Tratamients En Tablas.docx
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Tratamients En Tablas.docx as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 1,969
- Pages: 15
TRATAMIENTO 1TT1 Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 428.920 301.363 730.283
MS 142.973 18.835
F 7.59
P 0.002
Tabla 1.Análisis de Varianza de la temperatura T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 428.920 142.973 Error 16 301.363 18.835 Total 19 730.283
F 7.59
Valor-P 0.002
Resumen del modelo S = 4.33995 R-Sq = 58.7% R-Sq(adj) = 51.0% TRATAMIENTO 2 TT2
Tabla 13. Análisis de Varianza de la temperatura T2 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 280.878 93.6260 Error 16 175.405 10.9628 Total 19 456.283
F 8.54
Resumen del modelo S = 3.31102 R-Sq = 61.6% R-Sq(adj) = 54.3% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 280.878 175.405 456.283
MS 93.6260 10.9628
F 8.54
P 0.001
Valor-P 0.001
Fitted Line: TT2 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: PHT1 versus dias
Tabla 23.Análisis de Varianza de la pH T1 Fuente GL SC Regresión 3 2.73542 Error 16 2.57570 Total 19 5.31111
MC 0.911805 10.9628
F 5.66
Valor-P 0.008
Resumen del modelo S = 0.401224 R-Sq = 51.5% R-Sq(adj) = 42.4% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 2.73542 2.57570 5.31111
MS 0.911805 10.9628
F 5.66
P 0.008
Fitted Line: PHT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: PHT2 versus dias Tabla 34.Análisis de Varianza de la pH T2 Fuente GL SC Regresión 3 3.33911 Error 16 2.84283 Total 19 6.18194
MC 1.11304 0.17768
F 6.26
Resumen del modelo S = 0.421518 R-Sq = 54.0% R-Sq(adj) = 45.4% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 3.33911 2.84283 6.18194
MS 1.11304 0.17768
F 6.26
P 0.005
Valor-P 0.005
Fitted Line: PHT2 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: PHT3 versus dias
Tabla 45.Análisis de Varianza de la pH T3 Fuente GL SC Regresión 3 12.4559 Error 16 2.1260 Total 19 14.5819
MC 4.15198 0.13287
F 31.25
Valor-P 0.000
Resumen del modelo S = 0.364520 R-Sq = 85.4% R-Sq(adj) = 82.7%
Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 12.4559 2.1260 14.5819
MS 4.15198 0.13287
F 31.25
P 0.000
Fitted Line: PHT3 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: PHT4 versus dias Tabla 56.Análisis de Varianza de la pH T4 Fuente GL SC Regresión 3 9.8707 Error 16 2.0832 Total 19 11.9539
MC 3.29023 0.13020
F 25.27
Resumen del modelo S = 0.360837 R-Sq = 82.6% R-Sq(adj) = 79.3% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 9.8707 2.0832 11.9539
MS 3.29023 0.13020
F 25.27
P 0.000
Valor-P 0.000
Polynomial Regression Analysis: PHT5 versus dias Tabla 67.Análisis de Varianza de la pH T5 Fuente GL SC Regresión 3 14.6750 Error 16 3.0527 Total 19 17.7278
MC 4.89168 0.19080
F 25.64
Valor-P 0.000
Resumen del modelo S = 0.436802 R-Sq = 82.8% R-Sq(adj) = 79.6% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 14.6750 3.0527 17.7278
MS 4.89168 0.19080
F 25.64
P 0.000
Polynomial Regression Analysis: TT2 versus dias Tabla 78.Análisis de Varianza de la Temperatura T2 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 280.878 93.6260 Error 16 175.405 10.9628 Total 19 456.283
F 8.54
Resumen del modelo S = 3.31102 R-Sq = 61.6% R-Sq(adj) = 54.3% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 280.878 175.405 456.283
MS 93.6260 10.9628
F 8.54
P 0.001
Valor-P 0.001
Polynomial Regression Analysis: PHT3 versus dias Tabla 89.Análisis de Varianza de la pH T3 Fuente GL SC Regresión 3 12.4559 Error 16 2.1260 Total 19 14.5819
MC 4.15198 0.13287
F 31.25
Valor-P 0.000
Resumen del modelo S = 0.364520 R-Sq = 85.4% R-Sq(adj) = 82.7% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 12.4559 2.1260 14.5819
MS 4.15198 0.13287
F 31.25
P 0.000
Fitted Line: PHT3 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: TT3 versus dias Tabla 20.Análisis de Varianza de la Temperatura T3 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 583.608 194.536 Error 16 201.120 12.570 Total 19 784.728
