T3 B8 Hurley Final Report Chp 3-5 2 Of 2 Fdr- Entire Contents- Emails And Withdrawal Notices 976
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View T3 B8 Hurley Final Report Chp 3-5 2 Of 2 Fdr- Entire Contents- Emails And Withdrawal Notices 976 as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 1,535
- Pages: 11
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE RG: 148 Exposition, Anniversary, and Memorial Commissions SERIES: Team 3,9/11 Commission NND PROJECT NUMBER:
52100
FOIA CASE NUMBER: 31107
WITHDRAWAL DATE: 11/18/2008
BOX: 00003
FOLDER: 0014
COPIES: 1 PAGES:
TAB: 1
DOC ID: 31205989
45
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file: FOLDER TITLE: Hurley's Final Report Chpts. 3-5 [2o£2] DOCUMENT DATE:
DOCUMENT TYPE: Draft
FROM: TO: SUBJECT:
4.1, Version 062104
This document has been withdrawn for the following reason(s): 9/11 Classified Information
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE RG: 148 Exposition, Anniversary, and Memorial Commissions SERIES: Team 3,9/11 Commission NND PROJECT NUMBER:
52100
FOIA CASE NUMBER: 31107
WITHDRAWAL DATE: 11/18/2008
BOX: 00003
FOLDER: 0014
COPIES: 1 PAGES:
TAB: 2
DOC ID: 31205990
42
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file: FOLDER TITLE: Hurley's Final Report Chpts. 3-5 [2of2] DOCUMENT DATE: 06/16/2004
DOCUMENT TYPE: Draft
FROM: TO: SUBJECT:
Chapter 5, Team 3 Edits
This document has been withdrawn for the following reason(s): 9/11 Classified Information
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE RG: 148 Exposition, Anniversary, and Memorial Commissions SERIES: Team 3, 9/11 Commission NND PROJECT NUMBER:
52100
FOIA CASE NUMBER: 31107
WITHDRAWAL DATE: 11/18/2008
BOX: 00003
TAB: 3
FOLDER: 0014
COPIES: 1 PAGES:
DOC ID: 31205991
1 _ACCESS
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file: FOLDER TITLE: Hurley's Final Report Chpts. 3-5 [2of2] DOCUMENT DATE: 06/16/2004
DOCUMENT TYPE: Draft
FROM: TO: SUBJECT:
Final Report draft
This document has been withdrawn for the following reason(s): 9/11 Classified Information
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE RG: 148 Exposition, Anniversary, and Memorial Commissions SERIES: Team 3, 9/11 Commission NND PROJECT NUMBER:
52100
FOIA CASE NUMBER: 31107
WITHDRAWAL DATE: 11/18/2008
BOX: 00003
TAB: 4
FOLDER: 0014
COPIES: 1 PAGES:
DOC ID: 31205992
27
_ACCESs The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file: FOLDER TITLE: Hurley's Final Report Chpts. 3-5 [2o£2] DOCUMENT DATE: 06/21/2004
DOCUMENT TYPE: Draft
FROM: TO: SUBJECT:
Gorelick Notes on Chapters
This document has been withdrawn for the following reason(s): 9/11 Classified Information
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE RG: 148 Exposition, Anniversary, and Memorial Commissions SERIES: Team 3,9/11 Commission NND PROJECT NUMBER:
52100
FOIA CASE NUMBER: 31107
WITHDRAWAL DATE: 11/18/2008
BOX: 00003
FOLDER: 0014
COPIES: 1 PAGES:
TAB: 5
DOC ID: 31205993
56
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file: FOLDER TITLE: Hurley's Final Report Chpts. 3-5 [2o£2] DOCUMENT DATE:
DOCUMENT TYPE: Draft
FROM: TO: SUBJECT:
Chapter 6, Version 061804
This document has been withdrawn for the following reason(s): 9/11 Classified Information
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE
Page 1 of 1
Mike Hurley From:
Mike Hurley
Sent:
Monday, June 14, 2004 10:41 AM
To:
Team 3
Subject: Tim Roemer's Comments on Chapter 5
