Of Counsel: In Pro Se Nanci Meek 3308 Ariba St

  • Uploaded by: Nanci Meek
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Of Counsel: In Pro Se Nanci Meek 3308 Ariba St as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,579
  • Pages: 8
Of Counsel: In pro se NANCI MEEK 3308 Ariba St Las Vegas NV 89129 Telephone: (760) 413-5660 Petitioner in Pro Se IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII THE MATTER OF

)

T. No. 05-1-0101 AMENDED ) PETITION FOR DECLATORY ) RELIEF DECLARING ) 1ST AMENDMENT INVALID; ) EXHIBITS A - P; DECLARATION ) OF NANCI L. MEEK; ) )

THE ELVIN R MEEK FAMILY TRUST, DATED JUNE 14, 1996 AS AMENDED

__________________________________) AMENDED PETITION FOR DECLATORY RELIEF DECLARING 1ST AMENDMENT INVALID COMES NOW NANCI MEEK, an interested person seeks declatory relief that the 1st Amendment to the 1996 ELVIN R MEEK TRUST, the first dated September 16, 1997 and executed in Honolulu Hawaii and included in the original Petition For Declatory Relief Declaring the 1st Amendment Invalid dated December 2008 (Exhibit “A”) and the second 1st Amendment dated September 19, 1997 (Exhibit “B”) and executed in Atascadero, California, are invalid for the following reasons: 1) Forensic examination of the signatures on the 1st Amendment prepared by Robert Jones, Attorney for Elizabeth Meek, allegedly

1

signed in California have concluded the signatures are fraudulent. See Exhibit “C”. Also the document has no notary witness and no page numbers. 2) We stand by our allegations set forth in the original Petition For Declatory Relief Declaring the 1st Amendment Invalid dated December 2008 (Exhibit “A”) that the original Declaration of Trust of Elvin R Meek For The Benefit of Elvin R Meek executed and dated June 14, 1996 (Exhibit “D”) is a true and accurate document and supports our father, an attorney himself, and his true intent as to how he wanted his estate executed. 3) While we don’t doubt a 1st Amendment was signed by our father on September 16, 1997 as evident by the Notarial record provided by notary Susan Strong, an employee of the Bank of Hawaii (Exhibit “E”) with a notation “customers of Heidi”, we believe the 1st Amendment provided by Attorney Robert Jones who is involved with several fraud actions in San Luis Obispo County, is not the true and accurate 1st Amendment. The pages on the 1st Amendment are not numbered. 4) The Elvin R Meek and Elizabeth A Meek Living Trust dated January 10, 1992 is a true and accurate document. (See Exhibit “F”) This document names Elizabeth Meek as the trustee, allowing for equitable distribution to myself, my brother Melvin Meek and Lola

2

Dee Meek (Reklai) however in 1996 our father removed Elizabeth Meek as trustee, naming myself as Trustee and changed the distribution to 1/3 to myself, 1/3 to my brother, 1/6 to Elizabeth Meek and 1/6 to Lola Dee Meek; According to several others this was his intention prior to being diagnosed as terminally ill in September of 2003. 5) The Certification of Trust for the Elvin R and Elizabeth A Meek Living Trust dated January 10, 1992 (Exhibit “G”) prepared by Attorney Robert Jones and executed by Elizabeth Meek on February 20, 2004 four months after our father passed away supports our allegations that the both 1st Amendments in question were nonexistent at the time of our father’s death evidenced by item #1 which only refers to the Elvin R and Elizabeth A Meek Living Trust dated January 10, 1992 and not the 1996 Trust, or the Amendments. We allege Robert Jones prepared and Elizabeth executed this document in February of 2004 as part of a calculated scheme which would enable her to introduce to Union Bank Cal as a true instrument enabling her to cash out our father’s Union Bank Cal stocks in the amount of $646,000 which were included in the 1992 Trust. The stocks were also included as assets in the Elvin R Meek 1996 original trust, however the 1996 trust instrument had named Nanci Meek as the trustee. Elizabeth Meek deposited the $646,000

