Pcib Charts - Data 12

The Truth Behind the 2004 Elections

PART 2. Mechanics of Fraud : PCIB areas

THE VOTING PROCESS Precinct

GARCI OPERATIONS

City / Municipality

BY PRECINCT

PCIB OPERATIONS

 Wholesale changes in the COCs to reverse results such that FPJ's votes were given to GMA

 Discrepancies in different election result documents Province are obvious

 Pre-manufactured BY MUNICIPALITY ERs were Legend: switched with genuine as ERsERs – Election Returns insurance votes SOV – Statement of Votes for GMA COC – Certificate of Canvass  Dagdag bawas is

Congress

2

1

FIRST Mechanic of Fraud

PAD THE NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS AND CREATE GHOST PRECINCTS TO HIDE WHOLESALE ADDITION OF VOTES RESULTING IN STATISTICALLY IMPROBABLE VOTERS TURNOUT.

NATIONWIDE INCREASE IN REGISTERED VOTERS 38.8M

43.5M + 6.9M

CLEAN-UP OF VOTERS LIST

FPJ DECLARES CANDIDACY NOV 27, 2003

+ 4.2M + 4.2M

+ 2.4M + 2.1M

1992 1995 1998 1999 2000 2001 - 0.1M - 0.045M - 2.9M

2004 July 2002

Mar 2004

FORECAST

ACTUAL Comelec Project 4 of Precincts

WHAT THE LAW SAYS : Comelec Resolution 06-0060 dated 13 Feb 04 resolved to use 2002 registered voters data (forecast of 38.8M for 2004 elections) as basis to start printing the official ballots.

WHAT THE LAW SAYS RA 8189 “General Registration Act” Sec 24. National Central File “There shall be a national central file … under the custody of the Commission … consisting of all approved voter registration records in each city or municipality.”

Where is this National Central File to show the numbers of registered voters in the provinces and in fact, justify the 43.5 million registered voters nationwide?

WHAT THE LAW SAYS

t o n

RA 8189 General Registration Act Sec 31 Sealing of Precinct Book of Voters

S A ! e W n s o i d h t

“The Board shall notify within 15 days before the start of the campaign period of all registered political parties and members of the Board of Election Inspectors to inspect and verify the completeness of the voters’ registration records for each precinct compiled in the book of voters.”

2004 REGISTERED VOTERS : Forecast 2002 – Actual 2004 + 888,702

+ 520,288 + 941,722 5,405,059

5,832,126

+ 172,492 + 78,484 + 66,802 2,150,793 695,466

NCR

CAR

+ 46,908

4,016,703 2,384,676

1,420,296

REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5

LUZON

9

2004 REGISTERED VOTERS : Forecast 2002 – Actual 2004

+ 426,040

3,166,173

+ 513,506

2,784,440

+ 230,161 1,848,394

REGION 6

REGION 7

VISAYAS

REGION 8 10

2004 REGISTERED VOTERS : Forecast 2002 – Actual 2004

- 506,295 + 50,489

+ 656,601

+ 582,730

+ 93,670

2,640,710 1,568,662

- 33,790 1,410,508

1,284,809

1,069,472

REGION 9 REGION 10 REGION 11

REGION 12

CARAGA

MINDANAO

1,129,231

ARMM 11

The PCIB Area consists of Pampanga, Cebu, Iloilo and Bohol. These provinces illustrate the extent of padding of the voters' lists.

Pampanga

Iloilo Cebu Bohol 12

Why the PCIB provinces? • These provinces showed that Mrs. Arroyo had a strong showing in popularity ratings. • The logic is to maximize her winning margin in areas where she will win in a clean and honest elections. 13

Pulse Asia in November 2003 shows: • GMA received 39% support in the Visayas, and 15%, her lowest, in Metro Manila. • Before the entry of FPJ in the presidential race, GMA registered highest support from the poorest E class with 29%. From ABC class, she got the lowest, 20%. 14

SWS Survey from September 2003 to March 2004 shows: • GMA received +44% satisfactory rating in the Visayas, and 11%, her lowest, in Metro Manila.

