Presentation Novisad Gsg

interim

New intermodal liner concepts in the CADSES region

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes INTERREG IIIB CADSES

Neighbourhood Programme 4th Call

WORKSHOP Novi Sad New liner concepts and new concepts for value added services in the intermodal market 07.11.2007 INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

New intermodal liner concepts in the CADSES region

Agenda 1. Overview – Definition of „New liner services“ 2. Methodology First results including: 3. Analysis of existing intermodal relations 4. Analysis of the economical situation and potentials 5. Ideas for new liner services 6. Recommendations for liner services

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Definition of „New Liner Services“

Liner Services (definition): • Fixed route and fixed timetable (departure and arrival times according to schedule) • Regular service • Short stop in a node (terminal/port) • Operation all-year-round • Broad access for interested companies Liner Services to be highlighted and developed in INTERIM project: • Rail (liner trains) • Inland waterway (iww liners) • Substitution of iww liners with liner trains or their possible combination INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim •

Methodology

Analysis of existing: o intermodal transport trains o mixed and conventional trains o intermodal inland waterway transport o road transport relations

•

Analysis of economic situation and regional development

•

GDP-prognosis until 2015

•

Prognosis for industrial development of CADSES region Source : http://www.sgkv.de/deutsch/Bilder/multimodal.jpg

•

Ideas for „New Liner Services“ from Germany, Austria, Croatia, Serbia and Romania INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

Flensburg

interim

Kiel

Stralsund

Hamburg

Malbork

Schwerin Szeczecin Pila

Bremen Berlin

Hannover

Lodz

Lubin

Leipzig

Kassel Leverkusen

Radom

Aachen Köln Bonn

Lovosice

Fulda Koblenz Frankfurt/Main

Praha

Würzburg Mannheim

Katowice Krakow Tarnow Ostrava

Pardubice

Plzen Olomouc

Nürnberg

Tabor

Saarbr ücken

Zilina

Brno Regensburg

Choice between RAIL and IWW (substitution in case of bottlenecks)

Banska Bystrica

Passau Augsburg München

Freiburg Konstanz Zürich Sankt Gallen Bern Thun Lausanne

Presov

Trencin

Stuttgart Ulm

Enns Krems Linz

Wien Bratislava

Wels Salzburg

Innsbruck

Miskolc

Szombathely

Chur

Suceva

Debrecen

Budapest Szolnok

Graz

Dej

Oradea

Zalaegerszeg Villach

Bolzano Lugano

Kosice

Györ

Sopron

Luzern

Geneve

Lublin

Wroclaw

Dresden Chemnitz Decin

Erfurt

Warszawa

Konin

Nowa Sol

Cottbus Dortmund

Existing intermodal transport corridors in the CADSES area

Poznan

Frankfurt/Oder

Duisburg

Bialystok

Torun

Magdeburg

Münster Bielefeld Rotterdam

Gdansk

Koszalin

Rostock

Trento

Udine

Koper

Bacau

Maribor Szeged

Pecs

Ljubljana Zagreb

Trieste Verona

Cluj-Napoca

Karlovac Rijeka

Arad

Osijek

Sibiu Brasov Caransebes

Vokovar

Buzau

Piaceza Beograd

Pitesti Drobeta -Turnu Severi

Genova

- sea ports

hinterland connections

- inland

Zadar

Vidin

Craiova Caracal

Ploiesti Bukarest Calarasi

Constanta

Giurgiu

Split Mezdra Dubrovnik

Gorna Orjahovica Varna Sindel

Sofia Radomir

Dabovo Zimnica

Burgas

Plovdiv

connections

Svilengrad Kulata

Halkali Köseköy Saloniki

interim

Economical situation and potentials

Current sources Potential sources

Source: http://www.springerkiel.com/image/industrie. jpg Source: http://web71.ghostspace.de/zukunftleben/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/zukunft.jpg

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Current sources (example German Federal State Bavaria), statistics

Weekly trade volume

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Current sources – identified industry

Consignors – structured by region – structured by industry Identified industries - automotive - textiles - machines - metal products - consumer goods - foodstuffs - chemical products

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Current and future sources (Germany, Austria) Current

Future

Future

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Current and future sources (Germany, Austria)

Current

Future

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Current and future sources (Croatia)

Current

Future

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Ideas for new liner services (Germany)

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Ideas for new liner services (Austria)

a) Inland Waterway

Continental transport

Hinterland transport

DLO Danube Line Operator

COLD Container Liniendienst

Passau (DE) to Orsova (RO)

Krems (AT) to Constanta (RO)

b) Railway

AT- North- Line

AT- South- Line

Enns (AT) to Praha (CZ)

Enns (AT) to Koper (SLO) /Rijeka (HR)

Source: http://www.bahnbilder.net/specials/flieden21-02-07/P1080477.jpg, http://www.dlo.at

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Ideas for new liner services (Austria)

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Ideas for new liner services (Croatia)

Continental transport

Hinterland transport

a) Inland Waterway

(HR) Sisak – Beograd (SER)

a) Inland Waterway

(HR) Osijek – Vukovar – Beograd (SER)

b) Railway

(HR) Osijek – Vinkovici – Beograd (SER)

(HR) Rijeka – Zagreb – Botovo (or Varazdin) – Budapest (HU)

b) Railway

(HR) Zagreb – Split (HR)

