Value Stream Map Training

  • Uploaded by: jcastellon14370
  • 0
  • 0
  • April 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Value Stream Map Training as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 5,312
  • Pages: 90
Welcome Value Stream Mapping

Session Goals • Provide an overview of Value Stream Mapping • Demonstrate Value Stream Mapping as a tool to support Lean implementation. • Provide an overview of Lean Principles.

Introduction Name Current Position VSM Experience (if any)

What are the concepts of Lean? •

The elements for Operating a Lean Facility



Principles and Elements are Interdependent



Develops lean thinking leaders to deliver lean business results

Continuous Improvement

Short Lead Time

People Involvement Standardization

Built-InQuality

Standardization ✦ Definition: Standardization is a dynamic process by which we set standards of terminology, principles, methods, and processes within our organization. ✦ Purpose: The purpose of standardization is to stabilize, so as to achieve a base from which to grow and improve.



Standardization Elements

➨ ➨ ➨ ➨

Management by Takt Time Workplace Organization Standardized Work Visual Management

Change

s u o inu ent t n Co ovem r Imp

Standardization

World Class

Built In Quality ✦ Definition: The methods by which quality is built into the process, in a way that defects are prevented, detected, and countermeasures are implemented to prevent recurrence. ✦ Purpose: To ensure that defects are not passed to the customer.



Built-In Quality Elements

➨ ➨ ➨ ➨ ➨

Product Quality Standards Manufacturing Process Validation In-Process Control & Verification Quality Feedback/Feedforward Quality System Management

The Built-In-Quality Motto

Satisfy your Customer. . . Do not

Accept Build Ship

a Defect!

Solve problems through teamwork!

Short Lead Time ✦ Definition: The movement of product or material in the right quantity, at the right time, to the right location, with the right equipment, at the lowest possible cost for both the supplier and the customer. ✦ Purpose: To achieve customer enthusiasm by delivering the customer his/her product more quickly, while maintaining good quality. Ultimately, our Company benefits through cost reduction and increased customer loyalty.





short lead-time long lead-time

✦ Short Lead Time Elements ➨ ➨ ➨ ➨ ➨

Small Lot Packaging Fixed Period Ordering System Controlled External Transportation Simple Process Flow Scheduled Shipping/Receiving

➨ ➨ ➨ ➨

Temporary Material Storage Internal Pull/Delivery Level Vehicle Order Schedules Supply Chain Management

Continuous Improvement ✦ Definition: A process based on standardization, whereby results are achieved, through a series of small improvements. ✦ Purpose: To always advance ahead towards an ever more challenging target and make progress in Safety, People Involvement, Quality, Responsiveness, and Cost through the elimination of waste. ✦ Continuous Improvement Elements Andon Concept Business Plan Deployment Total Maintenance System Lean Design of Facilities, Equipment, Tooling and Layout ➨ Continuous Improvement Process ➨ Early Mfg. Design Integration (DFM/DFA) ➨ Problem Solving ➨ ➨ ➨ ➨

The Continuous Improvement Cycle Improvement Standardization Improvement Standardization Improvement Standardization Standardization

✦The diagram above shows how each time an improvement is implemented, it creates temporary instability. There will be a short period of instability until new standards are set, and applied. Only once the situation is truly stable can new improvements be implemented.

How Do We Expand VSM Throughout the Enterprise? • All the Principles and Elements apply, however, there is one big difference • In the factory, the process itself is very visible making it easy to see, study and improve • The processes in HR, Engineering, Purchasing, etc... are not as visible • What we need is a tool that will help make the process more visible

Value Stream Mapping • A tool originally used by the Toyota Production System experts to study processes • Developed and refined by John Shook and Mike Rother in Learning to See • Used in manufacturing, engineering and administrative offices by lean experts to improve business processes

What is a Value Stream? A value stream involves all the steps, both value added and non value added, required to complete a product or service from beginning to end

How Does Value Stream Mapping Fit With the Lean Journey • VSM is a tool used to support the implementation of lean strategies.

