 5 Required 8 Required 6 Required $72,200.00(new) Urinal: $3,800.00unit 2 Required 3 Required 1 Required $22,800.00(new) Sink: $2,500.00unit 2 Required 2 Required 4 Required $20,000.00(new) Sum: $486,625.00 $191,692.00 $185,470.00 $109,463.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 14

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

F. Windows Description:

The window assemblies throughout the complex were updated with thermally efficient window assemblies with double paine glazing. District officials noted the existing installations were installed in approximately 1993 +/- and now exceed 15 years of age. Insert panels reduced daylight quantities. The assemblies are operable and can not be equipped with integral blinds. A portion of structure is equipped with dated glass block assemblies.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for complete replacement of all window and glass block assemblies to conform to OSDM standards and include integral blinds.

Item

Cost

Unit

Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1925)Classroom Wing Addition (1949)Classroom Wing Addition (1965)Sum Comments 22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft² Insulated Glass/Panels:$55.00sq.ft. (Qty) 1,500 Required 1,336 Required 1,064 Required $214,500.00(includes blinds) Sum: $214,500.00 $82,500.00 $73,480.00 $58,520.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 15

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

G. Structure: Foundation Description:

The existing complex contains a masonry/concrete foundation. There were a few areas of deterioration. An exterior stair assembly, retaining wall and adjoining foundation structure display evidence of deterioration at the 1925 buildling. A portion of the 1949 building has several prominate cracks in the walls of the structure with an area of displaced masonry. The apparent damage extends through several floor levels. The damage may be the result of settlement or additional building movement. District officials noted the conditioning has been progressing over several years and is increasing in severity. The exterior grade adjacent to the wall structure was covered with stock piled snow from plowed pavement areas thus hendering assessment of the grade condition at the areas of damage. The grade appeared to slope slightly toward the wall structure. The ground floor (basement) wall structures displayed evidence of water infiltration in several areas.

Rating:

2 Needs Repair

Recommendations:

Provide a waterproof membrane system at the exterior wall structures of the habital and classroom areas of the ground floor to prevent below grade water infiltration at the perimeter of the structure. Replace the deteriorated stair and retaining wall assembly and repair adjoining foundation structures. Refer to Plate ’’H’’ for additional provisions.

Item

Waterproofing Spray Applied:

Cost

Unit

$4.00sq.ft. (Qty) $18.00ln.ft.

Whole Building

Drainage Tile Systems / Foundation Drainage: Other: Replace stair/retaining wall $10,000.00allowance assembly Sum: $46,100.00

Original Building (1925) 22,156 ft² 1,936 Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1949) 19,810 ft² 3,840 Required

242 Required

480 Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) 10,409 ft²

$24,000.00

Comments

$23,104.00(include excavation and backfill) $12,996.00(include excavation and backfill) $10,000.00Replace stair/retaining wall assembly

Required $22,100.00

Sum

$0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 16

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys Description:

The existing structure is constructed with masonry bearing wall assemblies with brick exteriors. District officials noted the structure underwent extensive masonry restoration in 1999 but there are several areas of new deterioration, especially at the north and east fascade of the structure. A portion of the 1949 building contains several prominate cracks in the walls and adjoining floor structure. The noted area of deterioration extends through multiple floor levels and a portion of the masonry structures are displaced from building movement. District officials reported the severity of deterioration has been progressing over several years despite attempts to repair. The cracks in the floor structures were covered with trim plates due to the progression of cracking at these areas. Several of the masonry lintels display evidence of corrosion.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide masonry cleaning, replace deteriorated lintels, copmlete masonry repairs, and provide masonry sealing. Provide for structure analysis and field invesigation at area of deterioration at the 1949 building and complete all recommended repairs.

Item

Tuckpointing:

Cost

Unit

$7.50sq.ft. (Qty) $1.50sq.ft. (Qty) $1.00sq.ft. (Qty) $30.00sq.ft. (Qty) $250.00ln.ft.

Whole Building

Exterior Masonry Cleaning: Exterior Masonry Sealing: Replace Brick Veneer System: Masonry Lintel Replacement: Install Control Joints $60.00ln.ft. Other: Structural $30,000.00allowance Repairs Other: Structural $5,000.00allowance analysis Sum: $209,872.50

Original Building (1925) 22,156 ft² 1,951 Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1949) 19,810 ft² 800 Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) 10,409 ft² 408 Required

Sum

9,756 Required

7,948 Required

8,152 Required

$38,784.00(wall surface)

9,756 Required

7,948 Required

8,152 Required

$25,856.00(wall surface)

30 Required 200 Required

12 Required

160 Required

192 Required Required

192 Required

Required $99,522.50

$75,390.00

Comments

$23,692.50(wall surface)

$900.00(total removal and replacement including pinning and shoring) $53,000.00(total removal and replacement including pinning and shoring) $32,640.00 $30,000.00Structural repairs allowance. $5,000.00Structural analysis allowance.

