Left Gatekeepers Part 2

Left Gatekeepers Part 2 I’ve decided to write more information about Left Gatekeepers. They are those people that claim that they are liberals, but support the agenda of the establishment. Many of them are funded by the CIA and other Big Foundations. One of the biggest controlled opposition left gate keeping groups is called the Daily Kos. The Daily Kos have been known for intimidating Democrats even Presidential candidates to follow their agenda. They have use character assassination against

those that disagree with them just like neo conservatives have done. They are radically liberal. The famous leader of the Kos is Markos Alberto Moulitsas Zúñiga. Zuniga admitted that he spent 6 months in the employ of the CIA in 2001. Also, Moulitsas said that he was a CIA employee and has no problem with working for them in the present. We do know that the CIA have been complicit in voting fraud, assassinations, overthrowing governments (in Iran, Guatemala, Indonesia, etc.) instigating violent Revolutions, war crimes (like Operation Phoenix during the Vietnam War). and other evils since its inception in 1947. According to John Stockwell, who is the former CIA Station Chief in Angola, the CIA murdered more than 6,000,000 people in the world. Moulitsas considers the CIA “a very liberal institution,” which is very funny. The CIA isn’t liberal or conservative, but corporate and authoritarian (The CIA’s predecessor was the OSS or the Overseas Secret Service). Vatican agent William Donovan was a leading member of the OSS. The OSS imported Nazis to come into America to work for the CIA under General Reinhard Gehlen. Klaus Barbie (’the Butcher of Lyon’), Otto von Bolschwing (the Holocaust mastermind who worked closely with Eichmann) and, SS Colonel Otto Skorzeny have all worked for the CIA according to author Mark Zepezauer (who wrote the “CIA’s Greatest Hits” book on 1994 form Odonian Press). So, the Central Intelligence Agency was created by the

OSS, the Nazis, and the Vatican (via their Knights of Malta. That is why historically many CIA leaders were members of the SMOMs like William Casey). Some accuse the CIA of financing the P2 Masonic Lodge (this Lodge worked with the Vatican and the Mafia. They are suspected of being involved in Operation Gladio). Operation Gladio also involved NATO in killing people, doing assassinations, etc. of those suspected of being a “Communist” inside the continent of Europe. Among the executives who lent their cooperation to the Agency were William Paley of the Columbia Broadcasting System, Henry Luce of Time Inc., Arthur Hays Sulzberger of the New York Times, Barry Bingham Sr. of the Louisville Courier-Journal, and James Copley of the Copley News Service. The Daily Kos is a sophisticated controlled opposition that claims to want liberty, but endorses the war on terror (as supported by their allies Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama) in Afghanistan, political agitation, increased funding to the Pentagon, and pure rhetoric in support of the left/right paradigm. The CIA is known for infiltrating organizations. Barrie Zwicker have been one of the experts in exposing the Left Gatekeepers. The Left gatekeepers refuse to expose the official story of 9/11 since we have a right to expose the inconsistencies about the official story about the September 11th attacks. Some of the entities that do this are The Nation, Z magazine, The Progressive, Mother Jones, Alternative Radio. The evidence of Ptech, NORAD standing down, the government foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks, witnesses hearing explosives in the Twin Towers (The work of Steven Jones, who is a physics professor for 20 years, deals with a published draft of an article entitled, “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?” in late 2005. This works puts up the view that thermite was involved in the destruction of the Twin Towers), Building Number Seven’s mysterious collapse, how the CIA & ISI funded the al-Qaeda network for decades, and how the government (via the Air Force, CIA, NORAD and National Reconnaissance Office) conducted wargames similar to 9/11 on 9/11 are facts that totally destroy the official story of 9/11. 9/11 was exploited by the establishment not only to gain oil resources, but to establish a globalized new world order (as mentioned by tons of elitists from CFR member Gary Hart to David Rockefeller). The Nation, Z and Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting attacked independent investigators who are piecing together the evidence, instead of helping those who have done the best work. AlterNet.org published The 9/11 Faith Movement by July Terry Allen, of the Independent Media Institute trying to use red herrings in demonizing those who reject the official story of 9/11. Alexander Cockburn has a longstanding habit of bashing the "conspiracy theorists" in his Counterpunch.org publication. Since 2006 though, more real liberals have been getting their eyes open to the facts on 9/11 Truth. David Corn (including John Foster "Chip" Berlet) is another left gatekeeper that has demonized people who believe that 9/11 was an inside job. Corn wrote a biography about CIA dirty trickster Ted Shackley called "Blond Ghost," which sidestepped the allegations about Shackley's involvement in the heroin trade during the Vietnam War. Even the New York Times had to apologize to Allen Ginsberg many years ago for calling him nuts for making the CIA-heroin allegation - and the CIA 1998 inspector general report essentially confirmed that Gary Webb had been correct. Gary Webb proved that the CIA worked with Contras to sell cocaine into America. David Corn even criticized some peace rallies. Bill Maher is another left

