Veterinary Parasitology Dicrocoelium 2[1]

  • Uploaded by: Dr. K.P.Jithendran
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Veterinary Parasitology Dicrocoelium 2[1] as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 2,421
  • Pages:
veterinary parasitology ELSEVIER

Veterinary Parasitology 61 (1996) 265-271

Prevalence of dicrocoeliosis in sheep and goats in Himachal Pradesh, India K.P. Jithendran *, T.K. Bhat Disease Investigation Laboratory, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Regional Station, Palarapur, HP 176 061, India

Received 6 December 1994; accepted l0 April 1995

Abstract A survey incorporating field and abattoir studies was carded out on the prevalence of Dicrocoelium dendriticum in sheep and goats in the Kangra valley of Himachal Pradesh (India).

Coprological studies on these migratory animals revealed that 8.1% of sheep and 4.1% of goats were positive for dicrocoeliosis, with a mean number of eggs per gram of faeces (EPG) of 702.1 for sheep and 566.7 for goats. The necropsy liver examination of slaughtered animals revealed that 24.1% of sheep and 12.3% of goats were infected with D. dendriticum and they had mean fluke burdens of 247.2 (sheep) and 298.1 (goats). No significant differences in fluke burden, liver lesion score and EPG count were observed between sheep and goats. The seasonal distribution of dicrocoeliosis indicated a higher percentage of infection in autumn and winter as compared with spring and summer. The potential role of migratory sheep and goats in the epizootiology of dicrocoeliosis is discussed. Keywords: Goat; Sheep-Nematoda; Dicrocoelium dendriticum; Epidemiology-Nematoda

1. Introduction Helminthic infections are a major impediment to livestock production in the Himalayas and other hilly regions of India. Here, sheep and goat rearing is generally the sole source of livelihood for various pastoral nomadic tribes such as Gaddis in Himachal Pradesh (HP) and Gujjars and Bakarwals in Jammu and Kashmir. The Gaddi breed of sheep and goats is distributed in the Kangra, Kulu, Chamba and Shimla districts in Himachal Pradesh and parts of the Jammu hills. These animals migrate to high alpine

* Corresponding author. 0304-4017/96/$15.00 © 1996 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved SSDI 0304-4017(95)00834-9

266

K.P. Jithendran. T.K. Bhat/ Veterinary Parasitology61 (1996) 265-271

pastures (3000-4500 m above mean sea level) during summer and return to lower hills (1500-2000 m above mean sea level) during the winter season. Dicrocoelium dendriticum is an important infection in sheep and goats and is widely prevalent in hilly regions of India (Somvanshi and Kaul, 1989). Sporadic occurrence of D. dendriticum infection from hill bulls, yaks and hill goats have been reported earlier (Dhar and Singh, 1963; Ansari et al., 1989; Somvanshi and Kaul, 1989). It is generally observed that clinical signs are not usually manifested, even in heavy infections, and that the major losses are due to liver condemnation at slaughter (Theodoridis et al., 1991). The present communication deals with the prevalence of D. dendriticum infection in migratory flocks of Gaddi sheep and goats and in those animals slaughtered in a local abattoir in the Kangra valley of Himachal Pradesh.

2. Materials and methods Studies on the prevalence of D. dendriticum infection were carried out for 1 year in various flocks of Gaddi sheep and goats and in those animals brought for slaughter to the local abattoir in Palampur (Kangra), which is located in the Himalayan belt of HP. Rectal faecal samples from sheep and goats were collected individually at random and transported to the laboratory in polythene bags for examination. The liver from each slaughtered animal was collected and examined in the laboratory for the parasite. An arbitrary system of liver lesion score (LLS) was used and assigned to each liver at necropsy, after taking into account the gross lesions caused by the parasite (Table 1). The animals which had a mixed infection of D. dendriticum and Fasciola gigantica in their livers were excluded from the scoring. The techniques used for faecal examination of D. dendriticum eggs and for the recovery and counting of flukes from the liver are as described by Sanz et al. (1987). A few specimens of the adult flukes thus collected were