What Makes Value Stream Mapping Unique? • Visualizes the Process Flow from a systems perspective • Focuses on the customer and the customer’s requirements • Includes information flow and product movement • Summarizes the timeline as it relates to delivery to the customer • Documents performance characteristics of both the Value Stream and the individual process steps

Value Stream Map Elements XYZ Org Supplier Orders

Customer Orders

Internal Scheduling

Supplier Customer Delivery Freq. Delivery Freq.

I

Process 1

Process 2

I

I Inventory

Process Time

Process Time

Wait Time

Wait Time

FTQ

Material Movement via PUSH

FTQ

Lead Time

Value Stream Maps Enable a System View • • • •

Starts with a Focus on the Customer Links process steps and information flow Reveals problems with flow Documents performance of the process – Customer Expectations – Process metrics – Visibility of progress and quality

• • • •

Reveals waste Establishes a common language Provides a blueprint for improvement Gets People involved in creating the future

VSM Analysis – Data Attributes • Lead time = – Processing time + Wait Time / Delays

• Typical batch size • First-Time Quality – Reliability (e.g. system or equipment uptime)

• Rework / revisions – % Complete and Accurate Inputs (% C&A) – Design Changes – Errors

• Number of people involved – % utilization of people

VSM Case Study

Using the Value Stream Mapping Tool Scoping the Value Stream

Current state drawing

Future state drawing

Planning and Implementation

Determine the Value Stream to be improved Understanding how things currently operate. This is the foundation for the future state. Designing a lean flow through the enterprise.

The goal of mapping!

Jack’s Taxes

Jack is a CPA and maintains a practice in personal, self-employed and small business income tax preparation. Jack would like to take on more corporate clients because of the higher margins. However, during the tax season, self-employed returns require long hours because of the frequent waits, delays and errors. If Jack can improve the process for self-employed clients, he could take on more work during that time of year. Generally, the sequence of events begins for each client sometime late January with Jack’s assistant, John, sending a reminder to submit their records as soon as possible. Then, sometime before the first of April, the client must bring in all necessary forms and receipts. Regular clients drop off or send their box of receipts and tax forms from various income sources. Jack sorts the receipts and documents, finding that most of the time, there is something missing. His next step is to prepare worksheets for the client in the Tax Software (TS) system. Once Jack starts filling out the worksheets, he frequently needs to confirm deductions such as what expenses qualify as business-related and details regarding retirement or insurance deductions. Once Jack has completed the worksheet, his assistant John actually prints and collates the IRS forms. For self-employed clients, John waits until Thursday when he prints all returns that have accumulated during the week from the TS system. Of course, Jack must review and sign each return. Finally, John completes the process by packaging and mailing the IRS forms with the necessary attachments to each client.

Tax Season: 8 weeks 40 self-employed clients

Data Set

Send Reminder: John P/T = 10 min FTQ = 100% Sort receipts & documents: Jack P/T = 30 min W/T = 1 week in inbox before sorting FTQ = 10% Prepare Worksheet: Jack Technology used: Tax Software (TS) P/T = 60 min W/T = 3 weeks in the inbox waiting to prepare worksheet W/T = 1 week due to interruptions FTQ = 95% Confirm deductions: Jack P/T = 10 min W/T = 1 week due to phone tag FTQ = 50%

Print and Collate IRS tax forms: John Technology used: Tax Software (TS) P/T = 15 min W/T = 1 – 5 days in inbox before form prep (3 day average) FTQ = 98% Review and sign forms: Jack P/T = 15 min W/T = 3 days in inbox before signing FTQ = 100% Mail forms to client: John P/T = 10 min W/T = 1 day accumulation before collation and mailing FTQ = 100%

Measurable Metrics & Performance Metric SPQRC

Current Estimate

Process Time

12 hours (720 Min.)

