Wa2.2 Assignment 4.docx

  • Uploaded by: Floor Roeterdink
  • 0
  • 0
  • October 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Wa2.2 Assignment 4.docx as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,573
  • Pages: 4
Floor Roeterdink

s1928937

Assignment 4 Read the introduction chapter to A. Stewart (2014), Art in the Hellenistic World, Cambridge University Press, and try to answer, reflect on and discuss the following questions: The Tazza Farnese 1. What is depicted on the Tazza Farnese? The dish depicts an old bearded man holding a cornucopia, a younger man holding a seed bag, knife and a plough, and a woman holding grain. She is dressed in the Egyptian Isis style and is lying on a sphinx with two more women to her right. Above the scene fly two youths, one in possession of a conch shell. On the back of the artefact is a Gorgon’s head surrounded by snakes. 2. When approximately was the Tazza Farnese produced? Although its first documented appearance was in AD 1239, the object dates back to the Ptolomaic dynasty in the 3rd century BCE. 3. What do the terms 1) libation, 2) cameo and 3) cornucopia mean or indicate?  Libation is a ritual during which a liquid is offered to a deity(-ies) as an offering.  Cameo is a carving method featuring a positive (raised) relief image usually resulting in a contrast of colours. This is the method used to carve the Tazza Farnese.  A cornucopia or ‘horn of plenty’ is a symbolic ornament consisting of a goat’s horn overflowing with fruit, flowers and vegetables. It symbolises abundant supply 4. Which material is used to make the Tazza Farnese? Why is this so interesting? It is made of sardonyx, the coloured bands being well suited to the engraving technique used – cameo. This material, due to its limited provinciality (mainly sourced from India) is highly exotic making it a fairly unique and valuable object. Furthermore, its hardness meant that its preparation and design processes would have taken a significant amount of time. These attributes add to its value and beauty as an artefact. 5. In what kind of social context would an object like the ‘Tazza Farnese’ have been used and why? The unique and luxury qualities inherent to the Tazza Farnese suggests it would have been an object used by someone from the Ptolemy family or someone who had a high position in their court. It would have been used as a dish perhaps even in ceremonial contexts only by high priests or the royals since the scene depicts and encompasses every aspect of their life and rule. 6. Stewart claims that the Tazza Farnese makes abundant use of mythological, historical and contemporary personification. Give an example for each three types of such personification.  Mythological – The reclining woman is an analogy of the goddess Euthenia making the bearded man her husband, the Nile and the younger man their son, Horus.  Historical – The three central figures may represent the Ptolemies e.g. Kleopatra VII

Floor Roeterdink



s1928937

Contemporary – The lack of specificity and individual traits/persons imply it is a synecdoche of the entire rule and being of the Ptolemaic dynasty

7. What is the find context of the Tazza Farnese? Provide a ‘biography’ of the object since it first surfaced. Discuss why this might be relevant for our understanding of the Tazza Farnese. It was first documented in AD 1239 while it was in possession of the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II who got it from two merchants. The object maintained its fascination by the upper circles of medieval Europe making appearances in Samarkand, Aragon, Florence, Vienna and Rome eventually ending up in Naples. The fact that even after its initial socio-cultural context it remained in circulation with the upper, elite spheres attests to the value of the object and perhaps even reflects the initial intended audience. It was a unique, foreign item meant only for the richest and most powerful to behold. Art in the Hellenistic world 8. Where did Alexander the Great come from? When did he live? Give a short description of his military conquest. Alexander the great (356 – 323 BCE) came from Macedon. Upon his father’s death he became king of Macedon and began the growth of his empire towards Persia. On his road to create an empire never seen before he managed to conquer Anatolia, Egypt the near east and Persia by the age of 25. By 30 his empire had increased to include the likes of Baktria and northwest India. 9. Name four powerful Hellenistic empires or kingdoms and describe their territorial expanse. The Diadochi were empires/kingdoms formed after the death of Alexander the Great. Major examples include the Antigonids in Macedon, The Seleucids in what was formerly the Persian empire (Syria), the Ptolemaic kingdom in Egypt and the Romans around ca. 200 BCE who eventually grew in power to conquer the rest. 10. Provide a short description of the Laokoon by Hagesandros. How would you describe its style? What kind of meanings would you ascribe to the statue? The statue depicts Laokoon of Troy and his sons being killed by 2 snakes sent by Poseidon. The dramatic scene depicting a heroic, yet tragic downfall is representative of the ‘expressive intensity’ characteristic of the Hellenistic Baroque style. The statue through exaggeration plays on different emotions. It intends to warn the Trojans about the ‘Trojan Horse’ and its duplicitous nature. Therefore, it is a statue that tells a political story and carries with it a moralistic message. 11. Explain the difference between primary and secondary sources and draw in some examples from the chapter you read. Primary sources are created in a contemporary context and provide a first-hand account of an event, person, time etc. In a Hellenistic context this concerns contemporary architecture, art, text and more. A secondary source however involves the interpretation and analysis of the primary source for example the book itself that these questions are based on.