15

2004 REGISTERED VOTERS : Forecast 2002 – Actual 2004

+ 136,695

944,092

2004 ESTIMATE

1,080,751

2004 ACTUAL

PAMPANGA 16

2004 REGISTERED VOTERS : Forecast 2002 – Actual 2004

+ 481,096

1,780,708 1,299,612

2004 ESTIMATE

2004 ACTUAL

CEBU PROVINCE 17

2004 REGISTERED VOTERS : Forecast 2002 – Actual 2004

+ 87,165 377,637

2004 ESTIMATE

464,802

2004 ACTUAL

CEBU CITY 18

2004 REGISTERED VOTERS : Forecast 2002 – Actual 2004

+ 135,682

787,580

2004 ESTIMATE

923,262

2004 ACTUAL

ILOILO PROVINCE 19

2004 REGISTERED VOTERS : Forecast 2002 – Actual 2004

+ 48,533

191,620

2004 ESTIMATE

240,153

2004 ACTUAL

ILOILO CITY 20

2004 REGISTERED VOTERS : Forecast 2002 – Actual 2004

+ 62,560

556,579

2004 ESTIMATE

619,139

2004 ACTUAL

BOHOL 21

2004 REGISTERED VOTERS : Forecast 2002 – Actual 2004

5,108,815 4,157,579

2004 ESTIMATE

+ 951,695

2004 ACTUAL

PCIB AREA 22

WHY INCREASE THE NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS? BECAUSE PADDED VOTERS' LIST LOWERS VOTERS' TURNOUT RATE.

PADDED VOTERS' LIST LOWERS VOTERS' TURNOUT RATE

85% 944,092

74% 1,080,751

799,265

799,265

REGISTERED TOTAL VOTERS VOTES CAST

REGISTERED TOTAL VOTERS VOTES CAST

2004 ESTIMATE

2004 ACTUAL

PAMPANGA

24

PADDED VOTERS' LIST LOWERS VOTERS' TURNOUT RATE

93%

1,780,708

1,299,612 1,208,810

68% 1,208,810

REGISTERED TOTAL VOTERS VOTES CAST

REGISTERED TOTAL VOTERS VOTES CAST

2004 ESTIMATE

2004 ACTUAL

CEBU PROVINCE

25

PADDED VOTERS' LIST LOWERS VOTERS' TURNOUT RATE

87% 377,637

327,672

70% 464,802

327,672

REGISTERED TOTAL VOTERS VOTES CAST

REGISTERED TOTAL VOTERS VOTES CAST

2004 ESTIMATE

2004 ACTUAL

CEBU CITY

26

PADDED VOTERS' LIST LOWERS VOTERS' TURNOUT RATE

89% 787,580

76% 923,262

700,582

700,582

REGISTERED TOTAL VOTERS VOTES CAST

REGISTERED TOTAL VOTERS VOTES CAST

2004 ESTIMATE

2004 ACTUAL

ILOILO PROVINCE

27

PADDED VOTERS' LIST LOWERS VOTERS' TURNOUT RATE

91% 191,620

73% 240,153

174,326

174,326

REGISTERED TOTAL VOTERS VOTES CAST

REGISTERED TOTAL VOTERS VOTES CAST

2003 ESTIMATE

2004 ACTUAL

ILOILO CITY

28

PADDED VOTERS' LIST LOWERS VOTERS' TURNOUT RATE

80%

89% 556,579

619,139

495,717

REGISTERED TOTAL VOTERS VOTES CAST

495,717

REGISTERED TOTAL VOTERS VOTES CAST

2004 ACTUAL

2004 ESTIMATE

BOHOL

29

• Aside from being padded,

voters lists were also juggled. Padding results in addition of favorable votes. Juggling leads to the disenfranchisement of legitimate voters and results in subtraction of unfavorable votes.

• Disenfranchisement is rampant in opposition areas.