Lead Time

6 – 8 weeks

First Time Quality Other(s)

100%

From Current State Map

Target from Future State Map

Actual (post implementation)

Typical Steps for Current State Mapping • Document customer information & need • Identify main processes (in order) • Select data attributes (Q,R,C - minimum) • Perform value stream walk and fill in data boxes (how the process really works) • Establish how each process knows what to process next (how work is prioritized) and document information flow • Calculate process time, wait time, lead time, first time quality, and any other metrics necessary to evaluate your Value Stream

Icons Process Box

MRP MRP Technology Used

Customer

IN In Box (Queue)

Wait-Time

Electronic Information Flow

P/T W/T FTQ

Conversation Information Flow Reminder post-card

Worker Weekly Schedule

Data Box

Withdrawal (Pull)

Movement of “physical” property

Supermarket

Iterations

Movement by Push

Changeover

Kaizen Lightning Burst

XOXO

Leveling, Mix and/or Volume

FIF O

First-In First-Out Flow

Draw the Current State

Jack’s Taxes - Current State Client Suppliers

40 clients

Start with Then Customer Suppliers

Customer

Jack’s Taxes - Current State Client 40 clients

Send reminder

Sort receipts & documents

Process Steps?

Prepare worksheet TS

Confirm deductions

Print & Collate TS forms

Review & sign forms

Mail forms

Jack’s Taxes - Current State Client 40 clients

Ta x

N Send reminder

IN

Sort receipts & documents

1 week P/T W/T FTQ

John 10 min --100%

P/T W/T FTQ

Jack 30 min --10%

is

ify

ot

si

m of

IN 3 weeks

ng

en

cu

s&

c

do

e

m

c

Do

um

m

y4

/10

Review & sign forms

3 days

Jack P/T 10 min W/T 1 week FTQ 50%

cli en

IN

3 days

Jack

o

tb

Process Data, Information Flow, Prepare Confirm Print & worksheet deductions Collate and ProcessINFlow TS TS forms

P/T 60 min W/T 1 week FTQ 95%

st

Clarify deductions

c Re

t eip

um

do

de

en

s nt

ing

in

rp

ts

M is s

m Re

os

for

ts

rd

a t-c

P/T W/T FTQ

John 15 min --98%

IN

Mail forms

1 day P/T W/T FTQ

Jack 15 min --100%

P/T W/T FTQ

John 10 min --100%

Jack’s Taxes - Current State Client 40 clients

Ta x

N Send reminder

Sort receipts & documents

IN 1 week

P/T W/T FTQ

P/T W/T FTQ

John 10 min --100%

10 min ----100 %

P/T W/T FTQ

1 week

Jack 30 min --10%

30 min ---10 %

is

ify

ot

si

m of

ng

en

cu

s&

c

do

e

m

c

Do

um

Confirm deductions

TS

3 weeks

Jack P/T 60 min W/T 1 week FTQ 95%

X

cli en

tb

IN

3 days

3 weeks

o

Total Leadtime and FTQ

Prepare worksheet

IN

st

Clarify deductions

c Re

t eip

um

m

do

de

en

s nt

ing

in

rp

ts

M is s

m Re

os

for

ts

rd

a t-c

95 %

X

/10

Review & sign forms

3 days

IN

Mail forms

1 day

John Jack John Total of P/T P/T 15 min P/T 15 min P/T 10 min W/T W/T W/T ------=Total 140 minutes of W/T FTQ FTQ FTQ 98% 100% Total Lead Time 100% =Product 7wks, 2days of FTQ = 7 wks, 2 days, and 140 min 10 15 15 10 min min min 1 week 3 days 3 1 day min 7 wks, 2 days ---- = 4.7% ------140 min. days X X X 50 % 98 % 100 100 4.7 %

P/T W/T FTQ

60 min 1 week

Print & Collate IN TS forms

y4

Jack 10 min 1 week 50%

%

% 7 wks, 2 Total Lead Time: days, 140 min

Measurable Metrics & Performance Metric SPQRC

Current Estimate

From Current State Map

Process Time

720 Min.

140 Min.

6 – 8 weeks

7 Weeks, 2 Days, 140 Min

100%

4.7%

Lead Time First Time Quality Other(s)

Target from Future State Map

Actual (post implementation)

