Petition For Issuance Of The Writ Of Kalikasan.docx

Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila GREEN POTATO, INC., PAPAYA BACOLOD MOVEMENT, ATTY. KARDO POTASYO, IN THE REPERESENTATION OF THE RESIDENTS OF BACOLOD CITY, GOV. IVAN MISAGAL AND VICE – GOV. EMMANUEL REBADONIA, IN REPRESENTATION OF THE RESIDENTS OF RESIDENTS OF BACOLOD SIBUGAY, ET. AL., Petitioners

-Versus-

G.R. No. 696969 Petition for Writ of Kalikasan With prayer for Temporary Restraining Order and Writ of Continuing Mandamus

HON. KARINA JOY GIMAY, in his capacity as Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, DIRECTOR Otto Patatas S. KADIL, Mines and Geosciences Bureau, DIRECTOR VALERY ANN P. SILANG, Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau and the CHAMBER OF MINES OF THE PHILIPPINES Respondents

x----------------------------------------------x

Petition for Issuance of Writ of Kalikasan With Prayer for Temporary Restraining Order and Writ of Continuing Mandamus

Petitioners, by undersigned counsel, to the Most Honorable Supreme Court respectfully state:

PREFARATORY STATEMENT “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1) This petition assails in the strongest terms imaginable the acts of the public respondents and private respondents which threaten to violate the petitioner’s right to a balanced and healthful ecology. Petitioners humbly come before this august body and most respectfully pray that its Honorable Members, acting collectively as the third great branch of government, exercise their constitutional duty to unanimously CHECK the illegal acts of the respondents.

Republic Act 7486 of the National Integrated Protected Areas System or NIPAS’s declaration of policy takes cognizance of man’s activities on all components of the natural environment particularly the effect of increasing population, resource exploitation and industrial advancement and recognizing the critical importance of protecting and maintaining the natural biological and physical diversities of the environment notably on areas with biological unique features to sustain human life and development. However, this is violated by the acts of the public respondents DENR and MGB by opening protected areas to be exploited by private respondents.

Republic Act 9147 or the Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act which seeks to protect the rare and endangered flora and fauna was also contravened by respondents. The impact of mining on the biodiversity is so grave that the destruction of natural habitats and removal of vegetation, and decline, endangerment and extinction of wildlife species is very imminent.

NATURE OF THE PETITION This petition is filed pursuant to Section I, Article 8 of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines which pertinently provides that this Honorable Supreme Court possesses the judicial power “to determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or in excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch of government.” This is also brought pursuant to the power of the Supreme Court under Section 4 of Article 3 of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines to decide cases involving the constitutionality of , among others, a law and its implementation.

The Parties 1. Green Potato Inc. is a Non -stock non-profit corporation duly registered under the laws of the Republic of the Philippines with its principal office address at La Purisima Street, Bacolod City where it may be served legal processes. It is established to provide assistance to victims of environmental injustice, research and advocacy on environmental policy, local government consultancy on environmental issues, promoting sustainability and the protection of human rights. It is represented by Atty. Mike Perez.

2. Papaya Bacolod Movement is a non-governmental organization working towards the sustainable use and management of biodiversity throughupholding life and nature to protect the Philippines and Southeast Asia from further ecological ruin and to serve as a beacon of awareness and action in the interest of environmental protection and sustainable development, represented by Bryan Anthony Zambo. Hehas his address at No. 20 Valderoza Street, Bacolod City.

3. Atty. Kardo Potasyo, and the residents of Vitali, Bacolod City.They may be served summons at La Purisima Street, Bacolod City.

4. Gov. Kaiser Adan Olaso, in behalf of his constituents with his family members from Bacolod Sibugay province. His office address is at Masayahin Street, Bacolod Sibugay. 4.Paulo Jerome Delatado, Department of Environment and Natural Resources Secretary, the principal agency authorized to grant applications for

exploration permit, mineral agreements, and financial or technical assistance agreements in Mindanao,wihKalKausarKadil as the Director of the Mines and Geosciences Bureau the represented by the Solicitor General. The DENR may be served summons at the DENR Compound, Visayas Avenue, Quezon City. The Solicitor General may be served at 134 Amorsolo St., Legaspi Village, Makati City.