$34,960.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 17

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs Description:

The floor construction for the entire complex is slab on grade construction and a steel joist system. The roof system for the structure is a steel joist system. There was no significant evidence of deterioration except for area noted in Plate ’’G’’.

Rating:

1 Satisfactory

Recommendations:

No work required at this time.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1925)Classroom Wing Addition (1949)Classroom Wing Addition (1965)SumComments 22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft² Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 18

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

J. General Finishes Description:

The current finishes throughout the complex are dated. Casework is wood and worn. The majority of the complex is lacking cubbies/lockers. Classrooms and corridors are equipped with coat hooks. District official did not provide the exact date of kitchen equipment but noted the majority of kitchen equipment is dated.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for replacement of all finishes, casework, lockers/cubbies and kitchen equipment due to age/condition and extent of renovation work.

Item

Cost

Unit

Complete Replacement $14.30sq.ft. of Finishes and Casework: Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00per stall Toilet Accessory $0.20sq.ft. Replacement Total Kitchen Equipment $141.00sq.ft. Replacement: (Qty)

Sum:

Whole Building

Original Classroom Wing Building (1925) Addition (1949) 22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² Required Required

Classroom Wing Sum Comments Addition (1965) 10,409 ft² Required $748,962.50(elementary, per building area, with removal of existing)

5 Required

8 Required

6 Required

$19,000.00(removing and replacing)

Required

Required

Required

$10,475.00(per building area)

662 Required

$871,779.50 $419,604.00

$93,342.00(square footage based upon only existing area of food preparation, serving, kitchen storage areas and walk-ins. Includes demolition and removal of existing kitchen equipment) $295,245.00

$156,930.50

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 19

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

K. Interior Lighting Description:

The entire complex contains fluorescent and incandescent lighting. Lighting levels are: Computer lab 39.4 FC, Art 61.0 FC, Science classroom 44.5 FC, Media Center 41.1 FC, and Typical classrooms 29.3 FC - 36.7 FC.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide complete replacement of lighting due to addition of a suppression system, HVAC system, and under illuminated spaces.

Item

Cost Unit Whole Building

Complete Building Lighting Replacement Sum:

$5.00sq.ft.

Original Building (1925) 22,156 ft² Required

$261,875.00 $110,780.00

Classroom Wing Addition (1949) 19,810 ft² Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) 10,409 ft² Required

$99,050.00

$52,045.00

Sum

Comments

$261,875.00Includes demo of existing fixtures

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 20

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

L. Security Systems Description:

The current security system is a motion sensor security system with magnetic lock controlled entry. Site lighting is provided by a combination of building mounted and a few pole mounted fixtures. The provisions provide limited illumination at the exterior site.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide upgrade of the current security system and exterior lighting to conform to OSDM standards.

Item

Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1925)Classroom Wing Addition (1949)Classroom Wing Addition (1965)Sum Comments 22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft² Security System: $1.50sq.ft. Required Required Required $78,562.50(complete, area of building) Exterior Site Lighting:$1.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $52,375.00building Sum: $130,937.50 $55,390.00 $49,525.00 $26,022.50

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 21

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting Description:

The complex is equipped with exit signs and emergency egress lighting. The system was updated in the recent past. A portion of the existing fixture installations are ceiling mounted and will be disturbed by recommended renovation work.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide complete replacement of the emergency/egress lighting system due to the addition of sprinkler and HVAC systems.

Item

Cost Unit Whole Building

Emergency/Egress Lighting: Sum:

$1.00sq.ft. $52,375.00

Original Building (1925) 22,156 ft² Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1949) 19,810 ft² Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) 10,409 ft² Required

$22,156.00

$19,810.00

$10,409.00

Sum

Comments

$52,375.00(complete, area of building)

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 22

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

N. Fire Alarm Description:

The complex is equipped with a fire alarm system with manual pull stations with zoned detection horn/strobe signals. The existing system is lacking horn/strobe signals in a portion of the occupiable rooms/spaces.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide complete replacement of the fire alarm. Provide an addressable system with horn/strobe signals in all occupiable rooms/spaces throughout the entire complex.