gatekeeper. He spews lies about religion, but there has never been conclusive evidence to disprove the existence of God at all. Pro-population expert Steven Mosher was unfairly demonized by an author from the Huffington Post (whose chief supporter and leader is Arianna Huffington). The Huffington Post is a typical left gatekeeping clique of people that's allied with Bilderberger and CFR member George Soros. The Huffington Post promotes the establishment's agenda of anti-gun laws, abortion, more centralized big government, and the war on terror. They are a corporate media machine masquerading as an independent source of political dialogue. Christina Page from the Huffington Post wrote an ad hominem filled article about the UNFPA (or the UN Population Fund). Page claimed that pro-life people are lying about the pro-forced abortion policy of UNFPA and their opposition to corporate pro-CFR puppet Hillary Clinton. She claimed that pro-life people are slandering the UNFPA, which is a lie of course. Christina Page use derogatory language like saying that pro-life people are apart of the pro-lie movement and she called those that love life as swirl eyed lunatics. These are sick intimidation tactics. Yet, these ad hominem attacks from the liar Christina Page will never crush the Pro-Life Movement at all. Pro-Life people exist from across the political spectrum. Page claimed that the UNFPA is helping China to relax its coercive one child policy. The truth is that Steven Mosher's PRI (or Population Research Institute) group have used tapes, written testimonies from dozens of witnesses, etc. to document how the UNFPA was complicit in the forced abortion procedures in China. Even the non-conservative Colin Powell sent an investigation team into China. They validated the finding of UNFPA's bad policies and that is why Bush didn't fund the UNFPA (which was created in 1969). The UNFPA promotes depopulation and Steve Mosher documented how they have been involved in forced sterilizations (not just forced abortions. Mosher and his PRI team did an investigation in 2001. They found witnesses like 3 women that said that the UNFPA did forced abortion. A victim told PRI that she hid to prevent a forced abortion. PRI sent evidence of UNFPA's forced coercion to the United States). He has made many Youtube videos on this issue. The PRI has been investigating the UNFPA since 1989. According to Mosher (and a report), in the early 1990's, the former dictator of Peru named Alberto Fujlmori instituted a forced sterilization campaign. The UNFPA was appointed by Fujimori as the Technical Secretary of the campaign. Fuimori called this program the National Population Program (which called over 300,000 Peruvian women to be sterilization). This is why it is illegal to have the US government to fund NGOs that have forced abortions and forced sterilization programs. Now, I'm not ashamed of being Pro-Life at all. The Gatekeeping groups are again funded by the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, the Carlyle Group, etc. via big Foundations (like Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie, MacArthur, Schumann, Soros’ clique, and others). The following is more information about the gatekeepers who reside in the 21st century.

Chris Matthews Chris Matthews is a Left Gatekeeper. He is famous for his show of Hardball from MSNBC. He was born an raised in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 1945. Matthews was Jesuit trained form Holy Cross College. He graduated from the place in 1967. Matthews served in the United States Peace Corps in Swaziland from 1968 to 1970 as a trade development advisor. As a young man, Matthews supported Republican Barry Goldwater, but was inspired to become a Democrat by Eugene McCarthy's anti-Vietnam war platforms. He frequently commented favorably about Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential election. On February 12, 2008, on MSNBC, he said: "The feeling most people get when they hear an Obama speech...I felt this thrill running up my leg." He also said, "Obama comes around, and this is the new testament." This is beyond critique, but advocacy. Real journalism is about unfair bias or obscene advocacy of any candidate at any circumstance if you aren’t a commentator. Chris Matthews lied about Pro Life issues and the Second Amendment for decades. Now, he has gone too far in his anti-life rhetoric. I don't believe he should be thrown off the air for his words (unlike the hypocrites supporting the Fairness Doctrine), but he should be criticized for his actions. On MSNBC, Chris Matthews called pro-life people, who criticized Health Secretary nominee Kathleen Sabelius, as using verbal terrorism. That's a lie and a disgrace since dissent is proAmerican. How dare he say some garbage like that when any nominee in government ought to be evaluated in constructive means. That has nothing to do with terrorism or verbal terrorism. That has to do with being intelligent human beings. Not to mention that Sabelius may have a connection to Tiller (who has been accused of doing illegal abortions) and she a member of the Bilderberg Group. Chris talked to Lois Romano of the Washington Post on this issue. Pro life people have been called terrorists in other occasions as well. In July 2006, Planned Parenthood's web site labeled pro-life groups "terrorists and extremists." Abortion activist Gloria Steinem came under fire in October 2004 when she called President Bush, because of his pro-life record on abortion, "more dangerous to this country's citizens than terrorists" at a New Mexico NARAL fundraising breakfast. Some so-called Christians support Kathleen Sabelius. They believe that she can enact policies that can reduce abortions in America.

These people include Sammy Rodriguez, Paul Devries, and Joel Hunter. The reality is that Sabellius have offered no common ground solutions of abortion greatly at all. The Kansas health department showed a 6.5 percent increase in abortions from 2005 to 2006. Sebelius repeatedly vetoed legislation that has proven in other states to reduce abortions in large numbers. A measure that protects pregnant women and unborn children from violent, was only signed after Sebelius spent years opposing it (and only because she knew the legislature would overturn a veto). In other words, she is so radically pro-abortion that she voted against even a legitimate bill that can stop crime only after the bill was veto proof. This law was called Alexa's Law (which was an unborn victim of violence bill). Mary Kay Culp (who is the head of Kansans for Life) told Lifenews.com in a letter that: "In 2007, she signed Alexa's Law, an unborn victim's of violence bill, which she had a 20 year history of opposing," Culp said. Sebelius only signed it "after it was attached to another bill she wanted and after favorable news coverage of very vocal support of the bill by the Brooks family of Wichita -- whose daughter, and 8 month gestation granddaughter, Alexa, were murdered." As the health secretary, Sebelius could have an impact in crafting a health care plan that could cover abortions with taxpayer funds or require insurance companies to cover abortions in their plans. She could even force doctors to do abortions if she revokes conscience protections that was established by President George W. Bush (which was one of the few things Bush got right). So, I'm not decieved about Kathleen Sabellius at all.

