Gap Analysis Template.docx
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Gap Analysis Template.docx as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 1,604
- Pages: 12
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE B1. Data Needed/Source EBEIS, Brgy. Nut. Status
Division Targets 2018
B2. Current Contributing Factor Yes/ No
Explanation
Possible enrolees are distributed to other nearby schools
ACCESS Gross Enrolment Rate a. Kindergarten
103%
100% (Enrolment Data)
NO
b.
110%
101%
YES
84% 93% 0.40%
100% 100.07% 0%
YES YES YES
2.80% 94% 92.5% 94%
0% 100% 100% 100%
YES YES YES YES
9 4 2 8 4 245
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 183 (Enrolment Data)
Teacher – Learner Ratio
1:31
Seat - Learner Ratio Classroom – Learner Ratio Learning Materials – Learner Ratio
1:1 1:33 1:1
Elementary Net Enrolment Rate a. Kindergarten b. Elementary Percentage of School Dropouts Percentage of School Leavers Percentage of Cohort Survival Percentage of Completers Percentage of Promoters Level of Participation in Special Programs Hearing Impaired Visually Impaired Cerebral Palsy Intellectual Disability Children with Autism b. Science Elementary
NO
Enrolment is only 183 learners
1:30
NO
1 teacher moved out
1:3 1:30
NO YES NO
B3. Inhibiting Factors
1 teacher moved out without replacement Lacking chairs Not all grade levels have complete books
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
Early Registration
Potential learners from other schools
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE B1. Data Needed/Source EBEIS, Brgy. Nut. Status
Division Targets 2018
QUALITY & RELEVANCE
B2. Current Contributing Factor Yes/ No
Explanation
School Data, EBEIS. SMEA
Percentage of Learners who, by EOSY, are independent readers in: English a.
Grade 3
b. Grader 4-6
80%
96.7%
YES
85%
96.3%
YES
85%
92.8%
YES
95%
95.9%
YES
Filipino a.
Grade 3
b. Grade 4-6
Percentage of Failures by the End of SY by Grade a.
Elementary Grade 1
1.8%
0%
YES
Grade 2
0.9%
0%
YES
Grade 3
3.0%
0%
YES
Grade 4
2.0%
0%
YES
Grade 5
3.0%
0%
YES
Grade 6
0.9%
0%
YES
Percentage of personnel who participated in professional development activities 100% a. Teachers
100%
YES
b. School Heads
100%
100%
YES
c.
100%
100%
YES
100%
0%
NO
Teaching-related
d. Non-teaching
No non-teaching personnel
B3. Inhibiting Factors
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE B1. Data Needed/Source EBEIS, Brgy. Nut. Status
Division Targets 2018
Percentage of Learners with at least 1 basic/action research submitted to and approved by the Division Research Review Committee No. of LAC sessions conducted every quarter No. of functional computer laboratory a. Elementary b. Junior High School c. Senior High School With internet connectivity? No. of quarterly SMEA conducted At least very satisfactory implementation of School Health and Nutrition Programs Average Rating Attained in Division Achievement Test Average MPS Attained in National Achievement Test Average Percentage of competency coverage
B2. Current Contributing Factor Yes/ No
Explanation Research was submitted to the Division Office but did not undergo review from the Division Research Committee
100%
0
NO
1
1
YES
1
0
NO
95% 100% 10% YES
0 N/A N/A
NO
4
4
No computer units and computer laboratory available No computer laboratory
YES
YES
YES YES
75%
87.36%
YES
75%
86.54%
YES
95%
98%
YES
2nd Quarter SMEA result
B3. Inhibiting Factors
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE B1. Data Needed/Source EBEIS, Brgy. Nut. Status
Division Targets 2018
Rating Attained in National Assessment Percentage of Learners within at least “Moving Towards Mastery” Level (66%-85%) in NAT MPS Average Rating on the level of satisfaction on the delivery of services as rated by education stakeholders No. of gold attained in Athletic Meet Regional Level
B2. Current Contributing Factor Yes/ No
75% 75%
87.3%
At least very satisfactory
