The Fabians Should Be A Movement, Not Just A Think Tank - Omar Salem

st

1 October 2008

The Fabians should be a movement, not just a think tank The Fabians must draw on their campaigning history to help Labour meet the challenges of the future says Omar Salem

The Fabian legacy

One day in June 1888 Annie Besant attended a Fabian Society meeting on female labour. She was appalled to hear about the conditions of women workers at Bryant & May, a matchmakers in East London. While the company announced huge profits, their employees were forced to work for pitifully low wages, which were further reduced by a system of unfair fines (e.g. for going to the toilet without permission). The next day she interviewed some of the workers at Bryant & May, and set about publicising the conditions that the workers suffered. She wrote an article entitled “White Slavery in London” and when the company tried to bully the workers into denying the article's description of working conditions the workers went on strike. After three weeks with their workers on strike, Bryant & May caved in, agreeing to abolish fines and deductions as well as give the women union recognition.

Here was an early example of the Fabians working with the trade unions to fight for workers' rights at a time of challenging circumstance for many. These practical campaigns were combined with an intellectual backbone provided by the pamphlets, speeches and plays of, among others, Beatrice and Sidney Webb, George Bernard Shaw and GDH Cole. When the Fabians developed ideas - including for a national health service, equal rights for women and proper employment rights for workers - they did not simply write pamphlets and allow them to gather dust with a vague hope that someone, somewhere, would implement them. Instead, they took their ideas and they built support for them: George Bernard Shaw attended over 1,000 public meetings across the country to argue for social justice; Beatrice Webb wrote article after article against the Poor Law; and Annie Besant helped organise women workers in East London to fight for their rights. It is this radical but practical approach that 1

st

1 October 2008

we should ensure is at the heart of the Fabian Society today. After all, it was this approach that laid the foundations for the welfare state so that when the Labour Government of Clement Attlee (himself a Fabian) came to power, they had both the ideas and the wide base of support to change Britain for the better. Additionally, pre-War Fabians played a key role in channelling the energies of the left into a constructive and democratic politics through the Labour Party and the trade unions – helping the UK avoid anti-democratic Fascism and Communism.

Of course, that was one of the most radical, progressive and reforming governments ever. Unfortunately, it was followed by more than a decade of Conservative rule. Fortunately, during this time the Fabians once again helped provide ideas for progress through Anthony Crosland’s groundbreaking 1956 publication, The Future of Socialism. Although it now sometimes reads as a little naïve and idealistic - Crosland believed Britain to be “on the threshold of mass abundance” and that “one cannot imagine to-day C a serious attempt to enforce, as so often happened in the 1920s, a coal policy to which the miners bitterly objected” – it renewed Labour thinking and provided a nuanced understanding of what the good life might look like.

Inspired by Crosland, the differentiation between ends and means became a motto of those working to reform the party. They defeated Militant and, inspired by another Fabian pamphlet – this time Giles Radice’s Southern Discomfort – ensured a landslide victory in 1997. The minimum wage, human rights act, civil partnerships, more paid holiday, NHS Direct and more were to follow. These changes did not come about just by chance, not just because someone had an idea for them, but because campaigns were run, arguments made and votes won – both inside and outside the Labour Party.

The new challenges

Today we face new challenges. Global economic difficulty, climate change, terrorism, demographic change, new pressures on children and families, knife crime, globalisation and increasing international competition are just a few of 2

st

1 October 2008

these. Anybody who has watched Robert McNamara’s film about the Cuban Missile Crisis cannot help but fear the future effects of nuclear weapons on our world. The World Health Organisation (WHO) cites research showing that an influenza pandemic could kill 2 to 7.4 million people globally. Following more than a decade of uninterrupted growth the economy seems rather less robust and former titans of the economy, like Lehman Brothers, have fallen.