Table 1 Gross lesion score Macroscopic lesions Normal liver Liver slightly indurated with a few white patches; cut surface slightly congested with low worm burden Liver slightly indurated with numerous white patches; cut surface moderately congested with low worm burden Liver moderately indurated with white streaks and slight scarring; bile ducts thickened with catarrhal exudate in them and having moderate worm burden Liver indurated with scarring, bile ducts markedly distended and thickened with severe fibrosis and having heavy worm burden

Score

267

K.P. Jithendran, T.K. Bhat/ Veterinary Parasitology 61 (1996) 265-271

Table 2 Prevalence of D. dendriticum infection in nomadic sheep and goats in Himachal Pradesh Host

Coprological examination

Necropsy examination

No. No. No. (%) animals examined infected with EPG

No. No. No (%) animals examined infected with worm burden

(%)

<100 100-499 500-1999

Sheep 1488

121 (8.1)

16 (1.1)

36 (2.4)

69 (4.6)

Goats 1552

63 (4.1)

6 (0.4)

29 (1.9)

28 (1.8)

(%)

<100 100-499 500-1999

390

94 (24.1)

26 (6.7)

58 (14.9)

10 (2.6)

479

59 (12.3)

15 (3.1)

38 (7.9)

6 (1.3)

flattened, fixed in 10% formalin and stained with borax carmine for the preparation o f permanent mounts and taxonomic identification (Soulsby, 1982). Statistical analysis o f the data was c a r d e d out using Student's t-test for unpaired data. A confidence limit o f 95% or more was considered as significant.

3. Results The prevalence rate of D. dendriticum infection is given in Table 2. The overall prevalence of D. dendriticum infection as revealed by faecal examination was 8.1% and 4.1% in sheep and goats, respectively. Similarly, the necropsy examination of the livers of slaughtered animals revealed an overall prevalence of 24.1% in sheep and 12.3% in goats. The faecal egg counts, expressed as eggs per gram of faeces (EPG), ranged from 50 to 1800 (mean 702.1 + 560.6) in sheep and from 50 to 1850 (mean 566.7 + 484.8) in goats, and were graded as low, moderate or heavy infections, as shown in Table 3. The livers of most of the infected animals were swollen, with thickened bile ducts, whitish spots on the surface, marked scarfing and cirrhosis, with a large number o f worms inside the bile ducts and gall bladder. The worm burden was arbitrarily grouped as light ( < 100), moderate (between 100 and 500) or heavy (between 500 and 2000), and the severity of the lesions varied depending on the infection load. The mean lesion scores were 1.6, 3.0 and 4.0 for light, moderate and heavy infections, respectively, for both sheep and goat livers (Table 4). The mean fluke burden o f sheep was 247.2 (range

Table 3 Faecal egg count in Dicrocoelium dendriticum-infected sheep and goats Status of infection Sheep Goats No. infected Low ( < 100) Moderate (100-499) Heavy (500-1999) Overall

EPG (mean 4- SD)

No. infected

EPG (mean 4-SD)

16 36 69

50.0 + 0.0 248.64-121.0 1089.9 + 430.7

6 29 28

50.0 4- 0.0 232.8 4- 99.4 1023.2 + 366.3

121

702.1 4-560.6

63

566.7 4-484.8

K.P. Jithendran, T.K. Bhat / Veterinary Parasitology 61 (1996) 265-271

268

Table 4 Mean worm burden of Dicrocoelium dendriticum in sheep and goats on liver examination Status of infection

Sheep

Goats

No. animals

Worm burden (mean + SD)

LLS (mean)

No. animals

Worm burden (mean ± SD)

LLS (mean)

Low (1-99) Moderate (100-499) Heavy (500-1999)