Item

Cost Unit Whole Building

Fire Alarm System: Sum:

$1.50sq.ft. $78,562.50

Original Building (1925) 22,156 ft² Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1949) 19,810 ft² Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) 10,409 ft² Required

$33,234.00

$29,715.00

$15,613.50

Sum

Comments

$78,562.50(complete new system, including removal of existing)

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 23

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

O. Handicapped Access Description:

The existing complex is not accessible and does not conform to the provisions of the ADA. Toiletroom/Restroom throughout the structure are not accessible. A portion of the existing door assemblies do not provide the required manuvering clearances. The majority of the existing door installations are equipped with lever hardware but many of door units are dated. Interior and exterior level change are not accessible. The complex was constructed on a sloping site providing a split level floor arrangement. Multiple elevators and/or lifts are required to provide access to all floor levels. A portion of the drinking fountains provide accessible accomodations but do not provide multi-height provisions.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for full accessibility throughout the entire complex in conformance with the provisions of the ADA and OSFC requirements.

Item

Cost

Signage: Ramps:

$0.10sq.ft. $40.00sq.ft. (Qty) $15,000.00unit $50,000.00each $3,000.00unit

Lifts: Elevators: Electric Water Coolers: Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: Toilet Partitions: ADA Assist Door & Frame: Replace Doors: Replace Doors: Sum:

Unit

Whole Building

Original Building (1925) 22,156 ft² Required 180 Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1949) 19,810 ft² Required

3 Required 3 Required 3 Required

2 Required 3 Required

2 Required 2 Required

$3,800.00unit $1,000.00stall $7,500.00unit

6 Required 1 Required 1 Required

7 Required 2 Required

9 Required 4 Required

$1,100.00leaf

31 Required

34 Required

28 Required

$5,000.00leaf

2 Required

4 Required

8 Required

$126,981.00

$216,040.90

$631,837.50 $288,815.60

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) 10,409 ft² Required

Sum

Comments

$5,237.50(per building area) $7,200.00(per ramp/interior-exterior complete) $75,000.00(complete) $250,000.00(per stop, $100,000 minimum) $24,000.00(new double ADA) $83,600.00(new ADA) $7,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included) $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc) $102,300.00(standard 3070 wood door, HM frame-classroom door/light, includes hardware) $70,000.00(rework narrow opening to provide 3070 wood door, HM frame, door/light, includes hardware)

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 24

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

P. Site Condition Description:

Buses load/unload along a separated drive at the main entry to the school complex. The parking areas were updated in 2000. Portions of the asphalt pavements display signs of deterioration, especially at areas adjacent to the existing playground. Sidewalks are deteriorated in limited areas. An existing walkway ramp was constructed with a plywood assembly. Playground equipment was recently updated. A limited quantity of the equipment displays evidence of deterioration, a portion of the equipment are wood structures. Soft surface play areas do not contain a containment barrier. Portions of the site were covered with snow at time of site visit, hindering full assessment of site conditions.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Replace deteriorated walks, curbing and pavement. Provide for replacement of deteriorated playground and/or wood play structures. Provide a soft surface containment barrier at all play structures. Replace the plywood walk assembly with a permanent walkway ramp, provision identified in Plate ’’O’’.

Item

Playground Equipment: Removal of existing Playground Equipment: Replace Existing Asphalt Paving: Asphalt Paving (light duty) / New Wearing Course: Concrete Curb: Concrete Sidewalk: Exterior Hand / Guard Rails: Base Sitework Allowance for Unforeseen Circumstances Sitework Allowance for Unforeseen Circumstances for buildings between 0 SF and 100,000 SF Sum:

Cost

Unit

$1.50sq.ft. (Qty) $2,000.00lump sum

Whole Building

Original Classroom Wing Building (1925) Addition (1949) 22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 4,432 Required 3,962 Required

Classroom Wing Sum Comments Addition (1965) 10,409 ft² 2,081 Required $15,712.50(up to $100,000, per sq.ft. of school)

Required

$2,000.00

$30.00sq. yard

1,441 Required 1,303 Required

686 Required

$16.00sq. yard

1,385 Required 1,253 Required

660 Required

570 Required 538 Required

80 Required 256 Required

$15.00ln.ft. $4.00sq.ft. (Qty) $42.50ln.ft. $50,000.00allowance

$1.50sq.ft.

152 Required 486 Required

20 Required Required

Required

$319,943.00 $168,824.00

Required

Required

$99,020.00

$52,099.00

$102,900.00(including drainage / tear out for light or heavy duty asphalt) $52,768.00(includes minor crack repair in less than 5% of paved area) $12,030.00(new) $5,120.00(5 in exterior slab) $850.00 $50,000.00Include this and one of the next two. (Applies for whole building, so only one addition should have this item) $78,562.50Include this one or the next. (Each addition should have this item)

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 25

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

Q. Sewage System Description:

The complex sanitary piping system is served by the local municipal system. School officials noted the system functioned satisfactorily.