(HR) Rijeka – Ljubljana (SLO)

b) Railway

(HR) Ploce – (BiH) – Sarajevo – Osijek – Pecs – Budapest (HU)

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Ideas for new liner services (Croatia)

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Ideas for new liner services (Serbia)

Continental transport

Hinterland transport

a) Inland Waterway

DE/AT (Regensburg / Vienna) – Beograd – Constanta (RO) (existing)

b) Railway

(SER) Beograd – Pancevo – Vrsac – Timosoara – Arad (RO)

(Montenegro) Bar – Valijevo – Beograd (SER)

b) Railway

(SER) Beograd – Zvornik (BiH)

(SER) Beograd –Nis – (MD) Skopje – Saloniki (GR)

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Ideas for new liner services (Serbia)

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

WP 4.1, Draft 3

interim

Kiel

Stralsund

Hamburg

Malbork

Schwerin Szczecin Pila

Bremen Berlin

Hannover

Poznan

Frankfurt/Oder

Duisburg

ErfurtGlauchau

Aachen Köln

Lodz

Lubin

Leipzig

Kassel Leverkusen

Radom

Lovosice

Fulda Frankfurt/Main Würzburg Mannheim

Praha

Katowice Krakow Tarnow Ostrava

Pardubice

Plzen Olomouc

Nürnberg

Tabor

Saarbrücken Regensburg Stuttgart Ulm

Presov

Trencin Banska Bystrica Linz

Wien Bratislava

Szombathely

Chur

Szolnok

Villach

Bolzano Trento

Udine Trieste Koper

Bacau Botovo

Szeged

Pecs

Ljubljana Zagreb Rijeka

Cluj-Napoca

Maribor Varazdin

Arad Sibiu

Osijek

Brasov

Timosoara

Karlovac Sisak

Piaceza

Novi Sad Vukovar

Caransebes Buzau

Vinkovici Pitesti Drobeta -Turnu Severi

Beograd Zvornik Genova

Orsova Sarajevo

Zadar

Vidin

–– –– –– main rail liner routes –– links between liner routes

Craiova Caracal

Ploce

Mezdra

terminals

Calarasi

Constanta

Dabovo Zimnica

Burgas

Skopje Bar

Plovdiv

–– waterways ports

Bukarest

Gorna Orjahovica Varna

Sofia Radomir

Dubrovnik

Ploiesti

Giurgiu

Nis

Split

…. main complementary links / feeder …. port hinterland routes / feeder

Dej

Oradea

Zalaegerszeg

Verona

Possible liner routes

Suceva

Debrecen

Budapest

Innsbruck Graz

Lugano

Miskolc

Sturovo

Györ

Sopron

Wörgl

Luzern

Geneve

Kosice

Enns Krems

Wels Salzburg

Freiburg

Zilina

Brno

Ceske Budejovice

Passau Augsburg München

Bern Thun Lausanne

Lublin

Wroclaw

Dresden Chemnitz Decin

Koblenz

Konstanz Zürich Sankt Gallen

Warszawa

Konin

Nowa Sol

Cottbus Dortmund

Bialystok

Torun

Magdeburg

Münster Bielefeld

Rotterdam

Gdansk

Koszalin

Rostock

Svilengrad Kulata

Halkali Köseköy Saloniki

interim

Expert interviews – stakeholders feedback at the national level

Stakeholders: Consignors (salesmen, manufacturers,…), Transport- and Logistics provider (forwarder, shipper,…) and national and regional administrations Some significant statements: – Sea ports located in Mediterranean (incl. Adriatic sea and Black sea) could benefit from current and possible future traffic congestions and caused bottlenecks in the EU´s Northern range sea ports and hinterland connections. – Extensions of the Motorways of the Seas (MoS) into the hinterland are very important. – The shippers and manufacturers still do not properly understand the inland waterway services as an alternative to roads and railways and do not involve them in their transport planning process.

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Expert interviews – stakeholders feedback at the national level

– The Balkan countries belong in the future to the rising markets. The intermodal traffic has big potential. Today in direction to Balkan states the road transport dominates. – Connecting the trimodal inland ports the main haulage by railways and inland waterways can play their advantages against roads. – The liberalisation of the railway market should be further implemented and the homogenous railway system in Europe is required. – The neutrality of intermodal transportation provider is required. The non discriminatory access to the intermodal network and path order is necessary as well the market transparency. – Terminals must be neutral. To attract the intermodal transport the costs of terminals shall be kept low. – Flexible transports are required, that means a substitution of inland waterways by rail and road. Logistics adjusted to rivers could be a solution. INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim

Reccommendations

The main problems of intermodal transports are regarding quality (speed, reliability) and coverage area (density of route offered). For intermodal connections between West and Central and South– eastern Europe can be recommended (examples): • Operational strategy e. g. liner trains, hub–and–spoke systems, intermodal transport in combination with wagonload transport, integrated model of principal network with larger terminals with regional network of smaller terminals connected with marshalling yards and junctions (railports) • Market Strategy e. g. concentration on cargo types, combination of axis oriented (main hubs as base points) and area–wide transport offers • Implementation of successful innovative technologies e. g. bi–modal technologies covering faster and with less investment a much bigger area • Development of trimodal nodes (rail, road, inland waterways).

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes

interim INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes INTERREG IIIB CADSES

WORKSHOP Novi Sad Thank you for your attention

INtegration in the intermodal goods Transport of non EU states: Rail, Inland/coastal waterway Modes