26 58 10

54.5+ 25.9 255.65:102.9 709.3 + 200.3

1.6+0.5 3.05:0.0 4.0 + 0.0

15 38 6

61.1 + 29.0 295.85:121.6 904.7 + 276.6

1.6+0.5 3.0+0.0 4.0 + 0.0

Overall

94

247.2+210.8

2.7+0.8

59

298.1+262.8

2.7+0.8

12-1230), while that of goats was 298.1 (range 8-1208). The percentage of animals with low, moderate and heavy infection was nearly identical in sheep and goats (Table 4). However, when the overall percentage infection as revealed by coprological and liver examination was considered, the sheep had a significantly (P < 0.05) higher level of prevalence of infection than goats (Table 2). However, no significant difference in fluke burden and EPG count was observed between sheep and goats.

Sheep

a

F ~ Goat

25 20 15 10 5 c,O m

0

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

July

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Oct

Nov

Dec

o

b

t-

60 5O v.4

40 30

o

n ~ Jan

J

Feb

NF~

Mar

Apr

May Jun

Jul'

Aug

Sep

Month Fig. 1. Monthly distribution of dicrocoeliosis as revealed by (a) coprological examination and (b) liver examination.

K.P. Jithendran, T.K. Bhat/ Veterinary Parasitology61 (1996) 265-271

269

15

10

10 -

4.6

o

Spring

4.7

4.9

Summer

4.4

Autumn

~

4.9

Winter

¢)

o~ 50 -

40.9

40 -

~

Spring

Summer

29.3

Autumn

Winter

Seasons Fig. 2. Seasonal distribution of dicrocoeliosis as shown by (a) coprological examination and (b) liver examination.

Many of the sheep (8.5%) and goats (6.9%) carrying D. dendriticum infection were concomitantly infected with F. gigantica. The monthly incidence of this infection in goats was somewhat different from the pattern observed in sheep (Fig. 1). Goats had the highest EPG during January, February and October, and maximum worm burden during July, September and December. In sheep, on the other hand, the EPG count reached a peak during January, October, November and December, and worm burden attained maximum levels during September, October and December. The seasonal distribution of dicrocoeliosis in these animals gave a clearer picture, with the coprological and liver data showing a higher percentage of infection in autumn and winter as compared with spring and summer (Fig. 2).

4. Discussion

Studies on the prevalence of D. dendriticum in slaughtered animals are limited in this subcontinent, despite the fact that heavy economic losses are sustained owing to liver condemnation in abattoirs. However, sporadic cases of D. dendriticum in Pashmina goats, hill goats, hill bulls and yaks in the hilly tracts of the Indian subcontinent, have been reported (Dhar and Singh, 1963; Ansari et al., 1989; Somvanshi and Kaul, 1989; Somvanshi et al., 1992). In domestic animals in India dicrocoeliosis occurs mainly in small ruminants, but in several European countries the incidence of the disease is high

