Retreat May 2009

  • Uploaded by: Parents' Coalition of Montgomery County, Maryland
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Retreat May 2009 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 628
  • Pages: 3
MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION RETREAT May 8, 2009

The Board of Education of Montgomery County met in retreat on May 8, 2009, at the Rockville Public Library, Rockville, Maryland , and beginning at 9:00 a.m. Present:

Ms. Shirley Brandman, President in the Chair Mr. Christopher Barclay Ms. Laura Berthiaume Dr. Judy Docca Mr. Philip Kauffman Mrs. Patricia O=Neill Dr. Jerry Weast, Secretary/Treasurer

Staff Present:

Mr. Larry Bowers, Chief Operating Officer Dr. Frieda Lacey, Deputy Superintendentof Schools Mr. Brian Edwards, Superintendent=s Chief of Staff Mr. Roland Ikheloa, Board=s Chief of Staff Ms. Suzann King, Staff Assistant Ms. Laura Steinberg, Staff Assistant Mrs. Glenda Rose, Board=s Administrative Secretary

Facilitators:

Dr. Barbara Anderson, Panasonic Foundation Mr. Andrew Gelber, Panasonic Foundation

The facilitators lead the sessions to collect information from the Board members which are cited below: NORMS 1. All contributions are valuable 2. Disagrees without being personal 3. Focused listening/active listening 4. Respect for different perspectives 5. Assume good intentions 6. No person dominates the discussion 7. When closure is accomplished, go on to the next topic 8. Speak your truth 9. Seek to understand before passing judgment 10. Name the elephant in the room 11. When necessary, apply the “red flag” rule CORE VALUES -- what’s missing from draft?

1

1. Students learning “to highest potential” 2. Student outcomes not predictable by … Pages 7 and 12– Strategic Plan 3. Number 7 – … provide instruction, learning, opportuni ties and environments to meet … 4. Number 4 … comprehensive early years program … GUIDING QUESTIONS   



   

Measurements, accountability to know what works and doesn’t for student achievement (budget constraints and allocation) Core Value #6 Experienced and effective teachers and administrators to work with neediest population -- Core Value #5 Clear outcomes drive policies that provide specific guidance to stay the course on commitment to improving performance for all students– Core Value #6 Balanced data outcomes with attention to the respect for individual needs of individual students to ensure developing appropriate practices– Core Value #7 Focus on an equity policy that is comprehensive– Core Value #3 Professional development focus on high expectations forall students and parent outreach -- Core Value #2 Ensure existing policies reflect Core Values and Equity Build capacity of Board, staff, and parents to ensure equity and excellence throughout MCPS Board policies must communicate high expectations– Core Value #2

 BOARD PROCESS  



Less is more – Core Values driving policies and revision s with alignment to Core Values at all levels Balance between the need for administration to provide updates to the Board and the Board’s need to query and evaluate issues todetermine whether “staying the course” (include self evaluation) Board to exercise leadership by establishing a context for community engagement and articulating vision 1. not your business 2. administrative support to do business 3. effective voice of constituents 4. good champions

EQUITY What definition of equity do we think MCPS is already doing? What is still missing?

2

  

Equity Framework Leading to equity – shared statements Core Values

REFRAMING TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT       

Create a balance between responsiveness and “setting limits” on demands to retain focus on “greater good” Create an environment that fosters productive community engagement Town hall meetings in specific communities, strategically designed toshare information and engage constituents Innovation in getting our story out – new tools, new outreach, new audiences Board dialogue with civic, service, and student groups Board more proactive and intentionregarding engagement Board members carry same message to allconstituents

NEXT STEPS 1. Ad Hoc Committee review suggestions 2. Send out revised draft to the Board 3. Go to Strategic Planning Committee on May 20, 2009 The retreat finished at 4:45 p.m.

3

Related Documents

Retreat May 2009
May 2020 2
Retreat
May 2020 25
Retreat
May 2020 18
Retreat
June 2020 21

More Documents from "Parents' Coalition of Montgomery County, Maryland"