Cws Slo Jan2008 Report

CWS Outcomes System Summary for San Luis Obispo County--01.07.08 Report publication: JAN2008 (Data extract: Q2 2007) Comparison to baseline

Measure number

Measure description

PR* PR* PR* PR* S1.1 S2.1 C1.1 C1.2 C1.3 C1.4 C2.1 C2.2 C2.3 C2.4 C2.5

Participation Rates: Referral Rates* Participation Rates: Substantiation Rates* Participation Rates: Entry Rates* Participation Rates: In Care Rates* No Recurrence Of Maltreatment No Maltreatment In Foster Care

Most Most Percent recent recent Most recent Most recent Most recent 1 2 3 start date end date numerator denominator performance Direction? change

Adoption Within 24 Months (Exit Cohort) Median Time To Adoption (Exit Cohort) Adoption Within 12 Months (17 Months In Care) Legally Free Within 6 Months (17 Months In Care) Adoption Within 12 Months (Legally Free)

01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 07/01/07 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 01/01/06 07/01/05 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/05

12/31/06 12/31/06 12/31/06 07/01/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/06 06/30/06 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 12/31/06 06/30/06

3,566 793 224 368 201 561 66 N.A. 15 25 15 N.A. 27 9 24

53,966 53,966 53,966 53,801 208 565 94 94 64 128 43 43 130 83 44

66.1 14.7 4.2 6.8 96.6 99.29 70.2 6.4 23.4 19.5 34.9 29.3 20.8 10.8 54.5

C3.1 C3.2 C3.3

Exits To Permanency (24 Months In Care) Exits To Permanency (Legally Free At Exit) In Care 3 Years Or Longer (Emancipated/Age 18

07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06

06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07

30 43 16

111 43 32

C4.1 C4.2 C4.3 2B 2B 2C** 2C** 2C** 4A 4A 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2)

Placement Stability (8 Days To 12 Months In Care) Placement Stability (12 To 24 Months In Care) Placement Stability (At Least 24 Months In Care

ICWA Eligible: Relative ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative Indian SCP*** ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative Non-Indian SCP ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative - Ethnicity SCP Missing Multi-Ethnic: Relative Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative Indian SCP Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative Non-Indian SCP Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative - Ethnicity SCP Missing

07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 04/01/07 04/01/07 Apr 2007 May 2007 Jun 2007 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07

06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 Apr 2007 May 2007 Jun 2007 07/01/07 07/01/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07

198 84 61 91 266 519 502 481 140 172 107 25 76 1 0 214 44 58 24 35 2 0 8 0 2 0 5 0

High School Diploma* Enrolled in College/Higher Education* Received ILP Services* Completed Vocational Training* Employed or Other Means of Support*

10/01/05 10/01/05 10/01/05 10/01/05 10/01/05

09/30/06 09/30/06 09/30/06 09/30/06 09/30/06

75 33 201 30 132

8A* 8A* 8A* 8A* 8A*

Reunification Within 12 Months (Exit Cohort) Median Time To Reunification (Exit Cohort) Reunification Within 12 Months (Entry Cohort) Reentry Following Reunification (Exit Cohort)

Timely Response (Imm. Response Compliance) Timely Response (10-Day Response Compliance) Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 1)** Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 2)** Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 3)** Siblings (All) Siblings (Some or All) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Relative) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Foster Home) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: FFA) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Group/Shelter) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Other) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Relative) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Foster Home) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: FFA) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Group/Shelter) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Other)

-24.9% -37.8% -3.9% 0.8% 24.8% -0.38% 2.3% 30.6% -17.1% 148.3% -36.6% 33.8% 51.2% 39.8% -32.4%

27.0 100.0 50.0

Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No

229 141 172 98 420 608 609 587 223 223 209 209 209 209 209 375 375 375 375 375 10 10 10 10 7 7 7 7

86.5 59.6 35.5 92.9 63.3 85.4 82.4 81.9 62.8 77.1 51.2 12.0 36.4 0.5 0.0 57.1 11.7 15.5 6.4 9.3 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 71.4 0.0

No No No Yes No N.A. N.A. No Yes Yes Yes N.A. N.A. Yes N.A. Yes N.A. N.A. Yes N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

-1.5% -5.7% -9.7% 0.3% -2.0% N.A. N.A. -3.8% 11.7% 3.3% 38.1% -37.6% -3.0% -91.2% -100.0% 30.3% -7.6% -37.8% -12.3% -17.8% -70.0% #DIV/0! 140.0% #DIV/0! -61.9% #DIV/0! 185.7% #DIV/0!