Rating:

1 Satisfactory

Recommendations:

No work required at this time.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1925)Classroom Wing Addition (1949)Classroom Wing Addition (1965)SumComments 22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft² Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 26

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

R. Water Supply Description:

The complex water supply is copper. The system is served by the local municipal system. No pressure problems were reported by District officals. An abandoned well remains on site.

Rating:

2 Needs Repair

Recommendations:

Fill cap or remove abandoned well.

Item

Cost

Unit

Other: Fill cap or remove abandoned well Sum:

$5,000.00allowance

Whole Building

Original Building (1925) 22,156 ft² Required

$5,000.00

$5,000.00

Classroom Wing Addition Classroom Wing Addition Sum Comments (1949) (1965) 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft² $5,000.00Fill cap or remove abandoned well. $0.00 $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 27

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

S. Exterior Doors Description:

The existing door assemblies are a combination of newer and dated installations. A portion of the assemblies are deteriorated and/or contain single pane glazing.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for replacement of dated/deteriorated door assemblies. Replace door assemblies equipped with single pane glazing with thermally efficient installations.

Item

Cost

Unit

Door Leaf/Frame and Hardware: Sum:

$2,000.00per leaf

Whole Building

$16,000.00

Original Building (1925) 22,156 ft² 4 Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1949) 19,810 ft²

$8,000.00

$0.00

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) 10,409 ft² 4 Required

Sum

Comments

$16,000.00(includes removal of existing)

$8,000.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 28

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

T. Hazardous Material Description:

District officials have provided information identifying hazardous materials in this facility.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Remove all hazardous material as identified by the hazardous material consultant. A full EEHA will be required to verify the accuracy of the provided information.

Item

Cost Unit

Environmental Hazards Form Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic Sum:

$3.00sq.ft. (Qty)

Whole Building

$75,000.00

Original Building (1925) 22,156 ft² EHA Form 25,000 Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1949) 19,810 ft²

$75,000.00

$0.00

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) 10,409 ft²

Sum

Comments

‹ $75,000.00See J $0.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 29

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

U. Life Safety Description:

The entire complex is not equipped with an automatic fire suppression system. A portion of the interior stairways are not enclosed and the handrail/guardrail systems do not conform to current code provisions or ADA accessibility requirements.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide an automated fire suppression system throughout the entire complex. Enclose open stair assemblies and provide a compliant handrail system.

Item

Cost

Sprinkler / Fire Suppression System: Interior Stairwell Closure:

$3.25sq.ft. (Qty) $5,000.00per level $40,000.00unit

Generator: Handrails: Sum:

Unit

$5,000.00level

Whole Building

Original Building (1925) 22,156 ft² 22,156 Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1949) 19,810 ft² 19,810 Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) 10,409 ft² 10,409 Required

4 Required

4 Required

2 Required

6 Required $114,382.50

2 Required $53,829.25

1 Required 6 Required $330,218.75 $162,007.00

Sum

Comments

$170,218.75(includes increase of service piping, if required) $50,000.00(includes associated doors, door frames and hardware) $40,000.00(75 KW w/fence and pad/day tank only, life safety only) $70,000.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 30

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

V. Loose Furnishings Description:

Typical classrooms are furnished with a combination of newer and older equipment. The majority of the media center addition is equipped with newer age furnishings.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Provide for furnishing replacement based upon the rating of 4 given for Item 6.17 of the attached CEFPI rating.

Item

Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1925)Classroom Wing Addition (1949)Classroom Wing Addition (1965)Sum Comments 22,156 ft² 19,810 ft² 10,409 ft² CEFPI Rating 4 to 5$4.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $209,500.00 Sum: $209,500.00 $88,624.00 $79,240.00 $41,636.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 31

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

W. Technology Description:

Typical classrooms are equipped with 4-5 data ports for teacher and student use, televisions, ceiling mounted projectors, and smart boards. Classrooms are not equipped with telephones.

Rating:

3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations:

Replace all wiring due to extensive renovations to be undertaken and to fully conform to OSDM standards.