5. Valery Ann Silang, Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau Director is the principal officer of the bureau for Establishment, management and development of the National Integrated Protected Areas System. She may be summoned at Diliman, 1100 Quezon City .

6. Chamber of Mines of the Philippines which represents Mining companies duly registered under the laws of the Republic of the Philippines who are engaged in mining activities in Bacolod City and Bacolod Sibugay.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND THE CASE

1. On July 21, 1991, the House of Representatives enacted Republic Act No. 7586 entitled “An Act Providing for the Establishment and Management of National Integrated Protected Areas System, defining its scope and coverage, and for other purposes.

2. The said Republic Act No. 7586 contains, among others, the following Section 20 paragraph f: SECTION 20. Prohibited Acts. – Except as may be allowed by the nature of their categories and pursuant to rules and regulations governing the same, the following acts are prohibited within protected areas:

f. Squatting, mineral locating, or otherwise occupying any land.

3. On July 30, 2001, the House of Representatives enacted Republic Act No. 9147 entitled “An Act for the Conservation and Protection of Wildlife Resources and Their Habitats, Appropriating Funds therefor and For Other Purposes.”

4. The said Republic Act No. RA 9147 contains, among others, specifically Section 27 paragraph C: CHAPTER IV ILLEGAL ACTS Section 27. Illegal Acts. - Unless otherwise allowed in accordance with this Act, it shall be unlawful for any person to willfully and knowingly exploit wildlife resources and their habitats, or undertake the following acts: (c) effecting any of the following acts in critical habitat(s) (i) dumping of waste products detrimental to wildlife; (ii) squatting or otherwise occupying any portion of the critical habitat; (iii) mineral exploration and/or extraction; (iv) burning; (v) logging; and (vi) quarrying 5. Respondents violated Section 20 (f) of RA 7586 of the National Integrated Protected Areas System Act because out of 170 tenements being opened by public respondents for mining, more than 11% subjected to extractive industry were Protected Areas (PAs)

6. Respondents also violated section 27 (c) of RA 9147 or the Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act, where the impact impact of mining to biodiversity affected the destruction of natural habitats and removal of vegetation, and decline, endangerment and extinction of wildlife species. 7. Respondents violated or threatened to violate petitioner’s right to a balanced and healthful ecology. By quarrying or digging tons to extract the ores, natural resources will be destroyed, and environment will be polluted. With more than 800,000 hectares opened to mining in Mindanao and less than 1,000 DENR regional personnel, the MGB will just rely on unsubstantiated and unverified reports that will be submitted by mining companies. 8. Petitioner, Mike Perez, of Legal Age, Single, and Executive Director of Save Green Earth, Inc., resident of Bacolod City. Petitioner, Mac Gyver Urabang, of Legal Age, Single, and Director of Green Potato Inc., and a resident of Bacolod City. Petitioner, Bryan Anthony Zambo, Citizen, of Legal Age, Married, and Executive Director of

Papaya Bacolod

Movement, and a resident of Bacolod City. Petitioner, Allen Michael Escudero, of Legal Age, Single, and Director of Papaya Bacolod Movement and resident of Bacolod City. Petitioner, Kardo Potasyo, of Legal Age, Single, and a resident of Vitali, Bacolod City. Petitioner, Mikaila Ross Fernandez, of Legal Age, Single and resident of Bacolod Sibugay. Petitioner, Imogen Poots, of Legal Age, single, resident of Lantawan, Bacolod City.

GROUNDS AND DISCUSSIONS

I.