But where there are new challenges there are new solutions. Using similar approaches to the Fabians of the past we can face and overcome the challenges of the future. We will also need to draw on other thinkers and traditions from Bentham and Mill to the participatory budgeting of Porte Alegre, Brazil. What we need is the imagination to challenge preconceptions and the willingness to campaign and work hard to get from idea to reality. The Fabians can fill a space between the internal policy processes of the National Policy Forum and the more departmental focus of individual Ministers and their Special Advisers.

In practice, this will mean that there are three things that the Fabians and Labour need to especially focus on at the moment: economic fairness, being radical and being in touch.

Economic fairness

Given the economic difficulties that Labour is facing, economic fairness, in a broad sense, must be at the heart of Labour’s agenda. We need to show two things to inspire the public’s trust and support.

First, we must show we can take the decisive and tough action that is needed to protect the economy. The Prime Minister did this last week in handling the falling stock market. The public want to know that there is a Prime Minister and party in power that is resilient in the face of challenges and resolute in acting to deal with them.

3

st

1 October 2008

Second, we must show that Labour has a different approach from the Tories when dealing with difficult economic times. We cannot only say that we are more competent that the Tories, however true that may be. We must show that our values and principles will result in better and fairer solutions – at a time when individuals and families are suffering.

As a Labour government we cannot allow people to freeze to death in the winter or face being homeless at Christmas. We are Labour precisely to stop these things. We must show that Labour’s response to the economic difficulties of today will be different from that of the Tories - not only because our approach involves action, but because that action is firmly rooted in clear Labour values. Our response should differ from that of past Conservative governments not only by being more effective but also by being fairer. While the Tories would walk away, we must show that Labour will help to insulate the British people against economic storms. We must make sure that people know they will have a roof over their head, will be able to afford to heat their home and feed their families. We should also hold firm on our commitments to reduce child poverty.

A big part of economic fairness will involve looking at how we can rebalance the tax system to help those who are on lower and middle incomes and whose living standards are most under threat. This would make a real difference to people’s lives and demonstrate that Labour has a distinctive approach to dealing with tough times - and it is one of the areas where policy changes can have a tangible effect very quickly. One idea might be to make April 30th, 2009, a ‘tax fairness’ day where we see the tax system rebalanced to reduce taxation on those on low and middle incomes.

There is an increasing feeling that economic rewards are distributed unjustly and undeservedly. Indeed, Crosland’s analysis of the British economy in the 1950s sheds an interesting light on today’s economy. He argued at the time that Britain was no longer a capitalist society, in part because of the transfer of decision-making at the level of the unit of production from ‘private ownermanagers’ to ‘a largely non-owning class of salaried executives’. What would 4

st

1 October 2008

Crosland have thought of today’s million-pound bonuses (which are often many times the recipients salaries)? Many of us feel some discomfort that bonuses get paid out seemingly regardless of performance and with questionable correlation to the recipients' contribution to society. We could look at how targeted property taxes could be used to make sure that the uberrich, who would otherwise avoid it, pay their fair share. At the other end of the income spectrum, we should not only continue to raise the minimum wage but also aim to ensure that public sector workers and those contracted by the public sector are paid a living wage.

Being bold, brave and radical

Although the Fabians come from a tradition of democratic gradualism, that need not mean being tame or unimaginative. New challenges need new solutions. Someone once said that we were “best when we were bold, best when we are Labour”. When Fabians first mooted the NHS and the minimum wage they were not mainstream ideas. Now they are part of the furniture of British life. For a party in its twelfth year of government, we are more likely to suffer from being too timid rather than from being too radical. Much as it is important to defend and be proud of our record to date, we cannot rely on restating old policies or trying to be better at claiming credit for what we have done. If we do that alone we will lose the next election.

What we need is an agenda of the change we want to bring to people’s lives in the future. Challenges such as climate change will require us to be willing to take bold, sometimes politically risky, decisions to bring about the change that is needed. We should not shy away from this task but rather embrace it. We are best placed to succeed, because progressive politics is about changing things for the better rather than settling for the status quo.

