The Invalidity Of The Novus Ordo Mass

What I just showed you on youtube was a video of the Tridentine Mass. Which is the Catholic mass. “Patriarchs, archbishops, and other hierarchs should zealously care for the faithful protection and the accurate observance of their rite, nor are they to permit or to tolerate any change in the rite.” Canon 1 paragraph 1 of the Oriental Code of Canon Law. On June 2, 1957 in the fullness of his Apostolic Authority, Pope Pius XII extended this law to the Universal Church. The first picture I am going to show is the missal of Vatican II

This second picture is the inside of the book according to Vatican II

We are specifically looking for the consecration form which I provided below.

This is the consecration form in which Vatican II uses.

However this is not the form in which the Church has always used. Holy Office warning, 24 July 1958: “This Supreme Sacred Congregation has learned that in a certain translation of the New Order of Holy Week into the vernacular, the words "mysterium fidei" in the form of the consecration of the chalice are omitted. it is also reported that some priests omit these words in the very celebration of Mass. Therefore this Supreme Congregation gives warning that it is impious to introduce a change in so sacred a matter and to mutilate or alter editions of liturgical books. (See Canon 1399, paragraph 10) Bishops therefore, in accordance with the warning of the Holy Office or 14 February, 1958, should see to it that the prescriptions of the sacred canons on divine worship be strictly observed, and they should be closely watchful that no one dare to introduce even the slightest change in the matter and form of the Sacraments.”

This is the Latin Translation into English from the above picture.... De Defectibus Decree of the Council of Trent Chapter II Defective Formula 1. DEFECTS may arise in respect of the formula, if anything is wanting to complete the actual words of consecration. The words of consecration, which are the formative principle of this Sacrament, are as follows: Hoc est enim Corpus meum; and: Ric est enim calix Sanguinis mei, novi et aeterni testamenti; mysterium fidei, qui pro vobis et pro multis effundetur in remissionem peccatorum. If any omission or alteration is made in the formula of consecration of the Body and Blood, involving a change of meaning, the consecration is invalid. An addition made without altering the meaning does not invalidate the consecration, but the Celebrant commits a mortal sin. 2. If the Celebrant cannot remember whether he has said the usual words of consecration, he is not on that account to be disturbed. But if he knows for certain that he has omitted something essential to the Sacrament, i.e. the formula of consecration, or part of it, he must repeat the formula, and go on with the Mass from that point. If he is doubtful, and yet thinks that very probably he has omitted something essential, he should repeat the formula conditionally, though the condition need not be expressed. But if it was something inessential, he need not repeat it, but should go on with the Mass. Let us then look at what we had originally...

Let us look for the consecration form of the Blood of Our Lord. See the next picture.

Now let us compare the two. Here is Vatican II consecration form (1962)

Here is the Catholic form (1957)

Vatican II form states: “For all men so that sins may be forgiven.” The Catholic form states: “For many unto the forgiveness of sins.” Vatican II states, that our “sins may be forgiven.” Is that not noticeably different from “the forgiveness of sins.”? In the Vatican II form, we can only hope that our sins are forgiven, but that is not a guarantee that they are forgiven. Whereas in the Catholic form it states “unto the forgiveness of sins.” In the Catholic form it guarantees us of the forgiveness of sins.

In addition, in the Vatican II form it states that “for all men” while in the Catholic form it states in “for many.” In the bible it states “for many,” “For this is my blood of the new testament, which shall be shed for many unto remission of sins.” Matthew 26:28 This change from “for many” to “for all” is a substantial change. It even contradicts the Holy Bible. “If any omission or alteration is made in the formula of consecration of the Body and Blood, involving a change of meaning, the consecration is invalid.” - De Defectibus Decree of the Council of Trent Therefore we can logically conclude that the Vatican II rite is invalid. If the rite is invalid, then the Novus Ordo Mass is invalid, for it was changed substantially. Every time you go up to receive communion you are not receiving the Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ, but just bread and wine. You commit a mortal sin and a sacrilege, for according to the Vatican II rite, as I have shown you, is invalid and does not change the bread to the body of Jesus Christ nor does it change the wine into the blood of Jesus Christ. You are worshiping bread as though it were God, and you would transgress the first Commandment by choosing to believe that piece of bread is God, despite knowing the consecration form is invalid. “I am the Lord, and there is none else: there is no God, besides me.” (Isaias 45:5) Below is further proof that they purposely changed the rite at Vatican II. They had the intention all along to change the rite. Which can only make one think, “An enemy hath done this.” (Matthew 13:28)