Appraisal Form Template[1]

1

Company Name Performance Evaluation Employee Name:

Department:

Emp ID:

Process Name:

Designation:

Immediate Supervisor:

Date of Joining:

Manager:

Evaluation Period:

Department Head:

Appraisee Photo:

Appraisal WEF:

Q1. State the main understanding of your task and your responsibilities?

Q2. What do you consider to be your most important achievement of past year?

Q3. What do you consider to be your most important task in the year?

Q4. Indicate the facilitating and the hindering factors in your overall performance round the year?

2 Facilitating Factor

Hindering Factor

Organization Perspective

Personal Perspective

List below the essentials functions of the position, and/or projects for which the employee is evaluated:

Responsibility KRA’s

Rating Standards

3 Not Applicable

0

The employee is not required to perform in a specific rating factor, and it cannot be measured.

Unacceptable

1

Work performance is inadequate and inferior to the standards of performance for the position. Performance at this level cannot be allowed to continue.

Improvement Needed

2

Work performance does not consistently meet the standards of performance for the position. Serious efforts is needed to improve performance.

Meets Expectations

3

Work performance consistently meets the standards of performance for the position

Exceeds Expectations

4

Work performance consistently above the standards of performance for the position

Outstanding

5

Work performance consistently superior to standards required for the job.

Technical Skills (Effectiveness with which the employee applies job knowledge and skill to job assignments) N/A-0

U-1

IN-2

ME-3

EE-4

O-5

RATING FACTORS Job Knowledge

Analyzes Problems

Provide suggestions for work Improvement

Employs Tools of the job Competently

Follows Proper Safety Procedures

Comments

4 Quality of Work (Manner in which the employee completes job assignments) N/A-0

U-1

IN-2

ME-3

EE-4

O-5

RATING FACTORS

Comments

Accuracy/Precision Thoroughness/Neatness

Reliability

Responsiveness to Requests for Service

Follow-Through/Follow-Up

Judgment / Decision Making

Interpersonal Skills (Effectiveness of employee's interactions with others and as a team participant) N/A-0

U-1

IN-2

ME-3

EE-4

O-5

RATING FACTORS With Co-workers With Supervisors With Other staffs and Managers

Team Participation

Team Contributions

Commitment to team success

Comments

5 Communication skills (If applicable to the job) N/A-0

U-1

IN-2

ME-3

EE-4

O-5

RATING FACTORS

Comments

Written Expression Oral Expression

Share Information Willingly

Tact and Diplomacy

Voice and Accent (If required)

Approach to Work (Characteristics the employee demonstrate while performing job assignments) N/A-0

U-1

IN-2

ME-3

EE-4

O-5

RATING FACTORS Actively Seeks ways to Streamline Processes Open to new Ideas and Approaches Initiative

Planning and Organization

Flexible/Adaptable

Follows Instructions Seeks Additional training & development Attendance Discipline and Decorum Positive Attitude Honesty and Fairness

Comments

6 Quality of work (Employee's success in producing the required amount of work) N/A-0

U-1

IN-2

ME-3

EE-4

O-5

RATING FACTORS

Comments

Priority Setting Amount of Work Completed

Work Completed on Schedule

Supervisory/Leadership Skills (Apply only to employee who is a Manager, Supervisor, or lead) N/A-0

U-1

IN-2

ME-3

EE-4

O-5

RATING FACTORS Support of VCCI Efforts/Programs Trains and develops staff Properly Aligns Responsibility, Accountability, Authority Evaluates Staff Regularly Faces Performance Problems Squarely Supports responsible Risk taking Control Costs and maximizes Resources Instills pride in Performance service, Innovation & Quality Sets High standards for Self, As Well as Others Supports Useful Debate & Disagreement Welcome Constructive Criticism Fosters Respect for Facts, Data, and Objective Analysis Uses Analytical Tools and Models for Process Improvements Supports Experimentation & Brainstorming That Leads to Innovation and Learning

Comments

7

Overall Performance Rating Technical Skills Quality of Work Interpersonal Skills Communication Skills Approach To Work Quantity of Work

Total

Unacceptable (0-1.0)

Improvement Needed (1.1-2.0)

Meets Expectations (2.1-3.0)

Exceeds Expectations (3.14.5)

Outstanding (4.65.0)

Work performance is inadequate and inferior to the standards of performance for the position. Performance at this level cannot be allowed to continue.

Work performance does not consistently meet the standards of performance for the position. Serious efforts are needed to improve performance.

Work performance consistently meets the standards of performance for the position.

Work performance consistently above the standards of performance for the position.

Work performance consistently superior to standards required for the job

Check in the box above describes the employee's overall performance rating. Supervisor's Comments (additional comments may be attached)

Manager's Comments/Reactions Employee Comments/Reactions

8

Dept Head Comments

Actions Plans/Training and development Goals (If applicable, summarize any specific projects, performance objectives, or training and development for the next review period)

HR Manager Comments

Employee Signature:

Date:

I have read and discussed this evaluation with my supervisor and I understand its contents. My signature means been advised of my performance status and does not necessarily imply that I agree with either the appraisal or the contents.

Next Appraisal will be due on:

June/December

Supervisor Signature:

Manager's Signature:

Date:

Date:

Dept Head Signature:

Reviewer Signature:

Date:

Date: