Kaedah 1 - Analisis Dokumen

  • Uploaded by: Mohd Asri Silahuddin
  • 0
  • 0
  • December 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Kaedah 1 - Analisis Dokumen as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 375
  • Pages: 7
ANALISIS DOKUMEN Buku Kitab Akhbar Jurnal Majalah Tesis Laporan Kajian Perangkaan Rekod

DUA KUMPULAN DOKUMEN 



Primary Documents 

i.e. The records kept & written by actual participants in or witness of, an event.



Constitutions, charters, laws, court decisions, official minutes/records, autobiographies, letters, diaries, census information, contracts, deeds, wills, permits, licenses, affidavits, declarations, certificates, bills, receipts, advertisement, maps, diagrams, books, pamphlets, catalogs, films, pictures, recordings, transcription, & research report.

Secondary Documents . . .

. . . Secondary Documents 

i.e. The reports of a person who relates the testimony of an actual witness of, or participant in, an event.



The writer of the secondary source was not on the scene of the event but merely reported what the person who was there said or wrote.



Limited worth: due to error may result when information passes from one person to another.



e.g. Textbooks or encyclopedias. They are often several times removed from the original, firsthand account of the event.



But would be a primary source when one study the changing contents of the textbooks.

TUJUAN KAJIAN DOKUMEN  

Menjadi Literature Review Mencari Maklumat membantu kajian:    



Kenalpasti apa telah diketengahkan sebelum ini Menyokong dapatan kajian Mengemukakan fakta-fakta Membandingkan maklumat sedia ada dgn dapatan baru

Sebagai kerangka teori kajian

METODE KAJIAN DOKUMEN 

TELITI    



MENGGUNAKAN 5WsH  





Persamaan antara dokumen / idea lain Perbezaan antara dokumen / idea lain

KRITIK  



Selalu menyoal ketepatan & kebenaran Selalu menimbulkan persoalan

PERBANDINGAN 



Gaya Bahasa Keaslian Suasana penerbitan Fakta

Tanpa memilih/memihak Ada asas kritikan

RUMUSAN

MASALAH MAKLUMAT DOKUMEN 

KETEPATAN FAKTA     



TIDAK KONTEMPORARI 



Perubahan maklumat semasa

KESEMPURNAAN MAKLUMAT  



Penggunaan data tidak tepat Hadis palsu Maklumat akhbar , majalah, internet Rujukan tidak betul Tafsiran individu, kumpulan

Kecuaian memindah, merujuk, menulis, mencetak Sengaja kerana persoanal, fahaman, organisasi

SUKAR MENDAPATKAN DOKUMEN  

Sensitif kpd individu, kerajaan, institusi, syarikat OSA

MENGATASI MASALAH 

PENELITIAN MENDALAM PENYELIDIK 



MELAKUKAN LITERATURE REVIEW SECARA SERIUS 



Sentiasa bersikap kritis

Kemahiran mengesan sumber maklumat berkaitan

MENGGUNAKAN KEMAHIRAN/HUBUNGAN PERIBADI MENDAPATKAN MAKLUMAT SULIT   

Link Pengalaman Boleh meyakinkan penyedia dokumen

Related Documents


More Documents from ""