The Right to a Balanced and Healthful Ecology as enshrined in Section 16 Article II of the 1987 Philippine Constitution

In the landmark case of Oposa v. Factoran 1, this Honorable Court stated that: “While the right to a balanced and healthful ecology is to be found under the Declaration of Principles and State Policies and not under the Bill of Rights, it does not follow that it is less important than any of the civil and political rights enumerated in the latter...” This right to a balanced and healthful ecology in return carries with it the correlative duty of the State and its citizens to refrain from impairing the environment. During the debates on this right in one of the plenary sessions of the 1986 Constitutional Commission, Commisioner Azcuna stated that: The right to healthful (sic) environment necessarily carries with it the correlative duty of not impairing the same and, therefore, sanctions may be provided for impairment of environmental balance. The Court ruled that said right implies, among many other things, the judicious management and conservation of the country's forests.2 Without such forests, the ecological or environmental balance would be irreversibly disrupted.3

However, despite this right, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the very agency which has been charged for the conservation and preservation of the environment, has allowed the opening of 800,000 hectares of land, which includesProtected Areas under the National Integrated Protected Areas System Act (see Annexes). Studies have been made by non-governmental organization showing the ill-effects of mining to the environment. (Annexes A, B, C) Furthermore, the Mines and Geosciences Bureau just rely on reports given by companies in its evaluation of the companies’ Environmental Management Programs and Reports, contrary to itsduty to be an independent body (Annex D, E, F, G, H, I, J) This inefficiency is evidenced by the inaction of the DENR Employees and officers of various complaints made by private citizens on alleged violations made by mining companies. (Annex X)

1

G.R. No. 101083 ibid 3 ibid 2

July 30, 1993

I. Violations of Section 20 (f) of Republic Act 7586 of the National Integrated Protected Areas System The National Integrated Protected Areas System Law, provides for the classification and administration of all designated protected areas to maintain essential ecological processes and life-support systems, to preserve genetic diversity, to ensure sustainable use of resources found therein and to maintain their natural conditions to the greatest extent possible; The law provides: Sec. 20. Prohibited Acts- Except as may be allowed by the nature of their categories and pursuant to rules and regulations governing the same, the following acts are prohibited within protected areas: (f). Squatting, mineral locating, or otherwise occupying any land; In the classification of protected areas, occupancy and exploitation is prohibited in areas which have been classified as Natural parks and Strict Nature Reserve 4 . Despite this, the DENR has allowed in the 170 tenements, the occupancy of mining companies where almost 5 % of the area is classified as the two above (Annexes O, P, Q,R,S), and the remainder of the 11% , as part of the Protected Areas as evidenced by permits, maps and documents released by the same office (Annexes K, L, M, N ).

III.

Violations of Section 27(c) of Republic Act 9147 or the Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act

The Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act, enacted as RA 9147 to conserve the wildlife resources and their habitats for sustainability which includes the conservation and protection of wildlife species and their habitats to promote ecological balance and enhance biological diversity. One of the illegal acts, as stated in the law includes the: 27 (c) effecting any of the following acts in critical habitats:\ i. 4

Dumping of waste products detrimental to wildlife;

RA 7586

ii. iii. iv. v. vi.

Squatting or otherwise occupying any portion of the critical habitat; Mineral exploration and/or extraction; Burning Logging And quarrying;

Despite this prohibition within areas of critical habitats, the acts are effected by private respondents which has affected the flora and fauna of Mindanao, as provided by studies made by various agencies around multiple areas within the island (Annex S, T, U, V, W ) Acts and Omissions Complained Of 1. Respondent violated or threatened to violate petitioner’s right to balanced and healthful ecology. By quarrying or digging tons to extract the ores, natural resources will be destroyed, and environment will be polluted. With more than 800,000 hectares opened to mining in Mindanao and less than 1,000 DENR regional personnel, the MGB will just rely on unsubstantiated and unverified reports that will be submitted by mining companies. 2. Respondents violated Section 20 (f) if RA 7586 if the National Integrated Protected Areas System Act prohibiting squatting, mineral locating, or occupying any land within the protected areas. Out of 170 tenements being opened by public respondents for mining, more than 11% subjected to extractive industry were protected areas (PAs). 3. Respondent’s acts also contravened section 27 (c) of RA 9147 or the Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act, where the impact of mining to biodiversity affected the destruction of natural habitats and removal of vegetation, and decline, endangerment and extinction of wildlife species. Prayer for Relief Wherefore, premises considered, petitioners most respectfully pray of this Honorable Court that: 10. Upon filing of this petition that this Court issue a Writ of Kalikasanand Temporary Protection Order enjoining the members of the Chamber of Mines from continuing their reckless operations to be effective until such time that the proper reforms and safety measures have been put in place in respondent companies facilities to ensure that the environment and resources will no longer be endangered. 11. This court issue a Writ of Continuing Mandamus to enjoin the DENR Secretary and Mines and Geosciences Bureau from approving all pending