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

10.4% 7.7% 10.7%

NOTE: '#DIV/0!' = value not available due to 0 denominator 1

Participation Rates: Rate per 1,000; C1.2 and C2.2: Median (Months); All others percent (%).

2

Percent change as compared to column P 'Directional Goal' on tab 'CWSOutcomes_CompareToBaseline'. Percent change=0.0% (no change) or matching direction = "Yes".

3

Percent Change calculated as: (most recent n/most recent d)/(baseline n/baseline d)-1.

*Participation Rates reports are published as calendar years only and Youth in Transition reports are published October through September only. **Comparisons (‘Percent change’ and ‘Direction?’) between baseline rate month 1 and most recent rate month 3. ***SCP=Substitute Care Provider. U.C. Berkeley Center for Social Services Research: CWS/CMS Dynamic Report System http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare

Full Excel version of this file: http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare/Ccfsr.aspx

CWS Outcomes System Summary for San Luis Obispo County--01.07.08 Report publication: JAN2008 (Data extract: Q2 2007) a

b

Measure number

Type (CDSS UCB) Measure description

PR* PR* PR* PR* S1.1 S2.1 C1.1 C1.2 C1.3 C1.4 C2.1 C2.2 C2.3 C2.4 C2.5 C3.1 C3.2 C3.3 C4.1 C4.2 C4.3 2B 2B 2C** 2C** 2C** 4A 4A 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 8A* 8A* 8A* 8A* 8A*

c

U U U U U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C C C C C C U U U U U U U U U U U U C C C C C C C C C C C C C

Participation Rates: Referral Rates* Participation Rates: Substantiation Rates* Participation Rates: Entry Rates* Participation Rates: In Care Rates* No Recurrence Of Maltreatment No Maltreatment In Foster Care Reunification Within 12 Months (Exit Cohort) Median Time To Reunification (Exit Cohort) Reunification Within 12 Months (Entry Cohort) Reentry Following Reunification (Exit Cohort) Adoption Within 24 Months (Exit Cohort) Median Time To Adoption (Exit Cohort) Adoption Within 12 Months (17 Months In Care) Legally Free Within 6 Months (17 Months In Care) Adoption Within 12 Months (Legally Free) Exits To Permanency (24 Months In Care) Exits To Permanency (Legally Free At Exit) In Care 3 Years Or Longer (Emancipated/Age 18) Placement Stability (8 Days To 12 Months In Care) Placement Stability (12 To 24 Months In Care) Placement Stability (At Least 24 Months In Care) Timely Response (Imm. Response Compliance) Timely Response (10-Day Response Compliance) Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 1)** Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 2)** Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 3)** Siblings (All) Siblings (Some or All) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Relative) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Foster Home) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: FFA) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Group/Shelter) Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Other) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Relative) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Foster Home) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: FFA) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Group/Shelter) Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Other) ICWA Eligible: Relative ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative Indian SCP*** ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative Non-Indian SCP ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative - Ethnicity SCP Missing Multi-Ethnic: Relative Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative Indian SCP Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative Non-Indian SCP Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative - Ethnicity SCP Missing High School Diploma* Enrolled in College/Higher Education* Received ILP Services* Completed Vocational Training* Employed or Other Means of Support*

d

e

f

g

h

Baseline start date

Baseline end date

Baseline numerator

Baseline denominator

Most Most Baseline recent start recent 1 performance date end date

01/01/02 01/01/02 01/01/02 07/01/03 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 01/01/02 07/01/01 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/01 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 05/01/03 06/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/02 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 04/01/03 10/01/01 10/01/01 10/01/01 10/01/01 10/01/01

12/31/02 12/31/02 12/31/02 07/01/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/02 06/30/02 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 12/31/02 06/30/02 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 04/30/03 05/31/03 06/30/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 06/30/03 09/30/02 09/30/02 09/30/02 09/30/02 09/30/02

