Cm Pf 259 Periodic Inspection Report For Cement

CM/PF 259 June 1989

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS REPORT OF PERIODIC INSPECTION FOR CEMENT ( …………….. Inspection since the grant of licence / the last renewal ) Licence No. CM/LValid upto ………………………. IS :

IR No. …………………….. Date of writing IR …………

Product : 1.

a) Licensee : b) Other Licences

Type of Cement

i) CM/L-No. ii) CM/L-No. 2.

Date of Inspection

3.

Person(s) Contacted

4.

Previous Inspection a) Date

b) Conducted by

c) Conclusions and Recommendations 5.

Changes since Previous Inspection a) Technical b) Administrative

6.

Action on advice rendered in previous inspection or otherwise asked for while granting the licence/ renewal of the licence

7.

Observation about different stages of cement being manufactured at the time of inspection i) Kiln burning stage ii) Grinding stage iii) Packing stage

REMARKS OF REVIEWING OFFICER 1. 2. 3. Signature : Name : Designation : Date :

CM/PF 259 June 1989

8.

Details of major raw materials and their suppliers

8.1

Any other blending material added during or after grinding

8.2

Disposal of sub-standard raw materials

8.3

Any change of source since last inspection

See Annexure A

Observation about comparison of the properties received from different sources 9.

Production and supply details since last inspection (Details of completed month to be furnished)

10.

Storing, Packing and Marking

See Annexure B

a) Material held in stock i) Clinker ii) Cement b) Condition of storing c) Details of packing and marking on packages

d) What test results are available at the time of packing e) Any change in the marking procedure from approved one 11.

Production Control

Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory

a) How is the control system being operated b) Variation in test results for principal requirements c) Variation in Weight and frequency of checking d) Are the records maintained satisfactorily ? e) What is the percentage of rejections , their reasons and manner of disposal ? f) Whether the failure is due to inherent cause or chance cause ?

See Annexure C

CM/PF 259 June 1989

12.

Testing in factory a) Requirements tested with results b) Comparison of results obtained with firm’s records c) Comparison of results obtained with the requirements of the specification d) Are the instruments in use calibrated periodically ( Give details of calibration ) e) Are the instruments in use reasonably accurate ? f) Whether relative humidity and temperature maintained as laid in IS 4031 g) Any addition to the existing testing equipment?

13.

Samples for Independent Tests a) Number and quantity of cement samples drawn b) Details of cement samples drawn c) Test record of the batch from which cement sample is drawn d) Code No. and test record of other samples e) Samples brought in or left with the firm for despatch to BIS Testing Laboratory f) Laboratory to which sample is sent/proposed to be sent g) Details of counter samples left with the firm h) Despatch position of the sample drawn during the previous inspection i) Any other information

See Annexure C

CM/PF 259 June 1989

14.

Conclusions and Recommendations a) Has the scheme operated satisfactorily for this period since last inspection ? b) Assessment of the operation of the scheme based on the present vis-à-vis past performance c) Any discussion with the firm on any point of interest e.g. any difficulty in operation, irregularities observed in the operation d) Any action to be taken including suspension e) Any other observation/comments for better appraisal of the report.

Station :

Signature

File Ref :

Inspected by

:

Name

:

Designation

:

Date

:

CM/PF 259 June 1989

ANNEXURE A RAW MATERIALS Name

Source/ Supplied by

SiO2

Al2O3

Variation in Test Results from Lab Records Fe2O3 CaO MgO LOI Lime Reactivity

Remarks Fineness

Lime Stone Clay Gypsum Fly Ash Calcined Clay Blast Furnace Slag

ANNEXURE B CEMENT DESPATCHES Month & Year

Parties Supplied to :

Quantity produced ( MT )

Quantity Unmarked ( MT )

Quantity Despatched with Standard Mark

CM/PF 259 June 1989

ANNEXURE C CEMENT TEST RESULTS Requirement

Loss on ignition Insoluble residue SO3 MgO LSF AM C3A Initial Setting Time Final Setting Time Fineness Soundness by LeChatelier Method Soundness by Autoclave Method 3 day Compressive Strength 7 day Compressive Strength 28 day Compressive Strength Drying Shrinkage

Factory test results

Variation as per Lab Records Clinker Grinding Stage

Packing Stage

Test Record of the batch from which the sample was drawn

REMARKS

CM/PF 259 June 1989

Sl No

Description

1.

Cement

2.

Clinker

3.

Fly Ash

4.

Calcined Clay

5.

Declared pozzolana content

Sample Code No.

Quantity

From where sampled

Source Factory Market

Counter Sample

Independent Lab

REMARKS

Left with licensee Carried by IO

FS : MS :