Chris Matthews is so anti-Second Amendment that he believes that no innocent citizen in America can bear any arm that they want. He publicly said: “…I want to see people disarmed. I want people disarmed in our major cities…” Wanting citizens to be disarmed in a Nazi tenet. Even the Supreme Court says that the police can’t protect us 24/7. The Second Amendment clearly states that all citizens have a right to bear and own arms. Chris Matthews denies that the Second Amendment is a bulwark against tyrannical government. Have he looked at history where brutal murderers like Mao, Hitler, Castro, and other deviant people disarmed innocent people and killed them. All of these criminals hated people owning weapons in their own property or homes. Not to mention that in Katrina, government officials illegally stole guns from innocent citizens. That occurred. Once again, Chris Matthews lied and say that if urban areas have more gun rights to citizens, crime will go up. The reality is that Switzerland has many urban areas with a freer gun ownership than the USA and it has less crime than us. The truth that Chris hates is that the 2nd Amendment is an individual right for the people. Gun bans for citizens is what the Nazis, Stalin, slave traders, and other dictators embrace. Even the Black Codes limited the gun rights of African Americans. Crime is very rampant in some of the most gun restrictive areas of the world like Mexico, Great Britain (After the 1997 gun ban, continues in 2004 with a 10% increase in street crime, 8% increase in muggings, and a 22% increase in robberies. This is backed up by the Gun Facts document), Russia, Brazil (whose homicide rate is almost three (3) times higher than the U.S.), Philadelphia, Detroit, Washington D.C., and so many other countries. Australia immediately saw a spike in crime when they passed their restrictive anti-gun laws. Crime rates are low in Switzerland and Israel

with more liberal gun laws. Matthews demonizes people promoting the Second Amendment as equated to embracing helicopter theories when black helicopters have invaded urban areas for years (for real). Real solutions that revolve around solving crime in big cities (and any other community) are building up communities, banning criminals from owning guns (until they paid their debt to society), improve our educational system, create mentor ships, and develop other solutions. There have been studies that have shown that in places where there are concealed-carry laws, the crime rate goes down because criminals are afraid that people may retaliate. Banning law abiding citizens from owning firearms doesn’t have to be apart of the equation at all. That’s something that Matthews doesn’t comprehend. We have the freedom of speech, the freedom to worship as we please, and the freedom of the press. Therefore, the freedom to bear arms is fine with me.

Mike Smerconish exposed Mike Smerconish is the pure representation of a compromiser, a Neo Con, and not a real conservative. I mention him here, because he is allied with Left Gatekeepers. His radio talk show junctures spread across America. He claims to be for liberty, but some of his views manifestation of a complete disregard from some of the liberties that are ingrained in the Bill of Rights (including the Constitution). One of his famous sick acts was that he literally supported the starvation-murder of Terri Schiavo. Even Jesse Jackson opposed her death, because you don't starve innocent human beings to death for the sake of "end of life issues" (especially when she didn't express her wishes at all on about how would she die). Mike lives around the Philadelphia area. He said that Terri's husband had the best interest in mind for Terri Schiavo. That's a lie. If he did had the best interests for Terri, he would do all he could to save that women's life. Also, Terri Schiavo's husband wouldn't commit adultery. Researchers have said that nurses had given testimony about possible abuse against Terri Schiavo. The act of starving her to death is a violation of the Geneva Convention. Pro-euthanasia doctors were chosen to inspect her. Some doctors commented that Terri could eat with mouth. There are numerous cases of those with PVS to awaken out of their comas and execute their bodily facilities greatly. Smerconish is known during his radio show for giving softball questions unto liberals (when a true interviewer should be fair among all points of view). He also has big government beliefs

like supporting the evil War on Drugs and agrees with the anti-freedom policy of giving mandatory minimums for criminals. Mike Smerconish regularly calls on the GOP to be pro-abortion (which is already is one some levels). The Republican Party compromised true conservative values on many cases a long time ago. That's why Mike supported the candidacy of the anti-gun, pro-abortion Senator of Pennsylvania Arlen Specter. His anti-civil liberty agenda is extending by him for advancing the wicked war on terror and supporting racial profiling (which is immoral since it violates the principles of using probable cause plus due process. We should never utilize a color of a man's skin as a means to judge a criminal). I do thank God that I'm pro-gun rights, pro-life, I'm for religious liberty, I'm pro-individual rights, and I'm anti-Patriot Act. Mike Smerconish even met with the Jesuit-trained dictator Fidel Castro. Mike asked Castro a silly question about Frank Rizzo. Michael Smerconish also agreed with jailing the innocent protestors of the Philadelphia 11 (who just preached the Gospel peacefully without violence at all). He agreed with pro-ADL woman Lynne Abraham. The Philadelphia 11 (some of these Christians faced 47 years in prison for a felony) refuted the argument that innocent Christians can't be oppressed in America as it has occurred in Canada, Britain, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, India, Pakistan, etc. REPENT AMERICA came to the Philadelphia 11's defense. The Philadelphia 11 was soon acquitted of all charges. Mike was hostile to the Christian callers who promoted the free speech rights of the Christian protestors. He wrote in the Philadelphia Daily News about the Christians getting what they deserved, which is sick. This was so wrong that the judge in Philadelphia threw the case out of the court. Well, Mike Smerconish supports Barack Obama. He has a right to do this and he has a right to say what he wants on his radio show. I don't believe in censorship. Yet, I have every right to disagree with him strongly. One reason he support Obama ironically is because of Obama's radical view of possibly invading Pakistan (even without their permission) to get "al-Qaeda." That's extreme. That's just as immoral and advocating an invasion of Iran and it's a violation of Pakistani sovereignty. Another reason why Mike supported Obama was because John McCain refused to make a Rockefeller Republican like Tom Ridge to be his Vice President nominee. Ridge is a member of the Knights of Columbus, is pro-abortion, and was once the head of Homeland Security. Mike Smerconish is on TV in MSNBC and CNN, sucking up to the establishment yet again. He's looking out for himself. The good news is that millions of Patriots endorse real liberty and are looking out for God plus all of humanity.

