Procedure for Amendment
Nature of Amending Process: Pandit Nehru: “Reconciliation Sovereignty”
of
written
Constitution
with
Parliamentary
The Constitution should not be so rigid that it cannot be adapted to the changing needs of National Development and Strength
Dr. Ambedkar: “Those who are dissatisfied with the Constitution have only to obtain 2/3 majority, and if they cannot obtain even 2/3 majority in the Parliament Elected on Adult Franchise in their favour, their dissatisfaction with the Constitution cannot be deemed to be shared by the General Public”
To introduce flexibility
1
Procedure for Amendment a)
b)
‘Not deemed to be amendment’
Ordinary process of Legislation
By simple majority
Article 368 – Amendment i)
ii)
Initiated by introduction of Bill in Parliament
Either House
Passed in both Houses by simple majority (50%) and by a Majority of not less than 2/3 members of that House present and voting
Assent of President
Accordingly stand amended
Ratification by the legislatures of not less than ½ of the State in following cases: a)
Manner of election of President
b)
Extent of executive power of Union and States
c)
The Supreme Court and High Court
d)
Distribution of Legislative Power of State and Union
e)
Lists in schedule VII
f)
Representation of States in Parliament
g)
Article 368 itself
General features of the Amending Procedure
Rigid in Nature 2
A.
a)
Parliament is vested with power and not a separate body
b)
State Legislature cannot initiate a Bill for amendment
c)
Ordinary and Special Majority
No Joint Sitting to resolve deadlock d)
Previous sanction of President not required to introduce Bill of Amendment
e)
Ratification by only ½ the States
f)
After passed by both Houses obligatory for President to give his assent
Upto Golaknath’s Case Supreme Court – All parts of Constitution Amendable
B.
Golaknath’s Case Fundamental rights to be amended by a Constitution Assembly
C.
Keshaananda Case Upheld the validity of amending Article 368 Article 13 – Amendment not Law Therefore Fundamental Rights are amendable
D.
Basic features not amendable
Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity of India
Federal System
Judicial Review
Parliamentary Form of Government
42nd Amendment 3
There shall be no limitation on the Constitutional Power of Amendment
This power shall not be called in question in any Court on any ground – Precludes Judicial Review
Nullified by Supreme Court in Minerva Mills Cases as Judicial Review abasic feature of Constitution cannot be taken away by amendment
Therefore as per Supreme Court: 1)
Any part of Constitution may be amended after complying with procedure under Article 368
2)
No referendum to Constituent Assembly would be required
3)
Basic features cannot be amended (list in page 160)
History of Amendments since 1950
83 times till December 2000
A.
42nd Amendment
Changes in Preamble
Substantive changes to underlying Constitution
a)
Judicial Review of Ordinary Laws
change
vital
principles
Distinction between Central and State Law
High Court constitutional
Supreme Court under Article 36 cannot pronounce state law unconstitutional unless Central Law challenged
cannot
hold
Central
Law
un-
4
b)
Artificial majority of Judges of Supreme Court and is required to pronounce law unconstitutional and invalid
Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendment Acts A Constitution Amendment Act will be immune from challenge in Court of Law procedurally and substantively
B.
C.
c)
Fundamental Duties to counteract Fundament Rights
d)
Fundamental Rights devalued
43rd and 44th Amendment 1)
Repealed provisions curbing Judicial Review
2)
More Extensive: a)
Omission and Restoration of certain articles
b)
Additional change – removal of Right to Property
c)
Biased Changes
73rd and 74th Amendments
Introduced electoral system for the composition of Units of Local Government below states, that is,
Panchayats in Rural Areas
Municipalities in Urban Areas
5
Dangers of Frequent Amendments
Used to achieve political purposes
Get rid of Judicial decisions
6