Cws Slo July2008 Report

  • Uploaded by: Kathleen Dearinger
  • 0
  • 0
  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Cws Slo July2008 Report as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 4,398
  • Pages: 6
CWS Outcomes System Summary for San Luis Obispo County--07.15.08 Report publication: JUL2008. Data extract: Q4 2007. Agency: Child Welfare. Comparison to baseline Most recent National Standard or perf. rel. to Goal nat'l std/goal 2 Direction?3

Most recent start date

Most recent end date

Most recent numerator

Most recent denominator

performance1

Participation Rates: Referral Rates* Participation Rates: Substantiation Rates* Participation Rates: Entry Rates* Participation Rates: In Care Rates* No Recurrence Of Maltreatment No Maltreatment In Foster Care

01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 07/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07

12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 07/01/07 12/31/07 12/31/07

3,575 534 199 355 217 552

53,801 53,801 53,801 53,801 250 553

66.4 9.9 3.7 6.6 86.8 99.82

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 94.6 99.68

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 91.8 100.1

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

-24.5% -58.0% -14.4% -2.8% 12.1% 0.10%

C1 C1.1 C1.2 C1.3 C1.4

Reunification Composite Reunification Within 12 Months (Exit Cohort) Median Time To Reunification (Exit Cohort) Reunification Within 12 Months (Entry Cohort) Reentry Following Reunification (Exit Cohort)

N.A. 01/01/07 01/01/07 07/01/06 01/01/06

12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/06 12/31/06

N.A. 64 N.A. 40 15

N.A. 91 91 86 93

113.8 70.3 7.6 46.5 16.1

122.6 75.2 5.4 48.4 9.9

87.9 93.5 71.1 96.1 61.4

No Yes No Yes No

-13.7% 2.4% 55.1% 64.6% 105.1%

C2 C2.1 C2.2 C2.3 C2.4 C2.5

Adoption Composite Adoption Within 24 Months (Exit Cohort) Median Time To Adoption (Exit Cohort) Adoption Within 12 Months (17 Months In Care) Legally Free Within 6 Months (17 Months In Care) Adoption Within 12 Months (Legally Free)

N.A. 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/06

12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 06/30/07 12/31/06

N.A. 21 N.A. 27 14 24

N.A. 41 41 152 88 50

122.1 51.2 23.0 17.8 15.9 48.0

106.4 36.6 27.3 22.7 10.9 53.7

127.8 139.9 118.7 78.3 146.0 89.4

No No No Yes Yes No

-11.0% -6.9% 5.0% 28.3% 53.8% -40.5%

C3

Long Term Care Composite

Yes No

Measure number Measure description PR* PR* PR* PR* S1.1 S2.1

Most recent

Percent 4 change

N.A.

12/31/07

N.A.

N.A.

124.7

121.7

104.2

01/01/07 01/01/07

12/31/07 12/31/07

21 39

107 39

19.6 100.0

29.1 98.0

67.4 102.0

Yes

-20.4% 7.7%

C3.3

Exits To Permanency (24 Months In Care) Exits To Permanency (Legally Free At Exit) In Care 3 Years Or Longer (Emancipated/Age 18)

01/01/07

12/31/07

10

30

33.3

37.5

112.5

Yes

-26.2%

C4 C4.1 C4.2 C4.3

Placement Stability Composite Placement Stability (8 Days To 12 Months In Care) Placement Stability (12 To 24 Months In Care) Placement Stability (At Least 24 Months In Care)

N.A. 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07

12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07

N.A. 183 81 55

N.A. 217 146 167

92.2 84.3 55.5 32.9

101.5 86.0 65.4 41.8

81.9 98.1 84.8 78.8

No No No No

-8.3% -3.9% -11.2% -16.7%

2B 2B

Timely Response (Imm. Response Compliance) Timely Response (10-Day Response Compliance)

10/01/07 10/01/07

12/31/07 12/31/07

76 226

80 365

95.0 61.9

N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A.

Yes No

2.6% -4.2%

2C** 2C** 2C**

Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 1)** Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 2)** Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 3)**

Oct 2007 Nov 2007 Dec 2007

Oct 2007 Nov 2007 Dec 2007

494 487 504

609 598 606

81.1 81.4 83.2

N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. No

N.A. N.A. -0.2%

4A 4A

Siblings (All) Siblings (Some or All)

01/01/08 01/01/08

01/01/08 01/01/08

128 163

218 218

58.7 74.8

N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A.