4,747 1,275 233 366 457 602 92 N.A. 26 7 22 N.A. 18 9 25 35 39 14 230 91 66 125 542 340 374 417 122 162 89 46 90 13 2 162 47 92 27 42 4 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 72 32 287 6 155

53,952 53,952 53,952 53,939 590 604 134 134 92 89 40 40 131 116 31 143 42 31 262 144 168 135 839 399 428 479 217 217 240 240 240 240 240 370 370 370 370 370 6 6 6 6 4 4 4 4 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

i

88.0 23.6 4.3 6.8 77.5 99.67 68.7 4.9 28.3 7.9 55.0 21.9 13.7 7.8 80.6 24.5 92.9 45.2 87.8 63.2 39.3 92.6 64.6 85.2 87.4 87.1 56.2 74.7 37.1 19.2 37.5 5.4 0.8 43.8 12.7 24.9 7.3 11.4 66.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 75.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

j

01/01/06 01/01/06 01/01/06 07/01/07 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 01/01/06 07/01/05 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/05 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 04/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07 05/01/07 06/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/06 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07 04/01/07 10/01/05 10/01/05 10/01/05 10/01/05 10/01/05

k

12/31/06 12/31/06 12/31/06 07/01/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/06 06/30/06 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 12/31/06 06/30/06 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 04/30/07 05/31/07 06/30/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 06/30/07 09/30/06 09/30/06 09/30/06 09/30/06 09/30/06

l

m

Most recent Most recent numerator denominator 3,566 793 224 368 201 561 66 N.A. 15 25 15 N.A. 27 9 24 30 43 16 198 84 61 91 266 519 502 481 140 172 107 25 76 1 0 214 44 58 24 35 2 0 8 0 2 0 5 0 75 33 201 30 132

53,966 53,966 53,966 53,801 208 565 94 94 64 128 43 43 130 83 44 111 43 32 229 141 172 98 420 608 609 587 223 223 209 209 209 209 209 375 375 375 375 375 10 10 10 10 7 7 7 7 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

n

o

National Most recent Standard or 1 performance Goal 66.1 14.7 4.2 6.8 96.6 99.29 70.2 6.4 23.4 19.5 34.9 29.3 20.8 10.8 54.5 27.0 100.0 50.0 86.5 59.6 35.5 92.9 63.3 85.4 82.4 81.9 62.8 77.1 51.2 12.0 36.4 0.5 0.0 57.1 11.7 15.5 6.4 9.3 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 71.4 0.0 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 94.6 99.68 75.2 5.4 48.4 9.9 36.6 27.3 22.7 10.9 53.7 29.1 98.0 37.5 86.0 65.4 41.8 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

p

q

Directional Direction? 2 goal Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No N.A. N.A. No Yes Yes Yes N.A. N.A. Yes N.A. Yes N.A. N.A. Yes N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + N.A. N.A. + + + + N.A. N.A. N.A. + N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Percent change 3 -24.9% -37.8% -3.9% 0.8% 24.8% -0.38% 2.3% 30.6% -17.1% 148.3% -36.6% 33.8% 51.2% 39.8% -32.4% 10.4% 7.7% 10.7% -1.5% -5.7% -9.7% 0.3% -2.0% N.A. N.A. -3.8% 11.7% 3.3% 38.1% -37.6% -3.0% -91.2% -100.0% 30.3% -7.6% -37.8% -12.3% -17.8% -70.0% #DIV/0! 140.0% #DIV/0! -61.9% #DIV/0! 185.7% #DIV/0! N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

2

CWS Outcomes System Summary for San Luis Obispo County--01.07.08 Report publication: JAN2008 (Data extract: Q2 2007) NOTE: '#DIV/0!' = value not available due to 0 denominator 1

Participation Rates: Rate per 1,000; C1.2 and C2.2: Median (Months); All others percent (%).

2

Percent change as compared to column P 'Directional Goal'. Percent change=0.0% (no change) or matching direction = "Yes".

3

Percent Change calculated as: (most recent n/most recent d)/(baseline n/baseline d)-1 .

4

Estimated as most recent n - [most recent d*(baseline n/baseline d)].

*Participation Rates reports are published as calendar years only and Youth in Transition reports are published October through September only. **Comparisons (‘Percent change’ and ‘Direction?’) between baseline rate month 1 and most recent rate month 3. ***SCP=Substitute Care Provider.

