Delica Xd.docx

The target in this study are the respondents IP (Indigenous People) or subanen Statistical Treatment [for quantitative studies]

[Describe the types of data gathered and how these will be treated statistically. Identify the tests to be conducted. (e.g. t-test, ANOVA or analysis of variance for testing significant differences or multiple regression or Pearson”r” for testing significant relationship.) 

No formula

Data Analysis [for qualitative studies]

[Describe what types of data are gathered and how these will be analysed]. Ethical Considerations in Research [Describe how ethics in research will be ensured. Enumerate the considerations and what measures are applied to ensure the observance of ethics]. 

Consult research books



How the study observe ethics



Chapter 4 Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data This chapter presents, analyzes and interprets the data on Variable 1, Variable 2 and Variable 3. The components of Variable 1 are: component 1, component 2 and component 3. The indicators for volume 2 are Indicator 1, indicator 2 and indicator 3. Variable 3 consists of indicator a, indicator b, and indicator c. Variable 1

This study includes the following indicators of variable 1: indicator 1, indicator 2 and indicator 3. Tables 2 to 5 present the data on Variable 1. [Present first the overall weighted mean. Second, the item with highest weighted mean. Third, the item with lowest weighted mean.] Indicator 1. Table 2 presents the data on indicator 1. As shown, the overall weighted mean of indicator 1 is 3.5, interpreted as Very Good. The table also presents that Item No. 4 etcetcetc got the highest weighted mean of 3.8, interpreted as very good. Item No. 1 The teacher is etcetcetcposted the lowest weighted mean of 2.6, interpreted as Good. (Interpret the data (why are they so? Why highest, why lowest) (Support with literature.Highlight how your data are similar or different from the findings of related literature. Why is it so?) ex. The results indicated that etc. etc. etc. The results find support from Agustero (2013), etc. etc etc. However, Lim (2013: p.12) argued that “etc., etc., etc.,etc”.

3 Table 1Indicator 1 Items

Weighted

Interpretation

Mean 1 The teachers is etcetcetc

2.60

Skilled

2

3.25

Skilled

3

3.27

Highly Skilled

4

3.80

Highly Skilled

5

1.78

Not Skilled

2.94

Skilled

Overall Mean Response Hypothetical Mean Range:

1.00-1.75

Highly Not Skilled

1.76 – 2.5

Not Skilled

2.51 – 3.25

Skilled

3.26 – 4.00

Highly Skilled

[The interpretation of the hypothetical mean must align with the question asked in the statement of the problem. e.g. Q1 level of skills hence interpreted as highly skilled, skilled, not skilled, highly not skilled]. Indicator 2. The data on Indicator 2 are presented in Table 3. As shown, the overall weighted mean of Indicator 2 is 3.26, interpreted Very Good. The table also presents that Item No. 4 etcetcetc got the highest weighted mean of 3.8, interpreted as very good. Item No. 3 The teacher is etcetcetcposted the lowest weighted mean of 2.5, interpreted as Fair. (Present first the overall weighted mean. Second, the item with highest weighted mean. Third, the item with lowest weighted mean.) (Interpret the data (why are they so? Why highest, why lowest)

4 (Support with literature.Highlight how your data are similar or different from the findings of related literature. Why is it so?) ex. According to Agustero (2013), etc. etc etc. Anghad (2013) supported this contention by saying “etcetc, etcetc”.

Summary Data on Variable 1. Table 5 shows the summary of data on V1 Indicators

Overall

Interpretation

Weighted Mean 1

Indicator 1

2

Indicator 2

3

Indicator 3 Overall Mean Response

Hypothetical Mean Range:

1.00-1.75

Highly Not Skilled

1.76 – 2.5

Not Skilled

2.51 – 3.25

Skilled

3.26 – 4.00

Highly Skilled

Variable 2

(Same as variable 1) Variable 3

(Same as variable 2) Testing of the Hypotheses

The following hypotheses were tested using the 0.05 level of significance. There is a significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 in terms of …..

5 Action Plan(desired output) Based on the findings, an action plan was developed to enhance V3 (cf. Appendix 5). (Discuss the action plan).

Chapter 5 Summary of Findings, Conclusion/s and Recommendations [Introductory paragraph stating the contents of the chapter.] Summary of Findings

Introductory paragraph. 1. (Question 1) Answer to Question 1 2. (Question 2) Answer to Question 2 3. And so on Conclusion/s

(Refer to your general statement of the problem) Make a general statement relevant to the purpose of your study. Add statements on so what? (ex. Students’ engagement in online games affects their social behaviors and academic-related behaviors. Then HEIs/Guidance Center should ….[still generic statements]. ) Recommendations

Based on the findings, the researcher endorses the following recommendations: 1. (identify the target group/persons who will implement the recommendation, then state the specific course of action.) (must jive to the significance). 2. And so on… 3. C 4. C 5. C 6. c

7 References

8 Appendix A [Permission to conduct the study]

9 Appendix B (Instrument A)

10 ( Appendix C Instrument B

11 Curriculum Vitae [Insert picture in toga]