Ots 24 > 24033-62 > Evaluati

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Ots 24 > 24033-62 > Evaluati as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 729
  • Pages: 30
EVALUATION OF ASHRAMSHALAS & IDEAL RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS Presented by: Rajneesh Kumar Pankaj Sudha Kant

INTRODUCTION  ASHRAMSHALA  IDEAL

RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS

Definition of evaluation "By the term evaluation, we mean systematic examination of events occurring in and consequent on a contemporary – an examination conducted to assist in improving this program and other programs having the same general purpose."

OBJECTIVES To understand the quantitative and qualitative performance of these schools.  To understand the factors influencing the quality of teaching in these schools.  To suggest possible measures for improving the quality of education in these schools. 

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY  Research

design  Research tools

SCOPE OF STUDY  Cities

studied

SAMPLING PLAN

FINDINGS  ASHRAMSHALA  IDEAL

RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL

ASHRAMSHALA (FINDINGS) INFRASTRUCTURE  School buildings  Classrooms  Living rooms  Sanitation

Findings (contd.)  STUDENT  TEACHER  QUALITY

OF EDUCATION  DROP OUTS  NEXUS BETWEEN SCHOOL AUTHORITIES AND GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS

Findings (contd.)  Governments

criteria of evaluation  Standards not being followed  Accountability of voluntary organization  Governments control over Ashramshala  Ashramshalas totally dependent on government funding  Facilities to students

Infrastructure – Ashram Shala

I.R.S (FINDINGS) INFRASTRUCTURE  School

buildings  Classrooms  Living rooms  Sanitation

Findings (contd.)  STUDENT  TEACHER  QUALITY

OF EDUCATION  DROP OUTS  NO GUIDELINES ON DEPLOYMENT AND TRANSFER OF TEACHERS  Others

Analyzing The Educational Schemes*

PROGRAMME OUTPUTS

TASK REQUIREMENTS

NEEDS

COMPETENCIE S

BENEFICIARIES DEMAND EXPRESSION

ORGANISATIO N DECISION PROCESS

* Framework given by David C. Korten

Needs Of Beneficiaries

 IMMEDIATE  LONG

NEEDS

TERM NEEDS

Outputs - Needs

 CATERS  LONG

TO IMMEDIATE NEEDS

TERM NEEDS NOT FULFILLED

Task requirements - Competence 



TASKS REQUIREMENTS (OBJECTIVE)  PLANNING  SELECTION OF BENEFICIARIES  CAPACITY BUILDING  LOGISTICS  PROVIDE QUALITY EDUCATION  MONITORING & EVALUATION COMPETENCE  TECHNICAL  SOCIAL  Motivational

Demand Expression – Decision Process  MOST

DIFFICULT FIT

 MECHANISM

OF DEMAND EXPRESSION

 ENSURING

PARTICIPATION FROM ALL THE STAKE HOLDERS

PROBLEMS (Ashramshala)  Poor

physical infrastructure  Low technical competency  Low motivational competency  Less number of teachers  No accountability  Dummy students and teaching & nonteaching staff

Suggestion  Short

term

Increased number of classrooms  Ashram shalas should have photographs of all students  At least four teachers per ashramshala  Teaching Pattern – Period wise  Minimum qualification of teachers 

   

PTC with Science at Intermediate B. Sc., B. Ed. M. Sc./B. Sc. Intermediate with Science

Contd….  Medium

Term

Appointment of teachers by government  Increased Government Control  School management be made accountable  Issue identity card to teaching and non-teaching staff of ashram shalas 

 Long 

Term

Ashram shalas should be closed and school building should be acquired by government

Problem (IRS)  Lack

of Infrastructure  Deployment of teachers  Low pass percentage  Poor learning  Lack of proper guideline on transfer of teachers

Suggestion  Better

Infrastructure need to be provided  Proper deployment of teachers  Remedial session for class eight students  Policies on transfer of teachers

THANK YOU

Students

back

Number of Students 180 160 Sanctioned Strength

140 120

No. of Students as per record

100

Number of students present

80 60 40 20 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 11 12 13 14 15

Teachers

back

Physical Infrastructure 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

No. of teachers No. of Class rooms

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11 12

13 14 15

Student Teacher Ratio

back

Teacher student ratio 70

64.00 60.00

60 51.50

50 40

42.67 38.67

38.50 31.25 32.75

32.00

30.00 30.00

30

30.00 30.00

23.67 17.50

20 10 0 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Drop Out(ashram shala) 2003-04

back

2002-03

Boys

Girls

Boys

Girls

Average Rate

10.66

16.46

7.66

10.34

Std. I

26.15

27.55

2.08

8.33

Std. II

6.43

10.00

10.11

14.29

Std. III

2.86

11.43

9.56

7.36

Std. IV

8.06

16.85

8.51

10.20

Std. V

6.02

17.50

8.51

4.42

Std. VI

15.13

15.36

8.25

2.08

Std. VII

10.00

16.53

6.58

25.72

Drop Out (IRS) Boys

back

Girls

2003-04

2002-03 2003-04 2002-03

8

12.35

5.26

13.35

11.98

9

5.22

12.76

4.65

15.47

10

11.37

10.53

12.04

3.10

Related Documents

Ots 24 > 24071 > Shgirma
November 2019 7
Gt
December 2019 22
Ou 24 Ppts > Oukarams > Uo
November 2019 2