N/A
1
0
NO
1
0
NO
Regional Level
3
0
NO
National Level
1
0
NO
Regional Level
1
1
YES
National Level
1
0
NO
Regional Level
1
0
NO
National Level
1
0
NO
National Level st
YES
rd
No. of 1 to 3 Placers in Campus Journalism Competition
st
rd
No. of 1 to 3 Placers in Math Competition
st
rd
No. of 1 to 3 Placers in Science Competition
st
rd
No. of 1 to 3 Placers in Aral. Pan. Competition
Explanation
B3. Inhibiting Factors
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
Regional Level
1
B1. Data Needed/Source EBEIS, Brgy. Nut. Status 0
National Level
1
0
NO
1
2
YES
1
0
NO
Division Targets 2018
No. 1st to 3rd Placers in Culture and Arts Competition Regional Level National Level
B2. Current Contributing Factor YES/NO NO
Explanation
B3. Inhibiting Factors
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE B1. Data Needed
Division Targets 2018
B2. Current Contributing Factor Yes/ No
GOVERNANCE Level of CSC PRIME-HRM
Level I
SBM Level of Assessment
Level III
Validated CFSS Level of Assessment
Level II
Approved and functional operational & procurement plans: School Improvement Plan
Yes
Annual Improvement Plan
Yes
Yes
Annual Procurement Plan
Yes
Yes
Project Procurement Management Plan With operational budget at the start of the year
Yes
Yes
Yes
With proper inventory on: School Buildings
Yes
Yes
Equipment
Yes
Yes
Furniture and Fixtures
Yes
Yes
Book and Learning Resources
Yes
Yes
Percentage of Reported complaints revolved at: School Level Amount of generated and bookedup resources With increased amount of generated resources compared to previous year?
100%
N/A
P 1.9M
N/A
Yes
Yes
Explanation
B3. Inhibiting Factors
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY With increased number of engaged partners and donors (MOA/MOU/DOA/DOD) compared to previous year? Resources raised from
Yes
a.
City Government
b.
Barangay Government
P 300K
c.
Private Sources (PTA, CSO, etc.)
P 1.5M
With proper accounting and reporting system of stakeholders’ contribution With complete liquidation by the end of CY
Yes
P 9M
Yes
Yes
Yes
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE B1. Data Needed/Source EBEIS, Brgy. Nut. Status
Division Targets 2018
B2. Current Contributing Factor Yes/ No
No. of gold attained in Athletic Meet Regional Level (ES & HS)
1
0
NO
National Level (ES & HS)
1
0
NO
3
0
NO
National Level (ES & HS)
1
0
NO
No. of 1st to 3rd Placers in Math Competition Regional Level (ES & HS)
1
1
YES
National Level (ES & HS)
1
0
NO
1
0
NO
1
0
NO
1
0
NO
1
0
NO
1
2
YES
1
0
NO
No. of 1st to 3rd Placers in Campus Journalism Competition Regional Level (ES & HS)
No. of 1st to 3rd Placers in Science Competition Regional Level (ES & HS) National Level (ES & HS) st
rd
No. of 1 to 3 Placers in Aral. Pan. Competition Regional Level (ES & HS) National Level (ES & HS) st
rd
No. of 1 to 3 Placers in Culture & Arts Competition Regional Level (ES & HS) National Level (ES & HS)
Explanation
B3. Inhibiting Factors
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE B1. Data Needed/Source EBEIS, Brgy. Nut. Status
Division Targets 2018
B2. Current Contributing Factor Yes/ No
GOVERNANCE Level of CSC PRIME-HRM
Level I
N/A
Percentage of schools with at least Level II SBM Assessment a. Elementary
5%
NO
b.
6%
NO
Secondary
Percentage of schools with at least Level II validated CFSS Assessment a. Elementary
5%
b.
6%
Secondary
Percentage of schools with approved and functional operational plans School Improvement Plan a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
AIP (Elementary & Secondary) a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
YES
Percentage of schools with approved and functional procurement plans Annual Procurement Plan a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
YES
Explanation
B3. Inhibiting Factors
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY Project Procurement Management Plan a. Elementary
100%
b.
