The Ethical Principle of Reciprocity By Anthony J. Fejfar, B.A., J.D., Esq., Coif © Copyright 2009 by Anthony J. Fejfar In the book, “Reciprocity,” Lawrence Becker spends hundreds of pages discussing reciprocity, without adequately defining it. Becker argues that “good for good” is a primary example of reciprocity. Becker also asserts that reciprocity has nothing to do with the Golden Rule. Thus, Becker is revealed as confusing the concept of reciprocity which is based upon the Golden Rule, with the rule of proportionality which is found in Aristotle.
Contrary to Becker, it is clear that the Ethical Principle of
Reciprocity is based upon the Golden Rule, as attributed to Jesus of Nazareth. The Critical Thomist Ethical Principle of Reciprocity which is based upon the Golden Rule provides that a person should “Treat another as you would wish to be treated in similar circumstances.” This involves true reciprocal thinking. Following Reciprocity, if you do no wish to be tortured, then you should not torture others. If you do not wish to be murdered, then you should not murder others. This is both and Ethical Principle as well as a Law of Karma, Cause and Effect.