Deber.docx

  • Uploaded by: Santy Lasso
  • 0
  • 0
  • April 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Deber.docx as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 354
  • Pages: 1
1. 2. 3. 4.

Porque al reducir el punto de corte de 50.000 UFC a 10.000 UFC la sensibilidad disminuye? Titulo: atractivo, 15 words, describe population, single paragraph. Autor: Leah Tzimenatos, emergency medicina and pediatrics Abstract: clear, objectives, methods (cocepts of UTI, two analysis, definition of POSITIVE urinalysis {LE, pyuria, nitrites}), results (population, S, E, NPV, PPV) and conclusions. Variable independiente – Variable resultado (dependiente) – Tipo analisis estadistico - X2, Wicolson 5. Introduction: concepts are clear and understandable, catch attention, answers to why, it is interesting. *APP: reported test S 48% to 99% E 88-98% *Methods of urine collection: catheter vs nocatheter; dipstick +/- microscopy *Urinalysis: LE, nitrite, pyuria * Aim is clear. *It shows a background for describing the problem. *It is difficult to find the predictive and dependent variable 6. Methods: - exclusion – sepsis, ho prematutiry, comorbid conditions, recent ATB use, bacteriemia wo UTI, concurrent UTI - inclusion - (+) test with catheterization or suprapubic aspiration. - ETICS: consent - Not mention about bias - Type of design: secondary analysis of a large, prospective cross-sectional study (prevalence) - X2 square: cathegorical infants w & w/o UTIs & infants w & w/o bacteremia. - Wilcoxon rank: cuantitativas continuas AP NP - Program:SAS version 9.4 - Explanation of 4778 – 631= 4147 7. RESULTS:  Found accuracy S & E of urinalysis in infants of 60 days and younger.  High and perfect S and E in children with UTIs +/- bacteremia.  The presentation of details are clear even though PPV ad NPV appear just in the table.  The used text and tables. Use one diagram for explaining exclusion criteria.  They didn’t repeat information of methods.  They describe characteristic of the population in the tables, clearly 8. DISCUSION: V. INTERNA (S & E) present because population is intented to be homogeneous, less subjects of study. V. EXTERNA: VPP, NPV (high). Generalization to other subjects? Just for the NPV 9. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy is expressed by high S, E. Theydont mention clearly the high NPV which represent an important indicator of external validity. The mention a clear, simple answer.

More Documents from "Santy Lasso"

Herencia.docx
December 2019 12
Deber.docx
April 2020 3
December 2019 28
Evaluacion Psicologica.docx
November 2019 3
Pagos Provisionales.xlsx
December 2019 9