3

check into the Bank of Hawaii in April of 2004. Attached as Exhibit “H” is an affidavit prepared by Goodsill Anderson, attorneys for Bank of Hawaii and executed by Elizabeth Meek in November of 2005 just prior to selling the property located at 469 Ena Road #3405 in Honolulu, Hawaii. The Affidavit explains Elizabeth Meek signed the Trust Certification in 2004 to enable her to transfer title and sell properties not included in the 1996 trust. However, we allege it is suspicious and perhaps criminal that the 1992 Trust is the only trust mentioned in the Certification of Trust signed February of 2004. At the same time the law firm for Bank of Hawaii, Goodsill Anderson also created and executed an Affidavit by Attorney Robert Jones (Exhibit “I”) also stating the Certification of Trust executive and drafted in September of 2004 was created by Robert Jones to assist in the selling of properties not yet transferred to the 1996 trust. The inconsistencies with both the Affidavits and the Certification of trust are nothing more than a back pedal attempt by Robert Jones and Elizabeth Meek. 6) The non-communicative behavior by Elizabeth towards myself and my brother after several months of attempted contact via phone, and correspondence sent to Elizabeth Meek inquiring as to her well being (Exhibit “J”) strengthens our allegations that both Elizabeth and her attorney Robert Jones were knowingly and with impunity

4

attempting to dissolve our father’s estate without our knowledge and with disregard for what we knew to be our father’s original intent. Attached is a copy of the letter sent to myself and my brother from Attorney Robert Jones indicating “Elizabeth Meek for a variety of reasons has chosen not to correspond with us at this time.” We have never in the 15 years Elizabeth Meek was with our father had any cross words with her. (See Exhibit “K”). 7) Furthermore we continue to question Attorney Robert Jones opening the original probate in the state of California whereas Elvin Meek had resided for several years in Honolulu and died in Hawaii. Attorney Robert Jones is not licensed to practice in Hawaii and we believe it was his intent to dissolve the estate utilizing the 1st Amendment we allege he fabricated after our father’s death and seizing the opportunity to take advantage of our father’s weakened condition. Robert Jones is currently involved in several fraud related litigations in San Luis Obispo County involving the Hurst Financial Group, and his client Kelly Gearhart, as well as illegal activity regarding an Indian Casino venture entitled Pe Ji Ho Ta. 8) The inconsistencies in the affidavit executed by Attorney Robert Jones on October 2, 2007 is nothing more than a poor effort by Mr. Jones to further support mask his criminal behavior and upon

5

scrutiny does nothing more than support our allegations he consistently acts with impunity. (Exhibit “L”) 9) As set forth in my affidavit (Exhibit “N”) filed with the court December 15, 2005, my father approached me in April of 2002, 18 months prior to his demise, at the El Torito restaurant parking lot in San Bernardino, California and entrusted me with a copy of The Elvin R Meek 1996 Family trust. He was upset because he had recently discovered that Elizabeth Meek was sending money as well as making deposits from his bank accounts at the Bank of Hawaii to another Bank of Hawaii branch located in Palau and in the name of her daughter Lola. He also indicated that he and Elizabeth were “not getting along”. 10)

Attached is my affidavit executed August 13, 2007 which

outlines the repeated efforts by Elizabeth Meek and Attorney Robert Jones to undermine and ignore our father’s intentions prior to his death on October 19, 2003. 11)

Attached as Exhibit “P” is the Objection to Petition for

Declatory Relief Declaring the 1st Amendment Invalid and with respect to Elizabeth Meek’s responses to our allegations 1-10 we disagree and stand by the allegations in the original Petition for Declatory Relief Declaring the 1st Amendment Invalid. Therefore, petitioner prays:

6

1. That the original Forensics Report prepared by Reed Hayes be lodged with the court. 2. That the court consider our allegations that the 1st Amendment to the 1996 original Elvin R Meek Family trust executed on September 16, 1997 as originally produced for the court by Attorney Robert Jones in September of 2004 has been fabricated and fraudulently produced by Attorney Robert Jones after the decedent’s death in an effort to support the 2nd Amendment and Last Will And Testament executed by Robert Jones and signed by the decedent Elvin Meek, while he was in a weakened state, incoherent and 100% incapacitated as declared by forensic expert Susan Kalb upon review of medical records. 3. Furthermore, Nanci L. Meek supports her original allegations and supports the original Petition For Declatory Relief Declaring the 1st Amendment Invalid dated December 2008 (Exhibit “A”) and vehemently denies any and all of the subsequent allegations contained in Elizabeth Meek’s Object to Petition for Declatory Relief Declaring 1st Amendment Invalid filed January 12, 2009 see Exhibit “P”. 4. We ask the court to declare both 1st Amendments to be invalid and recognize the original Elvin R Meek 1996 Trust document executed

7

in Honolulu, Hawaii on June 14, 1996 to be the true and accurate document. I certify that the forgoing is true and correct, and that each of the attachments are true and correct copies under penalty of perjury under the Laws of the State of Hawaii. DATED:

August 13, 2009, Honolulu Hawaii

_______________________ Nanci Meek Petitioner Self Represented

8

Related Documents

Ariba
October 2019 5
Nanci
October 2019 7
Pro-se
October 2019 14

More Documents from "Colleen Collins"