Jack’s Taxes - Current State Client 40 clients

Re

& pts tif

No Send reminder

IN

P/T W/T FTQ

P/T W/T FTQ

John 10 min --100%

10 min 100 %

Do

f yo

Sort receipts & documents 3 weeks

P/T W/T FTQ

Jack 30 min --10%

30 1 week min 10 %

m

g sin

c do

is

um

ng

s nt

e

m cu

ts

en

do

si is M

Prepare worksheet

IN

1 week

me

cu

ei

c Re

nts

st-

Ta

x fo

Clarify deductio ns

mi

r nde

po

d car

Confirm deductions

Print & Collate TS forms

IN

TS

3 days

Jack

P/T 60 min W/T 1 week FTQ 95%

60 min 3 weeks 1 week 95 %

P/T W/T FTQ

Jack 10 min 1 week 50%

10 min 1 week 50 %

s to

clie

nt b

y4

/10

Review & sign forms

IN

John 15 min --98%

15 min 98 %

Mail forms

IN

3 days

P/T W/T FTQ

3 days

rm

P/T W/T FTQ

3 days

1 day

Jack 15 min --100%

P/T W/T FTQ

John 10 min --100%

140 min

15 min

10 1 day min

100 %

100 4.7 % % 7 wks, 2 Total Lead Time: days, 140 min

7 wks, 2 days

Waste The elements of production that add no value to the product: waste only adds cost & time Points to Remember About Waste: • It is important to consider waste in the context of the value that the process provides to the customer • Waste is really a symptom of problems in the system. It shows where the problems are • We need to find and address the causes of waste to improve the performance of the system

Waste in a Value Stream • Muri – Waste of unreasonableness or overburden to a person or a machine • Mura – Waste of inconsistency; Waste of unevenness • Muda – The seven forms of waste (COMMWIP)

Shift Mindset

Unevenness

Producing reports that are CURRENT Processing REQUIRED excessive written Sending back forms for Keeping multiple not used, producing reports Delays THINKING communication THINKING togetting determine incomplete orin inaccurate data copies of reports before they areattention needed needed issues requiring information, (mental processing) End of month deadline Processing Correction approvals, or causing overtime; all decisions projects scheduled P Cndin 1QOver Inventory with none in 2 Production

WASTE

I W

FORMS OF WASTE

O M

Motion Waiting Searching for misplaced M items Employee assigned Material two Movement jobs due to understaffing

Filing documents that will never be used again WASTE NOT DEFINED REACT TO LARGE EXAMPLES REACTIVE IMPROVEMENT

Unreasonable -ness

WASTE IS "TANGIBLE" IDENTIFY MANY SMALL OPPORTUNITIES LEADS TO LARGE OVERALL CHANGE CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

Waste Exercise

Participants identify waste on current state maps.

Jack’s Taxes - Current State Client 40 clients

O

Ta x

MM Send reminder

P

P/T W/T FTQ

10 min ----100 %

is

fm

o W ify t o

Sort receipts & documents

I

P

1 week P/T W/T FTQ

1 week

Jack 30 min --10%

30 min 10 %

I

IN

Prepare worksheet

Confirm deductions

P

Jack P/T 60 min W/T 1 week FTQ 95%

3 weeks

st

P/T W/T FTQ

10 min 1 week

95 %

50 %

cli en

Print & Collate IN TS forms

I

I

IN

3 days

Jack 10 min 1 week 50%

60 min 1 week

o

tb

W C

TS

3 weeks

C

en

cu

m

C ng si

do

N

IN

John P/T 10 min W/T --FTQ 100%

Do

m cu

m

Clarify deductions

C

c Re

t eip

s&

m cu

e

do

m Re

ind

e

s nt

ing

p er

s nt

M iss

os

for

ts

rd

a t-c

y4

/10

Review & sign forms

I

IN

3 days P/T W/T FTQ

3 days

John 15 min --98%

15 min 98 %

1 day P/T W/T FTQ

3 days

Mail forms

Jack 15 min --100%

15 min 100 %

P/T W/T FTQ

1 day

10 min

John 10 min --100% 140 min 7 wks, 2 days

100 4.7 % % 7 wks, 2 Total Lead Time: days, 140

Lean Principle: Built-In-Quality People Involvement Continuous Improvement

Short Lead Time

Standardization

Built-In-Quality

Understanding Customer Requirements Right Product

Right Time! Right Price!!