Yes Yes

4.4% 0.2%

4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B

Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Relative) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Foster Home) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: FFA) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Group/Shelter) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Other) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Relative) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Foster Home) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: FFA) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Group/Shelter) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Other)

01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/08 01/01/08 01/01/08 01/01/08 01/01/08

12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 01/01/08 01/01/08 01/01/08 01/01/08 01/01/08

94 29 62 2 0 220 29 51 23 49

187 187 187 187 187 372 372 372 372 372

50.3 15.5 33.2 1.1 0.0 59.1 7.8 13.7 6.2 13.2

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Yes N.A. N.A. Yes N.A. Yes N.A. N.A. Yes N.A.

35.6% -19.1% -11.6% -80.3% -100.0% 35.1% -38.6% -44.9% -15.3% 16.0%

ICWA Eligible: Relative ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative Indian SCP*** ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative Non-Indian SCP ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative - Ethnicity SCP Missing ICWA Eligible: Group Home ICWA Eligible: Other Multi-Ethnic: Relative Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative Indian SCP Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative Non-Indian SCP Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative - Ethnicity SCP Missing Multi-Ethnic: Group Home Multi-Ethnic: Other

10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07

12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07

10 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 3 0 0 0

11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

90.9 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 27.3 0.0 0.0 0.0

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

45.5% N.A. N.A. N.A. -100.0% -100.0% 1.8% N.A. N.A. N.A. -100.0% N.A.

High School Diploma* Enrolled in College/Higher Education* Received ILP Services* Completed Vocational Training* Employed or Other Means of Support*

10/01/06 10/01/06 10/01/06 10/01/06 10/01/06

09/30/07 09/30/07 09/30/07 09/30/07 09/30/07

38 32 182 23 108

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

C3.1 C3.2

4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 8A* 8A* 8A* 8A* 8A*

8.2%

NOTE: "." or '#DIV/0!' = value not available due to 0 denominator 1

Participation Rates: Rate per 1,000; C1.2 and C2.2: Median (Months); Composites: Estimated score (estimates <50 set to 50, >150 set to 150 consistent with fed range and to control outliers); All others: Percent (%).

2

Performance relative to national std or goal=(Perf-50)/(Std-50)*100 for composites; (Perf)/(Std or Goal)*100 for measures with desired increase;(Goal)/(Perf)*100 for measures with desired decrease.

3

Percent change as compared to column P 'Directional Goal'. Percent change=0.0% (no change) or matching direction = "Yes".

4

Percent Change calculated=(most recent n/most recent d)/(baseline n/baseline d)-1.

*Participation Rates reports are published as calendar years only and Youth in Transition reports are published October through September only. **Comparisons (‘Percent change’ and ‘Direction?’) between baseline rate month 1 and most recent rate month 3. ***SCP=Substitute Care Provider. C.D.S.S. / U.C. Berkeley Center for Social Services Research: CWS/CMS Dynamic Report System http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare

Full Excel version of this file: http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare/Ccfsr.aspx

CWS Outcomes System Summary for San Luis Obispo County--07.15.08 Report publication: JUL2008. Data extract: Q4 2007. Agency: Child Welfare. b

a

Measure number PR* PR* PR* PR* S1.1 S2.1 C1 C1.1 C1.2 C1.3 C1.4 C2 C2.1 C2.2 C2.3 C2.4 C2.5 C3 C3.1 C3.2 C3.3 C4 C4.1 C4.2 C4.3 2B 2B 2C** 2C** 2C** 4A 4A 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 8A* 8A* 8A* 8A* 8A*

c

Type (CDSS UCB) Measure description

U U U U U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C C C C C C U U U U U U U U U U U U C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C

Participation Rates: Referral Rates* Participation Rates: Substantiation Rates* Participation Rates: Entry Rates* Participation Rates: In Care Rates* No Recurrence Of Maltreatment No Maltreatment In Foster Care Reunification Composite Reunification Within 12 Months (Exit Cohort) Median Time To Reunification (Exit Cohort) Reunification Within 12 Months (Entry Cohort) Reentry Following Reunification (Exit Cohort) Adoption Composite Adoption Within 24 Months (Exit Cohort) Median Time To Adoption (Exit Cohort) Adoption Within 12 Months (17 Months In Care) Legally Free Within 6 Months (17 Months In Care) Adoption Within 12 Months (Legally Free) Long Term Care Composite Exits To Permanency (24 Months In Care) Exits To Permanency (Legally Free At Exit) In Care 3 Years Or Longer (Emancipated/Age 18) Placement Stability Composite Placement Stability (8 Days To 12 Months In Care) Placement Stability (12 To 24 Months In Care) Placement Stability (At Least 24 Months In Care) Timely Response (Imm. Response Compliance) Timely Response (10-Day Response Compliance) Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 1)** Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 2)** Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 3)** Siblings (All) Siblings (Some or All) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Relative) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Foster Home) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: FFA) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Group/Shelter) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Other) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Relative) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Foster Home) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: FFA) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Group/Shelter) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Other) ICWA Eligible: Relative ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative Indian SCP*** ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative Non-Indian SCP ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative - Ethnicity SCP Missing ICWA Eligible: Group Home ICWA Eligible: Other Multi-Ethnic: Relative Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative Indian SCP Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative Non-Indian SCP Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative - Ethnicity SCP Missing Multi-Ethnic: Group Home Multi-Ethnic: Other High School Diploma* Enrolled in College/Higher Education* Received ILP Services* Completed Vocational Training* Employed or Other Means of Support*

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

k

National Standard or Goal

Baseline start date

Baseline end date

Baseline numerator

Baseline denominator

Baseline performance1

Baseline perf. rel. to nat'l std/goal (%)2

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 94.6 99.68 122.6 75.2 5.4 48.4 9.9 106.4 36.6 27.3 22.7 10.9 53.7 121.7 29.1 98.0 37.5 101.5 86.0 65.4 41.8 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

01/01/02 01/01/02 01/01/02 07/01/03 07/01/02 07/01/02 N.A. 07/01/02 07/01/02 01/01/02 07/01/01 N.A. 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/01 N.A. 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 N.A. 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 05/01/03 06/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 10/01/01 10/01/01 10/01/01 10/01/01 10/01/01

12/31/02 12/31/02 12/31/02 07/01/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/02 06/30/02 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 12/31/02 06/30/02 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 04/30/03 05/31/03 06/30/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 09/30/02 09/30/02 09/30/02 09/30/02 09/30/02

4,747 1,275 233 366 457 605 N.A. 92 N.A. 26 7 N.A. 22 N.A. 18 12 25 N.A. 35 39 14 N.A. 230 90 66 125 542 539 539 557 122 162 89 46 90 13 2 162 47 92 27 42 5 0 0 0 2 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 72 32 287 6 155

53,952 53,952 53,952 53,939 590 607 N.A. 134 134 92 89 N.A. 40 40 130 116 31 N.A. 142 42 31 N.A. 262 144 167 135 839 647 659 678 217 217 240 240 240 240 240 370 370 370 370 370 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

88.0 23.6 4.3 6.8 77.5 99.67 131.9 68.7 4.9 28.3 7.9 137.2 55.0 21.9 13.8 10.3 80.6 115.3 24.6 92.9 45.2 100.6 87.8 62.5 39.5 92.6 64.6 83.3 84.1 82.2 56.2 74.7 37.1 19.2 37.5 5.4 0.8 43.8 12.7 24.9 7.3 11.4 62.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 12.5 71.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 81.9 100.0 112.8 91.3 110.2 58.4 125.9 154.6 150.3 124.7 61.0 94.9 150.2 91.1 84.7 94.8 83.0 98.3 102.1 95.6 94.5 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

l

m

n

o

p

Most recent start date

Most recent end date

Most recent numerator

Most recent denominator

Most recent performance1

01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 07/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 N.A. 01/01/07 01/01/07 07/01/06 01/01/06 N.A. 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/06 N.A. 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 N.A. 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 11/01/07 12/01/07 01/01/08 01/01/08 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/08 01/01/08 01/01/08 01/01/08 01/01/08 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/07 10/01/06 10/01/06 10/01/06 10/01/06 10/01/06

12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 07/01/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/06 12/31/06 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 06/30/07 12/31/06 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 10/31/07 11/30/07 12/31/07 01/01/08 01/01/08 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 01/01/08 01/01/08 01/01/08 01/01/08 01/01/08 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 12/31/07 09/30/07 09/30/07 09/30/07 09/30/07 09/30/07