30

MASSIVE DISENFRANCHISEMENT VOTERS NAMES WERE NOT FOUND IN THE PRECINCT LIST • SWS EXIT POLLS 10 May 2004 : "900,000 were not able to vote because their names were not in the Voter's Lists" • COMELEC estimated the disenfranchisement at 900,000

MASSIVE DISENFRANCHISEMENT VOTERS NAMES WERE NOT FOUND IN THE PRECINCT LIST • NAMFREL 23 April 2004 : "Disenfranchisement may have run as high as two (2) million votes rather than 900,000 that exit polls suggested." • OPPOSITION AND CIVIC GROUPS: "… some three (3) million qualified voters were not able to vote last May 10 2004 because of what they claimed was a defective voter's list."

2

SECOND Mechanic of Fraud OVERPRINT EXTRA BALLOTS AND SETS OF ELECTION RETURNS TO BE USED FOR ADDITIONAL VOTES

WHAT THE LAW SAYS : Comelec Resolution 06-0060 dated 13 Feb 04 resolved to approve the quantity of forms for 250,000 clustered precincts plus 10% contingency.

COMELEC PRINTED 59,000 ELECTION RETURNS MORE THAN THE ACTUAL 216,000 CLUSTERED PRECINCTS. Up to now, COMELEC has not accounted for these extra ERs.

3

THIRD Mechanic of Fraud MANUFACTURE RESULTS TO ENSURE VICTORY OF FAVORED CANDIDATE USING EXTRA BALLOTS AND FORMS.

There were obvious and undisputable material defects in the PCIB election returns that indicated tampering, alterations and falsification. This was also found in many other areas in the country. 37

d e t a

Sec. 212 – Omnibus Election Code In the ERs, the tally of votes for each candidate is closed by the signing of names, and affixing of right thumb marks by all three Board of Election Inspectors.

l o i V

DEFECT NO. 1 Improper closing of vote tallies • NAKED. No signatures and thumbmarks of Board of Election Inspectors (BEI) • SEMI-NAKED. Incomplete BEI signatures and thumbmarks. 39

Improper closing

40

DEFECT NO. 2 Non-thumbmark finger prints • Small finger prints • Non-finger prints • Fingerprints with artistic designs

41

Small fingerprints / non-fingerprints

42

Fingerprints with artistic designs.

Sample scans Non-thumbmark

43

Fingerprints with artistic designs.

44

DEFECT NO. 3 Use of Unauthorized Fingerprint Takers •

Using violet or red colored ink

•

Using pen ink that leaves brown residue at the back of the ER

•

Using black paint that glitters when hit by light 45

WHAT THE LAW SAYS : Comelec Resolution 6667 Sec.15 states that each precinct shall receive "two (2) thumbmark / fingerprint takers" among other forms and supplies. (The color of these takers is grayish black.)

WHAT THE LAW SAYS : Comelec Resolution 06-0060 dated 13 Feb 04 resolved to approve the quantity of thumbmark takers of 500,000 pieces plus 10% contingency.

Comelec Resolution 04-0286 16 Mar 2004 Procurement of Indelible Ink and Fingerprint Takers

“Approving the procurement of indelible ink and fingerprint takers, two supplies required by law to be used every election.” “Two (2) pieces of fingerprint takers per precinct, 250mm x 75mm, durable plastic is clear form, good for 600 clear fingerprint impressions.”

Use of blue “wet” ink.

“Sample scans: Various ink samples”

49

This is the back of the previous ER, now with brownish “Sample scans: iron deposits.

Various ink samples”

50

Use of “black paint” type ink.

“Sample scans: Various ink samples”

51

Use of “black paint” type ink.

52

WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF THESE MATERIAL DEFECTS ON THE CANDIDATES’ VOTES?