Built-In-Quality • Product Quality Standards • In-Process Control & Verification • Quality Feedback/Feed Forward

Product Quality Standards • Focus On The Customer – J.D. Power

• Quality Standards must be easily understood by the Team members • Quality Standards must be Clear and Unambiguous

In Process Control & Verification Quality Feedback / Feed Forward Ability to signal for help when Sensing Abnormalities – Quality Must Be Assured In The Process – Error Proofing – In-Process Verification – Feedback / Feed Forward

Lean Principle: Continuous Improvement People Involvement Continuous Improvement

Short Lead Time

Standardization

Built-In-Quality

Andon ENABLERS

PROCESS NO.

1

2

3

4

5

6

3

Motion Correction Waiting

O.D. Reference 4

BENEFITS

Andon ENABLERS

PROCESS NO.

1

2

O.D. Reference 4

3

54

5

6

3

Motion Correction Waiting

BENEFITS • Implement corrective action • Quality in station • Inspection and Feedback • Open Communication • Teamwork • Improved Productivity

Andon ENABLERS •Team System •Team Leader Ratio •Clear Standards •Problem Solving Process •Employee Training •Standardized Work •Mutual Trust/Respect •Process Capability

1

2

O.D. Reference 4

4 3

PROCESS NO.

4

5 6

3

Motion Correction Waiting

BENEFITS • Implement corrective action • Quality in station • Inspection and Feedback • Open Communication • Teamwork • Improved Productivity

Lean Principle: Short Lead Time People Involvement Continuous Improvement

Short Lead Time

Standardization

Built-In-Quality

Lean Principle: Short Lead Time (Just-in-Time Elements) • Simple Process Flow (Single Part Flow, Quick Set Up) • Small Lot Packaging • Level Order Schedules • Pull Systems

Flow All process steps occur in tight sequence (continuous flow), with little or no waiting?

Pull Each process step occurs only at the command of the downstream step in response to the pull of the internal customer.

O SCHEDULE ONLY 1 POINT WHERE YOU CAN, PULL WHERE YOU CAN’T Schedule

Schedule

Supermarket

CONTINUOUS FLOW PROCESSING Batch & Push Processing

21 minutes for first piece

Continuous Flow one”

“make one, move

3 Minutes for first piece for total 12 Minutes order

One Piece Flow - Order entry - Before

Open Mail

Acknowledge

Batch Orders

Calculate Batch Total

Stack and Hold

Orders

File Batch

Enter Batch

One Piece Flow -

Open One Envelope

File Order

Order Entry – After Enter One Order

Acknowledge One Order

Leveling - Heijunka • Uneven customer demand creates a challenge • Variation & fluctuation in volume (spiky customer demand) can lead to waste • In a multi-product environment, demand leveling (heijunka) absorbs fluctuation & variation

No Good Production Schedule

Leveling

Monday…….400 A Tuesday……100 A, 300 B Wednesday..200 B, 200 C Thursday…. .400 C Friday……….200 C, 200 A

Better: Every Part Every Day

Daily: 140 A, 100 B, 160 C

Even Better: Every Part Every Ship Window Monday 50 B, 70 A, 80 C

50 B, 70 A, 80 C

Why have small lots and leveling? • Small Lot Strategy – Shortens Cycle Time (The amount of time it takes to complete the task) – Reduces Excess Inventory – Improves Responsiveness

• Production Leveling – Minimizes Stocks of Finished Products – Reduces Fluctuations in Flow – Balances Workload

Lean Principle: People Involvement People Involvement Continuous Improvement

Short Lead Time

Standardization

Built-In-Quality

Multifunctional Workers • Minimal (or no) Job Description Silos • Rotate Jobs • Perform Several Tasks • Balance the Workload • Standard Work

