Cm Pf 251 Periodic Inspection Report

CM/PF 251 June 1992

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS REPORT OF PERIODIC INSPECTION/LOT INSPECTION ( Put √ tick mark on the appropriate nature of inspection ) ( ____________ inspection since the grant of licence/renewal ) Licence No. CM/L-

IR No.

Valid upto : 1. a) Licensee

Date of writing IR

IS Product : Size/Grade/Type/Variety : b)

Other Licences held CM/L-No i) CM/Lii)

IS No

Product

CM/L-

2.

Special Inspection Charges , if applicable

3.

Date of Inspection

4.

Person(s) contacted

5.

Previous Inspection a)

Date

c)

Conclusions and Recommendations

d)

Despatch details of last two samples Sl No 1.

How Realised/ Not Realised

Cheque/Draft details

b) Conducted by

Date of drawal of samples

Date of dispatch of samples

Test Result : Pass/Fail (if available)

2. 6.

Action on advice rendered in previous inspection or otherwise asked for while granting licence / Renewal of the licence REMARKS OF THE REVIEW OFFICER

1. 2. 3. Signature : Review Officer’s Name & Designation : Date of Review :

-1-

CM/PF 251 June 1992

7.

Changes since previous inspection a)

Technical

b)

Administrative

8.

Description of article(s) being manufactured at the time of inspection

9.

RAW MATERIALS a)

Name of major ones

b)

Does the firm test the major raw materials or does it depend on Test Certificates from supplier?

c)

In either case note maximum and minimum values of principal requirements

d)

Disposal of sub-standard raw materials

10.

Supplied by

Sl No 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

PRODUCTION AND SUPPLY SINCE LAST INSPECTION 9DETAILS OF COMPLETED MONTH TO BE FURNISHED)

Requirement

MONTHS

a)

Quantity produced

b)

Quantity marked

c)

Quantity unmarked and manner of disposal

d)

Reasons for not marking

e)

Parties supplied to : ( Give complete addresses )

-2-

Variation in test values

QUANTITY

CM/PF 251 June 1992

11.

STORING, PACKING AND MARKING OF BIS CERTIFIED MATERIAL a)

Material held in stock

b)

Condition of storing

c)

Packing and marking on packages

d)

At what stage marking is done ( after or before test results are known )

e)

Any change in the marking procedure from approved one

12.

PRODUCTION CONTROL ( as observed from test and other relevant materials ) a)

How is the control system being operated ?

b)

Variation in test results for principal requirements (append test results if necessary or if required by the Instruction Sheet for this Standard )

c)

Are the test records maintained satisfactorily ? Vis-à-vis STI for the product licenced ?

d)

What is the percentage of rejections, their reasons and manner of disposal ( indicate the brand which is disposed )

e)

Whether the failure is due to inherent causes or chance cause ?

13.

Satisfactory/Not satisfactory Sl No

Requirement

Variation in test values

TESTING IN FACTORY a)

Description of Sample :

Batch / CU tested

Date of Manufacturing

Requirement

-3-

Value obtained

Recorded Value

Remarks

CM/PF 251 June 1992

b)

Are the instruments use calibrated periodically

c)

Are the instruments used reasonably accurate

d)

Any addition to the existing testing equipment

e)

Any comments on testing, testing equipment, testing personnel, etc.

14.

Instruments calibrated

Date of Calibration

Remarks

SAMPLES FOR INDEPENDENT TESTS a)

Sl. No.

Description Grade / Size Variety / Type

Batch/CU

b)

From where sampled ( stock or production line )

c)

Test record of the batch/CU from which sample is drawn

d)

Give details of packing, labelling,coding,etc. of the sample

e)

How sealed ? Give impression of the seal used.

f)

Samples brought in or left with the firm for dispatch to BIS or outside testing laboratory

g)

Details of counter sample left with the firm and the manner of packing , labeling, coding, sealing, etc. & also give the impression of seal

h)

Any further information

-4-

Sl. No.

Requirement

Date of Mfg.

Recorded test value

CM/PF 251 June 1992

15.

FOOD ARTICLES ( Indicate the hygienic conditions maintained in the factory, surroundings, in the plant equipment, personnel hygienic, General Remarks, etc. )

16.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS a)

Has the scheme operated satisfactorily for this period since last inspection ?

b)

If operated unsatisfactorily give reasons

c)

Assessment of the operation of the scheme based on the present vis-à-vis past performance

d)

Any discussion with the firm on any point of interest, such as manufacturing difficulties, inprocess control , testing procedure or any difficulty/irregularities observed in the operation

e)

Any action to be taken including suspension

f)

Any other observations/ comments for better appraisal of the report.

Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory

Station :

Signature :

File Ref :

Name : Designation : Date :

-5-

CM/PF 251 June 1992

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS REPORT OF PERIODIC INSPECTION/LOT INSPECTION ( Put √ tick mark on the appropriate nature of inspection ) ( ____________ inspection since the grant of licence/renewal ) Licence No. CM/L-

IR No.

Valid upto : 1. a) Licensee

Date of writing IR

IS Product : Size/Grade/Type/Variety : b)

Other Licences held CM/L-No i) CM/Lii)

IS No

Product

CM/L-

2.

Special Inspection Charges , if applicable

3.

Date of Inspection

4.

Person(s) contacted

5.

Previous Inspection a)

Date

c)

Conclusions and Recommendations

d)

Despatch details of last two samples Sl No 1.

How Realised/ Not Realised

Cheque/Draft details

b) Conducted by

Date of drawal of samples

Date of dispatch of samples

Test Result : Pass/Fail (if available)

2. 6.

Action on advice rendered in previous inspection or otherwise asked for while granting licence / Renewal of the licence REMARKS OF THE REVIEW OFFICER

1. 2. 3. Signature : Review Officer’s Name & Designation : Date of Review :

-1-

CM/PF 251 June 1992

7.

Changes since previous inspection a)

Technical

b)

Administrative

8.

Description of article(s) being manufactured at the time of inspection

9.

RAW MATERIALS a)

Name of major ones

b)

Does the firm test the major raw materials or does it depend on Test Certificates from supplier?

c)

In either case note maximum and minimum values of principal requirements

d)

Disposal of sub-standard raw materials

10.

Supplied by

Sl No 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

PRODUCTION AND SUPPLY SINCE LAST INSPECTION 9DETAILS OF COMPLETED MONTH TO BE FURNISHED)

Requirement

MONTHS

a)

Quantity produced

b)

Quantity marked

c)

Quantity unmarked and manner of disposal

d)

Reasons for not marking

e)

Parties supplied to : ( Give complete addresses )

-2-

Variation in test values

QUANTITY

CM/PF 251 June 1992

11.

STORING, PACKING AND MARKING OF BIS CERTIFIED MATERIAL a)

Material held in stock

b)

Condition of storing

c)

Packing and marking on packages

d)

At what stage marking is done ( after or before test results are known )

e)

Any change in the marking procedure from approved one

12.

PRODUCTION CONTROL ( as observed from test and other relevant materials ) a)

How is the control system being operated ?

b)

Variation in test results for principal requirements (append test results if necessary or if required by the Instruction Sheet for this Standard )

c)

Are the test records maintained satisfactorily ? Vis-à-vis STI for the product licenced ?

d)

What is the percentage of rejections, their reasons and manner of disposal ( indicate the brand which is disposed )

e)

Whether the failure is due to inherent causes or chance cause ?

13.

Satisfactory/Not satisfactory Sl No

Requirement

Variation in test values

TESTING IN FACTORY a)

Description of Sample :

Batch / CU tested

Date of Manufacturing

Requirement

-3-

Value obtained

Recorded Value

Remarks

CM/PF 251 June 1992

b)

Are the instruments use calibrated periodically

c)

Are the instruments used reasonably accurate

d)

Any addition to the existing testing equipment

e)

Any comments on testing, testing equipment, testing personnel, etc.

14.

Instruments calibrated

Date of Calibration

Remarks

SAMPLES FOR INDEPENDENT TESTS a)

Sl. No.

Description Grade / Size Variety / Type

Batch/CU

b)

From where sampled ( stock or production line )

c)

Test record of the batch/CU from which sample is drawn

d)

Give details of packing, labelling,coding,etc. of the sample

e)

How sealed ? Give impression of the seal used.

f)

Samples brought in or left with the firm for dispatch to BIS or outside testing laboratory

g)

Details of counter sample left with the firm and the manner of packing , labeling, coding, sealing, etc. & also give the impression of seal

h)

Any further information

-4-

Sl. No.

Requirement

Date of Mfg.

Recorded test value

CM/PF 251 June 1992

15.

FOOD ARTICLES ( Indicate the hygienic conditions maintained in the factory, surroundings, in the plant equipment, personnel hygienic, General Remarks, etc. )

16.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS a)

Has the scheme operated satisfactorily for this period since last inspection ?

b)

If operated unsatisfactorily give reasons

c)

Assessment of the operation of the scheme based on the present vis-à-vis past performance

d)

Any discussion with the firm on any point of interest, such as manufacturing difficulties, inprocess control , testing procedure or any difficulty/irregularities observed in the operation

e)

Any action to be taken including suspension

f)

Any other observations/ comments for better appraisal of the report.

Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory

Station :

Signature :

File Ref :

Name : Designation : Date :

-5-