Being in touch

Successful progressive change depends not only on having the right values and the guts to see change through, but an understanding of what is wanted 5

st

1 October 2008

and needed. The early Fabians' success did not come as a result of simply dreaming up good ideas. Rather these ideas came from an understanding of the sometimes grim reality of life at the time. Charles Booth's detailed studies of life in London informed Fabians' thinking, while Clement Attlee’s politics were influenced by his experiences as a social worker in East London. Linked to this is the need to renew our democracy - electing the House of Lords and giving more scope for people to control their local community.

Those in power are often afraid of change because they fear a backlash to anything too radical. The way to avoid this is to be in touch with what people are thinking by getting out on the doorstep and into communities, so that new policies are based not only on remote theory but also practical reality. Keeping in touch is not always glamorous, but it can be rewarding because that is how you get the right policies for a better, fairer world.

To help with keeping in touch all parts of the Labour movement, including the Fabians, must look at how they can open up and reduce barriers to entry for those we want to engage – just as Barack Obama has done with his ‘movement for change’. Not least in the case of the Fabians this means finding ways for members to take part – wherever they live in the country – beyond reading pamphlets and attending debates. Unlike other organisations, the Fabian Society has a significant and committed membership that with the right support can make an even greater contribution to the Labour movement. There need to be clearer and more open ways for members to develop and collaborate on ideas through the Fabian Review, publications and the website. Local Fabian societies should also be given more support and encouragement to build links with local charity and community groups, as well as open up their activities to a wider group of people beyond already engaged Labour Party members. Another idea might be for local societies to be encouraged to base their policy discussions and speaker meetings explicitly on the issues that have been coming up on the doorstep in local canvassing sessions – with meetings open to the public.

6

st

1 October 2008

The future

In pushing for a fair, radical and in-touch agenda we must ensure that the Fabians do not only produce ideas but that we also push for those ideas to become action. That means going beyond seminars and discussion groups alone, and allowing more scope for the ideas and energies of members to drive the work of the Fabians. It will also mean reaching out to build stronger links with others in the labour movement including the Trade Unions, Cooperative movement, fellow Socialist Societies, Compass and Progress. Learning from the Fabians' venerable history and contribution to the labour movement shows how this can be done. If we want progressive change in the future to be driven by the Fabians we must be a movement, not just a think tank.

Omar Salem is a member of the Fabian Society. He writes in a personal capacity.

7

st

1 October 2008

References

Collins, P, and Reeves, R. (2008) Liberalise or die, Prospect. Available at: http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=10177.

Crosland, C.A.R. (1956) The Future of Socialism, Jonathan Cape, London (Reprinted 2006).

Katwala, S. (2008) The Fabian tradition is a source of fresh ideas, not a poisoned well, The Guardian: available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/may/29/labour.gordonbrown.

Levenson, E, Lodge, G, and Rosen, R. (eds) Fabian Thinkers: 120 years of radical thought, Fabian Society.

Radice, G. (1992) Southern Discomfort, Fabian Society.

Shaw, G.B, and Wilshire, G. (eds) (1889) Fabian Essays in Socialism, Fabian Society (reprinted 1891). Available at http://www.econlib.org/library/YPDBooks/Shaw/shwFStoc.html.

Simkin, J. Matchgirls strike, Spartacus Educational: available at http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/TUmatchgirls.htm (accessed 18 September 2008).

The Match Workers Strike Fund Register, TUC History Online: available at http://www.unionhistory.info/matchworkers/matchworkers.php (accessed 18 September 2008) extracted from Charlton, J. (1999) It just went like tinder; the mass movement and New Unionism in Britain 1889: a socialist history, Redwords.

8

st

1 October 2008

Contact

Omar Salem can be contacted at omarsalem[at]gmail.com or on 0774 761 0243.

9