Teammies: Tim Roemer stopped by for a 15 minute chat before the Commission meeting began. He said he had some concerns about Chapter 5. His points follow: Page 7: There's a reference to an al Qaeda planes' operation in January 2000. The U.S. had a "fleeting glimpse" into aQ's preparation for this operation. Tim found the "fleeting glimpse" language to be a dig against the Clinton administration. Page 10: A discussion of the Gingrich supplemental to CIA. Tim thinks there should be more on George Tenet's approach, on what he was doing. Page 11: Similar to above point. There's a statement that the CIA remained under funded for any real attack on al Qaeda. Tim believes this is absolving CIA from its responsibilities. It's reducing everything to a question of resources and funding. He wands to see more on leadership and management at CIA. How did CIA's leaders manage the funds, what priorities did they target money against. Page 17: Near the top of the page. Deals with UBL and the Cole. There's a statement to the effect that they had not hit him yet; he wished they would; he was perhaps thinking this would enhance his prestige. This refers to UBL. Tim wants to know how anyone knows what he was "perhaps thinking." What is this based on? Isn't it just totally interpretative. Page 23: dispute over delay in transition during election controversy. Text says the dispute cut by half the transition period. And that it exacerbated the rancorous partisanship of the Clinton era. Tim thinks the "rancorous partisanship" is highly judgmental. Transition: Tim thinks the draft of Chapter 5 doesn't sufficiently highlight the change in Clarke's status (being bounced from the PC, being unable to call a PC). Tim also wants to see the Roger Cressey quote of Clarke—"there goes our ability to get quick decisions"—included. Text on the Millennium: Says the principals met more often than normal during the millennium. Tim thinks this understates the involvement of principals. Berger told us the small group principals met every day in the run up to the millennium. Does the text refer to Principals Committee meetings, or to principals' small group meetings? If the latter, then the phrase "met more often than normal," likely does understate the frequency of meetings. Mike
6/14/2004
Page 1 of 1
Mike Hurley From:
Alexis Albion
Sent:
Monday, June 14, 2004 10:52 AM
To:
Stephanie Kaplan
Cc:
Team 3
Subject: chapter 5
Stephanie: It's come to our attention that there are some major differences between the texts (not just copy edits but rewritten passages) in the 06/08/04 version of Chapter 5 (which you sent us on 06/11) and the 06/07/04 version (sent on 06/07). As we're going through the chapter fixing footnotes and offering comments to the FO we just want to make sure we're all working off the same version. Ideally this would be the latest version, but perhaps most practical would be to work off the version sent to Commissioners. Thanks for looking into this, Alexis
6/14/2004
Page 1 of 1
Mike Hurley From:
Mike Hurley
Sent:
Friday, June 11, 2004 3:04 PM
To:
Stephanie Kaplan; Steve Dunne
Cc:
Team 3; Sarah Linden; Nicole Grandrimo
Subject: Mike H review of Section 5.4 footnotes
Stephanie and Steve: Please check your classified email for a message from me containing my review of Section 5.4 footnotes. I've attached to that message a draft of chapter 5 with my edits to Section 5.4 "tracked." Please note that when Ernest May edited Chapter 5, he rolled into Section 5.4 some text that Warren had drafted for Section 5.5. I defer to Warren's review of footnotes related to that material. Thanks, Mike
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
Mike Hurley From:
Mike Hurley
Sent:
Friday, June 11, 2004 3:42 PM
To:
Stephanie Kaplan; Steve Dunne
Cc:
Team 3; Nicole Grandrimo; Sarah Linden
Subject: From Mike H footnote review of Section 5.4 Stephanie and Steve: Attached please find a draft of Chapter 5 containing my edits to Section 5.4. I used "track changes" to highlight a couple of additions to the footnotes. The footnotes aligned with the text. But portions of the footnotes had been chopped. And a couple of the footnotes, as edited, were misleading. I've tried to make the necessary corrections. While I drafted much of 5.4., Ernest May rolled into that section a couple of pages that Warren had drafted for Section 5.5. I defer to Warren for comments on footnotes connected to text that he drafted. Thanks, Mike