100%
Secondary
Percentage of schools with operational budget at the start of the year a. Elementary
100%
b.
100%
Secondary
YES
Percentage of schools with proper inventory School Buildings a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
YES
Equipment a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
YES
Furniture and Fixtures a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
YES
Books and Learning Resources a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
YES
Percentage of schools with reported complaints resolved at: School Level a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
N/A
Division Level a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
N/A
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY Percentage of schools heads provided with TA from the Division office Curriculum Implementation Division a. Elementary
100%
b.
100%
Secondary
YES
School Governance & Operations Division a. Elementary
100%
b.
100%
Secondary
Amount of generated and bookedup resources from school and Division a. Elementary b.
Secondary
c.
Division
Amount of generated resources from CLCs No. of schools with increased amount of generated resources a. Elementary b.
Secondary
P 1.9M P 2M P 0.25M P 50K
30 11
No. of CLCs with increased amount of generated resources No. of schools with increased number of engaged partners and donors (MOA/MOU/DOA/DOD) a. Elementary
20
b.
8
Secondary
No. of CLCs with increased number of engaged partners and donors (MOA/MOU/DOA/DOD)
2
YES
YES
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY Resources raised from a.
City Government
P 9M
b.
Barangay Government
P 300K
c.
Private Sources (PTA, CSO, etc.)
P 1.5M
No. of schools/ CLCs with proper accounting and reporting system of stakeholders’ contribution d. Elementary
41
e.
Secondary
18
f.
CLCs
8
Percentage of schools with complete liquidation by the end of CY a. Elementary
90%
b.
90%
Secondary
Percentage of Private Schools with Government recognition and accreditation a. Kindergarten
100%
b.
Elementary
100%
c.
Junior High School
100%
d.
Senior High School
100%
Division Targets 2018
B2. Current Contributing Factor Yes/ No
Explanation
Possible enrolees are distributed to other nearby schools
ACCESS Gross Enrolment Rate a. Kindergarten
103%
100% (Enrolment Data)
NO
b.
110%
101%
YES
84% 93% 0.40%
100% 100.07% 0%
YES YES YES
2.80% 94% 92.5% 94%
0% 100% 100% 100%
YES YES YES YES
9 4 2 8 4 245
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 183 (Enrolment Data)
Teacher – Learner Ratio
1:31
Seat - Learner Ratio Classroom – Learner Ratio Learning Materials – Learner Ratio
1:1 1:33 1:1
Elementary Net Enrolment Rate a. Kindergarten b. Elementary Percentage of School Dropouts Percentage of School Leavers Percentage of Cohort Survival Percentage of Completers Percentage of Promoters Level of Participation in Special Programs Hearing Impaired Visually Impaired Cerebral Palsy Intellectual Disability Children with Autism b. Science Elementary
NO
Enrolment is only 183 learners
1:30
NO
1 teacher moved out
1:3 1:30
NO YES NO
B3. Inhibiting Factors
1 teacher moved out without replacement Lacking chairs Not all grade levels have complete books
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
Early Registration
Potential learners from other schools
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE B1. Data Needed/Source EBEIS, Brgy. Nut. Status
Division Targets 2018
QUALITY & RELEVANCE
B2. Current Contributing Factor Yes/ No
Explanation
School Data, EBEIS. SMEA
Percentage of Learners who, by EOSY, are independent readers in: English a.
Grade 3
b. Grader 4-6
80%
96.7%
YES
85%
96.3%
YES
85%
92.8%
YES
95%
95.9%
YES
Filipino a.
Grade 3
b. Grade 4-6
Percentage of Failures by the End of SY by Grade a.
Elementary Grade 1
1.8%
0%
YES
Grade 2
0.9%
0%
YES
Grade 3
3.0%
0%
YES
Grade 4
2.0%
0%
YES
Grade 5
3.0%
0%
YES
Grade 6
0.9%
0%
YES
Percentage of personnel who participated in professional development activities 100% a. Teachers
100%
YES
b. School Heads
100%
100%
YES
c.