3,575 534 199 355 217 552 N.A. 64 N.A. 40 15 N.A. 21 N.A. 27 14 24 N.A. 21 39 10 N.A. 183 81 55 76 226 494 487 504 128 163 94 29 62 2 0 220 29 51 23 49 10 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 3 0 0 0 38 32 182 23 108

53,801 53,801 53,801 53,801 250 553 N.A. 91 91 86 93 N.A. 41 41 152 88 50 N.A. 107 39 30 N.A. 217 146 167 80 365 609 598 606 218 218 187 187 187 187 187 372 372 372 372 372 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

66.4 9.9 3.7 6.6 86.8 99.82 113.8 70.3 7.6 46.5 16.1 122.1 51.2 23.0 17.8 15.9 48.0 124.7 19.6 100.0 33.3 92.2 84.3 55.5 32.9 95.0 61.9 81.1 81.4 83.2 58.7 74.8 50.3 15.5 33.2 1.1 0.0 59.1 7.8 13.7 6.2 13.2 90.9 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 27.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

q

r

s

Most recent perf. rel. to nat'l std/goal Directional (%)2 goal Direction? 3 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 91.8 100.1 87.9 93.5 71.1 96.1 61.4 127.8 139.9 118.7 78.3 146.0 89.4 104.2 67.4 102.0 112.5 81.9 98.1 84.8 78.8 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No N.A. N.A. No Yes Yes Yes N.A. N.A. Yes N.A. Yes N.A. N.A. Yes N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + N.A. N.A. + + + + N.A. N.A. N.A. + N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Percent change4 -24.5% -58.0% -14.4% -2.8% 12.1% 0.10% -13.7% 2.4% 55.1% 64.6% 105.1% -11.0% -6.9% 5.0% 28.3% 53.8% -40.5% 8.2% -20.4% 7.7% -26.2% -8.3% -3.9% -11.2% -16.7% 2.6% -4.2% N.A. N.A. -0.2% 4.4% 0.2% 35.6% -19.1% -11.6% -80.3% -100.0% 35.1% -38.6% -44.9% -15.3% 16.0% 45.5% N.A. N.A. N.A. -100.0% -100.0% 1.8% N.A. N.A. N.A. -100.0% N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

2

CWS Outcomes System Summary for San Luis Obispo County--07.15.08 Report publication: JUL2008. Data extract: Q4 2007. Agency: Child Welfare. NOTE: "." or '#DIV/0!' = value not available due to 0 denominator 1

Participation Rates: Rate per 1,000; C1.2 and C2.2: Median (Months); Composites: Estimated score (estimates <50 set to 50, >150 set to 150 consistent with fed range and to control outliers); All others: Percent (%).

2

Performance relative to national std or goal=(Perf-50)/(Std-50)*100 for composites; (Perf)/(Std or Goal)*100 for measures with desired increase; (Goal)/(Perf)*100 for measures with desired decrease.

3

Percent change as compared to column P 'Directional Goal'. Percent change=0.0% (no change) or matching direction = "Yes".

4

Percent Change calculated=(most recent n/most recent d)/(baseline n/baseline d)-1 .

5

Estimated as most recent n - [most recent d*(baseline n/baseline d)].

*Participation Rates reports are published as calendar years only and Youth in Transition reports are published October through September only. **Comparisons (‘Percent change’ and ‘Direction?’) between baseline rate month 1 and comparison rate month 3. ***SCP=Substitute Care Provider.

3

t

Estimated # of children affected 5 -1,159 -737 -33 -10 23 1 N.A. 2 N.A. 16 8 N.A. -2 N.A. 6 5 -16 N.A. -5 3 -4 N.A. -7 -10 -11 2 -10 N.A. N.A. -1 5 0 25 -7 -8 -8 -2 57 -18 -41 -4 7 3 0 1 0 -3 -1 0 0 3 0 -3 0 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

4

5

CWS Outcomes System Summary for San Luis Obispo County--07.15.08 Report publication: JUL2008. Data extract: Q4 2007. Agency: Child Welfare.