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
Mike Hurley From:
Stephanie Kaplan
Sent:
Friday, June 11, 2004 1:23 PM
To:
Team 3
Cc:
Steve Dunne
Subject: FW: Chapters 5 Team 3: Attached is the copyedited version of Chapter 5. PLEASE do not accept or reject changes made by Alice. ONLY use this version to check footnotes. DO NOT add textual edits at this stage UNLESS it relates to the fixing the footnotes. We will review Alice's edits (and yours) at a later date. The goal here is to get one draft with correct footnotes, after which we can address grammatical and substantive edits. Mixing the two at this stage will thoroughly confuse my feeble brain. Thanks, Stephanie —Original Message From: Alice Falk Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 2:54 PM To: Stephanie Kaplan Subject: RE: Chapters 5 Stephanie, Here's 5. Alice
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
Mike Hurley From:
Mike Hurley
Sent:
Wednesday, June 09, 2004 7:22 AM
To:
Alexis Albion; Warren Bass; Sarah Linden; Nicole Grandrimo; Mike Hurley
Cc:
Steve Dunne; Stephanie Kaplan
Subject: FW: Footnotes for Chapter 5
Just a reminder that we owe Steve Dunne a review of the footnoting of our respective sections of Chapter 5. Thanks, Mike Original Message From: Mike Hurley Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:37 AM To: Warren Bass; Alexis Albion; Nicole Grandrimo; Sarah Linden Cc: Mike Hurley; Steve Dunne; Stephanie Kaplan Subject: Footnotes for Chapter 5
Sarah/Niki/Warren/Alexis: Steve Dunne asked that we review the current draft of Chapter 5 to ensure that the footnote (endnote) numbers in the text match up with the footnotes or endnotes themselves. Stephanie sent the latest version of Chapter 5 (as of 6/7) to each of you via classified email. Please work off that text and review the footnoting in your respective sections of 5 to see that everything lines up. Steve would like to hear from us by COB Wednesday June 9 on the status of the Chapter 5 footnotes. This review will help the "footnote team" do its work once the chapter is put into its hands for footnote formatting. Thanks, Mike
l/'fc-
6/9/2004
52100
FOIA CASE NUMBER: 31107
WITHDRAWAL DATE: 11/18/2008
BOX: 00003
FOLDER: 0014
COPIES: 1 PAGES:
TAB: 1
DOC ID: 31205989
45
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file: FOLDER TITLE: Hurley's Final Report Chpts. 3-5 [2o£2] DOCUMENT DATE:
DOCUMENT TYPE: Draft
FROM: TO: SUBJECT:
4.1, Version 062104
This document has been withdrawn for the following reason(s): 9/11 Classified Information
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE RG: 148 Exposition, Anniversary, and Memorial Commissions SERIES: Team 3,9/11 Commission NND PROJECT NUMBER:
52100
FOIA CASE NUMBER: 31107
WITHDRAWAL DATE: 11/18/2008
BOX: 00003
FOLDER: 0014
COPIES: 1 PAGES:
TAB: 2
DOC ID: 31205990
42
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file: FOLDER TITLE: Hurley's Final Report Chpts. 3-5 [2of2] DOCUMENT DATE: 06/16/2004
DOCUMENT TYPE: Draft
FROM: TO: SUBJECT:
Chapter 5, Team 3 Edits
This document has been withdrawn for the following reason(s): 9/11 Classified Information
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE RG: 148 Exposition, Anniversary, and Memorial Commissions SERIES: Team 3, 9/11 Commission NND PROJECT NUMBER:
52100
FOIA CASE NUMBER: 31107
WITHDRAWAL DATE: 11/18/2008
BOX: 00003
TAB: 3
FOLDER: 0014
COPIES: 1 PAGES:
DOC ID: 31205991
1 _ACCESS
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file: FOLDER TITLE: Hurley's Final Report Chpts. 3-5 [2of2] DOCUMENT DATE: 06/16/2004
DOCUMENT TYPE: Draft
FROM: TO: SUBJECT:
Final Report draft
This document has been withdrawn for the following reason(s): 9/11 Classified Information
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE RG: 148 Exposition, Anniversary, and Memorial Commissions SERIES: Team 3, 9/11 Commission NND PROJECT NUMBER:
52100
FOIA CASE NUMBER: 31107
