Hayner Te407l Poetry Presentation

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Hayner Te407l Poetry Presentation as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,150
  • Pages: 3
Alexander Hayner TE 407L Poetry Lesson

Digital Poetry Target Audience: Detroit Denby High School…11th grade English…4th period (1:05-2:15). My class has been studying classical poetry (Shakespeare, Frost, Yeats, Austen) for the past two weeks, and now we are progressing into more modern poetry. We will also take this progression even further to the likes of “digitally enhancing” works of poetry, both modern and classical. Issues for Observation: Does the “poetry lighting” distract students? Does the lighting obstruct vision, and/or does it make the room too dark to read and write notes on students’ desks? Are technological presentation materials clear and beneficial? Does the teacher allow ample time for students to express opinion? Does teacher talk too much? Objectives: 1. Educate students on importance of atmosphere for poetry reading (and studying in general) 2. Present feminine-inspired poem and conduct productive and meaningful classroom discussion. a. Pave the way for future study in feminine literature 3. Demonstrate how media/visual aids strongly impact (and possibly alter) the tone and mood of a poem. 4. Allow the demonstration of media-based poetry to pave the way for a “digital poetry” assignment. Materials Needed for Lesson: - laptop computer with internet access - projector and projection screen - classroom with windows - candles and matches - principle’s/school board’s approval for having candles in the classroom Materials Needed for Assignment: - Piece of poetry (borrowed or original) - Movie-making software o If not personally owned, can be obtained from school media center or public library. - Internet access (for visual and audio clips)

Background Information on Unit: This eleventh grade curriculum focused on inspiring appreciation and passion about poetry started off with analysis of the love sonnets of Shakespeare. This was transitioned from a previous reading of Shakespeare’s Othello, providing smooth transition with the old-English language. From the sonnets, my class has analyzed poems of love, hate, joy, and curiosity from various classical English authors (Keats, Frost, and Austen to name a few). Analysis of poems consists of identifying the speaker, the motive of the poem, the audience, and the desired outcome from reading and experiencing such poetic verse. Analysis has been demonstrated in small groups, large discussion groups, and individual 1-page reflection papers. Though we have been analyzing poetry for 2 weeks now, the students have yet to have the opportunity to compose their own individual poetic works. Presentation: Before students arrive to class, teacher sets up the classroom to create a “poetic environment”. To create such a mood, overhead lights are turned off and candles (4-6) are placed around front of room. Windows are left open to let in natural light unless extremely sunny (shades are drawn in this case). Reasoning: The creation of a “poetic mood” presents the ultimate visual aid without students consciously knowing it. Also, by having the classroom set up before the students walk in, the students are immediately engaged in learning and class can begin without any time being wasted. Text of the poem “Barbie Doll” by Marge Piercy is displayed on the projection screen via a projector connected to the teacher’s laptop. Teacher initially instructs class to read the poem silently and think about what the poem is trying to say and demonstrate. Teacher then calls on a student to read the short poem (25 lines) aloud while other students listen and follow along the project text. After conclusion of student’s reading, teacher conducts short discussion. Questions: What is the mood of the poem? Who is the narrator? Who is the audience? What is the message? Does this relate to reality, or is it a fictional concept? Reasoning: This short teacher-dictated discussion gets students thinking and allows them to form an initial opinion on the piece of poetry. By dictating the discussion, the teacher emphasizes on the key concepts (narrator, audience, etc.) of the poem. Also, by reading the text silently and then listening to one student read the poem out loud, the class as a whole observes two different ways to embrace a poem—an activity that paves the way for our digital viewing. Concluding the discussion, teacher then brings up a digital video on YouTube.com of a producer’s artistic representation of the poem. Class observes the digital poetry, then the discussion continues. The topic of class discussion is now turned to a pivotal question: How do the visual and audio effects affect the poem’s mood, tone, and overall reception by the audience? Do you see a change in you own reception and opinion of the poem now that you saw it with visual and audio enhancements? Do you like the poem more as its original presentation or digital enhancement? Reasoning: I feel this presentation of the “digitally modified” poem will spark some interesting and worth-wile discussion among the class. I feel that when

poems are set to images and music, it greatly alters the way they can be perceived by the audience. I feel my students will respond in a similar way, and by seeing the effectiveness of audio and visual enhancements, I an interest will be sparked in the upcoming digital poetry assignment. After discussion comes to an end (or teacher ends it), students are presented with a handout regarding the basis of their next major assignment: digital poetry. Handout outlines the criteria of the assignment, holding that each student must take a poem (original or borrowed) and set it to music and images, as we saw with the “Barbie Doll” poem. Assessment: Assessment can be gauged initially by observing the caliber and quality of the discussion about the poem. I feel the best way to analyze the discussion is through comparing/contrasting the discussion before watching the digital presentation and after watching it. Observation of the opinions paired with initial thoughts on the poem provides insight as to how digital poetry will affect each individual student, as well as the class as a whole. Final assessment of the lesson (and unit), will obviously be heavily weighted with the quality of each student’s original digital poetry movie. Follow-up Lessons: Lessons for immediate and long-term future of this unit can be easily drawn out. The next week of classes can have students working on comprising their own digital poetry movie. Trips to the library/media center can allow students without laptops access to necessary materials. Due dates can be initially set for rough-draft peer review sessions, where students view their peers’ works-in-the-making. This is beneficial for students because it allows them to get feedback from other viewers, an aspect they can not get from solely watching it themselves. On the date of the final project deadline (usually around 2 weeks after this initial presentation), the teacher can hold a “film festival” where all of the final versions of digital poetry are shown. Depending on the class, it may be appropriate to also allow the students to vote on a “Best in Show” award for the top few digital poetry videos.

Related Documents

1011 Poetry Presentation
October 2019 38
Hayner Unit4 Te[1]
April 2020 1
Poetry
August 2019 88
Poetry
November 2019 57