53

MATERIAL DEFECTS IN PAMPANGA ERs EXAMINED : 1,521 ERs WITH DEFECTS: 1,516

TOTAL DEFECTS : 1,923

49.3% 33.2% 17.5%

948 639

336 IMPROPER TALLY CLOSING

NON-THUMBMARK FINGER PRINTING

UNAUTHORIZED FINGERPRINT INK

GMA PADDED VOTES

154,873

54

MATERIAL DEFECTS IN CEBU PROVINCE ERs EXAMINED : 3,641 ERs WITH DEFECTS: 3,518

12.1%

TOTAL DEFECTS : 4,639

42.3%

45.7%

1,962

2,118

NON-THUMBMARK FINGER PRINTING

UNAUTHORIZED FINGERPRINT INK

559 IMPROPER TALLY CLOSING

GMA PADDED VOTES

379,944

55

MATERIAL DEFECTS IN CEBU CITY ERs EXAMINED : 1,733 ERs WITH DEFECTS: 1,653

TOTAL DEFECTS : 2,291

35.5% 22.9% 524 IMPROPER TALLY CLOSING

814 NON-THUMBMARK FINGER PRINTING

41.6% 953 UNAUTHORIZED FINGERPRINT INK

GMA PADDED VOTES

110,751

56

MATERIAL DEFECTS IN ILOILO PROVINCE ERs EXAMINED : 1,309 ERs WITH DEFECTS: 1,301

TOTAL DEFECTS : 2,025

54.4%

1,101

45.5% 860

3.2% 64

IMPROPER TALLY CLOSING

NON-THUMBMARK FINGER PRINTING

UNAUTHORIZED FINGERPRINT INK

GMA PADDED VOTES

120,993

57

MATERIAL DEFECTS IN ILOILO CITY TOTAL DEFECTS : 1,276

46.9%

38.7% 14.3%

599

494

183 IMPROPER TALLY CLOSING

NON-THUMBMARK FINGER PRINTING

ERs EXAMINED ERs WITH DEFECTS ERs WITH NONE

: 907 : 875 : 32

UNAUTHORIZED FINGERPRINT INK

GMA PADDED VOTES

54,250

58

MATERIAL DEFECTS IN BOHOL ERs EXAMINED : 1,471 ERs WITH DEFECTS: 1,467

TOTAL DEFECTS : 2,230

47.4%

12.5%

1,058

40.1% 894

278 IMPROPER TALLY CLOSING

NON-THUMBMARK FINGER PRINTING

UNAUTHORIZED FINGERPRINT INK

GMA PADDED VOTES

115,495

59

MATERIAL DEFECTS IN PCIB AREA ERs EXAMINED : 10,582 ERs WITH DEFECTS: 10,330

13.5%

TOTAL DEFECTS : 14,384

44.3%

42.2%

6,377

6,063

NON-THUMBMARK FINGER PRINTING

UNAUTHORIZED FINGERPRINT INK

1,944 IMPROPER TALLY CLOSING

GMA PADDED VOTES

936,306

60

WHAT THE LAW SAYS : Comelec Resolution 6669 Sec. 26. Material defects in election returns… "If it should clearly appear that requisites in form or data had been omitted in the election returns…, the board of canvassers shall call the board of election inspectors concerned to effect the corrections."

In view of these massive violations, and the inability to institute any corrective measure, the question is: Are these just simple coincidences or, unintended neglect or deliberately planned?

t Comelec Resolution 6669 Sec. 27. o n "If the election returns… appear to be S tampered with, altered or falsified… or A or were! prepared by otherwise not authentic, the BEI concerned, under duress, force, e W intimidation, or prepared n by persons other than the BEI,is the boardoof canvassers shall h use the other copiesd of said election return." t WHAT THE LAW SAYS :

t o Comelec Resolution 6669 Sec. 27. n "If the other copies are likewise tampered with, altered or falsified,S not authentic… A or any! candidate the board of canvassers e shall bring the matter to the attention of the W n Commission." s o i d h t WHAT THE LAW SAYS :

CONSPIRACY OR COVER-UP? •

At the level of the BEIs, why the deafening silence of the teachers on the defective ERs?

•

At the local canvassing levels, why the indifference of the BOCs at the presence of defective ERs?

•

At the Comelec level, why the defensive stance when confronted with these material defects?

•

At the national canvassing level, why the stubborn refusal to hear any complaints on authenticity, due execution and completeness of the ERs?

HOW CREDIBLE ARE THE RESULTS? Let us look at:

• Vote distribution • Voters' preferences for local

favorite sons and daughters of these provinces.