Floor Roeterdink

s1928937

12. In terms of primary sources, what are the best preserved types of sources we can use for our understanding of art in the Hellenistic period? (You can name several examples from the text). Why would these sources have been relatively well preserved? Architectural sculptures, statues, carved funerary and votive reliefs, pottery typically remain largely due tue their durability as a material which is essentially stone. Some bronze, silver and gold artefacts also remain such as jewellery and statuettes. Examples include polychrome vessels, select temples (albeit in ruin) and statues (Laokoon, Venus de Milo), and coinage. 13. Which sources have helped creating a scholarly prejudice against Hellenistic art in favour of Classical art? Pausanias’ Description of Greece heavily favours the classical period (primary source). Many 19th century academics also favoured the classical period, attributing it even to what were in fact Hellenistic artefacts (secondary source). 15. What is so problematic about the term ‘Hellenistic’? Think of different ways to define the term and argue in what way it should be used. ‘Hellenistic’ is the problematic umbrella term for a hugely intertwined group of microcultures attempting to organise them under one dominant culture. This in itself gives the term such a broad meaning it seems very difficult to classify such a vast range of objects under this name as it could simultaneously be Persian, or Ptolemaic. Alternatively, the term is also implicative of the period starting from the death of Alexander the great in 323 BCE until the roman empire took over the Hellenistic world. This inherent vagueness of Hellenistic makes it contentious to scholars. 16. According to you, is Rome part of the Hellenistic world or not? Elaborate on your answer. Personally, I do not believe Rome is part of the Hellenistic world largely because it is they who according to historians, put an end to it. The Hellenistic world is one with fundamentally Greek routes despite it spanning such a vast region. It was the Greek generals, proceeding the death of Alexander the great, who took over the Diadochi and continued the hybridisation of Greek and local cultures creating a completely new one in its place. Thus, the romans and Rome, although contemporary to the Hellenistic world, is not included in it. General and applied questions 18. Find a picture of an (art) object that dates to the modern period (renaissance or later) that seems to have been influenced by Hellenistic art. Provide a brief explanation for your choice. Depicted is an 18th century marble medallion of Louis XIV who himself is sculpted in the image of Alexander the Great. The medallion draws inspiration from antiquity with reference to both historical and artistic contexts. From his dress, his likeness and the political intentions of the artefact it is highly reminiscent of the Hellenistic style and motive.

Floor Roeterdink

s1928937

19. Which scholar is traditionally seen as the founding father of the study of classical art? Pliny the Elder (AD 23-79) who wrote ‘Natural History’ featuring several passages concerning the development of Greek sculpture and painting. 20. According to you, can the term ‘art’ be applied to the ancient world? To what extent is the conception of art in the modern West different from that in the Hellenistic period? The Hellenistic world saw art taking a more political and religious tone, constructed to appease the general public, elites and deities alike. Art became a monumental display. In a sense this is similar today. As art in the Hellenistic period gained broader meaning, still it does so in contemporary society to the point where art is the epitome of subjectivism and can be almost anything.

Related Documents

Assignment
November 2019 71
Assignment
July 2020 45
Assignment
November 2019 56
Assignment
November 2019 57
Assignment
June 2020 28
Assignment
June 2020 20

More Documents from ""