Full Excel ve http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childw

3

r

Estimated # of children affected 4 -1,182 -482 -9 3 40 -2 1 N.A. -3 15 -9 N.A. 9 3 -11 3 3 2 -3 -5 -7 0 -5 N.A. N.A. -19 15 6 29 -15 -2 -10 -2 50 -4 -35 -3 -8 -5 0 5 0 -3 0 3 0 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

4

ersion of this file elfare/Ccfsr.asp

5

CWS Outcomes System Summary for San Luis Obispo County--01.07.08 Report publication: JAN2008 (Data extract: Q2 2007)

U.C. Berkeley Center for Social Services Research: CWS/CMS Dynamic Report System http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare

METHODS Measure number

Type (CDSS UCB)

PR PR PR PR

U U U U

S1.1 S2.1

Measure description

Measure description (Select Cell to View Entire Text)

Hyperlink to methodology

Participation Rates: Referral Rates* Participation Rates: Substantiation Rates* Participation Rates: Entry Rates* Participation Rates: In Care Rates*

These reports compute annual Referral Rates based on population projections from the California Depar http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=RefRates Department of Finance. The Substantiation Rate (both state and county) for a given year is computed http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=RefRates These reports compute annual Entry Rates based on population projections from the California Departmehttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=EntryRates These reports compute annual In Care Rates based on population projections from the California Depart http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=InCareRates

U/C

No Recurrence Of Maltreatment

This safety measure reflects the percentage of children who were victims of a substantiated or indicated http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=S1M1

U/C

No Maltreatment In Foster Care

C1.1 C1.2 C1.3 C1.4

U/C U/C U/C U/C

Reunification Within 12 Months (Exit Cohort) Median Time To Reunification (Exit Cohort) Reunification Within 12 Months (Entry Cohort) Reentry Following Reunification (Exit Cohort)

C2.1 C2.2 C2.3 C2.4 C2.5

U/C U/C U/C U/C U/C

Adoption Within 24 Months (Exit Cohort) Median Time To Adoption (Exit Cohort) Adoption Within 12 Months (17 Months In Care) Legally Free Within 6 Months (17 Months In Care) Adoption Within 12 Months (Legally Free)

This safety measure reflects the percentage of children who were not victims of a substantiated maltreatmhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=S2M1 This measure computes the percentage of children discharged to reunification within 12 months of http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C1M1 This measure computes the median length of stay (in months) for children discharged to reunification. http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C1M2 This measure computes the percentage of children reunified within 12 months of removal for a cohort of http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C1M3 This measure computes the percentage of children reentering foster care within 12 months of a http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C1M4 This measure computes the percentage of children adopted within 24 months of removal. The http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C2M1 This measure computes the median length of stay (in months) for children discharged to adoption. http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C2M2

C3.1 C3.2 C3.3

U/C U/C U/C

Exits To Permanency (24 Months In Care) Exits To Permanency (Legally Free At Exit) In Care 3 Years Or Longer (Emancipated/Age 18)

C4.1 C4.2 C4.3

U/C U/C U/C

Placement Stability (8 Days To 12 Months In Care) Placement Stability (12 To 24 Months In Care) Placement Stability (At Least 24 Months In Care)

2B 2B

C C

Timely Response (Imm. Response Compliance) Timely Response (10-Day Response Compliance)

2C 2C 2C

C C C

Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 1)** Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 2)** Timely Social Worker Visits with Child (Month 3)**

4A 4A

U U

4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B 4B

U U U U U U U U U U

4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (1) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2) 4E (2)

C C C C C C C C

8A 8A 8A 8A 8A

C C C C C

This measure computes the percentage of children in foster care for 17 continuous months or longer on thttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C2M3 This measure computes the percentage of children who were in foster care for 17 continuous months or http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C2M4 This measure computes the percentage of children discharged from foster care to adoption within 12 mo http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C2M5 This measure computes the percentage of children discharged to a permanent home by the last day of thhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C3M1 This measure computes the percentage of legally free children who were discharged to a permanent homhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C3M2 This measure computes the percentage of children in foster care for 3 years or longer who were then eithhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C3M3 This measure computes the percentage of children with two or fewer placements who have been in fostehttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C4M123 This measure computes the percentage of children with two or fewer placements who have been in fostehttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C4M123 This measure computes the percentage of children with two or fewer placements who have been in fostehttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=C4M123 This measure computes the percentage of cases in which face-to-face contact with a child occurs, or is http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/CDSS_2B_2006Q2.pdf This measure computes the percentage of cases in which face-to-face contact with a child occurs, or is http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/CDSS_2B_2006Q2.pdf