Keith Olbermann Keith Olbermann is a famous journalist among MSNBC. I have more respect for him than the other Left Gatekeepers since at least Keith promote many of the civil liberties found in our Constitution. He is a famous for talking about issues relating to politics. MSNBC recently demoted Chris Matthews and Olbermann from their election coverage for pressure given by their critics many months ago. Their critics believe that they were biased against the McCain campaign. Now, Olbermann according to some wasn't demoted because of mere bias. The reason is that Keith says his commentary on his show all of the time about being against the Bush administration and McCain. He wasn't fired from his show because of that. Some believe that his criticism of the GOP exploitation of the 9/11 attacks was the real reason on why he was demoted. Has there been exploitation by the GOP. Of course and an example is when the RNC used images of the victims of 9/11 as an excuse for people to vote for them. Keith Olbermann apologized to viewers after the video because it linked Iran with 9/11 with burning buildings. Now, as we understand, Iran had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks at all. Olbermann made a pointed statement that these images weren't necessary to be display in the video from the RNC. As a result of this video, David Gregory is the new primary anchor during MSNBC's 2008 election coverage. What do I think of this? Olbermann is right that in many times the GOP utilize false, fear mongering tactics in advancing a political agenda. That is wrong. Keith Olbermann reported on Cheney and his staff wanting to stage a false flag incident sacrificing our own military as a means to provoke a with Iran. He was right to report on that story. Cheney is sick for even suggesting something like that. If they acquire bias, you have a right to change the channel or use your free speech to publicly speak your mind. Major TV networks are typically biased anyway toward one major party or another major party anyway. Now, this doesn't mean Keith Olbermann is perfect. Keith Olbermann sees this battle as solely political in terms of Republican vs. Democrat (He even praises liberals as correct on most issues). It's bigger than that. It's about a select few of corporate elites and globalists wanting to create a globalized, new world order. One example is how Foundation money are funding the mainstream media, universities, and other institutions of power among establishment left and establishment right entities. Olbermann is wrong in being anti-gun (he publicly denies the individual right to bear arms), supporting abortion, and going along with warfare in Afghanistan though.

Keith Olbermann and Bill Maher recently showed themselves as how much of left gatekeeping shills that they are. They call Glen Beck crazy for exposing plans for FEMA camps. Beck is wrong on many issues, but FEMA camps do exist now. Both Maher and Olbermann say that only crazy people would talk about these issues. They are no different than the neo-cons. The only difference is that they try to pretend to be for the people, but both are corporate media pundits that rarely if ever expose any real issues going on. Both just promote the left/right paradigm in dividing the American people further via political lines. Not to mention that many real conservatives support civil liberty, love the environment, abhor the evil War on Drugs, and want liberty for all human beings. Maher is the one that denies 9/11 Truth even when the collapse of Building Number Seven was mysterious. Maher doesn't expose Ptech, NORAD's standdown, and other important issues the destroys the official story of 9/11. Bill Maher says that there is no evidence that Barack Obama wants our guns. Yet, Obama does want concealed weapons banned. Obama doesn't want all of our guns, but he does want the Second Amendment to be so severely curtailed that only a handful of citizens will own a gun legally. The 2 major parties are controlled by the global elite (as found in the Vatican/Jesuit network, the Pilgrims, the Bilderbergers, the Trilateralists, the CFR, etc.) and they seem to omit that. Both lied and said that Glen Beck could incite a Timothy McViegh like reaction in society (when McVeigh was a military soldier with connections with the FBI-infiltrated Elohim City. Informants from the feds agitated the OKC Bombing to take place with videos of their crimes not being revealed totally to this day). This is to imply that anyone exposing FEMA Camps are equivalent to terrorists. These liars like the neo cons instead of demonizing Muslims, demonize Patriots and many conservatives (including true libertarians). Not to mention that Rex 84 was a real program in the 1980's that wanted to develop detention camps in case of emergencies. In early 2006 Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root was awarded a $385 million dollar contract by Homeland Security to construct detention and processing facilities in the event of a national emergency. HR 645 or the National Emergency Centers Act authorizes military bases to house American citizens (in cases of "emergency") in camps. The Pentagon’s Civilian Inmate Labor Program, was more recently updated and the revision details a “template for developing agreements” between the Army and corrections facilities for the use of civilian inmate labor on Army installations.” Keith and Maher omit that Barack Obama is an intelligent puppet. You can look at his policies to witness that. Barack claimed to be against lobbyists in his Cabinet, yet they are in his cabinet. He claimed to

be for common ground on the issue of abortion, but he passed policies that are radically proabortion (including many of his cabinet members are pro-abortion). His cabinet are made up of Bilderbergers and Trilateralists (including CFR members). Keith Olbermann wants to quote CFR member Madeline Albright when she was the one that supported the evil Iraqi sanctions that murder over 1 million innocent Iraqis (including children) in the 1990's. She said that the sanctions were worth it in a sick manner. See, Maher and Olbermann criticized George W. Bush on an intense level, but not they genuflect toward Barack Obama like a Saviour. Bill Maher and Keith Olbermann are frauds and hypocrites unless they change.

Appendix A: The SPLC The Southern Poverty Law Center hypocritically call for an end to hate but they seem to hate even peaceful conservative viewpoints. Once upon a time, the SPLC did in fact promoted some legitimate American values. They legitimately won court cases against real antiSemites and other racists. Now, they are a front organization that promotes an anti-free speech agenda. They use the brush of racism against people that aren’t even racist. It was created by Freemason Julian Bond and Morris Dees in 1971 and is based in Montgomery, Alabama . Since 1998, Bond has been chairman of the NAACP but remains active with the Center and serves on its board of Directors. Bond states that America is hopelessly racist. Bond is a very intelligent man, but lied and compared conservative Christians to the Taliban (that threw acid in money’s eyes, that formed an oppressive theocracy in Afghanistan, and that ruined societies). Morris Dees is the present face of the SPLC, although J. Richard Cohen is the President of the group. By nonprofit standards, the SPLC has an enormous endowment fund of over $152 million, according to its 2005 annual report. In the year ending on October 31, 2005, the SPLC paid Morris Dees $297,559 in salary and pension plan contributions. SPLC President Richard Cohen took home $274,838, but the Center co-founder Joseph Levin received only $171,904 for his efforts as general counsel. The