Item

Cost

Unit

ES portion of building with total SF < 50,000 Sum:

$10.68sq.ft. (Qty)

Whole Building

$559,365.00

Original Building (1925) 22,156 ft² 22,156 Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1949) 19,810 ft² 19,810 Required

Classroom Wing Addition (1965) 10,409 ft² 10,409 Required

$236,626.08

$211,570.80

$111,168.12

Sum

Comments

$559,365.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 32

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Facility Assessment

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost Renovation Costs (A-W) 7.00%

$6,245,303.25

Construction Contingency

Subtotal 16.20%

$437,171.23 $6,682,474.48

Non-Construction Costs

Total Project

$1,082,560.87 $7,765,035.34

Construction Contingency

$437,171.23

Non-Construction Costs

$1,082,560.87

Total for X.

$1,519,732.09

Non-Construction Costs Breakdown Land Survey

0.03%

$2,004.74

Soil Borings

0.10%

$6,682.47

Agency Approval Fees

0.15%

$10,023.71

Construction Testing

0.25%

$16,706.19

Printing

0.27%

$18,042.68

Advertising

0.03%

$2,004.74

Builder’s Risk

0.11%

$7,350.72

Design Professional Compensation

7.50%

$501,185.59

CM Compensation

6.00%

$400,948.47

Commissioning

0.33%

$22,052.17

Maintenance Plan Advisor

0.11%

$7,350.72

Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services)

1.32%

$88,208.66

16.20%

$1,082,560.87

Total Non-Construction Costs Back to Assessment Summary

Facility Assessment

Page 33

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

School Facility Appraisal

Name of Appraiser

Jeff Tuckerman

Date of Appraisal

Building Name

Hale Road Elementary

Street Address

56 Hale Rd

City/Town, State, Zip Code

Painesville, OH 44077

Telephone Number(s)

(440) 352-2300

School District

Riverside Local Local SD

Setting:

Small City

2008-03-18

Site-Acreage

32

Building Square Footage

52,375

Grades Housed

K-5

Student Capacity

419

Number of Teaching Stations

28

Number of Floors

3

Student Enrollment

1

Dates of Construction

1925,1949,1965

Energy Sources:

Fuel Oil

Gas

Electric

Solar

Air Conditioning:

Roof Top

Windows Units

Central

Room Units

Heating:

Central

Roof Top

Individual Unit

Forced Air

Hot Water

Steam

Type of Construction

Exterior Surfacing

Floor Construction

Load bearing masonry

Brick

Wood Joists

Steel frame

Stucco

Steel Joists

Concrete frame

Metal

Slab on grade

Wood

Wood

Structural slab

Steel Joists

Stone

Back to Assessment Summary

School Facility Appraisal

Page 34

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

1.0 The School Site School Facility Appraisal

Points Allocated

1.1

Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements

Points

25

25

20

18

10

8

10

8

10

8

5

4

5

4

5

4

5

4

5

5

The building sits on a 32 acre site.

1.2

Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population The site is geographically located to serve the school community.

1.3

Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards The site is located in a residential area with moderate traffic.

1.4

Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs The site contains mature trees, open lawn, and low shrubbery.

1.5

ES

Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areas

MS

Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parking

HS

Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking

Playground equipment was updated in the recent past. A limited portion of the equipment displays signs of deterioration.

1.6

Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines The complex is constructed on a sloping site, providing split level floor elevations.

1.7

Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion There were no significant areas of ponding or erosion. Soils are wet from snow and rain accumulation.

1.8

Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning There was no designated area for this activity. The site is equipped with a large playground area surrounded by woods.

1.9

Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes A limited portion of pavements were deteriorated.

1.10

ES/MS

Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided

HS

Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community

District officials noted there was adequate parking at this facility to serve the needs of the school.

TOTAL - The School Site

100

88

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 35

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features School Facility Appraisal

Points Allocated

Structural

2.1

Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally

Points

15

5

15

10

The majority of the complex does not provide accessible accommodations or conform to the provisions of the ADA guidelines.

2.2

Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight

The roofs are modified bituminous roof systems. Installations are a combination of newer and older assemblies. The majority of the roofs are dated.

2.3

Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks

10

6

10

4

10

7

10

7

10

5

10

6

A portion of the exterior walls are cracked with areas of masonry displacement which may be the result of settlement.

2.4

Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration The majority of the complex is not equipped with control joints. There were several areas of deterioration.

2.5

Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow The location of exits is adequate for student circulation. A portion of the ground floor (basement) is equipped with a dead end corridor.

2.6

Building ’’envelope’’ generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) The majority of the existing window assemblies were updated with thermally efficient units with double pane glazing.

2.7

Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials District officials provided a hazardous materials report indicating areas of known asbestos.

2.8

Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes The majority of the complex was not designed for flexibility of use.