F 15.48
Resumen del modelo S = 3.54542 R-Sq = 74.4% R-Sq(adj) = 69.6% Analysis of Variance Source Regression
DF 3
SS 583.608
MS 194.536
F 15.48
P 0.000
Valor-P 0.000
Error Total
16 19
201.120 784.728
12.570
Fitted Line: TT3 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: TT4 versus dias Tabla 21.Análisis de Varianza de la Temperatura T4 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 238.558 79.5192 Error 16 123.198 7.6999 Total 19 361.756
F 10.33
Valor-P 0.001
Resumen del modelo S = 2.77486 R-Sq = 65.9% R-Sq(adj) = 59.6% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 238.558 123.198 361.756
MS 79.5192 7.6999
F 10.33
P 0.001
Fitted Line: TT4 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: TT4 versus dias Tabla 22.Análisis de Varianza de la pH T1 Fuente GL SC Regresión 3 238.558 Error 16 123.198 Total 19 361.756
MC 10.33 7.6999
F 10.33
Resumen del modelo S = 2.77486 R-Sq = 65.9% R-Sq(adj) = 59.6%
Valor-P 0.001
Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 238.558 123.198 361.756
MS 79.5192 7.6999
F 10.33
P 0.001
Fitted Line: TT4 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: TT5 versus dias Tabla 23. Análisis de Varianza de la Temperatura T4 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 593.691 197.897 Error 16 149.481 9.343 Total 19 743.175
F 21.18
Valor-P 0.000
Resumen del modelo S = 3.05656 R-Sq = 79.9% R-Sq(adj) = 76.1% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 593.691 149.481 743.172
MS 197.897 9.343
F 21.18
P 0.000
Fitted Line: TT5 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 23. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 190.318 63.4393 Error 16 257.215 16.0760 Total 19 447.533
F 3.95
Valor-P 0.028
Resumen del modelo S = 4.00948 R-Sq = 42.5% R-Sq(adj) = 31.7% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 190.318 257.215 447.533
MS 63.4393 16.0760
F 3.95
P 0.028
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 24. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 152.903 50.9677 Error 16 226.741 14.1713 Total 19 379.644
F 3.60
Valor-P 0.037
Resumen del modelo S = 3.76448 R-Sq = 40.3% R-Sq(adj) = 29.1% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 152.903 226.741 379.644
MS 50.9677 14.1713
F 3.60
P 0.037
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 25. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 128.604 42.8679 Error 16 210.391 13.1494 Total 19 338.994
F 3.26
Valor-P 0.049
Resumen del modelo S = 3.62621 R-Sq = 37.9% R-Sq(adj) = 26.3% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 128.604 210.391 338.994
MS 42.8679 13.1494
F 3.26
P 0.049
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 26. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 133.925 44.6384 Error 16 180.329 11.2706 Total 19 314.244
F 3.96
Valor-P 0.027
Resumen del modelo S = 3.35717 R-Sq = 42.6% R-Sq(adj) = 31.9% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 133.915 180.329 314.244
MS 44.6384 11.2706
F 3.96
P 0.027
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus días Tabla 27. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC
F
Valor-P
Regresión Error Total
3 16 19
229.914 160.250 390.164
76.6381 10.0156
7.65
0.002
Resumen del modelo S = 3.16475 R-Sq = 58.9% R-Sq(adj) = 51.2% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 229.914 160.250 390.164
MS 76.6381 10.0156
F 7.65
P 0.002
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 28. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 229.914 76.6381 Error 16 160.250 10.0156 Total 19 390.164
F 7.65
Resumen del modelo S = 3.16475 R-Sq = 58.9% R-Sq(adj) = 51.2% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 229.914 160.250 390.164
MS 76.6381 10.0156
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias
F 7.65
P 0.002
Valor-P 0.002
Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 29. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 199.409 66.4697 Error 16 125.679 7.8550 Total 19 325.088
F 8.46
Valor-P 0.001
Resumen del modelo S = 2.80267 R-Sq = 61.3% R-Sq(adj) = 54.1% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 199.409 125.679 325.088
MS 66.4697 7.8550
F 8.46
P 0.001
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 30. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 418.471 139.490 Error 16 139.030 8.689 Total 19 557.501
F 16.05
Resumen del modelo S = 2.94778 R-Sq = 75.1% R-Sq(adj) = 70.4% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 418.471 139.030 557.501
MS 139.490 8.689
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias
F 16.05
P 0.000
Valor-P 0.000
Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 31. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 332.376 110.792 Error 16 150.865 9.429 Total 19 483.241
F 11.75
Valor-P 0.000
Resumen del modelo S = 3.07068 R-Sq = 68.8% R-Sq(adj) = 62.9% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 332.376 150.865 483.241
MS 110.792 9.429
F 11.75
P 0.000
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT2 versus dias Tabla 32. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T2 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 255.958 85.3193 Error 16 226.719 14.1700 Total 19 482.677
F 6.02
Resumen del modelo S = 3.76430 R-Sq = 53.0% R-Sq(adj) = 44.2% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 255.958 226.719 482.677
MS 85.3193 14.1700
F 6.02
P 0.006
Valor-P 0.006
Fitted Line: HT2 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT2 versus dias Tabla 33. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T2 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 255.958 85.3193 Error 16 226.719 14.1700 Total 19 482.677
F 6.02
Valor-P 0.006
Resumen del modelo S = 3.76430 R-Sq = 53.0% R-Sq(adj) = 44.2% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 255.958 226.719 482.677
MS 85.3193 14.1700
F 6.02
P 0.006
Fitted Line: HT2 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT3 versus dias Tabla 34. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T3 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 233.588 77.8628 Error 16 189.036 11.8147 Total 19 422.624
Resumen del modelo S = 3.43726 R-Sq = 55.3% R-Sq(adj) = 46.9% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 233.588 189.036 422.624
MS 77.8628 11.8147
F 6.59
P 0.004
F 6.59
Valor-P 0.004
Fitted Line: HT3 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT4 versus dias Tabla 35. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T4 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 398.665 132.888 Error 16 227.266 14.204 Total 19 625.931
F 9.36
Valor-P 0.001
Resumen del modelo S = 3.76884 R-Sq = 63.7% R-Sq(adj) = 56.9% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 398.665 227.266 625.931
MS 132.888 14.204
F 9.36
P 0.001
Fitted Line: HT4 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT5 versus dias Tabla 36. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T5 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 456.747 152.249 Error 16 159.131 9.946 Total 19 615.879
F 15.31
Resumen del modelo S = 3.15368 R-Sq = 74.2% R-Sq(adj) = 69.3% Analysis of Variance Source Regression
DF 3
SS 456.747
MS 152.249
F 15.31
P 0.000
Valor-P 0.000
Error Total
16 19
159.131 615.879
9.946
Fitted Line: HT5 versus dias ————— 30/03/2019 17:45:39 ——————————————————— — Welcome to Minitab, press F1 for help. Retrieving project from file: ‘C:\Users\Soledad\Desktop\TALLER ESTADISTICA\vilamodelos.MPJ’
————— 31/03/2019 12:14:30 ——————————————————— — Welcome to Minitab, press F1 for help. Retrieving project from file: ‘C:\Users\Soledad\Desktop\TALLER ESTADISTICA\vilamodelos.MPJ’
DF 3 16 19
SS 428.920 301.363 730.283
MS 142.973 18.835
F 7.59
P 0.002