Lean Principle: Standardization People Involvement Continuous Improvement

Short Lead Time

Standardization

Built-In-Quality

Standardized Work • The best combination of people, equipment and material to meet customer demand. • An agreed upon set of work procedures to establish the best sequence for each process. • Start at a baseline and continuously improve

If there is no standard, there is no improvement

Standardized Work Standardized work is used when there is a definable, repeatable process. Production

Materials

Office

Everyone can perform standardized work

Standardized work yields: • • • • •

Shorter lead time Reduced work-in-process Reduced wait time More flexibility, less waste Ability to identify and fix problems • Reduced handling • Better response to customer demand • Balanced workload

TAKT TIME – Component of Standardized Work Synchronizes Pace of Production to Match Pace of Demand Rate for producing a product, and its components, based on rate of delivery. Available Time Takt Time = Customer Requirement / Demand

Lean Principle: Continuous Improvement People Involvement Continuous Improvement

Short Lead Time

Standardization

Built-In-Quality

Continuous Improvement •

Everything Can Be Improved. Problems Are Opportunities. “No Problem” is a Problem. • Worker’s Ideas Are a Source of Improvement – Continuous Improvement (Kaizen) Teams – Problem Solving – Job Rotation – Total Productive Maint. – Suggestion Program • Steps to Improvement – Improve, Standardize, Stabilize and Repeat.

The Continuous Improvement Cycle Improvement Standardization Improvement Standardization Improvement Standardization Standardization

Continuous Improvement • Standardized Work contributes to continuous improvement by: – Documenting the current best practice that provides a base from which to improve – Creating the stability necessary to make changes – Providing the tools to make waste highly visible

Lean Principle: Standardization People Involvement Continuous Improvement

Short Lead Time

Standardization

Built-In-Quality

Workplace Management

Grasp the Situation • Workplace Organization - 5S Process • Standardized Work • Visual Management

Workplace Management Repeat

Grasp Current Situation

Add Valueadded Work; Standardize

Continuous Improvement to Eliminate Waste

Visual Management Where you have problem points in the flow…

Process Step 1

Process Step 2

Process Step 3

Set up checks for Quality, Timing, Output Make Progress and Problems Visible

Process Step 4

E-Toyota Application of Heijunka Box

Takt Time Bar Chart 30

25

20

(Sec) 15

10

5

0 Stamping

Body

Paint Departments

Trim

Shipping

Future State Questions Relating to Improving Delivery and Flow • What are the customer requirements? • Where and how will you trigger and sequence work? • How will you make work flow smoothly? • How will you establish rhythm to pace the work and surface problems? • How will you make the progress and delays of the work visible? • What process improvements are necessary to achieve your Value Stream vision?

Future State Mapping

Using the Value Stream Mapping Tool Scoping the Value Stream

Current State drawing

Future State drawing

Planning and Implementation

Determine the Value Stream to be improved Understanding how things currently operate. This is the foundation for the future state.

Designing a lean flow through the application of Lean principles The goal of mapping!

Future State Questions Relating to Improving Delivery and Flow • What are the customer requirements? • Where and how will you trigger and sequence work? • How will you make work flow smoothly? • How will you establish rhythm to pace the work and surface problems? • How will you make the progress and delays of the work visible? • What process improvements are necessary to achieve your Value Stream vision?

• Customer requirements? • Work flow smoothly? • Trigger & sequence work?

Jack’s Taxes - Current State

r me o t e s Cu entiv Inc o Fi rdio le n

= 40 days / 40 Clients = 1 per day 40 clients po

W/T FTQ

10 min 100 %

& pts

Do

f yo

3 weeks

30 1 week min 10 %

is

is M

g

n si

Ta

s nt

e

m cu

ts

en

do

x fo

Confirm deductions

Print & Collate TS forms

IN

COMBINE PROCESSES 3 days

Jack John P/T 60 min P/T W/T 1 week W/T FTQ 95% FTQ

60 min 3 weeks 1 week 95 %

rm

s to

clie

nt b

y4

Stand. Work

TS

IN Jack P/T 30 min W/T --FTQ 10%

m

g sin

c do

um

Prepare worksheet

receipts & documents

1 week

me

cu

tif No Sort XOXO

IN

P/T

nts

st-

ei

c Re

John P/T 10 min W/T --FTQ 100%

d car

Clarify deductio ns

Re

r nde

• Progress & delays visible? • Process improvements?