C.D.S.S. / U.C. Berkeley Center for Social Services Research: CWS/CMS Dynamic Report System http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare

METHODS Measure number PR* PR* PR* PR* S1.1 S2.1 C1 C1.1 C1.2 C1.3 C1.4 C2 C2.1 C2.2 C2.3 C2.4 C2.5 C3 C3.1 C3.2 C3.3 C4 C4.1 C4.2 C4.3 2B 2B 2C 2C 2C 4A 4A 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 8A* 8A* 8A* 8A* 8A*

Type (CDSS UCB) U U U U U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C C C C C C U U U U U U U U U U U U C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C

Measure description

Measure description (Select cell to view full text. Excel 2007: Expand formula bar.*)

Hyperlink to methodology

Participation Rates: Referral Rates* Participation Rates: Substantiation Rates* Participation Rates: Entry Rates* Participation Rates: In Care Rates*

These reports compute annual Referral Rates based on population projections from the California Depar http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=RefRates These reports compute annual Substantiation Rates based on population projections from the California http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=RefRates These reports compute annual Entry Rates based on population projections from the California Departmehttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=EntryRates These reports compute annual In Care Rates based on population projections from the California Depart http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=InCareRates

No Recurrence Of Maltreatment

This safety measure reflects the percentage of children who were victims of a substantiated or indicated http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=S1M1

No Maltreatment In Foster Care

This safety measure reflects the percentage of children who were not victims of a substantiated maltreatmhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=S2M1

Reunification Composite Reunification Within 12 Months (Exit Cohort) Median Time To Reunification (Exit Cohort) Reunification Within 12 Months (Entry Cohort) Reentry Following Reunification (Exit Cohort)