Tabla 1.Análisis de Varianza de la temperatura T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 428.920 142.973 Error 16 301.363 18.835 Total 19 730.283
F 7.59
Valor-P 0.002
Resumen del modelo S = 4.33995 R-Sq = 58.7% R-Sq(adj) = 51.0% TRATAMIENTO 2 TT2
Tabla 13. Análisis de Varianza de la temperatura T2 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 280.878 93.6260 Error 16 175.405 10.9628 Total 19 456.283
F 8.54
Resumen del modelo S = 3.31102 R-Sq = 61.6% R-Sq(adj) = 54.3% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 280.878 175.405 456.283
MS 93.6260 10.9628
F 8.54
P 0.001
Valor-P 0.001
Fitted Line: TT2 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: PHT1 versus dias
Tabla 23.Análisis de Varianza de la pH T1 Fuente GL SC Regresión 3 2.73542 Error 16 2.57570 Total 19 5.31111
MC 0.911805 10.9628
F 5.66
Valor-P 0.008
Resumen del modelo S = 0.401224 R-Sq = 51.5% R-Sq(adj) = 42.4% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 2.73542 2.57570 5.31111
MS 0.911805 10.9628
F 5.66
P 0.008
Fitted Line: PHT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: PHT2 versus dias Tabla 34.Análisis de Varianza de la pH T2 Fuente GL SC Regresión 3 3.33911 Error 16 2.84283 Total 19 6.18194
MC 1.11304 0.17768
F 6.26
Resumen del modelo S = 0.421518 R-Sq = 54.0% R-Sq(adj) = 45.4% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 3.33911 2.84283 6.18194
MS 1.11304 0.17768
F 6.26
P 0.005
Valor-P 0.005
Fitted Line: PHT2 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: PHT3 versus dias
Tabla 45.Análisis de Varianza de la pH T3 Fuente GL SC Regresión 3 12.4559 Error 16 2.1260 Total 19 14.5819
MC 4.15198 0.13287
F 31.25
Valor-P 0.000
Resumen del modelo S = 0.364520 R-Sq = 85.4% R-Sq(adj) = 82.7%
Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 12.4559 2.1260 14.5819
MS 4.15198 0.13287
F 31.25
P 0.000
Fitted Line: PHT3 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: PHT4 versus dias Tabla 56.Análisis de Varianza de la pH T4 Fuente GL SC Regresión 3 9.8707 Error 16 2.0832 Total 19 11.9539
MC 3.29023 0.13020
F 25.27
Resumen del modelo S = 0.360837 R-Sq = 82.6% R-Sq(adj) = 79.3% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 9.8707 2.0832 11.9539
MS 3.29023 0.13020
F 25.27
P 0.000
Valor-P 0.000
Polynomial Regression Analysis: PHT5 versus dias Tabla 67.Análisis de Varianza de la pH T5 Fuente GL SC Regresión 3 14.6750 Error 16 3.0527 Total 19 17.7278
MC 4.89168 0.19080
F 25.64
Valor-P 0.000
Resumen del modelo S = 0.436802 R-Sq = 82.8% R-Sq(adj) = 79.6% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 14.6750 3.0527 17.7278
MS 4.89168 0.19080
F 25.64
P 0.000
Polynomial Regression Analysis: TT2 versus dias Tabla 78.Análisis de Varianza de la Temperatura T2 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 280.878 93.6260 Error 16 175.405 10.9628 Total 19 456.283
F 8.54
Resumen del modelo S = 3.31102 R-Sq = 61.6% R-Sq(adj) = 54.3% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 280.878 175.405 456.283
MS 93.6260 10.9628
F 8.54
P 0.001
Valor-P 0.001
Polynomial Regression Analysis: PHT3 versus dias Tabla 89.Análisis de Varianza de la pH T3 Fuente GL SC Regresión 3 12.4559 Error 16 2.1260 Total 19 14.5819
MC 4.15198 0.13287
F 31.25
Valor-P 0.000
Resumen del modelo S = 0.364520 R-Sq = 85.4% R-Sq(adj) = 82.7% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 12.4559 2.1260 14.5819
MS 4.15198 0.13287
F 31.25
P 0.000
Fitted Line: PHT3 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: TT3 versus dias Tabla 20.Análisis de Varianza de la Temperatura T3 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 583.608 194.536 Error 16 201.120 12.570 Total 19 784.728
F 15.48
Resumen del modelo S = 3.54542 R-Sq = 74.4% R-Sq(adj) = 69.6% Analysis of Variance Source Regression
DF 3
SS 583.608
MS 194.536
F 15.48
P 0.000
Valor-P 0.000
Error Total
16 19
201.120 784.728
12.570