Points Allocated

Mechanical/Electrical

2.9

Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating

Points

15

7

15

11

15

13

Lighting levels do not conform to OSDM standards in many areas.

2.10

Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements Domestic supply piping is copper. District officials reported system leaks have been an ongoing issue of concern.

2.11

Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technology applications

Typical classrooms are equipped with 4-5 data ports and a portion of the classrooms are equipped with projectors and smart boards. Classrooms are not equipped with telephones.

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 36

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

2.12

Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible

10

10

10

8

10

5

10

6

10

6

10

5

5

3

Electrical service panels are located in the mechanical areas. The electrical system is recently updated.

2.13

Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions for the disabled The majority of drinking fountains were accessible but do not provide multi-height accomodations.

2.14

Number and size of restrooms meet requirements The majority of the toilet facilities were not accessible and do not conform to the provisions of the ADA.

2.15

Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements The site is served by the local municipal system. District officials noted system leaks have been an ongoing issue of concern.

2.16

Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements The facility is not equipped with a suppression system. The fire alarm system is lacking horn/strobe signals in some occupiable areas.

2.17

Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication between the office and instructional areas Classrooms are not equipped with telephones.

2.18

Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage A limited quantity of hose bibb connections are provided at the exterior of the structure.

TOTAL - Structural and Mechanical Features

200

124

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 37

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

3.0 Plant Maintainability School Facility Appraisal

Points Allocated

3.1

Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance

Points

15

10

15

8

10

7

10

5

10

9

10

6

10

8

10

9

The majority of window installations were updated. A portion of the exterior doors were deteriorated.

3.2

Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care Floor surfaces were terrazzo, carpet, vinyl tile, and wood. Wood flooring was loose and deteriorated at the 1929 building.

3.3

Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain Suspended acoustic ceilings are provided in some areas. A portion of ceilings were plaster.

3.4

Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance Casework installations are limited. The majority of casework is dated. A portion of casework was wood.

3.5

Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality The majority of the door assemblies were equipped with lever/ADA compliant hardware.

3.6

Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish The fixtures were a combination of wall and floor mounted units. Original/dated installations remain in many areas.

3.7

Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building The complex is equipped with a large storage area at the ground floor/basement of the structure.

3.8

Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area

School officials noted electrical provisions were adequate to serve the facilities current needs. The electrical system was recently updated.

3.9

Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement

10

8

Exterior lighting was provided primarily by building mounted fixtures.

TOTAL - Plant Maintainability

100

70

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 38

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

4.0 Building Safety and Security School Facility Appraisal

Site Safety

4.1

Points Allocated

Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways

Points

15

15

10

8

5

3

5

4

5

4

Buses load/unload along a separated drive at the main entry to the school.

4.2

Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians Walkways are deteriorated in limited areas.

4.3

Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area The main ingress/egress drive is not equipped with a signal system.

4.4

Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow Vehicular entrances were not equipped with turning lanes.

4.5

ES

Playground equipment is free from hazard

MS

Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazard

HS

Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard

The playground equipment was updated in the recent past. A limited portion of the equipment displayed evidence of deterioration.

Building Safety

4.6

Points Allocated

The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas

Points

20

15

15

10

The boilers were located in the mechanical areas. Classrooms were equipped with unit ventilators.

4.7

Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress

The facility contains multiple stair assemblies. A portion of the installations were not enclosed in rated assemblies. A portion of the ground floor was equipped with a dead end corridor.

4.8

Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware

10

8

10

8

10

5

10

6

Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic devices. A portion of installations are deteriorated.

4.9

Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical circuits The facility was equipped with an emergency/egress lighting system.

4.10

Classroom doors are recessed and open outward The majority of classroom doors are not recessed and open outward.

4.11

Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 39

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

The facility contains a motion sensor system with controlled magnetic lock entry.

4.12

Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition

5

2

Classrooms/educational areas were equipped with vinyl tile. Corridors were terrazzo and vinyl tile. Tile is suspected to contain asbestos. Flooring is damaged in many areas.

4.13

Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16

5

4

5

4

5

4

5

3

Stair risers do not exceed 7’’.

4.14

Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury Safety glazing was identified at some locations.

4.15

Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall Drinking fountains project into corridors.

4.16

Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress Main corridors lead to exits. A portion of the school structure is equipped with a dead end corridor.

Emergency Safety

4.17

Points Allocated

Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located

Points

15

13

15

10

15

10

15

11

Fire extinguishers were provided throughout the facility.

4.18

There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building Remote means of egress were provided from most areas. A portion of the structure is equipped with a dead end corridor.

