Rose Moffitt Complaint

  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Rose Moffitt Complaint as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 388
  • Pages: 2
CITY OF HARTFORD OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION COUNSEL 550 Main Street Hartford, Connecticut 06103

JOHNROSB.JR. Coiporation Counsel

Telephone: (860)757-9700 Fax: (860)722-8114 www.hartford.gov

CARLR.NASTO Deputy COiparatwn Counsel

April 3,2009 Carol Carson, Executive Director Office of State Ethics 18-20 Trinity Street, Suite 205 Hartford, CT. 06106-1660 Re; Notice of Possible Violation of Code of Ethics for Lobbyists

Dear Ms, Carson: I am legal counsel for the City of Hartford. Recently officials of the City have learned of possible violations of the State's Code of Ethics for Lobbyists (C.G.S. Sec. 1-91, etseq.). We discovered that an engineer, doing business as Richard L, Moffitt and Associates, P.C. solicited a City department head, being Clarence Corbin, Director of the Department of Public Works, to provide services variously described as "political liaison" activity or "political lobbying" related to certain proposed State Bond Commission approvals for funding for a municipal Flood Control Management Project. Neither Mr. Moffitt nor his company is a lobbyist for the City. He secured a sole source contract from DPW on or about November 5,2008 to perform what he described "broadly as financial management services". The contract was for $7000, all of which was billed between November 10,2008 and February 27,2009, and some $6850 has been paid thereon. Our investigation has revealed that Mr. Moffrtt/his company were to perform lobbying activities on behalf of a City department, acting by its department head and an Acting Director. Further, according to documents obtained by the City, Mr. Moffitt or his company, with his knowledge, performed lobbying services. Our information is that neither Mr. Moffitt nor his company is registered as a lobbyist in Connecticut, a violation of C.G.S. Sec. 1-100. We have documentation indicating that Mr. Moffitt actively solicited a Connecticut State Senator and

lobbied him concerning his assistance with placing a certain proposal on the agenda of the State Bond Commission and he misrepresented to the State Senator that he [Moffitt] was "working with the City.. .on its Flood Control Management Program". I have recently written Mr, Moffitt advising him to cease and desist any work for the City or for any department, officer or agency of the City. A copy of that letter is attached. Please initiate an inquiry into this matter. My office and all appropriate City agencies are available at your behest to cooperate with such inquiry.

Yours truly,

Related Documents

Rose
October 2019 61
Rose
June 2020 32
Rose
June 2020 29
Rose
November 2019 60
Rose
November 2019 41