Fitted Line: TT3 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: TT4 versus dias Tabla 21.Análisis de Varianza de la Temperatura T4 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 238.558 79.5192 Error 16 123.198 7.6999 Total 19 361.756
F 10.33
Valor-P 0.001
Resumen del modelo S = 2.77486 R-Sq = 65.9% R-Sq(adj) = 59.6% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 238.558 123.198 361.756
MS 79.5192 7.6999
F 10.33
P 0.001
Fitted Line: TT4 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: TT4 versus dias Tabla 22.Análisis de Varianza de la pH T1 Fuente GL SC Regresión 3 238.558 Error 16 123.198 Total 19 361.756
MC 10.33 7.6999
F 10.33
Resumen del modelo S = 2.77486 R-Sq = 65.9% R-Sq(adj) = 59.6%
Valor-P 0.001
Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 238.558 123.198 361.756
MS 79.5192 7.6999
F 10.33
P 0.001
Fitted Line: TT4 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: TT5 versus dias Tabla 23. Análisis de Varianza de la Temperatura T4 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 593.691 197.897 Error 16 149.481 9.343 Total 19 743.175
F 21.18
Valor-P 0.000
Resumen del modelo S = 3.05656 R-Sq = 79.9% R-Sq(adj) = 76.1% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 593.691 149.481 743.172
MS 197.897 9.343
F 21.18
P 0.000
Fitted Line: TT5 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 23. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 190.318 63.4393 Error 16 257.215 16.0760 Total 19 447.533
F 3.95
Valor-P 0.028
Resumen del modelo S = 4.00948 R-Sq = 42.5% R-Sq(adj) = 31.7% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 190.318 257.215 447.533
MS 63.4393 16.0760
F 3.95
P 0.028
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 24. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 152.903 50.9677 Error 16 226.741 14.1713 Total 19 379.644
F 3.60
Valor-P 0.037
Resumen del modelo S = 3.76448 R-Sq = 40.3% R-Sq(adj) = 29.1% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 152.903 226.741 379.644
MS 50.9677 14.1713
F 3.60
P 0.037
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 25. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 128.604 42.8679 Error 16 210.391 13.1494 Total 19 338.994
F 3.26
Valor-P 0.049
Resumen del modelo S = 3.62621 R-Sq = 37.9% R-Sq(adj) = 26.3% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 128.604 210.391 338.994
MS 42.8679 13.1494
F 3.26
P 0.049
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 26. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 133.925 44.6384 Error 16 180.329 11.2706 Total 19 314.244
F 3.96
Valor-P 0.027
Resumen del modelo S = 3.35717 R-Sq = 42.6% R-Sq(adj) = 31.9% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 133.915 180.329 314.244
MS 44.6384 11.2706
F 3.96
P 0.027
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus días Tabla 27. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC
F
Valor-P
Regresión Error Total
3 16 19
229.914 160.250 390.164
76.6381 10.0156
7.65
0.002
Resumen del modelo S = 3.16475 R-Sq = 58.9% R-Sq(adj) = 51.2% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 229.914 160.250 390.164
MS 76.6381 10.0156
F 7.65
P 0.002
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 28. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 229.914 76.6381 Error 16 160.250 10.0156 Total 19 390.164
F 7.65
Resumen del modelo S = 3.16475 R-Sq = 58.9% R-Sq(adj) = 51.2% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 229.914 160.250 390.164
MS 76.6381 10.0156
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias
F 7.65
P 0.002
Valor-P 0.002
Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 29. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 199.409 66.4697 Error 16 125.679 7.8550 Total 19 325.088
F 8.46
Valor-P 0.001
Resumen del modelo S = 2.80267 R-Sq = 61.3% R-Sq(adj) = 54.1% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 199.409 125.679 325.088
MS 66.4697 7.8550
F 8.46
P 0.001
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 30. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 418.471 139.490 Error 16 139.030 8.689 Total 19 557.501
F 16.05
Resumen del modelo S = 2.94778 R-Sq = 75.1% R-Sq(adj) = 70.4% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 418.471 139.030 557.501
MS 139.490 8.689
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias
F 16.05
P 0.000
Valor-P 0.000
Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT1 versus dias Tabla 31. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T1 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 332.376 110.792 Error 16 150.865 9.429 Total 19 483.241
F 11.75
Valor-P 0.000
Resumen del modelo S = 3.07068 R-Sq = 68.8% R-Sq(adj) = 62.9% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 332.376 150.865 483.241
MS 110.792 9.429
F 11.75
P 0.000
Fitted Line: HT1 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT2 versus dias Tabla 32. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T2 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 255.958 85.3193 Error 16 226.719 14.1700 Total 19 482.677
F 6.02
Resumen del modelo S = 3.76430 R-Sq = 53.0% R-Sq(adj) = 44.2% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 255.958 226.719 482.677
MS 85.3193 14.1700
F 6.02
P 0.006
Valor-P 0.006
Fitted Line: HT2 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT2 versus dias Tabla 33. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T2 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 255.958 85.3193 Error 16 226.719 14.1700 Total 19 482.677
F 6.02
Valor-P 0.006
Resumen del modelo S = 3.76430 R-Sq = 53.0% R-Sq(adj) = 44.2% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 255.958 226.719 482.677
MS 85.3193 14.1700
F 6.02
P 0.006
Fitted Line: HT2 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT3 versus dias Tabla 34. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T3 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 233.588 77.8628 Error 16 189.036 11.8147 Total 19 422.624
Resumen del modelo S = 3.43726 R-Sq = 55.3% R-Sq(adj) = 46.9% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 233.588 189.036 422.624
MS 77.8628 11.8147
F 6.59
P 0.004
F 6.59
Valor-P 0.004
Fitted Line: HT3 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT4 versus dias Tabla 35. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T4 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 398.665 132.888 Error 16 227.266 14.204 Total 19 625.931
F 9.36
Valor-P 0.001
Resumen del modelo S = 3.76884 R-Sq = 63.7% R-Sq(adj) = 56.9% Analysis of Variance Source Regression Error Total
DF 3 16 19
SS 398.665 227.266 625.931
MS 132.888 14.204
F 9.36
P 0.001
Fitted Line: HT4 versus dias Polynomial Regression Analysis: HT5 versus dias Tabla 36. Análisis de Varianza de la Humedad T5 Fuente GL SC MC Regresión 3 456.747 152.249 Error 16 159.131 9.946 Total 19 615.879
F 15.31
Resumen del modelo S = 3.15368 R-Sq = 74.2% R-Sq(adj) = 69.3% Analysis of Variance Source Regression
DF 3
SS 456.747
MS 152.249
F 15.31
P 0.000
Valor-P 0.000
Error Total
16 19
159.131 615.879
9.946
Fitted Line: HT5 versus dias ————— 30/03/2019 17:45:39 ——————————————————— — Welcome to Minitab, press F1 for help. Retrieving project from file: ‘C:\Users\Soledad\Desktop\TALLER ESTADISTICA\vilamodelos.MPJ’
————— 31/03/2019 12:14:30 ——————————————————— — Welcome to Minitab, press F1 for help. Retrieving project from file: ‘C:\Users\Soledad\Desktop\TALLER ESTADISTICA\vilamodelos.MPJ’
Related Documents
Tratamients En Tablas.docx
December 2019 2
En En
May 2020 41
En En
October 2019 100
En
June 2020 30
En
June 2020 28
En
October 2019 91More Documents from ""
Bases-practicantes-v-s-a.doc
December 2019 9
Tratamients En Tablas.docx
December 2019 2
Balotario_perfil-del-egresado-1.docx
December 2019 4
Out Of The Night That Covers Me
May 2020 100
Intake System.docx
May 2020 102