This is a child welfare supervised estimate of the composite score used in the CFSR2. Federally specifiehttp://www.nrccwdt.org/cfsr/data_tools.html This measure computes the percentage of children discharged to reunification within 12 months of rem http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C1M1 This measure computes the median length of stay (in months) for children discharged to reunification. Lhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C1M2 This measure computes the percentage of children reunified within 12 months of removal for a cohort ohttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C1M3 This measure computes the percentage of children reentering foster care within 12 months of a reunifichttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C1M4 Adoption Composite This is a child welfare supervised estimate of the composite score used in the CFSR2. Federally specifiehttp://www.nrccwdt.org/cfsr/data_tools.html Adoption Within 24 Months (Exit Cohort) This measure computes the percentage of children adopted within 24 months of removal. The denominhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C2M1 Median Time To Adoption (Exit Cohort) This measure computes the median length of stay (in months) for children discharged to adoption. Len http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C2M2 Adoption Within 12 Months (17 Months In Care) This measure computes the percentage of children in foster care for 17 continuous months or longer onhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C2M3 Legally Free Within 6 Months (17 Months In Care) This measure computes the percentage of children who were in foster care for 17 continuous months ohttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C2M4 Adoption Within 12 Months (Legally Free) This measure computes the percentage of children discharged from foster care to adoption within 12 mhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C2M5 Long Term Care Composite This is a child welfare supervised estimate of the composite score used in the CFSR2. Federally specifiehttp://www.nrccwdt.org/cfsr/data_tools.html Exits To Permanency (24 Months In Care) This measure computes the percentage of children discharged to a permanent home by the last day of http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C3M1 Exits To Permanency (Legally Free At Exit) This measure computes the percentage of legally free children who were discharged to a permanent hohttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C3M2 In Care 3 Years Or Longer (Emancipated/Age 18) This measure computes the percentage of children in foster care for 3 years or longer who were then ehttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C3M3 Placement Stability Composite This is a child welfare supervised estimate of the composite score used in the CFSR2. Federally specifiehttp://www.nrccwdt.org/cfsr/data_tools.html Care) This measure computes the percentage of children with two or fewer placements who have been in foshttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C4M123 Placement Stability (12 To 24 Months In Care) This measure computes the percentage of children with two or fewer placements who have been in foshttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C4M123 Placement Stability (At Least 24 Months In Care) This measure computes the percentage of children with two or fewer placements who have been in foshttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C4M123 Timely Response (Imm. Response Compliance) This measure computes the percentage of cases in which face-to-face contact with a child occurs, or is ahttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/CDSS_2B_2006Q2.pdf Timely Response (10-Day Response Compliance) This measure computes the percentage of cases in which face-to-face contact with a child occurs, or is ahttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/CDSS_2B_2006Q2.pdf Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 1) This measure computes the percentage of children who received a monthly visit, out of all those children http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/CDSS_2C_Methodology_042507.pdf Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 2) This measure computes the percentage of children who received a monthly visit, out of all those children http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/CDSS_2C_Methodology_042507.pdf Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 3) This measure computes the percentage of children who received a monthly visit, out of all those children http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/CDSS_2C_Methodology_042507.pdf Siblings (All) These reports provide point in time counts of sibling groups placed in Child Welfare supervised foster carhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=Siblings Siblings (Some or All) These reports provide point in time counts of sibling groups placed in Child Welfare supervised foster carhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=Siblings Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Relative) This measure is derived from a longitudinal database of all entries to out of home care (in care 8 days or http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=Entries Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Foster Home) This measure is derived from a longitudinal database of all entries to out of home care (in care 8 days or http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=Entries Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: FFA) This measure is derived from a longitudinal database of all entries to out of home care (in care 8 days or http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=Entries Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Group/Shelter) This measure is derived from a longitudinal database of all entries to out of home care (in care 8 days or http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=Entries Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Other) This measure is derived from a longitudinal database of all entries to out of home care (in care 8 days or http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=Entries Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Relative) This measure is a point in time count of all children who have an open placement episode of "Relative" inhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=PIT Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Foster Home) This measure is a point in time count of all children who have an open placement episode of "Foster Homhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=PIT Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: FFA) This measure is a point in time count of all children who have an open placement episode of "FFA" in thehttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=PIT Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Group/Shelter) This measure is a point in time count of all children who have an open placement episode of "Group/She http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=PIT Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Other) This measure is a point in time count of all children who have an open placement episode of "Other" in thhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=PIT ICWA Eligible: Relative This measure reflects the percent of Indian Child Welfare Act eligible children placed in out of home care http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_ICWA_q2_04.pdf ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative Indian SCP*** This measure reflects the percent of Indian Child Welfare Act eligible children placed in out of home care http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_ICWA_q2_04.pdf ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative Non-Indian SCP This measure reflects the percent of Indian Child Welfare Act eligible children placed in out of home care http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_ICWA_q2_04.pdf ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative - Ethnicity SCP Missing This measure reflects the percent of Indian Child Welfare Act eligible children placed in out of home care http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_ICWA_q2_04.pdf ICWA Eligible: Group Home This measure reflects the percent of Indian Child Welfare Act eligible children placed in out of home care http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_ICWA_q2_04.pdf ICWA Eligible: Other This measure reflects the percent of Indian Child Welfare Act eligible children placed in out of home care http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_ICWA_q2_04.pdf Multi-Ethnic: Relative This measure reflects the percent of American Indian (primary & multi-ethnicity) children in out of home chttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_Eths_q2_04.pdf Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative Indian SCP This measure reflects the percent of American Indian (primary & multi-ethnicity) children in out of home chttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_Eths_q2_04.pdf Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative Non-Indian SCP This measure reflects the percent of American Indian (primary & multi-ethnicity) children in out of home chttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_Eths_q2_04.pdf Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative - Ethnicity SCP Missing This measure reflects the percent of American Indian (primary & multi-ethnicity) children in out of home chttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_Eths_q2_04.pdf Multi-Ethnic: Group Home This measure reflects the percent of American Indian (primary & multi-ethnicity) children in out of home chttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_Eths_q2_04.pdf Multi-Ethnic: Other This measure reflects the percent of American Indian (primary & multi-ethnicity) children in out of home chttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_Eths_q2_04.pdf High School Diploma* This measure reflects the number of foster children eligible for Independent Living Services who earned ahttp://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/research/PG333.htm Enrolled in College/Higher Education* This measure reflects the number of foster children eligible for Independent Living Services who enrolled http://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/research/PG333.htm Received ILP Services* This measure reflects the number of foster children eligible for Independent Living Services who receivedhttp://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/research/PG333.htm Completed Vocational Training* This measure reflects the number of foster children eligible for Independent Living Services who complet http://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/research/PG333.htm Employed or Other Means of Support* This measure reflects the number of foster children eligible for Independent Living Services who are emphttp://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/research/PG333.htm

*To view full text in Excel 2007: on view tab, click 'Formula Bar'; on formula bar, click 'Expand Formula Bar' button (double down arrows at far right of formula bar).

Related Documents

Cws Slo July2008 Report
November 2019 15
Cws Slo Jan2008 Report
November 2019 14
July2008
April 2020 15
July2008
October 2019 30
July2008
November 2019 19
Prezentacija Slo
November 2019 30

More Documents from ""