This measure computes the percentage of children who received a monthly visit, out of all those children http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/CDSS_2C_Methodology_042507.pdf This measure computes the percentage of children who received a monthly visit, out of all those children http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/CDSS_2C_Methodology_042507.pdf This measure computes the percentage of children who received a monthly visit, out of all those children http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/CDSS_2C_Methodology_042507.pdf Siblings (All) These reports provide point in time counts of sibling groups placed in Child Welfare supervised foster carhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=Siblings Siblings (Some or All) These reports provide point in time counts of sibling groups placed in Child Welfare supervised foster carhttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=Siblings Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Relative) or more) during the time period specified and computes the percentage of children who have a first http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=Entries Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Foster Home) or more) during the time period specified and computes the percentage of children who have a first http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=Entries Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: FFA) or more) during the time period specified and computes the percentage of children who have a first http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=Entries Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Group/Shelter) or more) during the time period specified and computes the percentage of children who have a first http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=Entries Least Restrictive (Entries First Plc.: Other) or more) during the time period specified and computes the percentage of children who have a first http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=Entries Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Relative) in the CWS/CMS system (labeled "Kin" in UCB data tables). On the count day, children are assigned to http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=PIT Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Foster Home) Home" in the CWS/CMS system (labeled "Foster" in UCB data tables). On the count day, children are http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=PIT Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: FFA) the CWS/CMS system. On the count day, children are assigned to the county in which they have an http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=PIT Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Group/Shelter) "Group/Shelter" in the CWS/CMS system (presented separately as "Group" and "Shelter" in UCB data http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=PIT Least Restrictive (PIT Placement: Other) the CWS/CMS system (comprised of the following categories in UCB data tables: Pre-Adopt, Court http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/methodologies/default.aspx?report=PIT ICWA Eligible: Relative This measure reflects the percent of Indian Child Welfare Act eligible children placed in out of home care http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_ICWA_q2_04.pdf ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative Indian SCP*** This measure reflects the percent of Indian Child Welfare Act eligible children placed in out of home care http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_ICWA_q2_04.pdf ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative Non-Indian SCP This measure reflects the percent of Indian Child Welfare Act eligible children placed in out of home care http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_ICWA_q2_04.pdf ICWA Eligible: Non-Relative - Ethnicity SCP Missing This measure reflects the percent of Indian Child Welfare Act eligible children placed in out of home care http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_ICWA_q2_04.pdf Multi-Ethnic: Relative This measure reflects the percent of American Indian (primary & multi-ethnicity) children in out of home chttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_Eths_q2_04.pdf Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative Indian SCP This measure reflects the percent of American Indian (primary & multi-ethnicity) children placed in out of http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_Eths_q2_04.pdf Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative Non-Indian SCP This measure reflects the percent of American Indian (primary & multi-ethnicity) children placed in out of http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_Eths_q2_04.pdf Multi-Ethnic: Non-Relative - Ethnicity SCP Missing This measure reflects the percent of American Indian (primary & multi-ethnicity) children placed in out of http://cssr.berkeley.edu/cwscmsreports/cdss/4E-Method_Eths_q2_04.pdf High School Diploma This measure reflects the number of foster children eligible for Independent Living Services who earned ahttp://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/research/PG333.htm Enrolled in College/Higher Education This measure reflects the number of foster children eligible for Independent Living Services who enrolled http://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/research/PG333.htm Received ILP Services This measure reflects the number of foster children eligible for Independent Living Services who receivedhttp://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/research/PG333.htm Completed Vocational Training This measure reflects the number of foster children eligible for Independent Living Services who complet http://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/research/PG333.htm Employed or Other Means of Support This measure reflects the number of foster children eligible for Independent Living Services who are emphttp://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/research/PG333.htm