WITHDRAWAL DATE: 11/18/2008
BOX: 00003
TAB: 4
FOLDER: 0014
COPIES: 1 PAGES:
DOC ID: 31205992
27
_ACCESs The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file: FOLDER TITLE: Hurley's Final Report Chpts. 3-5 [2o£2] DOCUMENT DATE: 06/21/2004
DOCUMENT TYPE: Draft
FROM: TO: SUBJECT:
Gorelick Notes on Chapters
This document has been withdrawn for the following reason(s): 9/11 Classified Information
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE RG: 148 Exposition, Anniversary, and Memorial Commissions SERIES: Team 3,9/11 Commission NND PROJECT NUMBER:
52100
FOIA CASE NUMBER: 31107
WITHDRAWAL DATE: 11/18/2008
BOX: 00003
FOLDER: 0014
COPIES: 1 PAGES:
TAB: 5
DOC ID: 31205993
56
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file: FOLDER TITLE: Hurley's Final Report Chpts. 3-5 [2o£2] DOCUMENT DATE:
DOCUMENT TYPE: Draft
FROM: TO: SUBJECT:
Chapter 6, Version 061804
This document has been withdrawn for the following reason(s): 9/11 Classified Information
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE
Page 1 of 1
Mike Hurley From:
Mike Hurley
Sent:
Monday, June 14, 2004 10:41 AM
To:
Team 3
Subject: Tim Roemer's Comments on Chapter 5
Teammies: Tim Roemer stopped by for a 15 minute chat before the Commission meeting began. He said he had some concerns about Chapter 5. His points follow: Page 7: There's a reference to an al Qaeda planes' operation in January 2000. The U.S. had a "fleeting glimpse" into aQ's preparation for this operation. Tim found the "fleeting glimpse" language to be a dig against the Clinton administration. Page 10: A discussion of the Gingrich supplemental to CIA. Tim thinks there should be more on George Tenet's approach, on what he was doing. Page 11: Similar to above point. There's a statement that the CIA remained under funded for any real attack on al Qaeda. Tim believes this is absolving CIA from its responsibilities. It's reducing everything to a question of resources and funding. He wands to see more on leadership and management at CIA. How did CIA's leaders manage the funds, what priorities did they target money against. Page 17: Near the top of the page. Deals with UBL and the Cole. There's a statement to the effect that they had not hit him yet; he wished they would; he was perhaps thinking this would enhance his prestige. This refers to UBL. Tim wants to know how anyone knows what he was "perhaps thinking." What is this based on? Isn't it just totally interpretative. Page 23: dispute over delay in transition during election controversy. Text says the dispute cut by half the transition period. And that it exacerbated the rancorous partisanship of the Clinton era. Tim thinks the "rancorous partisanship" is highly judgmental. Transition: Tim thinks the draft of Chapter 5 doesn't sufficiently highlight the change in Clarke's status (being bounced from the PC, being unable to call a PC). Tim also wants to see the Roger Cressey quote of Clarke—"there goes our ability to get quick decisions"—included. Text on the Millennium: Says the principals met more often than normal during the millennium. Tim thinks this understates the involvement of principals. Berger told us the small group principals met every day in the run up to the millennium. Does the text refer to Principals Committee meetings, or to principals' small group meetings? If the latter, then the phrase "met more often than normal," likely does understate the frequency of meetings. Mike
6/14/2004
Page 1 of 1
Mike Hurley From:
Alexis Albion
Sent:
Monday, June 14, 2004 10:52 AM
To:
Stephanie Kaplan
Cc:
Team 3
Subject: chapter 5
Stephanie: It's come to our attention that there are some major differences between the texts (not just copy edits but rewritten passages) in the 06/08/04 version of Chapter 5 (which you sent us on 06/11) and the 06/07/04 version (sent on 06/07). As we're going through the chapter fixing footnotes and offering comments to the FO we just want to make sure we're all working off the same version. Ideally this would be the latest version, but perhaps most practical would be to work off the version sent to Commissioners. Thanks for looking into this, Alexis