100%
100%
YES
100%
0%
NO
Teaching-related
d. Non-teaching
No non-teaching personnel
B3. Inhibiting Factors
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE B1. Data Needed/Source EBEIS, Brgy. Nut. Status
Division Targets 2018
Percentage of Learners with at least 1 basic/action research submitted to and approved by the Division Research Review Committee No. of LAC sessions conducted every quarter No. of functional computer laboratory a. Elementary b. Junior High School c. Senior High School With internet connectivity? No. of quarterly SMEA conducted At least very satisfactory implementation of School Health and Nutrition Programs Average Rating Attained in Division Achievement Test Average MPS Attained in National Achievement Test Average Percentage of competency coverage
B2. Current Contributing Factor Yes/ No
Explanation Research was submitted to the Division Office but did not undergo review from the Division Research Committee
100%
0
NO
1
1
YES
1
0
NO
95% 100% 10% YES
0 N/A N/A
NO
4
4
No computer units and computer laboratory available No computer laboratory
YES
YES
YES YES
75%
87.36%
YES
75%
86.54%
YES
95%
98%
YES
2nd Quarter SMEA result
B3. Inhibiting Factors
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE B1. Data Needed/Source EBEIS, Brgy. Nut. Status
Division Targets 2018
Rating Attained in National Assessment Percentage of Learners within at least “Moving Towards Mastery” Level (66%-85%) in NAT MPS Average Rating on the level of satisfaction on the delivery of services as rated by education stakeholders No. of gold attained in Athletic Meet Regional Level
B2. Current Contributing Factor Yes/ No
75% 75%
87.3%
At least very satisfactory
N/A
1
0
NO
1
0
NO
Regional Level
3
0
NO
National Level
1
0
NO
Regional Level
1
1
YES
National Level
1
0
NO
Regional Level
1
0
NO
National Level
1
0
NO
National Level st
YES
rd
No. of 1 to 3 Placers in Campus Journalism Competition
st
rd
No. of 1 to 3 Placers in Math Competition
st
rd
No. of 1 to 3 Placers in Science Competition
st
rd
No. of 1 to 3 Placers in Aral. Pan. Competition
Explanation
B3. Inhibiting Factors
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
Regional Level
1
B1. Data Needed/Source EBEIS, Brgy. Nut. Status 0
National Level
1
0
NO
1
2
YES
1
0
NO
Division Targets 2018
No. 1st to 3rd Placers in Culture and Arts Competition Regional Level National Level
B2. Current Contributing Factor YES/NO NO
Explanation
B3. Inhibiting Factors
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE B1. Data Needed
Division Targets 2018
B2. Current Contributing Factor Yes/ No
GOVERNANCE Level of CSC PRIME-HRM
Level I
SBM Level of Assessment
Level III
Validated CFSS Level of Assessment
Level II
Approved and functional operational & procurement plans: School Improvement Plan
Yes
Annual Improvement Plan
Yes
Yes
Annual Procurement Plan
Yes
Yes
Project Procurement Management Plan With operational budget at the start of the year
Yes
Yes
Yes
With proper inventory on: School Buildings
Yes
Yes
Equipment
Yes
Yes
Furniture and Fixtures
Yes
Yes
Book and Learning Resources
Yes
Yes
Percentage of Reported complaints revolved at: School Level Amount of generated and bookedup resources With increased amount of generated resources compared to previous year?
100%
N/A
P 1.9M
N/A
Yes
Yes
Explanation
B3. Inhibiting Factors
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY With increased number of engaged partners and donors (MOA/MOU/DOA/DOD) compared to previous year? Resources raised from
Yes
a.
City Government
b.
Barangay Government
P 300K
c.
Private Sources (PTA, CSO, etc.)