270

K.P. Jithendran, T.K. Bhat / Veterinary Parasitology 61 (1996) 265-271

even in cattle (Tharaldsen, 1989). A survey of dicrocoeliosis in sheep slaughtered in an abattoir at Mosul (Iraq) showed 18.5% infection (AI-Khalidi and A1-Bayati, 1989). In the present study, coprological examination revealed an overall infection of 8.1% and 4.1% in migratory flocks of sheep and goats, respectively. On the other hand, the animals slaughtered at the local abattoir, on necropsy examination, had an overall incidence of 24.1% and 12.3% in sheep and goats, respectively. Although sheep were more prone to D. dendriticum infection than goats, the severity of infection in terms of worm burden and EPG was not found to be significantly different. Most of the sheep and goats had moderate infections of flukes, and a direct correlation was observed between worm burden and lesion score in all the infected animals. However, no attempt was made to correlate the egg output with the fluke burden because the faecal samples were collected randomly from the flock and were not linked to necropsy worm counts. The seasonal rather than the monthly variation of dicrocoeliosis gave a better picture of the disease distribution during the period of study. It indicated a high incidence during autumn and winter as compared with the spring and summer seasons. The autumn season corresponds to the downward migration of sheep and goats from high alpine pastures, and the availability for slaughter of large numbers of infected animals in the valleys in the winter season. During the spring and summer seasons only the animals confined to the valleys or low hills were available for slaughter, and they had a low prevalence of D. dendriticum infection as revealed by coprological and necropsy examination. The migratory flocks acquire D. dendriticum infection from pastures contaminated with infected ants during their migration to high altitudes in summer, and in winter they bring the infection back to the valley, where it is generally absent. In terms of disease transmission dynamics, this migratory period is a strong predisposing factor for helminthiasis in the pasture-grazing nomadic sheep and goat population, which in turn adds to the spiral build-up of infection in a flock. This obviously calls for treatment of sheep and goat populations once they reach the valley. The life cycle of D. dendriticum in the Indian subcontinent is still unknown, and the exact species of land snail and ant involved as intermediate hosts need to be identified (Chowdhury, 1994). In addition to the role of intermediate hosts, the longevity of parasite stages on the pasture and the economic loss due to this disease need to be ascertained. Finally, the results of this study indicate the importance of carrying out both coprological and liver examination of infected animals, and as far as possible in the same animal, to develop unambiguous prevalence data for this infection. This method of examination can be used to carry out prevalence studies in sheep and goat flocks raised in other Himalayan regions to obtain an overall picture of the epizootiological situation of dicrocoeliosis in small ruminants in the hilly regions of India.

Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to the Director, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar (UP), for facilities, and the Scientist in Charge, IVRI Regional Station, Palampur (HP), for helpful discussions.

K.P. Jithendran, T.K. Bhat / Veterinary Parasitology 61 (I 996) 265-271

271

References Al-Khalidi, N.W. and Al-Bayati, M.M.L., 1989. The epidemiology of dicrocoeliasis in sheep in Mosul (Iraq). J. Vet. Parasitol., 3: 21-23. Ansari, M.Z., Rai, M.K. and Chauhan, H.V.S., 1989. Pathology of liver, lung and caecum of yak (Bos poephagus) infected with Dicrocoelium, Fasciola, Echinococcus and Trichuris. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 59: 552-554. Chowdhury, N., 1994. Helminths of domesticated animals in the Indian subcontinent. In: N. Chowdhury and I. Tada (Editors), Helminthology. Springer, Berlin/Narosa Publishing, New Delhi, pp. 73-120. Dhar, D.N. and Singh, K,S., 1963. Histochemical studies on liver in dicrocoeliasis. Indian J. Vet. Sci., 33: 142-151. Sanz, F., Tarazana, J.M., Jurado, R., Friag, J., Tarozana, J.V. and Duncan, J.C., 1987. An evaluation of the efficacy of netobimin against Dicrocoelium dendriticum in sheep. Vet. Rec., 120: 57-58. Somvanshi, R. and Kaul, G.L., 1989. Dicrocoeliasis in Pashmina goats. Indian Vet. Med. J., 13: 42-43. Somvanshi, R., Vaid, J., Biswas, J.C. and Jithendran, K.P., 1992. Clinicopathological observations on dicrocoeliasis in goats. Indian J. Vet. Pathol., 16:112-114. Soulsby, E.J.L., 1982. Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals, 7th edn. ELBS and Bailliere Tindall, London, 809 pp. Tharaldsen, J., 1989. Ujabb ismeretek a Dicrocoelium dendriticum--fertozottseg kemoterapiaja es az ellene valo vedekezes teren Europaban. Mag. Allatorv. Lapja, 44: 403-404. Theodoridis, Y., Duncan, J.L., MacLean, J.M. and Himonas, C.A., 1991. Pathophysiological studies on Dicrocoelium dendriticum infection in sheep. Vet. Parasitol., 39: 61-66.

Related Documents


More Documents from ""

703 Aggregate (002).pdf
October 2019 33
Bm Vs Ks.docx
October 2019 29
November 2019 29
Medical Mystery - The Answer
December 2019 35
April 2020 13