T1a B50 Pleadings Fdr- Entire Contents- Court Docs- 1st Pgs For Ref 514

FindLow

WWW.FINDLAW.COM

HE&Snmd/2002R00760 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

*

v.

CRIMINAL NO.

*

(Obtaining Falsely Made or Unlawfully Obtaining Visa, RASMI SUBHI SALEH AL SHANNAQ * 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a)) ....oOo.... INDICTMENT The Grand Jury for the District of Maryland charges that: On or about October 3, 2000, RASMI SUBHI SALEH AL SHANNAQ did obtain from the United States Embassy in Doha, Qatar a United States nonimmigrant visa knowing that said visa had been falsely made and otherwise unlawfully obtained.

18 U.S.C. Sections 1546(a), 3238

Thomas M. DiBiagio United States Attorney

A TRUE BILL

Poreperson

Date

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) ) EYAD M. ALRABABAH, ) ) Defendant )

Criminal Number Count 1:18 U.S.C. § 1028(f) (conspiracy to commit identification document fraud) Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(l), (b)(l)(A)(ii), and (c)(3)(A) (unlawful production of identification documents), and § 2 (aiding and abetting) INDICTMENT

MARCH 2002 TERM - AT ALEXANDRIA Introductory Allegations to Counts 1 and 2

THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT: 1. To obtain a Virginia identification card or Virginia driver's license, an applicant must ordinarily present the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) proof of identity and Virginia residence. The DMV requires two official identification documents as proof of identity and one official or business document as proof of Virginia residence. Prior to September 21, 2001, however, applicants lacking the required documentary proof of identity and Virginia residence could complete and submit DMV forms DL6 and DL51 in lieu of the required documents. 2. DMV form DL6 is an identity affidavit. Prior to September 21, 2001, the DMV would accept a properly completed DL6 form in lieu of one of the two identification documents required to apply for a license or identification card. The form requires the applicant to provide and to swear to his name, address, and basic biographic information. The form further requires the sworn, notarized certification of an attorney. Through the certification, the attorney swears

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v.

) ) ) Criminal Number )

ABDEL RAHMAN OMAR TAWFIQ ALFAURU Defendant

)

) )

Affidavit in Support of a Criminal Cgmplamt and an Arrest. Warrant L, Peter W. Ashooh, being duly sworn, depose and state:

.

1. I am a special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), United States Department of Justice, assigned to the Washington Field Office, I have been employed by the FBI as a^special agent since 1984. My primary duties are to investigate Organized Crime matters. 2. This affidavit contains information necessary to support probable cause for this application, It is not intended to include each and every fact and matter observed by me or known by the government. The information provided is based on my personal knowledge and observations during the course of this investigation, information conveyed to me by other law enforcement officials, and my review of records, documents and other physical evidence obtained during this investigation. 3. This application is submitted in support of a criminal complaint and arrest warrant charging Abdel Rahman Omar Tawfiq Alfauru with unlawfully producing an identification document, and aiding and abetting the same, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2 and lQ28(a)(l), (b)(l)(A)(ii), and (e)(3)(A). In particular, I believe that Alfauru has

if t 1 ?

FindLow WWW.FINDLAW.COM

i^ THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AGUS BUDIMAN, Defendant

) ) ) Criminal Number 02-74-A ) ) ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT

Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, and John T. Morton, Assistant United States Attorney, and the defendant, Agus Budiman, and the defendant's counsel, William B. Moffitt and Pleasant S. Brodnax, III, pursuant to Rule 1 l(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, have entered into an agreement, the terms and conditions of which are as follows: . The defendant, Agus Budiman, agrees to plead guilty to count two of the pending indictment. Count two charges the defendant with identification document fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028(a)(l), (b)(l)(A)(ii), and (c)(3)(A), and Section 2. The maximum penalty for this offense is a term of fifteen years of imprisonment, a fine of $250,000, a special assessment, and three years of supervised release. The defendant is aware that this supervised release term is in addition to any prison term the defendant may receive, and that a violation of a term of supervised release could result in the defendant being returned to prison for the full term of supervised release. Upon the Court's acceptance of this plea, the United States will move to dismiss the remaining count of the indictment (count one) against this defendant. . Before sentencing in this case, the defendant agrees to pay a mandatory special assessment of one hundred dollars ($100.00) per count of conviction.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AGUS BUDIMAN, Defendant

) ) ) Criminal Number 02-74-A ) ) ) ) STATEMENT OF FACTS

The United States and the defendant, Agus Budiman, agree that had this matter proceeded to trial, the United States would have proven the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt: 1. The defendant, Agus Budiman, is a citizen of Indonesia currently in the United States unlawfully. The defendant's mother tongue is Indonesian, although he speaks and understands English. 2. Virginia identification cards and Virginia driver's licenses are identification documents made and issued by and under the authority of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Their production is in and effects interstate commerce. 3. To obtain a Virginia driver's license or identification card, an applicant must ordinarily present the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) documentary proof of Virginia residence. Prior to September 21, 2001, however, an applicant lacking documentary proof of Virginia residence could complete and submit DMV form DL51 in lieu of the required proof. 4. DMV form DL51 is a residency certification. Prior to September 21, 2001, the DMV would accept a properly completed DL51 form in lieu of documentary proof of Virginia

IL K AO 91 (Rav. IVgSi CMmln

2691= United States Di.shn.ci Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

CLERK. US, DISTRICT COURT ALEXANDRIA. VII6INIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

V.

OiO£>£fc ^£AL

MOBAJVCEOABDI

CASE NUMBER: Q / -

I. .tha undersigned complainant being duly sworn state the following is true and comet to the Dest of my knowledge and belief. From In or QbOUt _flflftjltf 1399 through Jme IQOt in the

gariera

District of

in Arilntton County tad Aleiindrta

Vlndria (he defendant did

knowingly t&A utUtwfnlly mite, ntter, ud possess • ftrjed twaittr Of » State and political ntbdhrfiton ttcrcuf nd of an orgftulzntlon, with Intent to dectlvc wathv pinnn, orgurfzatfia, ud goTtrmnent

In vtoletlon of THJ« ,

. United State* Cede. 3««lon(s)

I further state that I am a(n) Sataa AMiit and that this complaint la based on tha following facts: See Attached Afin&tft

Continued on tho attached shaat and mada a part hereof AU8A- Robert A. Spencer

Sworn to »3*for» me and subscribed (n my presence, September 23. 2001 DM* ilad Snla» Maattrrao Judg» _ RawIM r>°na^- Jr.. Unll NamaATItts Tltts ol JmDo'al OfRcar

Kevin W.Aihby Spiciil Agent.

Federal Bureau of Investigation