P 1.5M
With proper accounting and reporting system of stakeholders’ contribution With complete liquidation by the end of CY
Yes
P 9M
Yes
Yes
Yes
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE B1. Data Needed/Source EBEIS, Brgy. Nut. Status
Division Targets 2018
B2. Current Contributing Factor Yes/ No
No. of gold attained in Athletic Meet Regional Level (ES & HS)
1
0
NO
National Level (ES & HS)
1
0
NO
3
0
NO
National Level (ES & HS)
1
0
NO
No. of 1st to 3rd Placers in Math Competition Regional Level (ES & HS)
1
1
YES
National Level (ES & HS)
1
0
NO
1
0
NO
1
0
NO
1
0
NO
1
0
NO
1
2
YES
1
0
NO
No. of 1st to 3rd Placers in Campus Journalism Competition Regional Level (ES & HS)
No. of 1st to 3rd Placers in Science Competition Regional Level (ES & HS) National Level (ES & HS) st
rd
No. of 1 to 3 Placers in Aral. Pan. Competition Regional Level (ES & HS) National Level (ES & HS) st
rd
No. of 1 to 3 Placers in Culture & Arts Competition Regional Level (ES & HS) National Level (ES & HS)
Explanation
B3. Inhibiting Factors
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE B1. Data Needed/Source EBEIS, Brgy. Nut. Status
Division Targets 2018
B2. Current Contributing Factor Yes/ No
GOVERNANCE Level of CSC PRIME-HRM
Level I
N/A
Percentage of schools with at least Level II SBM Assessment a. Elementary
5%
NO
b.
6%
NO
Secondary
Percentage of schools with at least Level II validated CFSS Assessment a. Elementary
5%
b.
6%
Secondary
Percentage of schools with approved and functional operational plans School Improvement Plan a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
AIP (Elementary & Secondary) a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
YES
Percentage of schools with approved and functional procurement plans Annual Procurement Plan a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
YES
Explanation
B3. Inhibiting Factors
B4. Projects Implemented
B5. Groups that require attention
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY Project Procurement Management Plan a. Elementary
100%
b.
100%
Secondary
Percentage of schools with operational budget at the start of the year a. Elementary
100%
b.
100%
Secondary
YES
Percentage of schools with proper inventory School Buildings a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
YES
Equipment a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
YES
Furniture and Fixtures a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
YES
Books and Learning Resources a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
YES
Percentage of schools with reported complaints resolved at: School Level a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
N/A
Division Level a.
Elementary
100%
b.
Secondary
100%
N/A
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY Percentage of schools heads provided with TA from the Division office Curriculum Implementation Division a. Elementary
100%
b.
100%
Secondary
YES
School Governance & Operations Division a. Elementary
100%
b.
100%
Secondary
Amount of generated and bookedup resources from school and Division a. Elementary b.
Secondary
c.
Division
Amount of generated resources from CLCs No. of schools with increased amount of generated resources a. Elementary b.
Secondary
P 1.9M P 2M P 0.25M P 50K
30 11
No. of CLCs with increased amount of generated resources No. of schools with increased number of engaged partners and donors (MOA/MOU/DOA/DOD) a. Elementary
20
b.
8
Secondary
No. of CLCs with increased number of engaged partners and donors (MOA/MOU/DOA/DOD)
2
YES
YES
GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE ELEMENTARY Resources raised from a.
City Government
P 9M
b.
Barangay Government
P 300K
c.
Private Sources (PTA, CSO, etc.)
P 1.5M
No. of schools/ CLCs with proper accounting and reporting system of stakeholders’ contribution d. Elementary
41
e.
Secondary
18
f.
CLCs
8
Percentage of schools with complete liquidation by the end of CY a. Elementary
90%
b.
90%
Secondary
Percentage of Private Schools with Government recognition and accreditation a. Kindergarten
100%
b.
Elementary
100%
c.
Junior High School
100%
d.
Senior High School
100%
Related Documents
Gap Analysis
July 2020 12
Gap Analysis
May 2020 20
Gap Analysis
April 2020 16
Gap Analysis Report
December 2019 18
Gap Group Analysis Project
November 2019 20
Metrics Gap Analysis V0
November 2019 20More Documents from ""
Gap Analysis Template.docx
October 2019 19
Why-why Diagram.docx
October 2019 20
A Comparative Analysis On The Effectiveness Of Star Fruit.docx
October 2019 16
Prayers Of The Faithful.docx
October 2019 19
Spanish Alphabet.docx
December 2019 13