Psychopathology Week #5 - 9/27/2006 Attachment Theory -
-
-
-
-
-
A complex, flexible and adaptable mental network that is grounded in neuronal connections o Adaptive and necessary for healthy development relationship and personality development from infancy to adulthood people have a biological behavior pattern to maintain proximity btw themselves & other human beings people are social beings, hard wired for intimacy and connection Babies brains are 70% undeveloped o Leaves most of brain able to be shaped by environment o Early experiences have huge impact Harlow’s Monkeys Study o Shows that there is another drive outside Freud’s (the drive to be gratified – food) The need for nurturing, warmth, security o Brains were not fully developed if the natural attachment was disrupted They sought isolation, did not seek socialization Abused/neglected children have less brain mass, underdeveloped brains Bulbe’s idea o Important in childhood, but important through lifespan Needed to teach babies how to regulate their emotions & express their emotions Child develops an internal working model from early interactions o Relates to this model to relate to the world o Harsh, critical parents leads to harsh, critical view of future relationships Learns how to regulate in several ways o Seeks proximity to caregiver to help deal o Leads to the caregiver inside for self regulation Goal: Felt Security o Maintaining proximity to attachment figure Biologically predisposed o Look to attachment figure for safety haven, a secure base for exploration Strange situation experiment o Observe baby with mother in room, observe baby when mother left, observe baby with stranger in room, observe baby when mother comes back into the room w/ stranger o Categorizations: o Secure – initially distressed, able to explore Seeks mother when in distress – as a secure base Easily soothed Mother tended to be more accessible to children & attuned, helped them regulate their affect
Stranger entrance – apprehensive, playful w/ stranger Mother comes back – back went back to mother Tend to be more empathic and secure w/ interpersonal relationships o Anxious/Avoidant Played w/ toys when mother around, didn’t have interaction w/ mother Mother left – didn’t display distress Emotions are rigidly regulated, typically redirect emotions to environment – avoidant, withhold desire for closeness Stranger – avoidant Mother comes back – don’t seem to care Adults – unavailable/unresponsive. Avoidant emotionally Don’t have positive models of people o Anxious/Resistant Clingy w/ caregivers before separation Mother leaves – distressed Stranger – guarded Mother comes back – ambivalent Don’t use caregiver to regulate emotions Express exaggerated emotions to get response Experience caregivers as unavailable & unresponsive o Disorganized/Disoriented Don’t show a clear pattern Adult attachment interview o Narrative interview about relationships, 4 categories o Secure/Autonomous Value attachment relationships, aware of relationships impact on life Others were discussed as believable characters – not all good or all bad More open and direct o Dismissing Links to anxious/avoidant babies Responded incoherently Idealized childhood Denied early attachment influences Don’t see link from childhood to who they are in adulthood o Preoccupied Links to resistance babies Responded incoherently Exhibited confusion, oscillating about past experiences (good & bad)
-
Tend to describe parents as either angry or passive. Also describe them as involved but non-loving o Unresolved/Disorganized Disorientation of process and content of interview Most likely experienced trauma, abuse in childhood Links to disorganized/disoriented babies o Parents tended to have babies in the same categories “Attachment applies to all humans from the cradle to the grave” ~Bulbe Focuses on separation, loss & togetherness - explains how loneliness and love are related Similar emotional/behavioral dynamics from mother-child and adult romantic relationships
-