Takt Time = Available time / Customer Requirements

Client

Ac c

mi

Send reminder

• Rhythm (leveling)?

Jack 10 min 1 week 50%

10 min 1 week 50 %

Review & sign forms

IN

John 15 min --98%

15 min 98 %

Mail forms

IN

3 days

P/T W/T FTQ

3 days

FIFO

/10

P/T W/T FTQ

3 days

1 day

Jack 15 min --100%

P/T W/T FTQ

John 10 min --100%

140 min

15 min

10 1 day min

100 %

100 4.7 % % Total Lead Time: 7 wks, 2 days, 140 min

7 wks, 2 days

Jack’s Taxes - Current State

r me o t e s Cu entiv Inc o Fi rdio le n

40 clients po

P/T W/T FTQ

10 min 100 %

nts

st-

& pts

Do

f yo

3 weeks

10 %

is

is M

g

n si

Ta

s nt

e

m cu

ts

en

do

• Process improvements?

x fo

Confirm deductions

Print & Collate TS forms

IN

COMBINE PROCESSES 3 days

Jack John P/T 60 min P/T W/T 1 week W/T FTQ 95% FTQ

60 min 3 weeks 1 week 95 %

rm

s to

clie

nt b

y4

Stand. Work

TS

IN

30 1 week min

m

g sin

c do

um

Prepare worksheet

receipts & documents

Jack P/T 30 min W/T --FTQ 10%

me

cu

tif No Sort XOXO

1 week

John P/T 10 min W/T --FTQ 100%

d car

ei

c Re

IN

• Progress & delays visible?

= 40 days / 40 Clients = 1 per day

Clarify deductio ns

Re

r nde

Customer requirements? Work flow smoothly? Trigger & sequence work? Rhythm (leveling)?

Takt Time = Available time / Customer Requirements

Client

Ac c

mi

Send reminder

• • • •

Jack 10 min 1 week 50%

10 min 1 week 50 %

Review & sign forms

IN

John 15 min --98%

15 min 98 %

Mail forms

IN

3 days

P/T W/T FTQ

3 days

FIFO

/10

P/T W/T FTQ

3 days

1 day

Jack 15 min --100%

P/T W/T FTQ

John 10 min --100%

140 min

15 min

10 1 day min

100 %

100 4.7 % % Total Lead Time: 7 wks, 2 days, 140 min

7 wks, 2 days

Jack’s Taxes - Current State

r me o t e s Cu entiv Inc o Fi rdio le n

40 clients po

P/T W/T FTQ

10 min 100 %

nts

st-

& pts

Do

f yo

3 weeks

10 %

is

is M

g

n si

e

m cu

do

Ta

s nt en

ts

x fo

Confirm deductions

IN

Print & Collate TS forms

COMBINE PROCESSES 3 days

1040, 1040EZ 95 % training

s to

clie

nt b

y4

min 1 week 50 %

3 days

FIFO

/10

Review & sign forms

IN

min 98 %

Mail forms

IN

3 days

Jack John Jack John P/T 60 min P/T 10 min P/T 15 min W/T 1 week W/T 1 week W/T --FTQ 95% FTQ 50% FTQ 98% Reduce process time to 75 min Standardize Work 15 60 10

min 3 Individual weeks 1 week

rm

Stand. Work

TS

IN

30 1 week min

m

g sin

c do

um

Prepare worksheet

receipts & documents

Jack P/T 30 min Data entry W/T --Worksheet FTQ 10% training

me

cu

tif No Sort XOXO

1 week

John P/T 10 min W/T --FTQ 100%

d car

ei

c Re

IN

• Process improvements?

= 40 days / 40 Clients = 1 per day

Clarify deductio ns

Re

r nde

Customer requirements? Work flow smoothly? Trigger & sequence work? Rhythm (leveling)? Progress & delays visible?

