Moffitt Ethics Decision

p.3

— - ,-

Jun 18 09 04:42 P

Robert F Ludgin

860 524-8238

P-3

Mail:: Inbox; Moffitt cases

Page I of 1

Date; Thu, 16 Jun 2009 14:34:11 -0400 [-4:34:11 EOT) From: "WastelawsKi. Mark" <[email protected]> To: [email protected]

Subject Moff.it cases Mr. Ludgir

Both Moffitt cases are dismissed, and you win be receiving both dismissaJs in the mail shortly. (They were mailed out today.) The matters remain public, and not confidential, per your/your dient's request.

Please let me know if you have any question or concern.

Sincerely.

Mark E. Wasielewski. Esq.

Office of State Ethics 18-20 Trinity Street Hartford. CT 06106 Phone: (860) 263-2398 Fax: (860) 566-3806 E-Mail: [email protected]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient, and may contain privileged information or material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute, print or otherwise publish this message. If you have received this in error, please respond immediately by returr. email and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of ihis message.

•w O&V+tfXV

Z003-06:i9l5;2F

"

I* 1 M^t/lf'rtrt/tnOOOQ rTO

8602334537

' O j»» V*» I I ^ --—,,,.-.«• »%rtT^ /*i/^tl**\»l I I H-^^«**TI~

r*nminn4-*/* Wt i»*-W*%*^^— I •w^a••*^•^l•-**^ •i»«™--»r«'.r

1 M \^ _ .

I

fc

01 W /"»•»• Wl

_ , _

^^

jun ia uy U4:^ip

Kicnara iviorrra

Jun 18 09 04=42P

Robert F L U d e in

860 524-8238

R.2

Law Office

ROBERT F. LUDGIN 33 Linden Place Hertford Connecticut 06106 Post Office Box 2617V5 Hartford. Connecticut 06126-1775

(SuO) 549-3920 j.ax ^f^ 524-8231

June 18, 2009

c o

John Rose, Jr., Esq. Corporation Counsel City of Hartford 5 50 Main Street Hartford, Connecticut 06103 Re:

FOI Claims Docket Number 2009-35E, The Matter of Richard L. Moffitt; FOI Claims Docket Number 2009-36E, The Matter of Richard 1. Moffitt & Associates, P.C.; Office of State Ethics, Docket No.: 2008-35E - The Matter of an Evaluation of Richard L. Moffitt and Richard L. Moffitt & Associates, P.C., and claim of Richard L. Moffitt & Associates, P.C. v. City of Hartford

Dear John:

I have just received word from the Office of State Ethics that based on its evaluation of your complaint to it about my clients it has decided that your complaint was meiitless. For that reason, your complaint has been dismissed. A copy of the e-mail notice I received today from the Office of State Ethics is enclosed. I am hopeful that the decision of the Office of State Ethics will cause you to reconsider and re-evaluate your position on this matter and to decide to make a prompt payment to my client of what is owed to it ($17,480.42) by the City. You should be aware that notwithstanding all these disputes my client is still willing to resume work for the city on this very important and time sensitive matter. Meanwhile, you have still not complied with the FOI request which I made to you on April 8*. Please may I hear from you about that. Very truly yours,

Y

RFL/dkr ^ cc; Mxlvichard Moffitt U'Richard L. Moffitt & Associates PC SENT BY FAX: 233-4537 bcc:

2009-06-19 15:27

Mr. Jeffrey Cohen The Hartford Courant SENT BY FAX: 241-3865

8602334537

Page 2/3