IMPROBABLE VOTE DISTRIBUTION

1,208,810 80%

10% TOTAL VOTES

GMA

FPJ

4% LACSON

CEBU PROVINCE

3%

3%

ROCO VILLANUEVA 67

IMPROBABLE VOTE DISTRIBUTION 799,265 80%

11% TOTAL VOTES

GMA

FPJ

2% LACSON

PAMPANGA

2%

4%

ROCO VILLANUEVA 68

IMPROBABLE VOTE DISTRIBUTION 700,582 73%

12% TOTAL VOTES

GMA

FPJ

6%

5% LACSON

4%

ROCO VILLANUEVA

ILOILO PROVINCE

69

IMPROBABLE VOTE DISTRIBUTION 214,140 1. CARCAR

78%

2. MINGLANILIA 3. NAGA 4. SAN FERNANDO 5. SIBONGA 6. TALISAY CITY

11% TOTAL VOTES

GMA

FPJ

4%

4%

3%

LACSON

ROCO

VILLANUEVA

1ST DISTRICT, CEBU PROVINCE

70

IMPROBABLE VOTE DISTRIBUTION 225,148

85%

1. ALCANTARA

1. DUMANHUG

2. ALCOY

2. GINATILAN

3. ALEGRIA

3. MALABUYOC

4. ARGAO

4. MUAL BUAL

5. BADIAN

5. OSLOB

6. BOLJOON

6. RONDA

7. DALAGUETE

7. SAMBOAN 8. SANTANDER

8% TOTAL VOTES

GMA

FPJ

3%

3%

1%

LACSON

ROCO

VILLANUEVA

2ND DISTRICT, CEBU PROVINCE

71

IMPROBABLE VOTE DISTRIBUTION 240,600

84%

1. ALOGUISAN 2. ASTURIAS 3. BALAMBAN 4. BARILI 5. PINAMUNGAHAN 6. TUBURAN 7. TOLEDO CITY

8% TOTAL VOTES

GMA

FPJ

3%

3%

2%

LACSON

ROCO

VILLANUEVA

3RD DISTRICT, CEBU PROVINCE

72

IMPROBABLE VOTE DISTRIBUTION 228,611

1. BANTAYAN

83%

2. BOGO 3. DAAN BANTAYAN 4. MADRIDIJOS 5. MEDELLIN 6. SAN REMEGIO 7. SANTA FE 8. TABOGON 9. TABUELAN

7% TOTAL VOTES

GMA

FPJ

3% LACSON

4% ROCO

3%

VILLANUEVA

4TH DISTRICT, CEBU PROVINCE

73

IMPROBABLE VOTE DISTRIBUTION 250,711

81%

1. BORBON

6. PILAR

2. CARMEN

•

PORO

3. CATMON

•

SOGOD

4. COMPOSTELA

4. TUDELA

5. LILOAN

5. DANAO CITY

10% TOTAL VOTES

GMA

FPJ

4% LACSON

3% ROCO

2%

VILLANUEVA

5TH DISTRICT, CEBU PROVINCE

74

IMPROBABLE VOTE DISTRIBUTION 346,233

71%

1. CONSOLACION 2. CORDOVA 3. MANDAUE CITY 4. LAPU-LAPU CITY

15% TOTAL VOTES

GMA

FPJ

5%

5%

4%

LACSON

ROCO

VILLANUEVA

6TH DISTRICT, CEBU PROVINCE

75

VOTERS' PREFERENCE OF CEBUANOS

73% 727,884

80% 965,630

994,726

1,208,810

VOTES TOTAL VOTES CAST GARNERED

1998 OSMENA

VOTES TOTAL GARNERED VOTES CAST

2004 MACAPAGAL

CEBU PROVINCE

76

VOTERS' PREFERENCE OF CEBUANOS

58% 175,468

67% 220,060

305,018

327,869

VOTES TOTAL VOTES CAST GARNERED

1998 OSMENA

VOTES TOTAL GARNERED VOTES CAST

2004 MACAPAGAL

CEBU CITY

77

VOTERS' PREFERENCE OF ILONGGOS

56%

73% 512,812

317,032 567,962

700,528

VOTES TOTAL VOTES CAST GARNERED

1998 SANTIAGO

VOTES TOTAL GARNERED VOTES CAST

2004 MACAPAGAL

ILOILO PROVINCE

78

VOTERS' PREFERENCE OF ILONGGOS

45%

61% 105,597

157,369

71,478

VOTES TOTAL VOTES CAST GARNERED

1998 SANTIAGO

174,326

VOTES TOTAL GARNERED VOTES CAST

2004 MACAPAGAL

ILOILO CITY

79

4

FOURTH Mechanic of Fraud TAMPER WITH ELECTION RESULT FORMS

CHANGING OF THE NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS IN PAGE 7 OF CEBU PROVINCE SOV [Show scanned PSOV pages]