managing editor of the Advertiser at the time, Jim Tharpe, later characterized several charity-monitoring groups as being sharply critical of the SPLC's financial practices. Judy Andreas wrote that the SPLC once accused Harry Potter and the Lord of the Rings of promoted racism. They may promote witchcraft, but them promoting racism is ludicrous. The SPLC has been criticized by civil rights writer Laird Wilcox for essentially functioning as a private intelligence gathering agency for the Federal Bureau of Investigation and other law enforcement agencies, doing activities as a private organization that public law enforcement agencies are barred by law from doing (such as keeping dossiers on people solely because of their political or religious views) because for a government agency to do them would be a violation of civil rights. In the summer of 2003, the SPLC's Intelligence Journal carried a feature article entitled "Into the Mainstream", by Chip Berlet. Berlet called libertarians like the Ludwig von Mises Institute as equivalent to Hitler when Hitler was pro-abortion, antigun, anti-civil liberty, and pro-new world order. The SPLC even list Traditional Values Coalition as a hate group when they disagree with lifestyle, but they advocate hatred of any human being. The SPLC has demonized the American Enterprise Institute, Jewish columnist Don Feder, Young Americans for Freedom, Representative Tom Tancredo (R-CO), American Vision, Mass Resistance, headed by Jewish conservative Brian Camenker, and others (in equating them with Neo-Nazis and KKK racists).

There is something else about the SPLC that some don’t know about. Some accuse the SPLC of having a connection to the OKC Bombing in certain ways. A Utah attorney alleges informants gathering information on Timothy McVeigh or his associates warned the FBI about the plot to bomb the Oklahoma City federal building, but the agency took no action to stop the 1995 attack. An attorney named Tim Trentadue contends he has documented that at least SEVEN informants were involved with McVeigh and his associates. These informants worked with the white supremacists responsible for the OKC Bombing. Tim Trentadue claimed that the Elohim City compound consisted of a joint operation by the FBI and the Southern Poverty Law Center, a civil rights

organization based in Alabama to monitor radicals. He claims there is evidence that the SPLC, which heard about the impending attack from the informants, warned the FBI. There is no question that even low level ATF workers admitted that federal plants were in Elohim City. The FBI had foreknowledge of the attacks, but they didn’t warn anybody or arrest those in Elohim City at all (before the OKC Bombing). Jesse Trentadue also says there were others involved in carrying out the bombing besides McVeigh and Terry Nichols. That’s true since witnesses believe that a John Doe #2 existed and all of the cameras from the OKC Bombing haven’t been released to this day to the public. Jesse Trentadue said that his brother Kenneth was falsely accused of being involved in the bombing (since he looked like Richard Lee Guthrie) and was assaulted in prison. During the process of his lawsuit, Trentadue was able to receive documents with names blacked out that show the FBI’s OKC bombing informants were conducting armed robberies with Timothy McVeigh in order to fund the construction of the fertilizer bomb used in the attack on the federal building. The documents also show that McVeigh called Elohim City two days before the bombing asking for help. Four months before the bombing, an FBI informant told his superiors of the attack plan and said that the Alfred P. Murrah building had been scouted. He accused Attorney General Eric Holder of covering up information pertaining to the event of the Oklahoma City bombing. “You have to ask yourself, why would the death of one little person, which they claim was a suicide by hanging, generate this kind of activity at the highest levels of the Clinton/Reno Justice Department, the answer is….they knew this murder, if investigated, would lead to the Oklahoma City Bombing and lead to the fact that the Department of Justice, through the FBI and ATF informants, was involved and this occurred just before the re-election of Bill Clinton in 1996,” said Trentadue. On September 25, 2008 Trentadue won a ruling. During the ruling, he had sought for over a year and a half to depose, on video, federal inmates David Paul Hammer and Terry Nichols. Nichols, who was convicted and sentenced to life in prison for his still unknown role in the bombing, says he is ready to tell all. The DOJ, the FBI, and BOP tried to stop Trentadue's inquiries. New information is coming out about Hammer (who is on Death row now in Terre Haute, Indiana. For a time, he was in a cell next to Timothy McVeigh for the last years of McVeigh's life). Hammer's book entitled "Secrets Worth Dying For" said that McVeigh confessed that he was an agent of the government during the planning plus execution of the bombing. Hammer will release a new edition of the book on April 19, 2009 showing more details about the role of Timothy McVeigh. Trentadue wants information about German National Andreas Strassmier’s role as an informant/ agent in the bombing, and the nature of his exact relationship with McVeigh and the Aryan Republican Army/ Midwest bank robbers known. Trentadue isn't defending McVeigh or Nichols' actions, but he is trying to discover the total truth of the event. More and more evidence proves that the OKC Bombing was a federal government

agitated op that promoted anti-civil liberty laws (and demonized sincere Patriots in America). The SPLC never expose real far left hate groups at all. They want to demonize those who want to disagree with. They promote a political agenda is proabortion, pro-illegal immigration, and anti-gun. According to Dees, “I learned everything I know about hustling from the Baptist Church. Spending Sundays sitting on those hard benches, listening to the preacher pitch salvation … why it was like getting a Ph.D. in selling.” Dees’ words represent his total mindset by trying to hustle a Baptist Church in a disrespectful manner in order to promote his agenda.

