MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS
Module - 6
Objectives of the module
Multinational Corporations
Organization , design and structures
Head quarters and subsidiary relations in multinational corporations
Foreign capital : Need
Sustaining a high level of investment The technological gap Exploitation of natural resources Undertaking the initial risk Development of basic economic infrastructure The Foreign exchange gap
This foreign capital is generated by private participation of foreign players or by allowing MNCs in the country or FDIs.
MNC
A corporation that has its facilities and other assets in at least one country other than its home country. Such companies have offices and/or factories in different countries and usually have a centralized head office where they coordinate global management. Very large multinationals have budgets that exceed those of many small countries.
Sometimes referred to as a "transnational corporation". Nearly all major multinationals are either American, Japanese or Western European, such as Nike, Coca-Cola, Wal-Mart, AOL, Toshiba, Honda and BMW. Advocates of multinationals say they create jobs and wealth and improve technology in countries that are in need of such development. On the other hand, critics say multinationals can have undue political influence over governments, can exploit developing nations as well as create job losses in their own home countries.
Multinational Corporations
Dynamics of economic liberalization
Led to expansion and growth of MNCs
Acc. To World Investment Report 1997 there were 45,000 MNCs with some 280,000 affiliates Acc. To World Investment Report 2002 there were about 65,000 MNCs with some 8.5 lacs foreign affiliates
Developed countries account for only 12 % of these China host to more than 3.5 lacs of affiliates Three-fourth of them in developing countries
Indian Scenario
More than 1400 in India………………….
Organization Structure
Defining Organizational Structure Vertical Differentiation Arguments for Centralization Arguments for Decentralization Horizontal Differentiation International Division Worldwide Area Structure Strategic Business Unit Product Division Structure Matrix Structure Network Structure.
Organizational Architecture
Totality of a firm’s organization, including firm’s formal organization structure, control systems & incentives, organizational culture, processes & people
Three conditions need to be fulfilled for successful architecture: The
different elements of firm’s architecture should be internally consistent Must fit the strategy of the firm Strategy & architecture must be fit with competitive conditions in the market
Organization Structure I. The formal division of the organization into subunits such as product divisions, national operations, and functions (Horizontal differentiation) II. The location of decision making responsibilities within that structure (centralized or decentralized) – Vertical Differentiation III. The establishment of integrating mechanisms to coordinate the activities of subunits including cross-functional teams and or pan-regional committees – integrating mechanisms
Vertical Differentiation
VD determines where in its hierarchy the decision making power is concentrated
E.g., Are production, marketing & finance decisions are centralized to the top-level managers or decentralized to low level managers
Let’s discuss on arguments for centralization and decentralization
Arguments for Centralization 1.
3.
5.
7.
Centralization can facilitate coordination Centralization can help ensure that decisions are consistent with organizational objectives Centralization can give top-managers the means to bring about needed organizational changes Centralization can avoid the duplication of activities that occurs when similar activities are conducted by various subunits within the organization
Arguments for decentralization 1. Top mgmt. can become overburdened when decision making authority is centralized & can result in poor decision making 2. Motivational research favors decentralization 3. Decentralization permits greater flexibility 4. Decentralization can result in better decisions 5. Decentralization can increase control
Strategy & Centralization in International Business
The choice between centralization & decentralization
Centralize some decisions & decentralize others, depending upon the type of decisions & the firm’s strategy
Firms pursuing Global Strategy
They must decide how to disperse the various value creating activities around the globe so location and experience economies can be realized
The head office must make decision about where to locate R&D office, production & marketing & so on
The globally dispersed web of value creation activities that facilitates a global strategy must be coordinated. This creates pressure for centralizing some operation
In contrast, the emphasis on local responsiveness in multi-domestic firms creates strong pressures for decentralizing operating decisions to foreign subsidiaries
International firms tend to centralize their core competencies and to decentralize other decisions to foreign subsidiaries
Horizontal Differentiation
How the firm decides to divide itself into subunits
May be based upon function, type of business, or geographical area
The structure of Domestic firm Owner / Manager Owner/Manager makes all major decisions directly and monitors all activities Difficult to maintain this structure as the firm grows in size and complexity
As firm grows, the demand of management become too great for one individual or a small team to handle
At this point the organization is split into functions reflecting the firm’s value creation activities – production, marketing, R & D, sales
Functional Structure Top Management Level
Purchasing
Branch unit 1
Manufacturing Marketing
Branch unit 2
Branch unit 3
Finance
Branch Unit 4
Advertising
Branch Unit 5
Branch Unit 5
Further, horizontal differentiation may be required if the firm significantly diversifies its product offerings Problems of coordination & control arise when different business areas are to be managed within the framework of a functional structure At this stage most firms switch to a product divisional structure With a product division structure is division is responsible for a distinct
Product Divisional Structure Structure Headquarters Division-Product Line A
Dept. Purcha sing
Division Product Line B
Dept. Dept. Manufac Marketin turing g
Dept. Finance
Division Product Line C
Dept. Product ion
Dept. adverti sing
International Divisional Structure Headquarters Domestic Division- GM Product Line A
Domestic Division –GM Product Line B
Domestic Division GM Product Line Cc
Country 1 GM Product A,B,C
Internatio Division Divisio GM
Coun GM Product
Worldwide Area Structure North American Area
European Area
Latin American Area
Multinational Headquarters
Middle East area
Middle Eastern African Area
Far East Area
Worldwide Product Division Structure Worldwide Products Division A
Worldwide Products Division B
Area 1 Domestic
Area 2 ernational
Worldwide Products Division F
Worldwide Products Division E
Multinational Headquarters
Worldwide Products Division C
Worldwide Products Division D
Global Matrix Structure North American Area Canadian Division
Mexican Division
United States Division
European Area British Division
French Division
Chemicals product group
Consumer goods product group
Automobile product group
Individual business division
28
8-
Pacific Area Japanese Division
Taiwan Division
Matrix Organization at Stewart Martha Merchandising Group
Media Group
Specialt y/ Retailing Sears Paint
Catalog Line
K-mart Line
Network/ Cable TV
Radio/ Newspa per
Internet
Books
Magazin es
Area Speciali sts
Cooking Entertain ment Weddings Crafts Gardenin g Home Holidays Children 6 - 29
Relationships between headquarters & subsidiaries
Few subsidiaries can be directly managed by an MNC If the number is more, it has to make a permanent structural relationship between itself & its subsidiaries Since, MNC supplies various resources & inputs to its subsidiaries and receives inputs from the subsidiaries This activity needs to be controlled & coordinated
Different aspects of relationship
Information Sharing Resource Sharing Decisions flow Co-ordination of activities Control of operations Strategy Formulations