Takt Time = Available time / Customer Requirements

Client

Ac c

mi

Send reminder

• • • • •

P/T W/T FTQ

3 days

1 day

Jack 15 min --100%

P/T W/T FTQ

John 10 min --100%

140 min

15 min

10 1 day min

100 %

100 4.7 % % Total Lead Time: 7 wks, 2 days, 140 min

7 wks, 2 days

Customer Requirements:

Jack’s Taxes Future State

•Tax Forms completed accurately •Finished before filling time •Lowest possible cost

Takt Time = Available time / Customer Requirements = 40 days / 40 Clients = 1 per day

Client ile F n

40 clients

o rdi

co

t&

Ac

e Ch

lis ck

te

m

Co

Send Reminder

ple

XOXO IN

c Ac

d or

ion

ile

P/T W/T FTQ

10 min

rm

1 per day Over 8 weeks

F

max 1 day Data entry + print FS forms

John P/T 10 min W/T FTQ 100%

fo

FIFO

Check & sign forms

John

cli en

t

Mail forms IN

Jack P/T 15 min W/T 1 day FTQ 100%

P/T 75 min W/T FTQ 98%

P/T W/T FTQ

15 min

75 min 98 %

o

max 1 day

1 day 100 %

st

10 min

100 min 2 days

1 day 100 %

John 10 min 1 day 100%

100 %

98 % 2 days, 100 min

Measurable Metrics & Performance Metric SPQRC

Current Estimate

From Current State Map

Target from Future State Map

Process Time

720 Min.

140 Min.

100 Min.

6 – 8 weeks

7 Weeks, 2 Days, 140 Min

100%

4.7%

Lead Time First Time Quality Other(s)

2 Days, 100 Min. 98%

Actual (post implementation)

Summary of Results – Potential Impact •

Reduced PT 40 mins (29%) – Jack could add 11 additional self employed clients without adding work hours! Increased revenue, no more time.



FTQ increased 20 fold (4.7% to 98%). Improved area of greatest opportunity.



Turn around time is now well within customer expectations (from 7 weeks and 2 days down to 2 days). Able to respond to customer needs faster.



Moved 70 mins of Jack’s “high priced time” over to John. Jack can now concentrate on more complicated returns or on obtaining more higher revenue generating corporate clients.



Reduced personal overtime – Jack does not stay late signing returns anymore.



This new Future State now becomes the next Current State (continuous improvement). Next Jack could investigate further leveling the work he receives in, filing electronically, …

Implementation Planning

Using the Value Stream Mapping Tool Scoping the Value Stream

Current State drawing

Future State drawing

Planning and Implementation

Determine the Value Stream to be improved Understanding how things currently operate. This is the foundation for the future state. Designing a lean flow through the application of Lean principles The goal of mapping!

Current State

Changes

Future State

The specific changes (Kaizen Bursts) needed to move from CS to FS are your Objectives The Methods / Action Steps are how you will get there

Business Plan Deployment (BPD) is the Standard Process that enables the total organization to set targets, integrate plans, and remain focused to achieve company-wide goals and manage change

st en t

OBJECTIVES

Clear & Measurable

TARGETS

Re g

ul

ar

an

d

n

Co n

si

GOALS

io at

Specific

Concrete

n di or Co

Re vi e

w

s

BPD Elements

A METHOD

to reach the targets / GAP CLOSURE PLAN and Strategies

Common Measurements

Business Plan Deployment Is a PDCA Cycle 4

Act (Standardized & Countermeasures) Problem Description

1

Plan Plant Master Plan

Tasks

Direct Cause Why? Cause Why? Why? Cause Why? Cause Why? Root Cause

3

Check

Act

Plan 2

Check

Do

Do (Communicate & Implement)

A c ti o n

2

Scorecard

Annual Business Plan

Leadership’s Role Plan

Act

TEACH!

Check

Do

Wrap-Up

Wrap-up • What did you learn today? • Did the program meet your expectations? • How can we improve this learning event?

Related Documents


More Documents from "Vishnu Rayapeddi"