Appendix B: The United Nations and a Possible Global Tax The United Nations (regardless of what people like Oilempire.us says) was created by and for the global elite. The Rockefeller Family gave up some of their land to construct the U.N. headquarters in New York City. To this day, they promote internationalism and globalism. Many of their Secretary Generals have been Communists. Also, their NGOs have infiltrated many organizations worldwide to promote their agenda. Now, the U.N. wants a Green New Deal. The U.N. Environment Agency head Achim Steiner said that he wants a global warming tax that will violate U.S. national sovereignty and allow Americans to be bounded under increasingly centralized global regulations. “Investments of $750 billion could create a “Green New Deal” to revive the world economy and protect the

environment, perhaps aided by a tax on oil, the head of the U.N. environment agency said on Thursday,” reports Reuters. Steiner wants this especially since Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and others are very receptive to similar goals of a cap and trade system. Steiner wants to fund his proposal by taxing oil in rich nations of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.” He said this tax will be placed upon consumers. The global carbon tax of course is planned to be placed on food, water, carbon, and other spheres of our lives. Achim claims it’s fine since oil prices are down, but what if oil prices increase to $140 a barrel as was seen in mid 2008. The U.N. could try to tax more things and that can cause hyperinflation by the Federal Reserve (since it’s pumping trillions of dollars now). This is economically not feasible. The IPCC’s own figures state that it would cost about $100 trillion to avert 1 degree Celsius of global warming through reducing CO2 emissions, even if you believe that man-made climate change is a reality. Now, man made global warming have been exposed as a hoax. So, the globalists want a system of quasi-feudalism to control the common man more completely again (Today, they use slick justifications for it like Peak Oil which is promoted by the Club of Rome. They also promote control via harassing our mind with global warming hysteria which is promoted by the Trilateral Commission and the CFR. Dr. Michael Coffman said that sunspots and solar radiation have a higher role in the climate than man does. Also, the United Nations wants to control land and transportation in their plans of Agenda 21 and Smart Growth). Out of these actions elites like the Bilderbergers have received huge profits from their yelling about global warming. On a side note: What is the Club of Rome? It was created in the late 1960's that warns that the world is in close to a disaster and population control is one out of many evil solutions to solve the world's problems. The Club of Rome admits to this nefarious plan of promoting paranoia about eco disasters. In a report titled The First Global Revolution, published in 1991 by the Club of Rome, a globalist think tank, you will find the following statement: "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill... All these dangers are caused by human intervention... The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."(Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, The First Global Revolution: A Report by the council of The Club of Rome, pp. 115, Published by Pantheon Books, a division of Random House, Inc., New York, and simultaneously in Canada by Random House of Canada Limited, Toronto) The promotion of man-made global warming is about Big Corporations and elite groups controlling more lands plus newer technologies. Also, those in the CFR and Bilderberg Group (even Al Gore) want a global tax on carbon. The elite want neo-mercantilism in ruling most of the lands. Many of them ignore real environmental issues like Gm foods, the poisoning of the water with nerve gases & fluoride, toxic waste dumping, endangered species, the cross species of man and animals (i.e. chimeras), rainforest destruction, etc. The reality is that man has nothing to do with the ending of previous Ice Ages prior to 1900. The Ice Ages ended by natural activities like sunspots, volcanoes, etc. In fact, the sun (i.e. solar radiation) is a huge factor in the environment (Dr. Michael Coffman said that a solar rupture occurred in 1998 when El Nino came causing warming on Earth). The sun is showing more thermal output. An amazing new study just came out. It was Authored by Prof. David H. Douglass (Univ. of Rochester), Prof. John R. Christy (Univ. of Alabama), Benjamin D. Pearson (graduate student), and Prof. S. Fred Singer (Univ. of Virginia). The study appears in this month's International Journal of Climatology of the Royal Meteorological Society. Bascially it said that natural forces is the major contributor to climate change not man made CO2. They outline these natural factors as cosmic rays, solar output, etc. The global warming extremists omit that CO2 is a natural gas needed to improve plant life. Plants give off oxygen and need CO2 to develop their food and energy. CO2 increased when the temperature globally decreased from the 1940's to the 1980's. Scores of scientific papers show that when the medieval warm period existed, global temperatures were up to 3 degrees C warmer than now. Many books talk about it like S. Fred Singer, who is a climate physicist, co-wrote the book "Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 Years." It's hypocritical for those who promote this hysteria when they want no "carbon restrictions" on India, China, and other nations. "Carbon credits" is about shifting money from industrialized nations into Third World nations without using modernization plus legitimate industrialization to be sent into the Third World to end their poverty. Many

scientists disagree with Al Gore's opinions. It's hypocritical for them also to say that we must change when new information comes, but reject any debate on the causes of climate change. Climates rise and fall in temperature for eons. There are times when the climate was warmer than now. Global Warming after the ancient Ice Age built better crops and created better civilizations like in the Bronze Age. The Earth is warming, but most of it is caused by Nature and the sun. Man can destroy ecosystems, but we have technology to make ecosystems better in the 21st century. Many of the NGOs (or National Governmental Organizations) and the elite are pantheist believing that Nature is God. Al Gore is a Universalist who hold to similar beliefs. They are interrelated with the Lucis Trust and other occultists advocating a one world religion.

Club of Rome members include Bill Gates, Al Gore, David Rockefeller, Gorbachev, Maurice Strong, and others. Many of these global elitists worship Nature as God so they promote environmental extremism to express that false ideology. Many of them like the Club of Rome (Thomas Malthus and Ted Turner) accepts the lie that the world is overpopulated. Here's the truth. Many nations in Western Europe, Japan, North Korea, Russia, etc. are having an underpopulation crisis. All humans can fit in Texas given 1,000 sq. ft. each per person. The UN models says population will peak by 2050 then decline. The total increase of world population have decreased percentage wise since 1960. Even an environmentalist named Stewart Brand admitted this truth:

"....However, in the 1990s, the U.N. started taking a closer look at fertility patterns, and in 2002, it adopted a new theory that shocked many demographers: human population is leveling off rapidly, even precipitously, in developed countries, with the rest of the world soon to follow. Most environmentalists still haven't got the word. Worldwide, birthrates are in free fall. Around one-third of countries now have birthrates below replacement level (2.1 children per woman) and sinking. Nowhere does the downward trend show signs of leveling off. Nations already in a birth dearth crisis include Japan, Italy, Spain, Germany, and Russia--whose population is now in absolute decline and is expected to be 30 percent lower by 2050...The world population growth rate actually peaked at 2 percent way back in 1968, the very year my old teacher Paul Ehrlich published The Population Bomb. The world's women didn't suddenly have fewer kids because of his book, though. They had fewer kids because they moved to town.” ("Environmental Heresies" by Stewart Brand, the founder of The Farmers Almanac, printed in MIT Technology Review, May 2005) It's a known scientific fact that better technology, better health, better nutrition, etc. stabilizes a population. It does not create "overpopulation" (when there is no such thing to me). The environmental radicals don't even believe that man can improve the ecosystem via better technologies. They want to blame man for almost everything. Man can harm ecosystems, but man can help ecosystems also. The United Nations definitely supports man made global warming. Even a UK court exposed 9 lies from Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth." These lies include polar bears, Chad, Katrina, and other information. The UN support population control, abortion, and other pro-NWO philosophies. The same folks who created CFR help invent the UN.

Pravada, which is Russia's online newspaper, claims evidence shows that a warm, 12,000 year Holocene period will soon end, and the planet with experience a glacial age for the next 100,000 years. "The report says that ice cores, ocean sediment cores, the geologic record, and studies of ancient plant (plus animal populations) will see a long lasting Ice Age according to the report. Pravda cites three astronomical "Milankovich cycles" as further proof of cooling. The tilt of the Earth varies over a 41,000 year period. The report believes that the Earth's orbit changes in times of warmth and cooling. John Imbrie, James Hays and Nicholas Shackleton, published "Variations in the Earth's orbit: Pacemaker of the Ice Ages" in 1976 in which they linked climate data from ocean sediment cores and astronomical Milankovich cycle patterns. There is a noticeable recent wave of global cooling related to a death of sunspot activity and exemplified by the Arctic ice sheet expanding by 30 per cent, an area the size of Germany, since the summer of 2007. The reports said that warming trends are reversing. World temperatures are coming into record lows. It has been decreasing since 2000. 2008 is easily the coldest year of this century. Some scientists disagree that we are entering an Ice Age lasting thousands of years. One thing is certainly true. We are going into a cooling period of the Earth's temperature. Global warming has been discredited like no other time in 2008 and now in 2009. We realize that CO2 is not a poison, but a boon for plant photosynthesis. Over 650 scientists signing their names to a US Senate Minority report that challenges the contention of the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change that there is a scientific “consensus” on the causes of global warming. Tom DeWeese from March 10, 2009 on NewsWithViews.com exposed the polar bear lies that global warming hysterics promote. One lie is how polar bears are going extinct. Extremists show pictures of polar bears holding on to bits of lie. They faithfully believe that the Arctic Circle will soon disappear of all of its ice. There are ads that talk about this issue. It's funded by the WWF or the World Wildlife Fund as well. It's a lie. Polar Bears are not endangered. There is no proof that polar bears are experiencing a radical reduction of their population at all. Many hunters in the Arctic are hunting them down to keep their populations low. Of 13 Polar Bear populations, 11 are thriving and growing. One of the real agendas for the WWF's polar bear campaign to to stop the drilling of American oil and force Americans to embrace the toxic UN's Kyoto Climate Change Treaty. This policy is otherwise known as sustainable development. Sustainable development is about stealing private property for the sake of perseving them for ecosystem, yet the catch is that the U.N. primarily owns the land. With the polar bears, the WWF and the Sierra Club (which is funded with elite money) managed to get the polar bears on the endangered species list last year. The green eco-extremists want to further control our energy production along with a high percentage of our economy. Last year, in a Congressional hearing on the listing of the Polar Bears, Congressman Don Young of Alaska said that testimony by Bush Administration officials “clearly indicated the overriding goal was to use the ESA as a tool

to stop energy production in any and all states.” Under questioning, former U.S. Fish and Wildlife Director Dale Hall confirmed and admitted the deception that even a colar fired plant might damage the polar bear thousands of miles away. That's impossible of course. The truth is coming out. Many folks have presented scientific evidence to refute the existence of man-made global warming completely. Therefore, we should protect animal species like the polar bears. Yet, there is nothing wrong with drilling for American oil in an environmentally friendly fashion and there is nothing wrong with exposing WWF's lies about polar bears. Freedom is under threat all of the time in the 21st century. Henry Lamb have written about this issue. Bill Clinton officially was President by 1993. Few understood what the term "sustainable development" meant back then. "According to Lamb, when Barack Obama assume the Presidency in January 20, sustainable development will guide the formulation of public policy in city councils, county commissions, state legislatures, the U.S. Congress, and the U.N. General Assembly. Sustainable development deals with the reorganization of society around a body of principles and recommendations that set forth in the Agenda 21 document. Agenda 21 was supported by 179 nations in 1992 at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro. In other words, sustainable development makes NGOs and the U.N. to dictate to governments about how they will handle its development (for the sake of environmental protection along with economic plus social equity). Free markets and

private property rights are restricted in a sustainable society that is managed by the government. The federal government even tried to bribe states with incentives to handle the principles of Agenda 21. Freedom lovers fought back against Agenda 21 with the existence of Freedom21 that wanted to advance the principles of freedom in the 21st century. Neighbors were educated about the threat of the U.N. promoting Agenda 21 plus global governance. Alabama's Alliance for Citizens Rights conducted regular seminars throughout the state, educating both elected officials and private citizens about the source plus consequences of sustainable development. The Alabama group also exposed the "smart growth" policies. "Chairman Ken Freeman and Vice Chairman Don Casey led the group to resist policies that violate private property rights. Hundreds of other groups have worked with the freedom movement to fight against Agenda 21. Some of these people have been successful to block the government's plans to manage local markets. Therefore, organizations along with other people still exist that believe in the fundamental principles of individual liberty, freedom, and national sovereignty. The truth will exist forever. You can never destroy the truth at all.