4.19

Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure Rated assemblies could not be identified. Masonry construction may provide equivalence ratings.

4.20

Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided

The facility is equipped with a fire alarm system with manual pullstations. A portion of the occupiable spaces are lacking horn/strobe signals.

TOTAL - Building Safety and Security

200

147

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 40

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

5.0 Educational Adequacy School Facility Appraisal

Academic Learning Space

5.1

Points Allocated

Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards

Points

25

18

15

10

10

8

10

5

10

5

10

5

Typical classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.2

Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity There is not designated space for this activity. Classrooms are undersized.

5.3

Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive noise The media center is located in a classroom wing but is remotely located as is the gym from the majority of classrooms.

5.4

Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students There is no designated space for this activity, classrooms are undersized.

5.5

Storage for student materials is adequate The majority of the complex was not equipped with lockers or cubbies. Classrooms and corridors were equipped with coat hooks.

5.6

Storage for teacher materials is adequate Storage space is limited. There is little casework in classrooms.

Special Learning Space

5.7

Points Allocated

Size of special learning area(s) meets standards

Points

15

9

10

7

10

7

5

3

10

7

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.8

Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.9

Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space The Media Center is located in a converted classroom area.

5.10

Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction The gymnasium is utilized as student dining.

5.11

ES

Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instruction

MS/HS

Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 41

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

5.12

Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space

5

3

5

3

Music education takes place in a dedicated classroom. There are limited sound treatments.

5.13

Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.

School Facility Appraisal

5.14

Points Allocated

Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment

Points

5

4

5

1

5

3

Technology education takes place in a dedicated classroom.

5.15

Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms There is no designated space for this activity.

5.16

Storage for student and teacher material is adequate Classroom storage provisions are limited.

Support Space

5.17

Points Allocated

Teacher’s lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals

Points

10

6

10

4

5

3

5

3

5

3

5

3

5

3

Accomodations are limited.

5.18

Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation The gymnasium serves as student dining. The kitchen is undersized.

5.19

Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturity of the students served Administrative offices are located adjacent to the main entry, space is limited.

5.20

Counselor’s office insures privacy and sufficient storage Office provisions are limited and the area is dated.

5.21

Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements The clinic is undersized and does not conform to the current standards established for the State of Ohio.

5.22

Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors Adminstrative areas are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.23

Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy Administrative work space is limited.

TOTAL - Educational Adequacy

200

123

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 42

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

6.0 Environment for Education School Facility Appraisal

Exterior Environment

6.1

Points Allocated

Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students

Points

15

10

10

7

10

7

10

8

5

2

Exterior masonry construction is appropriate for educational design.

6.2

Site and building are well landscaped The site contains mature trees and open lawn, with few additional amenities.

6.3

Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning The site is located in a residential area with moderate traffic.

6.4

Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather A portion of entrances were equipped with overhangs.

6.5

Building materials provide attractive color and texture The facility materials are consistent throughout the complex.

Interior Environment

6.6

Points Allocated

Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning

Points

20

12

15

5

15

7

15

10

15

7

10

7

10

6

Interior finishes and casework are worn and dated. There was no unified color scheme.

6.7

Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building The majority of the facility is not equipped with air conditioning.

6.8

Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement The ventilation system does not conform to current OSDM standards.

6.9

Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination Lighting levels are below OSDM standards in many areas.

6.10

Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located The majority of toilet rooms do not provide accessible accomodations.

6.11

Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization The gymnasium and the media center provide the only common areas for socialization.

6.12

Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 43

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

A portion of the complex is equipped with a dead end corridor.

6.13

Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group

10

6

10

6

10

6

10

8

10

4

The gymnasium and the media center provide areas for interaction.

6.14

Large group areas are designed for effective management of students The gymnasium also serves as student dining.

6.15

Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control Acoustic ceilings are provided in some areas. A portion of ceilings are plaster.

6.16

Window design contributes to a pleasant environment The majority of the window assemblies are equipped with insulated glazing. Installations are updated in most areas.

6.17

Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere Furnishings and equipment is a combination of newer and dated installations.

TOTAL - Environment for Education

200

118

Back to Assessment Summary

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

Page 44

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Justification for Allocation of Points

Building Name and Level:

Hale Road Elementary K-5

Building features that clearly exceed criteria: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate: 1.

The building is not suppressed.

2.

The majority of the complex is not equipped with air conditioning.