and new applications for exploration permits, mineral agreements, and financial or technical assistance for mining companies in Mindanao. 12. This court to issue a Writ of Continuing Mandamus to enjoin the Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau Director to prevent mining activities that may affect or endanger wildlife and resources. 13. And other just and equitable reliefs are likewise prayed for. Bacolod City, Philippines, October 13, 2019

Micheal Jemera Counsel for the Petitioners La Purisima Street, Bacolod City IBP No. 0001/ZC PTR No. 0001/ZC Roll of Attorneys No. 0001 Potpot Kazooo Counsel for the Petitioners La Purisima Street, Bacolod City IBP No. 88910/ZC PTR No. 0002/ZC Roll of Attorneys No. 0001 Verification and Certification of NON-FORUM SHOPPING

We: a. Mike Perez, of Legal Age, Single, and Executive Director of Save Green Earth, Inc., resident of Bacolod City. b. Mac Gyver Urabang, of Legal Age, Single, and Director of Green Potato Inc., and a resident of Bacolod City. c. Bryan Anthony Zambo, of Legal Age, Married, and Executive Director of Papaya Bacolod Movement, and a resident of Bacolod City. d. Allen Michael Escudero, of Legal Age, Single, and Director of Papaya Bacolod Movement and resident of Bacolod City. e. Kardo Potasyo, of Legal Age, Single, and a resident of Vitali, Bacolod City.

f. Ivan Misagal, of Legal Age, Married, and Governor and resident of Bacolod Sibugay. g. Emmanuel Rebadonia, of Legal Age, Single and Vice Governor and resident of Bacolod Sibugay. h. Imogen Poots, of Legal Age, single, resident of Lantawan, Bacolod City

All of us swearing in according to law, depose and state that e. I, Antonio Leandro C. Dagdag, is the representative of Petitioner Save Green Earth, Inc.;

duly

authorized

f. I, Bryan Anthony Zambo, is the duly authorized representative of Petitioner Papaya Bacolod Movement; f. We have caused the foregoing to be prepared and filed; read all the allegations contained therein; and found them to be true and correct to our personal knowledge or based on authentic documents; g. We have not commenced any other action or proceeding involving the same issues in the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals or any other tribunal or agency; and to the best of my knowledge, no such action or proceeding is pending in the said courts, tribunal or agency; and should we thereafter learn of such fact, we will notify the Honorable Court within five (5) days from such notice.

In witness whereof, we have set our hand this day of September 1, 2019 , Metro Manila, Philippines.

Mike Perez

Mac Gyver Urabang

Bryan Anthony Zambo

Allen Michael Escudero

Kardo Potasyo

Kaiser Adan Olaso

Mikaila Ross Fernandez

Coke Sprite

Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in the city of Bacolod , on this 13th day of October, 2019 by all affiants who are personally known to me being my clients in this case. Atty. Salvino Kristi S. Kalalang Notary Public PTR No. 1234567, Bacolod City, 1/2/20 IBP OR No. 654321, Bacolod City, 1/2/20 Attorney’s Roll No. 88910 MCLE Compliance Certificate No. IV0025415, Bacolod City, 1/2/17

Doc No. 123; Page No. 21; Book No. 32; Series of 2019.