Poplawski and Left Gatekeepers’ new lying campaign The Left/Right paradigm is still effect today. Max

Blumenthal, in the wake of Richard Poplawski's murder rampage in Pittsburgh, has falsely demonized conservatives yet again. Max is the son of former Clinton aide Sidney Blumenthal. He is

well known as for publishing information on liberal website. He is even a research fellow for Media Matters for America. Media Matters is a website that was created by former neocon David Brock who calls himself a hitman for all things Democrat. This is silly by him, because sucking up to Democrats unconditionally is not being independent. A truly independent, free thinking man is beyond the labels of Republicans and Democrats. Ironically, globalist George Soros funds Brock and Media Matters to spew their propaganda. George Soros (a Bilderberger, a Carlyle Group member, and a pro-CFR agent), the hedge fund manager who is “dedicated to transforming our constitutional republic into a socialist hive,” according to the neocon Richard Poe. This socialism is bounded to the internationalist bankers' design not a recast of the SDS's agenda. Blumenthal says that since Poplawski posts on Infowars.com, then Alex Jones is tied to these people. Media Matters and their ilk also lie and say that Glen Beck and Bill O’Reilly’s views have been complicit in the deaths as well. I don’t agree with Beck or O’Reilly on many issues, but these 2 men aren’t complicit in the deaths of Pittsburgh at all. I don't agree with Jones on many issues, but even I will say that Poplawski doesn't have a connection with Jones at all. Ironically, Poplawski was critical of Alex Jones for not blaming the Jewish people collectively for the new world order. Now, this claim that Poplawski was influenced by Alex Jones, Infowars, and Prison Planet.com has been discredited. Raw Story later issued a retraction and removed the lies from their original piece altogether after numerous people questioned the sloppy nature of their writer Muriel Kane’s hit piece. Liberal blgos and websites

inflated the shooting as a means to justify gun grabbing of even innocent citizens. Their tactics are also a means for them to make people ignore about how Barack Obama supports antiSecond Amendment policies (under the guise of people buying guns, etc.). While a state senator, Obama voted for a bill that would ban nearly every hunting rifle, shotgun and target rifle owned by Illinois citizens. That same bill would authorize the state police to raid homes of gun owners to forcibly confiscate banned guns. Obama supported a bill that would shut down lawabiding firearm manufacturers including Springfield Armory, Armalite, Rock River Arms and Les Baer. Obama also voted for a bill that would prohibit law-abiding citizens from purchasing more than one gun per month. While a state senator, Obama voted 4 times against legislation that would allow a homeowner to use a firearm in defense of home and family. Obama’s tenure as the director of the Joyce Foundation, a non-profit organization that “spent millions creating and supporting anti-gun organizations.” Barack Obama supported the DC gun ban before he was against it. He disagrees with concealed carry weapons and wants the Assault Weapons ban. So, Barack Obama is anti-Second Amendment.

So, Poplawski was a critic of Jones and he didn't support him. Blumenthal denies that FEMA camps are being built in America, denies that anti-gun policies are promoted where guns have been disarmed (despite guns being disarmed during Katrina and the BATF for over 2 decades), and denies that a dictatorship can come in these circumstances. He's wrong on all of these accounts since Barack Obama wants concealed carry laws even to be banned. FEMA camps have been built and a dictatorship is a possibility if we don't improve our nation. See,

establishment liberals love Barack Obama (even if he is a puppet with an administration filled with CFR members, Bilderbergers, Jesuit-trained people, and Trilateralists). The reason is that these elite system now is being administered by Democrats. To them, forcing people to accept their lies are fine. Blumenthal goes on to demonize Tea parties and protests over the Barack Obama bailout plan. He is ignorant of the fact that Glen Beck denies the existence of FEMA camps. Beck is a shill who works for Knight of St. Gregory Rupert Murdoch (Murdoch once backed Hillary Clinton for President). FOX News is no different than CNN or MSNBC. The only difference is that these networks either promote the establishment left or the establishment right line on subject matter. They all support the ruling elite and focus on mundane topics (they even obssess with the shill Rush Limbaugh) in other to distract the public. Lawful tea parties is fine and many radical liberals (from ACORN and the Huffington Post) are trying to disrupt the Tax Day Tea Parties. That proves their Stalinist shill tactics of hating people with whom they disagree with. Blumental talks about Newt Gingrich, but he is a statist on certain issues. Gingrich supports the WTO, the UN, and the war on terror as a statist. People like Gingrich, Savage, Hannity, etc. talk somewhat about the new world order since they are utilized as controlled opposition. They haven't seen the light since they support torture, the Patriot Act, the war on terror, and other anti-liberty policies. The hypocritical neo cons blame Obama for increasing the debt when George W. Bush did so even worse than Barack Obama. While the phony neo liberals call Rush Limbaugh the head of the Republican Party and demonize conservatives as representative of the actions of the disturbed murder of Poplawski. This is going on and the international bankers are funding both sides. Some believe that this rhetoric is about the means to promote the Fairness Doctrine in order to censor speech over the airwaves (under FCC imposed regulations) in other to silence opposition. Let's hope that these occurences don't happen at all. It's apparently clear for us to escape that contrived left/right paradigm in order to be politically independent. The Daily Kos site operated by the former Reaganite and documented wannabe CIA employee Markos Moulitsas Zuniga. Zuniga promotes hate against the Second Amendment, the pro-life truth, and other real issues. Other real issues have shown that the militarization of state and local law enforcement is ever real. These globalists like Gordon Brown, Kissinger, etc. want their new world order to be established. The false left/right paradigm is what shills like Zuniga promote, so the international bankers, secret

orders, and the government can disarm Americans and centralize control over the American people. Therefore, I wouldn't be intimidated by smears at all.

By Timothy