3. 4. 5. 6. Back to Assessment Summary

Justification for Allocation of Points

Page 45

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Building Summary - Hale Road Elementary (14845) District:

Riverside Local Local SD

County:

Lake

Name:

Hale Road Elementary

Contact:

Mr. Jack Miley

Phone:

(440) 352-2300

Address: 56 Hale Rd Painesville,OH 44077 Bldg. IRN: 14845

Date Prepared: 2008-03-18

By:

Tony Schorr

Date Revised: 2008-08-26

By:

Jeff Tuckerman

Current Grades

K-5

Acreage:

32

Proposed Grades

N/A

Teaching Stations:

28

Current Enrollment

1

Classrooms:

26

Projected Enrollment

N/A Date HA

Number of Floors

Original Building

1925 no

3

Classroom Wing Addition

1949 no

3

Classroom Wing Addition

1965 no

Section

‹

‹

‹

176

88%

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 22,156 3.0 Plant Maintainability

400

248

62%

Borderline

200

140

70%

Satisfactory

19,810 4.0 Building Safety and Security

400

294

74%

Satisfactory

400

246

62%

Borderline

400

236

59%

Borderline

‹

‹

‹

2000

1340

67%

1.0 The School Site

5.0 Educational Adequacy 2

10,409 6.0 Environment for Education 52,375

*HA

= Handicapped Access

*Rating

=1 Satisfactory

Commentary Total

‹ Satisfactory

‹ Borderline

C=Under Contract

=2 Needs Repair

Renovation Cost Factor

=3 Needs Replacement

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2007

Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category 200

Current Square Feet

Total

Rating

104.16% $8,088,060.81

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is Dollar requested from a Master Plan. Assessment C

A. Heating System

3

$1,518,875.00 -

B. Roofing

3

$146,937.00 -

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

1

$0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems

2

$80,000.00 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

3

$486,625.00 -

F. Windows

3

$214,500.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation

2

$46,100.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

3

$209,872.50 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

1

$0.00 -

J. General Finishes

3

$871,779.50 -

K. Interior Lighting

3

$261,875.00 -

L. Security Systems

3

$130,937.50 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

3

$52,375.00 -

N. Fire Alarm

3

$78,562.50 -

O. Handicapped Access

3

$631,837.50 -

P. Site Condition

3

$319,943.00 -

Q. Sewage System

1

$0.00 -

R. Water Supply

2

$5,000.00 -

S. Exterior Doors

3

$16,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material

3

$75,000.00 -

U. Life Safety

3

$330,218.75 -

V. Loose Furnishings

3

$209,500.00 -

W. Technology

3

$559,365.00 -

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

-

$1,519,732.09 -

Total

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Cover Sheet

Addition

-

Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)

$7,765,035.34 Previous Page

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845)

Page 46

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24

Environmental Hazards - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845) - Original Building Environmental Hazards - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - Hale Road Elementary (14845) - Original Building

Owner:

Riverside Local Local SD

Facility:

Hale Road Elementary

Bldg. IRN:

14845

BuildingAdd:

Date:

Original Building

Consultant Name:

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) ACM Found 1. Boiler/Furnace/Breeching Insulation Removal 2. Tank/Duct Insulation Removal 3. Pipe Insulation Removal 4. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal 5. Acoustical Plaster Removal 6. Fireproofing Removal 7. Hard Plaster Removal 8. Gypsum Board Removal 9. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal 10. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic 11. Roofing Removal 12. (Sum of Lines 1-11) 13. (Sum of Lines 1-9)

Status Quantity Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 25000 Not Present 0 Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work

AFM=Asbestos Free Material Unit Cost Estimated Cost $10.00 $0.00 $8.00 $0.00 $8.00 $0.00 $20.00 $0.00 $7.00 $0.00 $15.00 $0.00 $7.00 $0.00 $6.00 $0.00 $3.00 $0.00 $3.00 $75,000.00 $2.00 $0.00 $75,000.00 $0.00

B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks Tank No. 1. (Sum of Lines 1-0)

None Reported Location

Age

Product Stored Size Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks

C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only 1. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups 2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups 3. (Sum of Lines 1-2) D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Area Of Building Addition 1. 22156 0

$0.00

Addition Constructed after 1980 $0.00 $0.00 Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00

Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts

Unit Cost $0.05

E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks 1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) 2. (Sum of Lines 1-0)

Est.Rem.Cost

None Reported Cost Estimate $0.00 $0.00

Description Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition

F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries 1. A12, B1, C3, D1, and E1 2. A13, B1, D1, and E2

Not Applicable Total Cost $0.00

Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition

$75,000.00 $0.00

* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM): a.

Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.

b.

Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster, acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12"×12" floor tile and mastic.

c.

Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.

THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.



Page 47

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:24