T2 B18 Congressional Oversight 1 Of 2 Fdr- Emails From Berkowitz Re Choices For Congressional Oversight Hearing (pg 1 Of 2nd Pg Not In File) 765
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View T2 B18 Congressional Oversight 1 Of 2 Fdr- Emails From Berkowitz Re Choices For Congressional Oversight Hearing (pg 1 Of 2nd Pg Not In File) 765 as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 523
- Pages: 2
Mail:: INBOX: Re Congressional Experts
&
§*
ft
88
P
2
Page 1 of 1
?
@1
5
fe
®
«3
INBOX Compose Folders Options Search Problem? Help Addressbook Tasks Memos Calendar Logout
13
Open Folder -
4.50MB /476.84MB (0.94%)
INBOX: Re Congressional Experts (3 of 102)
Co Move i copy [This message to
Delete | Reply | Reply to All j Forward | Redirect | Blacklist | Message Source | Resume | Save as | Print Date: Mon, 05 May 200319:10:09-0700 From: "Bruce BerkowitzQ-lomeV'l9/11 Personal Privacy) To;|
9/11 personal Privacy 11 commission.gov> 44 Reply-to9/11 Personal Privacy
Back to INBOX < >
I "Lederman. Gordon (9-11 Commission)"
Subject: Re Congressional Experts Partfs): [|^ 2 unnamed message/rfc822 2.28 KB jjgj Kevin, Gordon -
I asked one of myhoover colleagues for recommendations, thought you might find it useful — Bruce (D 2.1 unnamed text/plain 0.96 KB |Jgj
Probably the best is Steve Smith at Wash U. Knows everything about Congress and is extremely talkative, interesting, funny, etc. Joel Aberbach at UCLA is very knowledgeable about oversight, but he won't be a spellbinding talker. Richard Hall at Michigan is very knowledgeable, but I have never heard him give a talk. These are the ones who occur to me off the top.
At 06:37 PM 5/1/03 -0400, you wrote: >Terry — I'm working with the commission investigating the 9-11 >terrorist attacks. We'd like to look at the issue of congressional >oversight of intelligence by contracting three or so experts on the >subject to take part in conference calls, perhaps a seminar or two, etc. > >I was thinking of a Dick Fenno type -- someone who was a generalist on >Congress who understood the oversight process in several areas, and who >was personable enough to keep the attention of the commissioners. > >Anyone come to mind? > >Bruce ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^i
9/11 Personal Privacy
Delete | Reply | Reply to All | Forward | Redirect | Blacklist j Message Source | Resume | Save as j Print Back to INBOX <3 t>
Move | Copy' This message to [_]
http://kinesis.swishmail.com/webmail/imp/message.php?index= 100
5/6/2003
Mail :: INBOX: Resources on Congressional Oversight
Page 2 of 2
2. Hire 2-3 senior scholars on congressional oversight to prepare a seminar for the members. The scholars should be senior enough and have communication skills such that the commissioners would view this as an opportunity to discuss the issue with experts. The scholars would each write a paper or prepare a briefing on the problem of oversight, with special emphasis on the problems presented by intelligence and other terrorism-related topics. The objective is to make intelligence/counterterrorism oversight a routine part of the congressional process, and get a broad perspective on the problems of oversight as they apply to the new CT threat. I'd suggest Dick Fenno if he is available. Morris Fiorina from Stanford might also be good. Regards, B
################################################################# ################################################################# #######§######################################################### ##### ##### ##### ##############t################################################## «###tt############################################################ ########################t########################################
Delete | Reply | Reply to All | Forward | Redirect | Blacklist | Message Source | Resume | Save as | Print Back to INBOX ^
Move | copy This message to
http://kinesis.swishmail.com/webmail/imp/message.php?index=90
5/4/2003
&
§*
ft
88
P
2
Page 1 of 1
?
@1
5
fe
®
«3
INBOX Compose Folders Options Search Problem? Help Addressbook Tasks Memos Calendar Logout
13
Open Folder -
4.50MB /476.84MB (0.94%)
INBOX: Re Congressional Experts (3 of 102)
Co Move i copy [This message to
Delete | Reply | Reply to All j Forward | Redirect | Blacklist | Message Source | Resume | Save as | Print Date: Mon, 05 May 200319:10:09-0700 From: "Bruce BerkowitzQ-lomeV'l9/11 Personal Privacy) To;|
9/11 personal Privacy 11 commission.gov> 44 Reply-to9/11 Personal Privacy
Back to INBOX < >
I "Lederman. Gordon (9-11 Commission)"
Subject: Re Congressional Experts Partfs): [|^ 2 unnamed message/rfc822 2.28 KB jjgj Kevin, Gordon -
I asked one of myhoover colleagues for recommendations, thought you might find it useful — Bruce (D 2.1 unnamed text/plain 0.96 KB |Jgj
Probably the best is Steve Smith at Wash U. Knows everything about Congress and is extremely talkative, interesting, funny, etc. Joel Aberbach at UCLA is very knowledgeable about oversight, but he won't be a spellbinding talker. Richard Hall at Michigan is very knowledgeable, but I have never heard him give a talk. These are the ones who occur to me off the top.
At 06:37 PM 5/1/03 -0400, you wrote: >Terry — I'm working with the commission investigating the 9-11 >terrorist attacks. We'd like to look at the issue of congressional >oversight of intelligence by contracting three or so experts on the >subject to take part in conference calls, perhaps a seminar or two, etc. > >I was thinking of a Dick Fenno type -- someone who was a generalist on >Congress who understood the oversight process in several areas, and who >was personable enough to keep the attention of the commissioners. > >Anyone come to mind? > >Bruce ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^i
9/11 Personal Privacy
Delete | Reply | Reply to All | Forward | Redirect | Blacklist j Message Source | Resume | Save as j Print Back to INBOX <3 t>
Move | Copy' This message to [_]
http://kinesis.swishmail.com/webmail/imp/message.php?index= 100
5/6/2003
Mail :: INBOX: Resources on Congressional Oversight
Page 2 of 2
2. Hire 2-3 senior scholars on congressional oversight to prepare a seminar for the members. The scholars should be senior enough and have communication skills such that the commissioners would view this as an opportunity to discuss the issue with experts. The scholars would each write a paper or prepare a briefing on the problem of oversight, with special emphasis on the problems presented by intelligence and other terrorism-related topics. The objective is to make intelligence/counterterrorism oversight a routine part of the congressional process, and get a broad perspective on the problems of oversight as they apply to the new CT threat. I'd suggest Dick Fenno if he is available. Morris Fiorina from Stanford might also be good. Regards, B
################################################################# ################################################################# #######§######################################################### ##### ##### ##### ##############t################################################## «###tt############################################################ ########################t########################################
Delete | Reply | Reply to All | Forward | Redirect | Blacklist | Message Source | Resume | Save as | Print Back to INBOX ^
Move | copy This message to
http://kinesis.swishmail.com/webmail/imp/message.php?index=90
5/4/2003
Related Documents
Congressional Oversight Panel
June 2020 5More Documents from ""
Letter To 9/11 Commission About John Kerry
April 2020 0