6/14/2004
Page 1 of 1
Mike Hurley From:
Mike Hurley
Sent:
Friday, June 11, 2004 3:04 PM
To:
Stephanie Kaplan; Steve Dunne
Cc:
Team 3; Sarah Linden; Nicole Grandrimo
Subject: Mike H review of Section 5.4 footnotes
Stephanie and Steve: Please check your classified email for a message from me containing my review of Section 5.4 footnotes. I've attached to that message a draft of chapter 5 with my edits to Section 5.4 "tracked." Please note that when Ernest May edited Chapter 5, he rolled into Section 5.4 some text that Warren had drafted for Section 5.5. I defer to Warren's review of footnotes related to that material. Thanks, Mike
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
Mike Hurley From:
Mike Hurley
Sent:
Friday, June 11, 2004 3:42 PM
To:
Stephanie Kaplan; Steve Dunne
Cc:
Team 3; Nicole Grandrimo; Sarah Linden
Subject: From Mike H footnote review of Section 5.4 Stephanie and Steve: Attached please find a draft of Chapter 5 containing my edits to Section 5.4. I used "track changes" to highlight a couple of additions to the footnotes. The footnotes aligned with the text. But portions of the footnotes had been chopped. And a couple of the footnotes, as edited, were misleading. I've tried to make the necessary corrections. While I drafted much of 5.4., Ernest May rolled into that section a couple of pages that Warren had drafted for Section 5.5. I defer to Warren for comments on footnotes connected to text that he drafted. Thanks, Mike
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
Mike Hurley From:
Stephanie Kaplan
Sent:
Friday, June 11, 2004 1:23 PM
To:
Team 3
Cc:
Steve Dunne
Subject: FW: Chapters 5 Team 3: Attached is the copyedited version of Chapter 5. PLEASE do not accept or reject changes made by Alice. ONLY use this version to check footnotes. DO NOT add textual edits at this stage UNLESS it relates to the fixing the footnotes. We will review Alice's edits (and yours) at a later date. The goal here is to get one draft with correct footnotes, after which we can address grammatical and substantive edits. Mixing the two at this stage will thoroughly confuse my feeble brain. Thanks, Stephanie —Original Message From: Alice Falk Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 2:54 PM To: Stephanie Kaplan Subject: RE: Chapters 5 Stephanie, Here's 5. Alice
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
Mike Hurley From:
Mike Hurley
Sent:
Wednesday, June 09, 2004 7:22 AM
To:
Alexis Albion; Warren Bass; Sarah Linden; Nicole Grandrimo; Mike Hurley
Cc:
Steve Dunne; Stephanie Kaplan
Subject: FW: Footnotes for Chapter 5
Just a reminder that we owe Steve Dunne a review of the footnoting of our respective sections of Chapter 5. Thanks, Mike Original Message From: Mike Hurley Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:37 AM To: Warren Bass; Alexis Albion; Nicole Grandrimo; Sarah Linden Cc: Mike Hurley; Steve Dunne; Stephanie Kaplan Subject: Footnotes for Chapter 5
Sarah/Niki/Warren/Alexis: Steve Dunne asked that we review the current draft of Chapter 5 to ensure that the footnote (endnote) numbers in the text match up with the footnotes or endnotes themselves. Stephanie sent the latest version of Chapter 5 (as of 6/7) to each of you via classified email. Please work off that text and review the footnoting in your respective sections of 5 to see that everything lines up. Steve would like to hear from us by COB Wednesday June 9 on the status of the Chapter 5 footnotes. This review will help the "footnote team" do its work once the chapter is put into its hands for footnote formatting. Thanks, Mike
l/'fc-
6/9/2004
Related Documents
More Documents from "9/11 Document Archive"
Letter To 9/11 Commission About John Kerry
April 2020 0