81

RE-STAMPING OF SERIAL NUMBERS OF Page 1 of the ELECTION RETURNS TO CONFORM TO PRE-PLANNED VOTE COUNTS Uncovered initially 131 ERs (from 17 provinces and 4 NCR cities), 29 from PCIB area, giving GMA 11,921 insurance votes (minimum).

MANUFACTURING ERs WHERE FPJ GOT ZERO VOTES Uncovered initially 247 ERs (from 25 provinces including NCR), 65 ERs from the PCIB area with FPJ getting ZERO votes and GMA getting 26,335 votes.

MANUFACTURING ERs WHERE GMA GOT ZERO VOTES Uncovered initially 85 ERs (from 15 provinces including NCR) with GMA getting ZERO votes and FPJ getting 7,663 votes. A deliberate cosmetic to provide a sense of credibility for the results.

5

FIFTH Mechanic of Fraud SELECTIVE RESULTS TO BE TRANSMITTED FOR CANVASSING TO MANIPULATE THE OUTCOME.

BOHOL

996

ILOILO

1,115

QUEZON PROV

1,877

BUKIDNON

825

TOTAL

EASTERN SAMAR

447

= 6,883 Precincts

SARANGANI

446

ANTIQUE

377

ABRA

216

OTHERS

158

at about 175 voters per precinct -

1,204,525 votes were not transmitted

SLOW TRANSMISSION OF COC'S: Far away locations were received first than the Metro Manila locations.

IMPACT OF THESE MECHANICS OF FRAUD • Voters Padded Lists or “GMA Vote Bank: Nationwide: 4.8 million voters PCIB area: 951,695 voters • Disenfranchised voters due to juggling of voters lists: from 900,000 to 3.0 million voters • Material Defects of ERs from the PCIB area: at least 936,306 GMA padded votes • Unreported precincts whose votes were not counted: Nationwide: about 1.2 million votes Iloilo and Bohol: about 369,425 votes 88

THESE ARE MINIMUM AND CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATES OF THE IMPACT OF THE FRAUD EXEMPLIFIED IN THE PCIB AREA. BUT ALL INDICATIONS POINT TO THE MASSIVENESS AND THE NATIONWIDE EXTENT OF THE PREMEDITATED PLAN TO THWART THE WILL OF THE ELECTORATE. THESE ALSO SHOW THE DIFFICULTY OF UNCOVERING AND DOCUMENTING THESE FRAUDULENT MECHANICS AND THE RESULTING IMPACT TO THE INTEGRITY OF THE 2004 NATIONAL ELECTIONS.

In summary, this study shows … 1. On the basis of tampered COCs, GMA won the 2004 elections. + 1,123,576

FPJ

11,782,232

GMA

12,905,808

90

In summary, this study shows … 2. When the 951,695 padded PCIB votes are subtracted from GMA, her lead is reduced to 171, 881 + 1,123,576 171,881

FPJ

11,782,232

GMA

11,954,113 12,905,808

91

In summary, this study shows … 3. When the 365,797 DAGDAG votes to GMA in 6 Mindanao provinces are subtracted, FPJ leads by 193,916 + 171,881 + 193,916

FPJ

11,782,232

GMA

11,954,113 11,588,316

92

In summary, this study shows … 4. . . . and the 295,944 BAWAS votes are returned to FPJ, his lead increases to 489,860 + 489,860 193,196

FPJ

11,782,232 12,078,176

GMA

11,588,316

93

The true winner is FERNANDO POE JR ! . . . and his lead does NOT even include VOTES SHAVED from NCR and Regions 1 to 5, 9 to 12. + 489,860

FPJ

12,078,176

GMA

11,588,316

94

END

95